throbber

`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 33
`
`
` Entered: February 3, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`NUVASIVE, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Cases IPR2013-00206 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`IPR2013-00208 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)1
`_______________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, LORA M. GREEN, and STEPHEN C. SIU,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are generally the same in both cases. Therefore,
`we exercise discretion to issue one order to be filed in each of case. The parties,
`however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers since
`doing so may cause confusion.
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00206 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`Case IPR2013-00208 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`
`
`On January 31, 2014, a conference call was held between counsel for the
`respective parties and Judges Medley, Green, and Siu. The purpose of the call was
`to discuss certain exhibits filed by the Patent Owner in support of its Patent Owner
`Response and in response to objections served by the Petitioner. Another purpose
`of the conference call was for Petitioner to seek authorization to file a motion for
`additional discovery.
`
`
`Exhibits marked private by the Patent Owner
`On December 20, 2013, Patent Owner filed a Patent Owner Response.
`Paper 32.2 On the same day, Patent Owner filed several exhibits. Some of these
`were uploaded into the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) as private
`documents, e.g.., sealed documents, unable to be viewed by the public. No
`accompanying motion to seal was filed as required per 37 C.F.R. § 42.14.
`The record files for an inter partes review shall be made available to the
`public, except that a document filed with a motion to seal shall be treated as sealed
`until the motion is decided. 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. § 42.14. A party
`may file a motion to seal where the motion contains a proposed protective order,
`such as the default protective order set forth in the Office Patent Trail Practice
`Guide. The standard for granting a motion to seal is good cause. 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.54(a).
`A protective order governs the treatment of confidential portions of
`documents, testimony and other information designated as confidential, as well as
`
`2 References are to IPR2013-00206.
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00206 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`Case IPR2013-00208 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`
`the filing of confidential documents or discussion of such information in papers
`filed with the Board. The Board has the authority to enforce the terms of a
`protective order entered in a proceeding. Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77
`Fed. Reg. 48756, 48770 (Aug. 14, 2012). Because of the above, it is important that
`the Board understands and agrees to the terms of any proposed protective order
`filed with the Board. As such, the Board has a default protective order that the
`parties may follow. When a party deviates from the default protective order, the
`party should explain the differences. A protective order that deviates from the
`Board’s default protective order must nonetheless include certain terms as outlined
`in the Office Practice Guide. Id. (“The Protective Order shall include the
`following terms:”).
`As explained during the call, Patent Owner has until February 7, 2014 to file
`a motion to seal along with a protective order. If no motion to seal is filed, the
`sealed exhibits will be expunged from the record. 37 C.F.R. § 42.7.
`
`
`Certain Exhibits to be expunged
`Petitioner objected to several of Patent Owner’s exhibits. In response,
`
`Patent Owner served and filed supplemental evidence. Based on the facts of this
`case, the supplemental evidence should not have been filed, but only served. See
`37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2). The Board proposed to expunge exhibits 2057-2062 and
`neither party objected.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00206 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`Case IPR2013-00208 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`
`
`Exhibits 2046 and 2047
`Patent Owner relied on Exhibits 2046 and 2047 in support of its Patent
`
`Owner Response. Patent Owner requests to substitute those exhibits with two
`other exhibits. Petitioner does not object. Based on the facts presented, good
`cause was shown to authorize Patent Owner to substitute “corrected Exhibit 2046”
`and “corrected Exhibit 2047” for original Exhibits 2046 and 2047. Accordingly,
`original Exhibits 2046 and 2047 will be expunged from the record. Patent Owner
`is authorized to submit corrected Exhibit 2046 and corrected Exhibit 2047 no later
`than February 7, 2014.
`
`
`Motion for Additional Discovery
`Petitioner requested authorization to file a motion for additional discovery.
`
`In preparation for that discussion, Petitioner filed a list of the discovery it seeks
`from Patent Owner. Based on the discussion had, the parties indicated that they
`would work together to possibly agree to, at least some of, the discovery Petitioner
`seeks from the Patent Owner. As the Board explained, the parties may agree to
`additional discovery between themselves. 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(2). The Board
`appreciates the parties willingness to work together to reach an agreement, thereby
`facilitating the Board’s goal of resolving these inter partes reviews in a just,
`speedy and inexpensive manner. 37 C.F.R. § 42.1(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00206 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`Case IPR2013-00208 (Patent 8,251,997 B2)
`
`
`Order
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner shall file a motion to seal and protective order
`by February 7, 2014;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall file “corrected Exhibit
`2046” and “corrected Exhibit 2047” by February 7, 2014;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibits 2046, 2047, 2057-2062 shall be
`expunged from the record; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is not authorized to file a motion for
`additional discovery at this time.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Stephen Schaefer
`schaefer@fr.com
`
`Michael Hawkins
`hawkins@fr.com
`
`Todd Miller
`miller@fr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Thomas Martin
`tmartin@martinferraro.com
`
`Wesley Meinerding
`wmeinerding@martinferraro.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket