throbber
Case: 11-55120 01/19/2011 Page: 1 of 6
`
`ID: 7618239 DktEntry: 6-5
`
`No. 11-55120
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
`
`NEUROVISION MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`NUVASIVE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`On Appeal from the United States District Court
`for the Central District of California,
`Case No. 2-09-CV-6988 R (JEMx)
`
`DECLARATION OF MARK D. PETERSON M.D. IN SUPPORT
`OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF
`PERMANENT INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL
`
`I, Mark D. Peterson, M.D., state and declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am an orthopedic surgeon associated with Southern Oregon
`
`Orthopedics located in Medford, Oregon. I have personal knowledge of the
`
`matters stated herein, except where stated based on information and belief, and if
`
`called upon to do so, I would testify competently to them.
`
`1
`
`PX0409-0001
`
`PX0409
`
`WARSAW2043
`NuVasive, Inc. v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
`Case IPR2013-00206
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case: 11-55120 01/19/2011 Page: 2 of 6
`
`ID: 7618239 DktEntry: 6-5
`
`2.
`
`I attended medical school at Oregon Health Sciences University,
`
`graduating in 1988. Subsequently, I did my residency and internship in the
`
`Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Akron City Hospital. I completed my
`
`residency in 1993 and therefore had three fellowships in orthopedic and spinal
`
`surgery at the Royal Adelaide Hospital (in Adelaide, South Australia), Queens
`
`Medical Center (in Nottingham, England), and North Kansas City Hospital (in
`
`Kansas City, Missouri). I have worked continuously since 1994 as an orthopedic
`
`surgeon in Medford, Oregon, specializing in spinal surgery.
`
`3.
`
`I regularly use NuVasive's XLIF® procedure in the course of my
`
`surgical practice, and am readily familiar with the XLIF® procedure and
`
`NuVasive's NEUROVISION® nerve monitoring system.
`
`4.
`
`When I first started my orthopedic surgery practice, all lower spine
`
`surgery was "open surgery" wherein the spine was accessed from either the front
`
`(anterior) or the back (posterior). The NEUROVISION® nerve monitor system
`
`was a groundbreaking development that allowed spinal surgeons to access the
`
`spine from the side (laterally) in a minimally invasive procedure (NuVasive's
`
`XLIF® procedure), with little muscle dissection, less bone work and smaller
`
`incisions. This resulted in less blood loss, less operative time, and less pain to the
`
`patient as compared to standard open spine surgery.
`
`2
`
`PX0409-0002
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case: 11-55120 01/19/2011 Page: 3 of 6
`
`ID: 7618239 DktEntry: 6-5
`
`5.
`
`Chronic lower back and leg pain often is a result of the deterioration
`
`of the flexible discs between the vertebrae in the lower back. The loss of disc
`
`height creates pressure upon the nerve roots and/or spinal cord - resulting in
`
`chronic lower back pain and/or pain, numbness, or weakness in the legs. This
`
`condition is known as degenerative disc disease ("DDD").
`
`6.
`
`Until now, NuVasive could only treat patients suffering from DDD by
`
`fusing the adjacent vertebrae on either side of the degenerated disc. This involves
`
`removing the affected disc and implanting a generally rectangular, hollow plastic
`
`device that allows bone to grow from one adjacent vertebrae through the implant to
`
`the other adjacent vertebrae. While a dramatic improvement over the traditional
`
`anterior and posterior approaches to accomplish spinal fusion, there remains a
`
`significant unmet need for patients who may not need fusion yet and who would
`
`otherwise benefit from a restoration of disc height while preserving motion
`
`between the adjacent vertebrae.
`
`7.
`
`A small number of companies offer motion preservation implants;
`
`however, they are implanted via an anterior approach to the lumbar spine.
`
`Approaching the lumbar (lower) spine in this manner (from the front of the patient)
`
`is necessarily an "open" procedure based on the need to move the bowels out of the
`
`way, and is routinely associated with greater blood loss, longer operative times,
`
`longer post-operative recovery, and inherent challenges based on the need to pass
`
`3
`
`PX0409-0003
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case: 11-55120 01/19/2011 Page: 4 of 6
`
`ID: 7618239 DktEntry: 6-5
`
`by vital anatomical structures (e.g., the great vessels which lie in front of the spinal
`
`column) to reach the spine.
`
`8.
`
`NuVasive has developed the answer to this unmet need: a total disc
`
`replacement device that we are currently studying for use via its minimally
`
`invasive (XLIF) technique. I am currently the lead investigator on a clinical trial
`
`that NuVasive is conducting for the device, called the "XL-TDR" (for "extreme
`
`lateral- total disc replacement). The NEUROVISION® nerve monitoring system
`
`is critical to the clinical trials because it is the only nerve monitoring system on the
`
`market that allows for safe and reproducible lateral access to the spine.
`
`9.
`
`The trials are being conducted at 17 sites and will require a total of
`
`252 surgeries on patients. Surgeons participating in the clinical trials have enrolled
`
`and performed surgeries on 60% of those patients, which means that an additional
`
`150 patients still need to be enrolled. On average, approximately 8-10 patients are
`
`enrolled in the study each month. At this rate, full enrollment is anticipated to be
`
`complete in October 20 11.
`
`10.
`
`The XL - TDR device is particularly exciting for spinal surgeons
`
`because it will provide patients with a device that is designed to relieve the painful
`
`symptoms ofDDD, while preserving motion in the back. Once implanted between
`
`the vertebrae, the disc is designed to restore height and to replicate the motion
`
`characteristics of an intact healthy disc. The ability to maintain motion is
`
`4
`
`PX0409-0004
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Case: 11-55120 01/19/2011 Page: 5 of 6
`
`ID: 7618239 DktEntry: 6-5
`
`important in that it will allow patients more freedom of movement to perform their
`
`activities of daily living. It may also minimize the number of patients who will
`
`ultimately need fusion surgery, which can cause a degenerative cascade at adjacent
`
`discs above and below the site of the original fusion surgery.
`
`11.
`
`The clinical trials for NuVasive' s new XL - TDR device require
`
`lateral access to the spine, which requires use of NuVasive's NEUROVISION®
`
`nerve monitoring system. I have already seen the benefits of the XL - TDR device
`
`in the clinical trials in which I have been involved, and believe that this device
`
`holds great promise for patients who suffer from lower back pain. Their pain will
`
`be prolonged if NuVasive is required to stop lending or circulating the
`
`NEUROVISION® nerve monitoring system to hospitals, surgical centers and
`
`research institutions because the clinical trials cannot be completed with using the
`
`NEUROVISION® nerve monitor. The trials would come to a complete halt.
`
`12.
`
`If the trials are halted, Food and Drug Administration clearance of a
`
`promising new medical device would be delayed, resulting in prolonged pain for
`
`patients for whom a minimally invasive surgery implanting the XL - TDR device
`
`is the best option. As an orthopedic surgeon responsible for patient safety and
`
`comfort, it is untenable to me that the legal system would disrupt such important
`
`work because of an issue with the name of a product.
`
`5
`
`PX0409-0005
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Case: 11-55120 01/19/2011 Page: 6 of 6
`
`ID: 7618239 DktEntry: 6-5
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 18,2011, in
`
`Medford, Oregon.
`
`Mark D. Peterson, M.D.
`
`6
`
`PX0409-0006
`
`Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket