throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`Sipnet EU S.R.O.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`______________
`
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,108,704
`
`______________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES UNDER 37
`C.F.R. § 42.51(a)
`
`October 28, 2013
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.51(a), Straight Path IP Group, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) hereby requests
`
`that Sipnet EU S.R.O. (“Petitioner”) serve a written response to the interrogatories
`
`by December 2, 2013.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`The Definitions, Rules and Instructions set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26
`
`through 37 are incorporated herein by reference.
`
`2.
`
`“And” and “or” shall be construed conjunctively or disjunctively,
`
`whichever makes the request more inclusive.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`“Any” or “each” shall be construed to include and encompass “all.”
`
`“Anyone” shall mean individuals, trusts, corporations, partnerships,
`
`joint ventures, limited liability companies, associations, unincorporated
`
`organizations or other legal entities.
`
`5.
`
`The terms “Sipnet,” “you,” “your,” and “Petitioner” mean Sipnet EU
`
`S.R.O., any predecessor companies or proprietorships, and each of its present and
`
`former employees, agents, officers, directors, representatives, consultants,
`
`accountants, experts, and attorneys, or other persons under its control or purporting
`
`to act on its behalf.
`
`6.
`
`The term “Stalker Software” mean Stalker Software, Inc.,
`
`CommuniGate Systems, Inc., Vladimir Butenko, any predecessor companies or
`
`2
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`proprietorships, and each of its present and former employees, agents, officers,
`
`directors, representatives, consultants, accountants, experts, and attorneys, or other
`
`persons under its control or purporting to act on its behalf.
`
`7.
`
`“Identify,” “specify,” or “identification” mean: When used with
`
`reference to a person, to state the person’s: full name; present business address, or
`
`if unavailable, last known business address; present home address, if a natural
`
`person, or if unavailable, last known home address; business affiliation, if a natural
`
`person, or if unavailable, last known business affiliation; and job title and
`
`description of the duties and responsibilities of such person, including all changes
`
`thereto. When used in connection with a communication, “identify” means to state
`
`a brief description of the subject matter communicated; the date on which it took
`
`place; the means of communication (e.g., personal conversation, correspondence,
`
`telephone, telegram); the place or places where it occurred; and the identity of each
`
`person who participated in the communication.
`
`8.
`
`“Person” or “persons” means any natural person, legal entity, or
`
`business entity, including, but not limited to, any corporation, partnership,
`
`unincorporated association, joint venture, sole proprietorship, or any and/or all
`
`other organizations or group of individuals.
`
`9.
`
`“Thing” or “things” means any physical specimen or other tangible
`
`item, other than a “document” as defined herein.
`
`3
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`10.
`
`The terms “patent-in-suit” or “’704 Patent” shall mean U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,108,704.
`
`11.
`
`The “present Inter Partes Review” means Case No. IPR2013-00246.
`
`12. Any word not specifically defined herein shall be given its ordinary
`
`meaning.
`
`INSTRUCTIONS
`
`1.
`
`Any pronoun shall be construed to refer to the masculine, feminine, or
`
`neutral gender, in singular or plural, as each case is most appropriate.
`
`2.
`
`If you object to or otherwise refuse to answer any portion of an
`
`Interrogatory, state the objection or reason for such refusal and provide all
`
`information called for by that portion of the Interrogatory to which you do not
`
`object or that you do not decline to answer as follows:
`
`a.
`
`If you object to an Interrogatory on the grounds that it is too
`
`broad (i.e., that you believe it calls for both information which is relevant
`
`and is not relevant to the subject matter of the action), answer that
`
`Interrogatory by producing as much information as you believe is relevant;
`
`b.
`
`If you object to an Interrogatory on the grounds that to provide
`
`an answer would constitute an undue burden, provide as much of the
`
`requested information as can be provided without undertaking an undue
`
`burden; and
`
`4
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`c.
`
`If you object to any portion of an Interrogatory on the grounds
`
`that it is vague or indefinite, you shall set forth your understanding of the
`
`allegedly vague or indefinite term and shall then provide a response based
`
`upon that stated understanding.
`
`3.
`
`If you object to an Interrogatory, or portion thereof, on the grounds
`
`that it seeks privileged information or the information is subject to an immunity
`
`from discovery, identify the basis for the claim of privilege or immunity,
`
`including:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`the author(s) or person(s) supplying the information;
`
`all persons to whom such information was and has been
`
`communicated;
`
`c.
`
`the form in which the information was communicated (letter,
`
`memorandum, tape-recording, etc.);
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`the general subject matter of such information;
`
`the nature of the privilege or immunity asserted;
`
`the date(s) of said communication and/or any document(s)
`
`recording the information for which the privilege or immunity is asserted;
`
`and
`
`g.
`
`sufficient particulars about the information to allow Patent
`
`Owner to evaluate the claim of privilege or immunity from production.
`
`5
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`INTERROGATORIES
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 1
`
`Please identify anyone other than counsel at Kilpatrick Townsend &
`
`Stockton LLP, who contributed to, participated in, or were otherwise involved in
`
`the preparation of any filings in the present Inter Partes Review in any way.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 2
`
`Please identify anyone who provided or is currently providing payment,
`
`funding, financial assistance, or other monetary contributions to Petitioner and/or
`
`Petitioner’s counsel in connection with any filings in the present Inter Partes
`
`Review.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 3
`
`Please identify anyone, who exercised or is currently exercising direction
`
`and/or control or otherwise providing input to Petitioner or Petitioner’s counsel in
`
`connection with any filings in the present Inter Partes Review, including but not
`
`limited to providing or suggesting any patents; printed publications; legal
`
`arguments; facts; claim constructions; claim charts; exhibits or documents, or any
`
`other technical and/or legal input.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 4
`
`Please identify anyone at Petitioner or any counsel for Petitioner who
`
`participated in any litigation, and/or membership in any joint defense group (past
`
`6
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`or present) involving U.S. Patent No. 6,108,704, including but not limited to the
`
`Skype litigation (Case No. 06-2469, D.N.J. 2006) and Stalker litigation (Case No.
`
`2:12-cv-00007, E.D. Va. 2012).
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 5
`
`Please identify anyone on behalf of Petitioner, including but not limited to
`
`Petitioner’s counsel, who has communicated or is communicating with Stalker
`
`Software about the ’704 Patent and/or the present Inter Partes Review and describe
`
`the specific nature of those communications.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 6
`
`Please identify anyone who identified or suggested counsel to represent
`
`Petitioner in connection with any filings in the present Inter Partes Review.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 7
`
`Please identify all third parties, who communicated or are currently
`
`communicating with Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s counsel in connection with any
`
`filings in the present Inter Partes Review.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 8
`
`Please identify how and when Petitioner became first aware of the ’704
`
`Patent.
`
`7
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 9
`
`Please identify the entire extent of business Petitioner conducts in the United
`
`States, including, but not limited to, providing services in the United States, selling
`
`products in the United States, litigating in Federal Courts in the United States, and
`
`filing patent applications in the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 10
`
`Please identify or classify the relationship that Petitioner has with Stalker
`
`Software, including, but not limited to, an agency relationship, a licensee/licensor
`
`relationship, a customer-service provider relationship, or a parent company-
`
`subsidiary relationship.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 11
`
`Please identify all shareholders, owners, and/or persons with controlling
`
`interests of Sipnet.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 12
`
`Please identify the organizational structure of Sipnet, any affiliated corporate
`
`entities, and the nature of the relationship with each affiliate.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 13
`
`Please identify all shareholders, owners, and/or persons with controlling
`
`interests of Sipnet who are also shareholders, owners, and/or persons with
`
`controlling interests in Stalker Software.
`
`8
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 14
`
`Please identify all products and services provided by Stalker Software to
`
`Sipnet, including, but not limited to, CommuniGate Pro.1
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 15
`
`Please explain the circumstances leading to the listing of Sipnet as a
`
`reference on CommuniGate’s customer list.2
`
`1 See http://www.sipnet.net/en/contacts.
`
`2 See https://www.communigate.com/main/customers/references.html.
`
`9
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`Date: October 28, 2013
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Patrick J. Lee/
`Patrick J. Lee (Reg. No. 61,746)
`Fisch Hoffman Sigler LLP
`5335 Wisconsin Avenue
`Suite 830
`Washington, D.C. 20015
`Telephone: 202-362-3500
`Fax: 202-362-3501
`Email: patrick.lee@fischllp.com
`
`10
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that this PATENT OWNER’S FIRST SET
`OF INTERROGATORIES was served, by agreement of the parties, by electronic
`mail on counsel for the Petitioner on October 28, 2013 as follows:
`
`Paul C. Haughey
`Michael T. Morlock
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP
`phaughey@kilpatricktownsend.com
`mmorlock@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Dated: October 28, 2013
`
`/ Patrick J. Lee /
`
`Patrick J. Lee
`Registration No. 61,746
`Fisch Hoffman Sigler LLP
`5335 Wisconsin Avenue NW
`Suite 830
`Washington, DC 20015
`Telephone: 202-362-3500
`Fax: 202-362-3501
`Email: patrick.lee@fischllp.com
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`11
`
`Straight Path Ex. 2027
`Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`Case No. IPR2013-00246
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket