throbber

`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 13
`
` Entered: August 9, 2013
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`NUVASIVE, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Cases IPR2013-00206 (Patent 8,251,997 B2) (SCM)
`IPR2013-00208 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)1
`_______________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, LORA M. GREEN, and STEPHEN C. SIU,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses an issue that is the same in both cases. Therefore, we
`exercise discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties,
`however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers since
`doing so may cause confusion.
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00206 and IPR2013-00208
`Patent 8,251,997 B2
`
`
`A conference call was held on August 6, 2013 with counsel for the
`
`respective parties and a panel of administrative patent judges. The purpose of the
`
`conference call was for NuVasive, Inc. (“NuVasive”) to seek authorization to file a
`
`motion to submit additional evidence and updated information in response to
`
`Warsaw’s preliminary response. Warsaw opposed the request.
`
`Counsel for NuVasive explained that Warsaw, in its preliminary response,
`
`relied upon evidence from a district court case related to U.S. Patent 5,860,973
`
`(“the ’973 patent”); an uninvolved patent. As a result, NuVasive is of the
`
`impression that Warsaw did not provide the Board with a complete evidentiary
`
`record of certain of the district court documents. NuVasive seeks authorization to
`
`file certain exhibits to provide clarification for the record. The documents that
`
`NuVasive seeks to submit into the record were discussed. In addition, NuVasive
`
`seeks authorization to submit an update of the district court case related to the
`
`uninvolved ’973 patent.
`
`Upon consideration, the Board has determined that neither the filing of the
`
`documents nor an update of the district court case related to the’973 patent are
`
`necessary at this point in the proceeding. Accordingly, NuVasive’s request to file
`
`a motion to submit additional evidence and updated information is denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2013-00206 and IPR2013-00208
`Patent 8,251,997 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Stephen Schaefer
`Michael Hawkins
`Fish and Richardson PC
`schaefer@fr.com
`hawkins@fr.com
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas Martin
`Wesley Meinerding
`Martin and Ferraro LLP
`tmartin@martinferraro.com
`wmeinerding@martinferraro.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket