throbber
Case 11-55120
`
`01/19/2011
`
`Page
`
`of
`
`7618239 DktEntry
`
`6-4
`
`No 1i_c7zO
`
`114 THIS UNIThD STAlES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
`
`NEUROVISION MI3DTcALpRoDucTs INC
`
`Plaintiff
`
`NUVASIVE INC
`
`Defendant
`
`from the UthtedState District Court
`
`On Appeal
`for the Central District of California
`Case No 2LO9CV6988
`JIEMX
`
`DECL
`
`lION OF WILLIAM Ii SMITh MJ4 IN SUPPORT
`OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR STAY OF
`PERMANENT INJUNCTION PEINDJI4G APPEAL
`
`Willi
`
`Smith M.D state and clare
`
`am Board-cettified
`
`neurological
`
`surgeon associated with Westprn
`
`RegiOnal Center
`
`for Brain
`
`Spine Surgery with Offices lob(cid:224)ted
`
`in Kingman
`
`Arizona and Las VegasNevada
`
`have pevscthal hbwiedge of the matters
`
`stated
`
`herein except where stated based on infornation and belief ajidif called upon to
`
`do so woukftestify
`
`competently
`
`them
`
`PODflOOd
`
`wqJgQ Il-Ut
`
`X2J
`
`PX2489_000
`
`PX2489
`
`WARSAW2044
`NuVasive, Inc. v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
`Case IPR2013-00208
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 11-55120
`
`01/19/2011
`
`Page
`
`of
`
`ID7618239
`
`DktEntry
`
`6-4
`
`Sended Georgetown University Medical Center For seven years
`
`also did my residency at Georgetown Urtiversity Iv edical Center
`
`in neurological
`
`sutgery
`
`completed my residency in 1994 and have since worked continuously as
`
`neurological
`
`surgeon in Arizona and Nevada My specialty
`
`is neurological
`
`surgery including surgery of the spine
`
`3.
`
`regularly use NuVasives XLIF procedure in the course of my
`
`surgical practice and am reathl familiar with the XLIF prbcedure
`
`and
`
`NuVasives NEURO VISION nerve monitoring systent
`
`perform 6-12
`
`.surgcries per week using NuVasives XLIF procedure
`
`and NuVasives
`
`.NEUROVISION nerve monitoring system
`
`When
`
`first tarted my neurosurgery practiceaIII
`
`lower spine surgery
`
`was open surgery wherein the spine was accessed
`
`from either the front anterior
`
`or die back posterior Such open spinal surgety involjed significant
`
`risks
`
`inc1udin significant blood loss high morbidity rates and lengthy recovery
`
`periods The NEUIRO VISION nerve monitor system was
`
`groundbreaking
`
`development
`
`that aIlSed neur(cid:243)surgŁons
`
`to access the spine from the side
`
`laterally in minimallyinvasive procedure fl acceSsi
`
`the pine from the side
`
`there is little muscle thsection less bone work and smaller incisions which results
`
`in less blood loss less operative time and less pain to the patient
`
`as compared to
`
`standard open spine iirgØy NuVasives XLIF procedure
`
`takes advantage
`
`of the
`
`Pflfl/7.Ufld
`
`W2LF.cIJ
`
`Liii
`
`EL ur
`
`PX2489_0002
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 11-55120
`
`01/1912011
`
`Page
`
`df
`
`cD7618239
`
`DktEætry 6-4
`
`advances
`
`provided by the NFUROVISION nerve monitoring technology
`
`and
`
`allows safer and less invasive surgeries in the lower spinal region
`
`Not only areNuVasivesXLLFprocedure
`
`and NEUROVISION
`
`nerve monitor used to adess many common ba(cid:244)k problems including
`
`for
`
`example degenerative
`
`disc disease scoiosis slipped discs and disc herniation
`
`they are also used in life threatening cases such as in the case of
`
`tumor or acute
`
`trauma
`
`XLIP surgeries
`
`are in high demand and they cannot be performed
`
`without Nuvasives NEUROVISION nerve monitoring system No other
`
`Company manufactures
`
`nerve monitoring system that can be used in connection
`
`with the flII procethge The inability to use the NETJROVISION nerve
`
`monitor system to perform XLIF procedures
`
`in life threatening cases
`
`involving
`
`acute trauma or tumors could worsen neurological
`
`injuries or cause irreversible
`
`injury and possible death in cases that canuol be delayed
`
`The inability to use NuVasives NEURO VISION nerve monitoring
`
`system in cases that are not life threatening will alsohave serious repercussions for
`
`my patients In the bet case scenario my patients surgeries will be delayed until
`
`NuVasive is able to provide NEUXOVISION nerve monitoring system or until
`
`am able to find an appropriate safe and reliable alternative
`
`surgical procedure
`
`which may be more invasive than NuVasives XLJF procedure In some cases
`
`Von/cnN
`
`tlrngqfl
`
`LLOZ
`
`CL U2f
`
`PX2489_0003
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 11-55120
`
`0111912011
`
`Page
`
`of
`
`ID 7618239
`
`DktEntry
`
`6-4
`
`however it will mean that my patients will hot be able to receive any surgical
`
`freatmnts at all because thereis no suitable alternative
`
`to the XLIF procedure
`
`This is especially
`
`so for my elderly patients for whom the morbidity rate and high
`
`risk of blood loss in traditional
`
`open surgeries is too gteat
`
`risk For these elderly
`
`patients
`
`thØieisno alternative
`
`to NuVasives XLIF procedure which requires
`
`the use of NuVasives NEURO7VISIQN nerve monitor sjsterns
`
`As
`
`surgeon will
`
`fight any order that proscribes use of NuYasiv(cid:244)
`
`nerve monitoring systems as it would threaten
`
`the well bemg of patients whose
`
`lives and limbs are under rn care
`
`declare under penal oPpeu under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that
`
`the foregoing is true and correºt
`
`201
`
`in
`
`LAsVe3osMetrccAcz
`
`vnn/vnrbl
`
`wnircrl
`
`tLfli
`
`rt uer
`
`xLi
`
`PX2489_0004
`
`Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket