throbber
1
`
`NUVASIVE 1051
`NuVasive, Inc. v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
`IPR2013-00206
`IPR2013-00208
`
`

`

`Bending the Paradigm
`A White Paper on the Spine
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Investing in Orthopedics and Spine .............................................................................
`
`Product Introductions Expected to Drive Robust Spine Market Growth
`
`Orthopedic Sector Valuation ............
`
`Spine Sector Valuation
`
`Top Pick: Kyphon ...........
`Trends and Drivers in the Spine Market ................
`
`Trends and Drivers in Spine.....................................
`
`Demographics—Expanding the Market at Both Ends ...........
`
`Increasing Use of Implants .................................................................................
`
`Minimally Invasive Surgery—Penetrating All Areas of Spine
`
`New Technologies Broaden the Spectrum.......................................................
`
`Overview of the Spine................................
`
`Overview of the Spine.................
`
`
`Evolving the Treatment Landscape: Ciironologic Overview .....
`
`Consolidation Trend: Recent Acquisitions1n the Spine Market ...................
`
`
`Competitive Landscape ..................................
`
`Vertebral Compression Fracture Market .....
`
`Vertebral Compression Fracture Market (VCF) ............
`
`Current Product Offerings: Pros and Cons
`
`Vertebral Surgery Market 0pporrunity............
`
`Expanding Indications—Long—Term Growth Driver.....................................
`
`Competitive Landscape...
`Reimbursement Overview..
`
`Who Wins? Kyphon Well—Positioned \Vith Endustry—-Lead.ing Growth
`
`Spinal Fusion Market and MIS Fusion Landscape............
`
`Spinal Fusion Market: Estimated 53bit Opportunity.”
`
`MIS Fusion: Small Competitors Make a Large Impact
`
`Manufaculrers: Who Will Win Out? Spotlight on NuVasive ..
`
`Feedback on Competitive Offerings ................
`
`Competitive Overview
`
`Dynamic Stabilization.
`Expect Large Opportunity for Soft Stabilization
`Artificial Disc Market .........................................
`
`
`Artificial Discs: New Technology Supports Growtngh ar ets..
`Physician Feedback: \Which Design Will Win? ...............
`
`
`”ricing/Reimbursement.........................................
`
`
`Artificial Discs: What Are They? ............................................................
`Differentiating Artificial Discs ..........................
`
`Cost/Reimbursement .......
`
`Competitive Landscape...
`
`Nucleus Replacement Players ..............................................
`
`'h'ch Disc Pipeline Demonstrates Solid Early Results ..
`
`Orthobiologics ...................................................................
`
`Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutestriving Growth in Spina Surgery.
`
`An Overview of Bone Grafting ...........................................
`
`Stimulating Bone Growth—Where Are We Now? .......
`
`Synthetic Bone Growth Factors ......................................
`
`Players in the Orthobiologics /Bone Graft Market
`Initiatives Target Orthobio Opportunity....................
`CompanyModels
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 2
`
`

`

`july 12, 2005
`
`Medical Devices
`
`Lynn C. Pieper, CFA
`415.364.5999
`lpieper@tweisel.com
`
`Bro oke LeVass cur
`415.364.2559
`
`bLeVasseur@tweiseLcom
`
`Kari Hall
`415.364.2904
`
`khall@tweisel.com
`
`W Thomas Weisel Partners
`EfililT‘i’ EESEARfiE-i
`
`
`
`BENDING THE PARADIGM
`
`A \White Paper on the Spine
`
`Executive Summary
`
`the fastest-growing segment within the orthopedic
`the spine market,
`We estimate that
`market, will reach approximately $4.1bn worldwide in 2005, representing yearrover-year
`growth of 21%. We are optimistic that the spine market can sustain growth above 20% for
`the next several years, driven by favorable demographics, new product
`introductions,
`industry consolidation, and advanced surgical
`techniques.
`\Ve expect pipelines
`to be
`dominated in the near term by product introductions in orthobiologics and artificial discs.
`
`Trends within the spine market remain robust, with favorable demographics and the
`introduction of new technologies driving unit volume growth approaching the double digits.
`In addition, the increasing use of instrumentation and orthobiologics is increasing price per
`procedure and contributing to mix benefit.
`
`Minimally invasive (MIS) trend sustainable. Our research suggests that the spinal surgery
`segment will continue to trend toward more minimally invasive surgical alternatives. We
`expect that minimum~access spinal surgery will remain at
`the high end of the growth
`spectrLini, driven largely by new surgical
`instrumentation and techniques designed to
`minimize muscle damage and blood loss associated with open procedures. We believe that
`NuVasive stands best positioned to benefit from the ongoing shift toward MIS.
`
`Continuum of carewemerging market. The evolution of care from conservative, non»
`surgical
`treatment to total disc replacement will soon be populated by a multitude of
`offerings to address various states of spinal and disc degeneration. We expect that new
`dynamic technologies
`such as
`flexible rod systems,
`intrabody spacers, and nucleus
`replacements will all see strong acceptance in the market, helping to mold the new
`continuum of care, which we expect to be tilled with many non—fusion alternatives.
`
`Kyphon continues on strong trajectory. The vertebral compression fracture (VCF) market
`continues to present a large, underpenetrated market opportunity. Physician feedback
`indicates that kyphoplasty Continues to lead this market, based on potential for height
`restoration, safety profile, and ease of use. In addition, we believe that Kyphon is beginning
`to expand its geographic presence and make inroads into other untapped markets such as
`cancer and trauma.
`
`Consolidation likely to continue. The spinal market has been a hotbed for acquisition in
`the past few years, With many attractive targets sitting on the blocks, private players with
`solid technology continue to be taken out at premium valuations ranging from 2.5x to 6.5x
`Hailing 12—month sales. \We expect this trend toward consolidation to continue as the larger
`players iook to boost growth rates and ensure a play in hot new technology areas,
`
`
`
` 3
`
`

`

`
`
`INVESTING IN ORTHOPEDICS AND SPINE
`
`Over the past several years, the orthopedic device market has grown to approximately
`$20bn. Important trends in orthopedics,
`in our view, include demographics that are
`expanding implant procedure volume, price increases (although moderated somewhat
`from recent years), and mix shift to innovative technology, all of which are sustaining
`strong spine growth at the 20% level.
`
`the fastest-growing segment within the
`We estimate that the worldwide spine market,
`orthopedic market, will reach approximately $4.1bn in 2005, representing year—over—year
`growth of 21%. We are optimistic that the combined spine market can sustain greater than
`20% growth for the next several years, aided in the near
`term by new product
`introductions in orthobiologics and minimally invasive surgery and by the acceptance of
`artificial discs in the United States.
`
`We have identified four primary growth drivers for the spine market, which are the
`following:
`
`6
`
`0
`
`Favorable demographics. The 4-5-65 year old group is growing as a percent of the
`overall populau'on and continues to expand the patient base. This group is also
`becoming increasingly active, driving procedural volume.
`
`the use of additional spinal
`Increasing use of implants. We estimate that
`instrumentation is growing. The increase in instrumentation per procedure—“as well
`as more adjunctive orthobiological use with InFuse EM? and related bone growth
`factors—increases the revenue per procedure.
`
`9 Minimally invasive surgical approaches are making spinal surgery an Option for
`less serious conditions (i.e., VCF), thus increasing the potential patient population.
`
`0 Orthobiologics. We expect to see continued use of Bilfl’, resulting in an ongoing
`and increased pull-through of caged procedures and more favorable reimbursement
`for next—generation growth factors coming out of the pipeline. We expect Medttonic
`to continue to benefit from this trend via lnFuse with its LT and lnterFix cages, and
`
`we also expect Stryker to receive approval for OP-l in spinal fusions in the next 12—
`24 months.
`
`u_____.._._—————-———~_———-"—‘-'—‘““_———
`
`PRODUCT INTRODUCTIONS EXPECTED TO DRIVE ROBUST SPINE MARKET
`GROWTH
`
`We expect that strong market trends will complement a robust industrywide product
`pipeline tor the next three to five years, noting powerful demographics driving spinal
`surgery procedural volume growth, increased use of devices in spinal surgery, and add—on
`products such as orthobiologic agents. In addition, our channel checks indicate that spine
`surgeons are enthusiastic, although cautious, about the opportunity presented through
`next-generation spinal disc technology. We believe that, over the next few years, adoption
`of artificial disc technology will be somewhat tempered but will ultimately be the catalyst
`driving sustainable 20%+ growth in the spine market.
`
`
`ommsWelise Partners LL
`July 5,005" "
`
`
`
` 4
`
`

`

`
`
`Orthobiologic agents are becoming an increasingly important component of spinal
`procedures, and we expect the development of biologic agents to continue to help shape
`the spine market over the next 12-24 months. We broadly define the spinal fusion market
`as metal devices and cages, machined allograft bone dowels, wedges and spacers, all used
`in spinal fusion procedures {i.e., fuse vertebrae or correct spinal deformities and fractures).
`While still a relatively small portion of the total spinal market, we believe that artificial
`discs and minimally invasive solutions will significantly expand the worldwide spine
`market over the next several years.
`
`Our market models indicate that the spinal market represented approximately 20% of total
`orthopedic industry sales
`in 2005,
`including an accelerating contribution from
`orthobiologics. We expect spine sales to continue to increase as a percentage of the
`orthopedic industry over the next few years, as growth in the spine market continues to
`outpace that of the overall orthopedics industry, which is growing in the mid—to—high
`teens.
`
`
`
`ORTHOPEDIC SECTOR VALUATION
`
`At the present valuation level, the orthopedic industry offers investors a unique opportunity
`for modest capital appreciation with downside risk protection, in our view. Historically, the
`market has placed a premium P/E on the predictable, consistent results and cash flow
`generation posted by industry leaders. More importantly, the industry leaders continue to
`exceed top-line expectations while investing in salesforce enhancements and research and
`development in products to address high-growth markets. Recently, concerns over pricing
`pressure, gain sharing and the scrutiny placed on consulting agreements have put pressure on
`industry multiples. We believe that the decline is unwarranted and that, longer term, the
`orthopedic space deserves to trade at a premium to its medical device peers.
`
`Reflecting conservatism, our model anticipates tempered (but positive) growth in
`reconstructive implants, augmented by strong performance in spine, orthobiologics, sports
`medicine and, to a lesser degree, trauma. We expect a 12~15% top-line orthopedic industry
`growth rate in 2006, coupled with expanding margins and innovation in spine products, to
`support valuations in 2006 and 2007. Moreover, we are optimistic that new premium-
`priced product introductions may push reconstructive segment growth rates above our
`13% estimate for 2006.
`
`We expect the combination of consistency and predictability in earnings and cash flow
`generation and the continuation of high growth in markets such as spine, orthobiologics
`and soft tissue repair to support ongoing outperformance of the orthopedic sector in
`2005-2007.
`
`With the orthopedic sector amentiy trading at nearly 1.3x bottom—line growth rates on 2006
`111’.) estimates, we do not see much room for mediate multiple cxpanston. We Believe that
`upside to estimates in reconstruction and]or further development of spine and orthobiologics
`would warrant the valuadon of the sector remaining at current levels, however.
`
`We continue to believe that the large—cap orthopedic group (at 20x CYOGE EPS) deserves
`to maintain a premium to the large-cap device group (also at 20x CYOGE BPS), albeit with
`tempered enthusiasm, given decelerating revenue growth expectations for 2006 and less
` favorable currency tailwinds.
`
`I
`I
`..
`I
`I
`I
`i
`i
`7'
`Thomas Weisel Partners LLC
`Lynn C. Pieper, CFA 415.364.5999
`
`' july 12, 2005
`3
`
`
`
`__m
`
` 5
`
`

`

`:13
`ig
`
`
`
`H”a...”mmw,mw..wsmmww.wmwvtmmmitwm
`
`lg
`
`
`
`SPINE SECTOR VALUATION
`
`While we expect a 12-15% top—line orthopedic industry growth rate in 2006, we note that
`our assumption for core reconstructive implant growth lies at the 10-12% level and is
`bolstered by innovation in spine products. We estimate that the spine market will continue
`to post growth at the 20% level as demographics, minimally invasive procedures and
`instrumentation and artificial disc technology further penetrate and expand existing
`market opportunities.
`
`While there has been meaningful consolidation within the spine and orthopedic markets,
`much of the acquisition activity has been of development stage companies with artificial
`disc technologies. Pureaplay spine companies have, on average, carried a significant
`valuation premium to the broader medical device group, reflecting both this takeout
`potential and superior market growth rates.
`
`The pure~play spine companies are currently trading at 4.5x 2006 sales estimates,
`representing a premium to the large—cap orthopedic group (at 4.0x 2006 sales estimates),
`the broader large-cap medical device group (at 3.0x 2006 sales estimates) and to the small»
`to—mid—cap medical device group (at 3.6}: 2006 sales estimates). We estimate blended sales
`growth of approximately 35% in 2006 for the pure~play spine companies, however, with
`sustainable top—line growth at the 20% level. This compares to our expectation for 13%
`growth for largevcap orthopedic companies in 2006, 11% growth for the largercap medical
`device group, and 20% top—line growth for the small—to—mid cap medical device group in
`2006.
`
`While we do not see room for significant multiple expansion from current levels as the
`spine companies already trade at a premium valuation, we believe that superior growth
`prospects relative to the medical device market, upside to estimates driven by continued
`market expansion and strong gross margin will continue to support
`this premium
`valuation. With our expectanon for BPS growth at or above the 30% level for the next 2-3
`years, we continue to believe that the spine sector offers investors a unique opportunity
`for meaningful capital appreciation with moderate risk stemming from the evolving spine
`market.
`
`
`
`TOP PICK: KYPHON
`
`Kyphon’s long—term strategy of focusing on treating spine-related ailments exposes the
`company to one of the fastest-growing segments in orthopedics, which we estimate is
`growing 20u25% annually. While the company continues to serve the underpenetrated
`VCF market with its BOO-person-plus woridwicle salesforce, we believe that it will be able
`to leverage the infrastructure in the US. to provide instrumentation for a variety of
`ailments treated by spine surgeons. On track LU have trained: 4,800 US. surgeons ij} the
`end of 2005, Kyphon’s salcsforce is, we believe, capable of selling additional products
`used to treat vertebral compression fractures, spine deformities and disc-related injuries.
`Moreover, the company’s efforts to expand internationally are beginning to bear fruit with
`the estabiishment of direct selling efforts (the company will have more than 60 direct reps
`in Europe by year’s end) and reimbursement in select countries such as Germany. We
`expect condoned sales growth to be driven by expanding and penetrating the VCF market,
`particularly with the additional marketing clearance relative to outcomes data, higher
`
`Thomas
`eisel Partners LLC
`July 2, 2005
`4
`Lynn C. Pieper, CFA 415.364.5999
`
`
`
` 6
`
`

`

`
`
`revenue per procedure as Kyphon’s bone cement is incorporated in an increasing percent
`of procedures, product pipeline addressing additional indications (i.e., cancer and trauma),
`and geographical expansion.
`
`Kyphon Salesforce Continues to Execute
`
`inErastructure of
`We believe that Kyphon is well positioned to leverage its US.
`approxinmtely 200 sales reps to provide instrumentation for a variety of ailments treated
`by spine surgeons. The company has embarked on an aggressive marketing campaign
`targeted at primary care physicians to improve referral patterns for the treatment of VCF
`to the spine surgeon for kyphoplasty.
`
`Expanding Indicadons—Long—Tem) Growth Driver
`
`Kyphon continues to focus an expanding the use of ltyphoplasty to areas outside of
`osteoporosis, in trauma and cancer in particular. Management estimates that the trauma
`and cancer markets for kyphoplasty represent opportunities of approximately $450mn and
`$350mn, respectively. The company has six trials set to enroll (or already enrolling) in
`2005 in trauma, oncology, pulmonary function, and to address the Japanese regulatory
`process. We are modeling $4—5mn in clinical trial expense during 2005, with an additional
`$4-5mn directed at clinical and regulatory efforts in Japan.
`
`International Expansion Ongoing
`
`Kyphon continues to be committed to long-term growth, with focus shifting to more
`aggressive international expansion. Direct operations have been established in Germany
`and Austria, and growth continues to demonstrate strong uptake. Germany continues to
`post very strong growth and comprised approximately 55% of international sales during
`the 1Q05.
`
`Trauma use growing outside the U.S. Kyphon has launched lIauma applications in
`Europe and expects to expand the product line to cover additional applications. The
`company continues to discuss details of a US. clinical with the FDA, but it expects the
`road to approval to take several years.
`
`Reimbursement Landscape: With positive reimbursement in place in Germany and
`with an established presence in Spain and Italy, Kyphon anticipates that Switzerland and
`Austria will
`iikely receive positive reimbursement decisions in 2005. While focused on
`
`building direct efforts where possible, the company also has a distributor model in Turkey,
`Eastern Europe, Mexico, and Brazil. In addition, the company currently has a nine person
`team working on clinical and regulatory issues in japan, with clinical trials expected to
`have begun enrollment in ZQOS, and commercialization slated for 2008.
`
`We expect international sales to increase to i5.4% of sales, with growth ahead of US.
`growth rates in both 2005 and 2006. We have modeled international sales growth of 65%
`in 2005 and 35% in 2006, to which we believe there may be modest upside.
`
`
`
`Jugy12,20()WS ..
`...._...
`..
`.
`I
`.. ThrndasVeisel Pasrtner LLC ..
`5
`Lyon C, Pieper, CPA 4153645999
`
` 7
`
`

`

`
`
`Valuation
`
`Kyphon is trading at a 4.7x our 2006 sales estimate, compared with the small cap medical
`device group at 3.7x. On a P/E basis, shares of Kyphon are trading at 39:: our 2006 EPS
`estimates versus the small cap group multiple of 33x 2.006 estimates. We continue to
`anticipate Kyphon to post (1) longer term EPS growth at the 30% level and (2) carry a
`spine/takeout premium. We believe that Kyphon can continue to execute on its strategy
`to increase market penetration, grow referral patterns, and expand through its competitive
`strength. We believe that recent concerns surrounding the Disc-O-Tech litigation,
`reimbursement, and competitive threats are largely overblown and expect to see multiple
`expansion over the next few months as fears are put to rest. We reiterate our Outperform
`rating‘
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`WlPamters LL
`'
`Lynn C. Pieper, CFA 415.364.5999
`
` 8
`
`

`

`
`
`TRENDS AND DRIVERS IN THE SPINE MARKET
`
`
`17,“;2050
`..
`.
`.
`.
`..
`.. .Thoms WCiseletncgs LLC
`Lynn C. Pieper, CFA 415.364.5999
`
`3
`
` 9
`
`

`

`
`
`TRENDS AND DRIVERS IN SPINE
`
`Over the past 10—15 years, we have seen a momentous shift in the spinal landscape, Spine
`fusion procedures have become largely instrumented (we estimate that more than 95% of
`fusions currently employ some form of instrumentation). In addition, we are seeing an
`increase in the use of multiple instruments during a procedure—for example rods, screws
`and cages. We believe that the primary drivers of this trend are better technology and
`better outcomes.
`
`The spine market has represented one of the fastest~growing sectors in medical devices,
`with spinal fusions growing in the mid—teens over the past few years. More than 12 million
`people in the United States alone have chronic back pain, almost half of which (6 million)
`are in some way disabled by such pain. In addition to being the number-one reason for
`physician visits in the United States, chronic ‘back pain is the second-leading cause of
`worker’s disability. According to spineuniverse.corn, the treatment of degenerative disc
`disease in the United States is estimated to cost due healthcare system more than $60bn
`annually.
`
`Solid Growth Prospects
`
`\ll/e expect the spine market to continue to experience robust growth above 20% over the
`next several years. We suggest that the impetus for such growth will be demographic
`trends and new technology innovation. Demographic tailwinds include the increasing
`prevalence of spinal disease and injuries, an aging and elderly population and a more active
`patient population; leading to an increasing prevalence of spinal surgery. Technological
`innovation is driving the use of more devices and products per procedure to drive better
`outcomes, peer-reviewed clinical studies are illustrating superior outcomes in instrumented
`fusion procedures versus bone—graft‘only procedures, and an increasing number of
`surgeons are now specializing in the spine.
`
`DEMOGRAPHICS—EXPANDING THE MARKET AT BOTH ENDS
`
`Favorable demographics are expanding the demand for spine treatments, according to our
`research, and we expect this trend to support continued strong unit growth in the spine
`market. We are currently modeling an increase of base unit growth of approximately 6-
`12% per year, based on positive demographic trends, with overall market growth of 15—
`22% supported by increasing cost per procedure (largely the result of an increase in the
`use of instrumentation) and modest price contribution (26%). Census calculations
`indicate that the population of people aged 65 and over will grow by approximately 70%
`over the next 20 years, which we suggest Will benefit the orthopedics cleVlce market vra
`increasing demand. We expect the total number of surgical interventions in the spine to
`increase from an estimated 1.1 million in 2002 to more than 1.3 million by 2005. We
`project that spinal fusion procedures will increase from an estimated 508,732 in 2003 to
`641,208 in 2006, representing 26% growth.
`
`
`
`
`
`jaly 12, 005 "
`9
`
`10
`
`
`Thomas Wesel Partners LLC ..
`Lynn C. Pieper, CPA 415.364.5999
`
`
`10
`
`

`

` U.S. Population Over 65 Years (millions)
`
`2020B
`
`2010E
`
`Sources: Social Security Association and Thomas Waisel Partners LLC estimales
`
`Among seniors, the number of spinal procedures is growing because of more active
`lifestyles among the elderly (cg, golf and traveling) and longer life expectancies.
`Increasingly, aging patients are demanding new joints to maintain their active lifestyles. In
`addition, patients are becoming more aware of available options and are taking a more
`proactive role in determining their own healthcare. We believe that this trend continues to .
`help grow the overall market, particularly benefiting players such as Medtronic and
`Johnson 8c johnson, which continue to devote a significant amount of resources toward
`patient education and adveru'sing.
`
`Highlighted Demographic Statistics
`
`Roughly 90% of all people over 30 years old are afflicted With some form of back
`problem.
`
`There are more than 49 million back pain iniuries in the U.S. annually, many of which
`involve missed days from work.
`
`the leading reason for physician visits and accounts for more
`Back pain is
`hospitalization than any other musculoskeletal condition.
`
`Back deformity/impairment is the most frequently suffered impairment for people
`under the age of 45 years.
`
`Total back pain costs worldwide exceed $100 billion annually.
`
`According to the National Osteoporosis Foundation, the lifetime risk for getting an
`osteoporotic fracture is 50% for women over 50 and 25% for men over 50
`
`There are more than 700,000 spinal fractures from osteoporosis every year in the
`United States
`
`Over the next 20 years, the 40-64 year old group is expected to increase at a rate of
`more than 2% per year, while the overall US. population is expected to post growth
`of 1% annually.
`
`
`Thomas Weisel Partners LLC
`July 12, 2005
`10
`Lynn C. Pieper, CPA 415.364.5999
`
`11
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`INCREASING USE OF IMPLANTS
`
`Our research suggests that instrumented spinal fusions have significantly increased as a
`percentage of overall procedures from the last few years. In the past, non—instrumented
`spinal fusions were performed in which an autograft (using a patient’s own bone tissue,
`usually harvested from the hip) or an allograft (using cadaver bone tissue) is used to
`promote the fusion of two vertebrae at an unstable vertebral joint. However, bone fuses
`more effectively in an environment with minimal motion, and bone grafts are prone to
`shift once in place. Thus, spine surgery instruments, commonly referred to as interbody
`fixation devices (IBFD), are now used in essentially all fission procedures as an adjunct to
`bone grafts in order to limit motion and promote successful spinal fusion.
`
`What Is Being Used?
`
`In instrumented fusion, pedicle screws, rods, hooks, clamps, wires, and plates latch onto a
`vertebral segment to limit
`its motion. Interbody cages (titanium cylinders), machined
`allograft bone dowels and spacers are also used. They screw into a disc space and allow
`bone to grow through them. Bone graft is often packed around the implant or into the
`center of the metallic device to promote adjacent vertebral bone fusion.
`
`
`
`MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERYWPENETRATING ALL AREAS OF SPINE
`
`The majority of spine surgery continues to be performed via large open incisions with
`major dissection of the muscle tissue overlying the spine. These techniques are fraught
`with post—operative morbidity. With the recent advent of minimally invasive spine devices,
`the promise of shorter hospital stays and less post—operative morbidity is in sight for
`patients with spine disease. Lfinimally invasive techniques have been introduced
`suceessfully into most surgical fields. Patients have reaped the benefits of less»invasive
`techniques, enjoying shorter hospital stays, less post—operative pain and faster recovery
`periods (often, such procedures are performed on an outpatient basis). We expect that, as
`in other surgical specialties, utilization of minimally invasive techniques in the spine will
`continue to increase.
`
`MIS Takes All Forms
`
`Minimally invasive surgical alternatives have developed in several different areas over the
`last few years. Vertebral compression fractures, which were once only treated with
`conservative care, can now be addressed with minimally invasive alternatives, such as
`kyphopiasty and vertebroplasty, that offer better outcomes. LeSs invasive, muscle-sparing
`fusion techniques and platforms are creating a new gold standard for ideal surgery length,
`blood, loss. and recovery time
`
`Large Competition Benefits Market
`
`We continue to receive feedback that salesforce relationships will he key in increasing the
`use of minimaliy invasive spine surgery. We have been told that every new competitor that
`enters the MIS market brings with it a set of loyal surgecuns. We have noticed a significant
`increase in the number of M13 fusion platforms on the market over the last six to nine
`
`
`LLC
`Thomas \«eeisl
`Lynn C. Pieper, CFA 415.364.5999
`
`l‘l
`
`12
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`this charged competitive atmosphere could boost overall
`that
`months and expect
`awareness and adoption of MIS, benefiting all participants in the market. In addition, we
`believe that each competitive offering brings with it a unique set of advantages and that,
`longer-term, surgeons will seek out a combination of treatments to address various spinal
`ailments,
`
`NuVasive Pioneering MIS Fusion Market
`
`to join the MIS revolution, NuVasive has quickly leveraged its
`While not the first
`proprietary nerve monitoring technology and Maximum Access (MaXcess) platform to
`rapidly gain share within the spinal fusion market. Surgeon feedback is overwhelmingly
`positive, indicating that the company’s technologies are much more physician friendly and
`useful than previous offerings from larger competitors, such as Medtronic. Our physician
`contacts indicate that there are several important factors involved in selecting a minimally
`invasive platform,
`including ease of use, availability of training, and familiarity with
`offering/manufacturer. We believe that NuVasive stands positioned to address these
`needs, as the company is increasingly making a footprint for itself in surgery centers and
`operating rooms through its approximately 200 sales reps. In addition, the recent focus on
`training is likely to benefit adoption rates, as the new training facility in San Diego is now
`equipped to train multiple surgeons at once and is filling spots quickly.
`
`Kyphoplasty Alters VCF Landscape
`
`Kyphon has rapidly grown to be a market ieader in the minimally invasive spine market.
`Different from its predecessor, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty utilizes an expandable balloon
`to create a void for cement injection. Theoretically, hyphoplasty may carry the potential to
`restore some of the height lost to VCF. We expect that, as referral patterns continue to
`improve, more patients will turn to kyphoplasty to relieve pain. We currently believe that
`the osteoporosis VCF market alone represents a $1bn—plus opportunity.
`
`
`
`NEW TECHNOLOGIES BROADEN THE SPECTRUM
`
`We believe that new product introductions in the areas of dynamic stabilization, artificial
`discs and orthobiologics (i.e., InFuse BMP, allograft and synthetic bone graft substitutes),
`will likely help sustain spinal industry growth of more than 20% over the near term.
`
`Continuum of Care: Dynamic Stabilization Makes an Entrance
`
`The evolution of care from conservative, non—surgical treatment to total disc replacement
`will soon be populated by a multitude of offerings to address various states of spinal and
`disc degeneration. We expect that new dynamic technologies such as flexible rod systems,
`intrabody spacers, and nucleus replacements will all see strong acceptance in the market,
`helping to mold the new continuum of care, which we expect to be filled with many non—
`fusion alternatives. We believe that Zimmer stands to benefit from this trend, having been
`one of the first companies to spearhead this market with its Dynesis flexible-rod system.
`
`
`
`
`205 '
`hmosWeisel Patners LLC
`'12
`Lynn C. Pieper, CFA 415.364.5999
`
`13
`
`
`
`.w.t......s.;a.ma'c'..w..wmmfm‘M._smmficu‘éaésd}w.;niaznwumli"'
`
`..».......-..s.,.-.....-W.c.m
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`Artificial Disc Opportunity Holds Promise
`
`Although data are still being collected, the opportunity for both lumbar and cervical discs
`
`could be quite large. Feedback indicates that the keys to adoption are longer-term data,
`greater understanding of motion in the spine and better revision options. Technological
`differences between the various discs are likely to take a back seat as physicians become
`more at ease with dise implantation in general We believe that an important element of
`this evolving market will be proper patient selection and a grasp of all the various data.
`
`Orthobiologics
`
`We believe the future of the orthobiologics market remains in the hands of bone
`morphogenic proteins (BMPs)—eventually to be joined by gene therapy products—both
`of which seek to promote safe and effective bone growth. While Medttonic now
`commands this market with its InFuse EMF product, several other companies have
`products in development that are likely to contribute to growth in this area over the next
`few years.
`
`
`
`Inn—I'll—.Ill-um—_—_—_
`
`
`'July 12, .005
`13
`
`
`
`Thomas eisel Parnrtes LLC 7
`Lynn C. Pieper, CPA 415.364.5999
`
`14
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`SPINAL FUSION MARKET AND MIS FUSION LANDSCAPE
`
`
`
`Images courtesy of Zimme: Holdings, reproduced here with permission
`
`M J
`
`Thomas Weisel Partners LLC
`Lynn C. Piepez, CFA 415.364.5999
`
`uly 12, 2005
`48
`
`15
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`SPINAL FUSION MARKET: ESTIMATED $3BN OPPORTUNITY
`
`Over the past 10—15 years, we have seen a momentous shift in the spinal landscape. Spine
`fusion procedures have become largely instrumented (W

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket