`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SONY CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`Patent of YISSUM RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF THE
`
`HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013—00219 (SCM)1
`Patent 7,477,284
`
`Title: SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAPTURING AND VIEWING
`
`STEREOSCOPIC PANORAMIC IMAGES
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
`
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)
`
`I The IPR2013—00327 proceeding has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Supplemental Evidence
`IPR2013-00219 (Patent 7,477,284)
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE FO SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
`
`Patent Owner submits that Petitioner’s objection to deposition evidence
`
`Exhibit YRD-2007 filed on November 14, 2013, under § 42.64(b)(l), is improper.
`
`Specifically, objections to deposition evidence are governed by § 42.64(a), entitled
`
`“Deposition evidence” which states that “[a]n objection to the admissibility of
`
`
`deposition evidence must be made during the deposition.” Here, the Petitioner did
`
`not object to the admissibility of deposition evidence Exhibit YRD-2007 during the
`
`deposition. (Dr. Darrell Deposition at 30-32). Thus, Patent Owner submits that
`
`Petitioner has waived any objection to the admissibility of deposition evidence
`
`Exhibit YRD-2007.
`
`Patent Owner notes that although deposition evidence Exhibit YRD-2007
`
`has not yet been submitted to the Board, it will be submitted by the court reporter
`
`in due course. Patent Owner further submits that deposition evidence Exhibit
`
`YRD—2007 facilitated the deposition of Dr. Trevor Darrell by having a specific
`
`example with which to discuss stereoscopic imaging in general, and therefore is
`
`relevant. Further still, Patent Owner submits that Petitioner’s own expert witness,
`
`Dr. Darrell, authenticated Exhibit YRD—2007 as a printed reproduction of a stereo
`
`pair, displayed in two colors, which when viewed by red/cyan glasses provides a
`
`perception of depth. (Dr. Darrell Deposition at 3 1 27-32: 12). Thus, Petitioner’s
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Supplemental Evidence
`IPR2013—00219 (Patent 7,477,284)
`
`objection to the relevance and authenticity of deposition evidence Exhibit YRD-
`
`2007 is without merit.
`
`If further discussion is needed, Patent Owner requests a telephone
`
`conference between the parties and the Board.
`
`
`Dated: November 20 2013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`fl/M
`
`avid M. O’Dell
`
`Registration No. 42,044
`
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, Texas 75219
`
`Telephone: 972-739—8635
`Facsimile: 214-200-0853
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 50519.3
`Customer No. 27683
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Supplemental Evidence
`IPR2013—00219 (Patent 7,477,284)
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SONY CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`Patent of YIS SUM RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF THE
`
`HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013-00219 (SCM)2
`Patent 7,477,284
`
`Title: SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAPTURING AND VIEWING
`
`STEREOSCOPIC PANORAMIC IMAGES
`
`The undersigned certifies, in accordance with 37 CPR. § 42.205, that
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`service was made on the Petitioner as detailed below.
`
`Date ofservice November 20, 2013
`Manner ofservice Electronic Mail: (Sony-HurnanEyes@kenyon.corn);
`Walter Hanley (whanley@kenyon.com);
`Michelle Carniaux (mcarniaux@kenyon.com)
`
`Documents served PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL
`
`EVIDENCE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)
`
`Persons served Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`
`
`David M. O’Dell
`
`Registration No. 42,044
`
`2 The IPR2013-00327 proceeding has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
