`Petition For Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Wavelock Advanced Technology Co., Ltd.,
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`Textron Innovations Inc.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 6,455,138
`Issue Date: September 24, 2002
`Title: METALLIZED SHEETING, COMPOSITES,
`AND METHODS FOR THEIR FORMATION
`
`DECLARATION OF ROBERT IEZZI, Ph.D.
`
`Inter Partes Review No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`1.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`I have been retained by Morrison & Foerster LLP in this case as an
`
`expert in the relevant art.
`
`2.
`
`I have been asked to provide my opinions and views on the materials I
`
`have reviewed in this case related to U.S. Patent No. 6,455,138 (the ’ 138 patent),
`
`and the scientific and technical knowledge regarding the same subject matter as the
`
`’ 138 patent before and at the earliest effective filing date of December 31, 1997.
`
`The ’ 138 patent issued from US Application Serial No. 09/223,545 (the ’545
`
`application), which was filed on December 30, 1998. The ’ 138 patent also claims
`
`priority to US Provisional Application Serial No, 60/070,166 (the ’ 166
`
`application), which was filed on December 31, 1997, and is the earliest effective
`
`filing date of the ’ 138 patent.
`
`3.
`
`My opinions and underlying reasoning for the opinions are set forth
`
`below.
`
`II.
`
`PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
`
`4.
`
`I have been active in industries related to the relevant field of art of
`
`thermoplastic composites and laminate films for approximately 40 years. I am
`
`presently Vice President of Coating Technologies at NEI Corporation in Somerset,
`
`NJ. In this capacity, I am responsible for new product development of novel
`
`polymer coatings and films based on nano-materials. I am also the Founder and
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`#
`
`
`
`CEO of RAI Technical Solutions®, Inc. In this capacity, I provide consulting on
`
`corrosion, coatings, polymers, and nano-composites. Prior to this, I was Manager
`
`of the Coating Research Group at Arkema Chemicals Research Center, King of
`
`Prussia, PA (1994-2002) where I was responsible for the new product development
`
`and technical service of polyamide and fluoropolymer films and coatings. At the
`
`same company, I was Manager of the Plastic Additives Research Group (2002-
`
`2006) with responsibility for new product development of novel additives for
`
`plastic products. Prior to that (1989-1994), I was Section Head of Metals &
`
`Plastics Coatings Research at Betz Laboratories, Trevose, PA. From 1985-1989, I
`
`was the Director of Packaging Technology at Campbell Soup Company in
`
`Camden, NJ. From 1965 to 1985, I worked on metal and paint coatings at
`
`Republic Steel and Bethlehem Steel. All the positions described above relate to
`
`work with coatings, including polymer films, metallization, and adhesives.
`
`5.
`
`I was also an Adjunct Professor of Engineering at Pennsylvania State
`
`University, Great Valley Campus from 2006 to 2010. In this part-time position, I
`
`taught graduate level engineering courses in innovation and creativity, along with
`
`an MBA course in New Business Ventures and Entrepreneurship.
`
`6.
`
`I earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Widener University in
`
`1965. I earned a M.S. in Physics from Kent State University in 1969. I also
`
`earned a Ph.D. in Materials Science from Lehigh University in 1979.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`$
`
`
`
`7.
`
`Most of my research has focused on polymer composite materials, and
`
`metal and organic coatings applied to metals and plastic composites, including
`
`chemical vapor deposition. As far as applications, I have over 40 years of
`
`experience with the automotive industry, mainly in metal and plastic auto body
`
`materials and coatings. More specifically, I have worked on: (a) chemical vapor
`
`deposition of metal coatings on steel for use on autobody parts; (b) polymer
`
`composite films for use on plastic autobody parts; (c) nylon coatings for
`
`automotive under-hood applications and guide rails for sliding minivan doors; (d)
`
`impact modifiers for polycarbonate body panels; and (e) automotive thermoplastic
`
`olefins.
`
`8.
`
`My research has resulted in over 50 publications and presentations of
`
`papers.
`
`I am an inventor on six issued U.S. patents, and two pending patent
`
`applications.
`
`9.
`
`I am a member of the American Chemical Society, the American
`
`Coatings Association, and the Federated Societies of Coatings Technology. I was
`
`previously on the Board of Directors of the National Coil Coating Association, and
`
`the Delaware Valley Volunteers of America.
`
`I was also a member of the American
`
`Society for Materials, and the Society of Plastic Engineers.
`
`10.
`
`I am recipient of the following awards: (a) Packing Institute
`
`International Annual Education Award (best paper); (b) National Association of
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`%
`
`
`
`Corrosion Engineers Romanoff Award (best paper); (c) National Coil Coating
`
`Association Technical Section Certificate of Appreciation; and (d) chosen to
`
`participate in the Industrial Research Institute Visiting Scientist Program.
`
`11. A copy of my curriculum vitae that summarizes my education, work
`
`history and publications is in Appendix A.
`
`12.
`
`I am being compensated for taking part in this case but have no other
`
`relationship to Wavelock Advanced Technology Co., Ltd. My compensation is not
`
`dependent on the outcome of this case.
`
`III. BASIS FOR OPINION
`
`13. My opinions and views set forth in this report are based on my
`
`education, training, and experience in the relevant field, as well as the materials I
`
`reviewed in this case, and the scientific knowledge regarding the same subject
`
`matter that existed prior to the earliest effective filing date of the ’ 138 patent.
`
`IV.
`
`PATENT LAW STANDARD
`
`14.
`
`It is my understanding that a patent claim is invalid for anticipation if
`
`it can be shown that each and every limitation of the claim is disclosed either
`
`expressly or inherently in a single prior art reference. It is also my understanding
`
`that to establish anticipation by inherency, the extrinsic evidence must be clearly
`
`described in the reference.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`&
`
`
`
`15.
`
`It is my understanding that a patent claim is invalid for obviousness if
`
`the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill
`
`in the art at the time the invention was made, in view of a single prior art reference
`
`or a combination of prior art references. Specifically, I understand that a
`
`determination of whether a claimed invention would have been obvious requires
`
`taking into consideration factors which include: (a) assessing the scope and content
`
`of the prior art; (b) the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art;
`
`and (c) the level of ordinary skill in the art. I fiirther understand that secondary
`
`considerations, such as commercial success, the solution of long-recognized but
`
`unresolved needs, failures of others, etc. may be considered in a determination of
`
`obviousness.
`
`16.
`
`It is my understanding that when combining two or more references,
`
`or when modifying an item disclosed in one reference, so as to arrive at a claimed
`
`invention, one should consider whether there is a reason for the proposed
`
`combination or modification. For example, when a technology or product is
`
`available in one field of endeavor, design incentives and other market forces can
`
`prompt variations of it, either in the same field or a different one. For the same
`
`reason, if a technique has been used to improve one device, and a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the art would recognize that it would improve similar devices in
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`'
`
`
`
`the same way, using the technique is obvious unless its actual application is
`
`beyond his or her skill.
`
`17.
`
`It is my understanding that the claims of a patent are analyzed from
`
`the perspective of “a person of ordinary skill in the art” and that the claims of the
`
`’ 138 patent are interpreted as a person of ordinary skill in the art would have
`
`understood them at the time the ’545 application, which issued as the ’ 138 patent,
`
`was filed.
`
`18.
`
`It is my understanding that “prior art” includes patents and
`
`publications in the relevant literature and information that predates the effective
`
`filing date of the ’ 138 patent, December 31, 1997. It is also my understanding that
`
`a patent application can describe prior technologies as prior art in his specification,
`
`and the admitted prior information can be used as “prior art” against his claims.
`
`V.
`
`A PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART
`
`19. A person of ordinary skill in the art relevant to the ’ 138 patent would
`
`have had at least a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering, material science, or
`
`chemistry, and at least five years of experience working with or researching
`
`thermoplastic films and composites.
`
`VI. OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICABLE TECHNOLOGIES
`
`20.
`
`Following is an overview of the applicable technologies and the state
`
`of the art before and at the earliest effective filing date of the application that
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`issued as the ’ 138 patent. The ’ 138 patent issued from US application Serial No.
`
`09/223,545 (“the ’545 application”), which was filed on December 30, 1998. The
`
`’ 138 patent also claims priority to US Provisional application Serial No.
`
`60/070,166 (“the ’ 166 application”), which was filed on December 31, 1997, and is
`
`the earliest effective filing date of the ’ 138 patent.
`
`21.
`
`The ’ 138 patent generally relates to metallized thermoplastic
`
`composites. These metallized composites can be used as reflective surfaces, for
`
`example, as mirrors or as substitutes for decorative chrome parts. For example,
`
`these metallized composites can be used for decorative trim used on the bumpers
`
`and bodies of automobiles as well as interior reflective trim parts.
`
`22.
`
`In the late 1970s, the automotive industry started replacing
`
`conventional decorative trim made of metals, such as chrome, with decorative trim
`
`made of plastic composites including thermoplastic layers and a metal layer
`
`deposited on one of the thermoplastic layers. Examples of the thermoplastic
`
`materials of the composites are polyesters, polycarbonates, and vinyl polymers. As
`
`specific example, polyurethane terephthalate (PET) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-
`
`styrene (ABS) were used for the thermoplastic layers. See, for example, U.S.
`
`Patent No. 4,403,004 (Parker), col. 4:33-42. The plastic composites offered better
`
`alternates to conventional all-metal parts because they were light and inexpensive.
`
`When creating a metallized film, a base layer is typically metallized. A second
`
`(
`
`
`
`
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`polymer layer was then applied over the metallized layer to protect the metal from
`
`the elements and corrosion. The second polymer layer could be applied directly to
`
`the metallized layer; however, often times an adhesive layer was applied prior to
`
`the second polymer layer to improve adhesion of the second polymer layer and
`
`further improve corrosion and delamination characteristics of the composite. See,
`
`for example, Parker, col. 5:58-60. For metallization, aluminum and chrome were
`
`used at the beginning of this technology. However, prior to the filing of the ’545
`
`application, a wide variety of metals were used for metallization including
`
`(
`
`
`
`
`
`(
`
`
`
`
`
`aluminum, chromium, tin, indium and iron. See, for example, U,S, Patent No.
`
`4,101,698 (Dunning), col. 226-13.
`
`23. As stated in the Background of the Invention portion of the ’ 138
`
`patent, before the filing of the ’545 application, it was known that, in order to
`
`provide reflectivity suitable for automotive trim, the metal layer in the composite
`
`does not have to be continuous. Therefore, a discontinuous film can be used to
`
`provide a surface that has better corrosion resistance than metallized films with
`
`continuous metal surfaces. A discontinuous metal layer resists corrosion because,
`
`even if corrosion starts, it does not propagate to neighboring portions of metal
`
`layer due to the separations of the metal islands. It was also known that a
`
`discontinuous metal layer promotes better attachment between two thermoplastic
`
`layers sandwiching the metal layer, which also contributes to corrosion resistance
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 9
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`1:24-32.
`
`24.
`
`by reducing possibility of delamination. See, for example, the ’ 138 patent, col.
`
`It was well known at the time that the ’545 application was filed that
`
`(
`
`
`
`
`
`metal layers could be deposited on a thermoplastic layer using a variety of
`
`deposition techniques, such as evaporation and sputtering. These deposition
`
`processes include continuous processes in which a web of plastic film is unrolled
`
`and fed into a deposition chamber. See, for example, Parker, col. 8:21-50, and
`
`FIG. 2.
`
`25. During a metal deposition process, deposition begins at small
`
`(
`
`
`
`
`
`nucleation sites on the polymer film. Small islands of the metal are formed on the
`
`plastic film at these nucleation sites. The typical size of the metal islands is as
`
`small as 100 A. Once the metals islands are formed, the islands continue to grow
`
`to fill the gaps between the islands and thus to form a continuous film. It was
`
`known that a discontinuous metal layer could be formed by stopping the deposition
`
`process before the islands grow together. See, for example, U.S. Patent No.
`
`4,407,871 (Eisfeller), col. 5:206.
`
`26.
`
`It was also understood that it is easier to form metallized layers, and
`
`(
`
`
`
`
`
`(
`
`discontinuous metal layers in particular, using low-melting-point metals. See, for
`
`example, Translation of Japanese Patent Application Publication No. S63-286337
`
`(Kuwahara), at 4:17-27. These metals all have melting points below 500°C.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`Page 10
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(
`
`
`
`
`
`Examples of such metals are tin, lead, bismuth, zinc and indium. It was known
`
`that it is easy to control the nucleation and growth of a metal with a low melting
`
`point. Further, higher melting point metals can damage or destroy the polymer
`
`base layer because of the high temperatures required to deposit these metals. It
`
`was also known that various types of adhesives could be used to attach a
`
`metallized thermoplastic layer to another thermoplastic layer. These adhesives
`
`included polyester, polyamides, silicone and polyurethane adhesives. See, for
`
`example, U.S. Patent No. 5,532,045 (Wade), col. 5:59-63, and Parker, col. 6:1-4.
`
`Since the adhesives are made of materials similar to the thermoplastic layers, they
`
`adhere well to the thermoplastic layers. The adhesion between a metal layer and
`
`an adhesive is essentially determined by bonding between the adhesive and
`
`hydroxyl groups formed on the oxidized surface of the metal layer. For this
`
`reason, it was known that adhesives that adhere well to one type of metallized
`
`surface would typically adhere well to other metallized surfaces.
`
`VII. THE ’138 PATENT
`
`27.
`
`The ’ 138 patent includes only one independent claim, claim 1, which
`
`recites:
`
`1. A metallized composite, comprising:
`
`a) a first thermoplastic layer;
`
`b) a discontinuous layer on said first layer, said discontinuous layer
`
`including discrete islands of metal in an adhesive; and
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 11
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`c) a second thermoplastic layer, said discontinuous layer being between said
`
`first and second thermoplastic layers.
`
`28. Dependent claims 2 and 33-36 add structural features of the
`
`metallized composite, dependent claims 3, 8, 10, 31 and 32 define chemical
`
`features of the thermoplastic layers, dependent claims 16-19 and 21 define
`
`chemical features of the adhesive, dependent claims 25-27 define chemical features
`
`of the metal, and dependent claims 27-30 add coloring features of the composite, to
`
`the respective parent claims.
`
`The Specification of the ’ 138
`
`29.
`
`The ’ 138 patent issued from the ’545 application, which was filed on
`
`December 30, 1998. The ’545 application claims priority to U.S. provisional
`
`Application No. 60/070,166, which was filed on December 31, 1997. Col. 1:5-7.
`
`In the Background of the Invention section of the ’ 138 patent, the applicant states
`
`that existing composites having two polymer sheets and a continuous metal layer
`
`disposed between the two sheets, which are used as a substitute for automotive
`
`decorative chrome parts, have delamination and corrosion problems. Col. 1:15-23.
`
`The Background of the Invention section also acknowledges that a known solution
`
`to the delamination and corrosion problems was to make the metal layer
`
`discontinuous. Col 1:23-32. However, in the Background of the Invention, the
`
`’ 138 patent states that in situ polymerization of a top coat layer may not result in a
`
`+
`
`
`
`
`
`+
`
`
`
`
`,
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 12
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`#
`
`
`
`strong bonding between the top layer and the underneath layers. According to the
`
`’ 138 patent, it was known that the bonding problem could be improved by etching
`
`blackening of the metal layer. Col. 1:33-60.
`
`+
`
`
`
`
`,
`
`problems with laminate composites that include a discontinuous layer: 1) a
`
`the metal layer prior to the in situ polymerization, but the etching leads to
`
`+
`
`
`
`
`
`30. Accordingly, the ’ 138 patent describes two structures to address these
`
`laminate that includes two thermoplastic layers and a discontinuous metal layer of
`
`discrete metal islands in an adhesive that is placed between the two thermoplastic
`
`layers (shown in FIG. 1); and 2) a continuous thermoplastic sheet that includes a
`
`discontinuous metal layer in the sheet (shown in FIG. 2). Col. 2:6-16.
`
`31.
`
`The metals described in the ’ 138 patent for metallization were
`
`conventional metals that were used for thin film deposition, including aluminum
`
`and indium. Col . 4:11-14. Similarly, the ’ 138 patent provides a list of known
`
`adhesives that were used for laminating thermoplastic layers. Col. 4: 19-35. The
`
`’ 138 patent also states that many of conventional thermoplastic materials can be
`
`used as the materials for the thermoplastic layers in the composite. Col. 4:26-67.
`
`The metallized composites can be colored using conventional coloring techniques
`
`known at the time. Col. 528-21. The ’ 138 patent also states that conventional
`
`methods could be used to perform molding, folding, or embossing of the
`
`metallized composite. Col. 6: 10-12.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 13
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`$
`
`
`
`The File History
`
`32.
`
`The ’545 application was filed December 30, 1998, claiming priority
`
`to the ’166 application, filed December 31, 1997. The original ’545 application
`
`included claims 1-96. Claim 2 in the ’545 application corresponds to issued claim
`
`1 of the ’ 138 patent. Claim 2 and its dependent claims were allowed essentially
`
`without amendments.
`
`33.
`
`In the first Action issued October 13, 2000, claim 2 along with claims
`
`3, 11, 16-18, 26-43, 45, 54-55, 57 and 61-70 were rejected under 35 USC l03(a)
`
`by U.S. Patent No. 4,115,619 (Kurfman ’619) or U.S. Patent No. 4,211,822
`
`(Kurfman ’822) in view of U.S. Patent No. 4,407,871 (Eisfel1er)or U.S. Patent No.
`
`4,101,698 (Dunning). Also, claims 17-19 and 22, which correspond to claims 16-
`
`18 and 21 of the ’ 138 patent (the adhesive chemistry claims), were rejected under
`
`l03(a) over the two Kurfinan references, Eisfeller and Dunning and further in view
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 4,503,189 (Igarashi).
`
`34.
`
`In response to these rejections, the applicant filed an Amendment on
`
`November 28, 2000, cancelling claim 1. In support of claim 2, however, applicant
`
`argued that:
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. To the contrary, both Kurfman, et al ’619 and ’822 teach away
`
`from employing a discontinuous metallized layer. .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 14
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`%
`
`
`
`Certain discontinuities in the metal layer are taught by Kurfman, et al
`
`’619 and ’822 as being tolerable. .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`However, such pinholes in a continuous metal layer do not cause the
`
`formation of a “discontinuous layer of discrete island of metal” as
`
`employed in Applicant’s claimed invention.
`
`November 28, 2000, Amendment, at 4, lines 8-25. Applicant also argued that “. .
`
`.
`
`these references [the two Kurfrnan references and Durming] teach away from
`
`employing a layer of discrete islands of metal, because such a layer would not be
`
`considered a continuous metal layer.” Id. page 5, lines 24-26. In other words,
`
`applicant took the position that a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have
`
`combined the teachings of the Kurfinan references relating to a laminate including
`
`a continuous metal film and the teachings of Eisfeller and Durming relating to a
`
`-
`
`
`
`laminate including a discontinuous metal film. Applicant also argued that “there is
`
`no disclosure or suggestion in either Eisfeller ’87l or Durming, et al. that the
`
`with thermoplastics to form either of Applicant’s claimed embodiments of the
`
`
`
`-
`
`/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`/
`
`thermosets employed as at least one of the elastomeric layers could be substituted
`
`metallized composite.” Id. at 5, lines 26-29.
`
`35.
`
`In the next Action, a final Action dated February 27, 2001, claims 2-
`
`37, which correspond to claims 1- 36 of the ’ 138 patent, were allowed and claims
`
`38-43, 45, 54, 55, 57 and 61-70 were rejected. Applicant kept fighting over the
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 15
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`&
`
`
`
`patentability of these claims, but ended up cancelling all of the remaining claims in
`
`response to another Action rejecting these claims. A notice of allowance issued
`
`June 13, 2002.
`
`VIII. THE PRIOR ART
`
`36.
`
`Following are brief summaries of the prior art references applied
`
`against the claims of the ’ 138 patent in this declaration. The prior art references
`
`are exhibits to the accompanying Petition and referred to in my declaration by their
`
`exhibit numbers.
`
`Ja anese Patent A lication Publication No. S63-286337 Kuwahara
`
`37. My discussion of Kuwahara (Exhibit 1006) pertains to the translation
`
`provided to me, which is Exhibit 1007.
`
`38. Kuwahara was published on November 24, 1998.
`
`I understand that
`
`Kuwahara was not cited during the prosecution of the ’ 138 patent, and therefore
`
`was not considered by the Examiner of the ’ 138 patent. Kuwahara relates to a
`
`decorative laminate, including a discontinuous metal layer on a first thermoplastic
`
`layer, an adhesive layer on the discontinuous metallized layer opposite the first
`
`thermoplastic layer, and a second metal layer on the adhesive layer. The
`
`decorative laminate in Kuwahara can be used, for example, as a trim for electronic
`
`equipment. Kuwahara uses a discontinuous metal layer in the laminate so that the
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 16
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`
`
`laminate is not electrically conductive and yet maintains metal luster as a
`
`decorative trim.
`
`39. Kuwahara’s laminate includes two thermoplastic layers, such as a
`
`polyethylene terephthalate (PET) layer and a vinyl chloride (VC) layer, and a
`
`discontinuous metal layer made of a low-melting point metal, such as tin, placed
`
`between the two thermoplastic layers. The metal layer is fonned on one of the
`
`thermoplastic layers by a deposition technique, such as evaporation, ion plating or
`
`sputtering. The metal deposition is controlled so that, after the nucleation, the
`
`metal layer has a structure of islands. The separation between the metals islands is
`
`100 — 5000 A. Low-melting point metals, such as Sn, Pb, Zn and Bi, are easily
`
`formed into islands. An adhesive, a Vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer, is used
`
`to attach the thermoplastic layer on which the metal islands are formed to another
`
`thermoplastic layer. The adhesive is applied to the metal layer by a roll coater, and
`
`then the two thermoplastic layers are laminated together using the adhesive under
`
`heat and pressure. Since the adhesive is applied on top of the discontinuous metal
`
`layer in a liquid state, the adhesive would inherently flow around the island metal
`
`structures so that islands of metal would be in the adhesive. Kuwahara states that
`
`the laminate can be colored and molded.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`l7
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 17
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,101,698 gDunning[
`
`40. Dunning was patented on July 18, 1978 and is Exhibit 1008. During
`
`prosecution of the ’ 138 patent, Dunning was applied against the claims as a
`
`secondary reference to disclose a discontinuous metal layer. Dunning relates to a
`
`decorative laminate, including a discontinuous metallized thermoplastic layer, used
`
`as a trim for automobiles. Dunning uses the discontinuous metal layer in the
`
`laminate to reduce corrosion of the laminate. Dunning’s laminate includes a
`
`metallized thermoplastic layer, such as a polyurethane layer, and an adhesive
`
`applied on the metallized surface of the thermoplastic layer. The laminate is
`
`attached to an automotive part, such as a bumper or other substrate using the
`
`adhesive. The bumper or other substrate may be a second thermoplastic layer
`
`since these substrates may be made of thermoplastic materials, such as urethane
`
`rubber. The metal layer is formed on the thermoplastic layer by a deposition
`
`technique, such as evaporation and electroless plating. The metal deposition is
`
`controlled so that the metal film has a thickness of 0.01 mil (2540 A) or less and
`
`includes discontinuous dots. Dunning states that the metals that can be used for
`
`this metallization include chromium, aluminum and indi11rn. Durming states
`
`adhesives such as a vinyl coating adhesive or acrylic adhesive may be used.
`
`Dunning also states that the adhesives may include pigments and the laminates
`
`may be molded.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 18
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,403,004 (Parker)
`
`41.
`
`Parker was patented on September 6, 1983 and is Exhibit 1009.
`
`Parker was listed in an Information Disclosure Statement filed by the applicant of
`
`the ’ 138 patent but was not relied on by the Examiner. Parker relates to a
`
`decorative laminate, including a metallized thermoplastic layer, that can be used
`
`for trim for automobiles. Parker describes a laminate structure with reduced
`
`delamination problems including a first thermoplastic layer, a thin metal layer,
`
`which has a thickness of 100 to 200 A, an adhesive on the side of the metal layer
`
`opposite the first thermoplastic layer, and a second thermoplastic layer on the
`
`adhesive layer opposite the metal layer. Parker states that the thermoplastic
`
`polyethylene terephthalate (PET) may be used to form the thermoplastic layers.
`
`Parker states that the thin metal layer may be formed from a Variety of metals
`
`including chromium, nickel and aluminum. The metal layer is formed on one of
`
`the thermoplastic layers by a deposition technique, such as evaporation. An
`
`adhesive, such as a silicone resin or an acrylic polymer, is used to attach the
`
`thermoplastic layer on which the metal islands are formed to another thermoplastic
`
`layer. The adhesion process may be performed under pressure or heat. Parker
`
`discloses that laminates may be colored and that the laminate may be molded.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 19
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,275,099 gDani)
`
`42. Dani was patented on June 23, 1981 and is Exhibit 1010. Dani was
`
`not cited during the prosecution of the ’ 138 patent. Dani relates to a decorative
`
`laminate that can be used for trim for automobiles. The laminate in Dani includes
`
`a first thermoplastic layer, a metal layer on the first thermoplastic layer, an
`
`adhesive layer on the metal layer opposite the first thermoplastic layer, and a
`
`second thermoplastic layer on the adhesive layer opposite the metal layer. Dani
`
`uses a uniform metal layer and reduces the delamination problem of the laminate
`
`by using adhesives such as a polyurethane adhesive formed by the reaction of the
`
`isocyanate with hydroxyl groups of the polyester polyol. Dani’s two thermoplastic
`
`layers may be formed from thermoplastics such as polyethylene terephthalate
`
`(PET) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and a metal layer made of metals, such
`
`aluminum, placed between the two thermoplastic layers. The metal layer is formed
`
`on one of the thermoplastic layers by a deposition technique, such as evaporation.
`
`An adhesive that includes polyurethane formed by the reaction of the isocyanate
`
`with hydroxyl groups of the polyester polyol is used to attach the metallized layer
`
`to the second thermoplastic layer. The adhesive is applied to the metal layer on the
`
`first thermoplastic layer by a roller, dried and then placed on the second
`
`thermoplastic layer. The stack is then laminated under pressure and heat. Dani
`
`states that these plastic automotive parts may be colored and molded.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 20
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`#
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,532,045 (Wade)
`
`43. Wade was patented on July 2, 1996 and is Exhibit 101 l. Wade was
`
`not cited during the prosecution of the ’ 138 patent. Wade relates to a decorative
`
`laminate that can be used as trim for automobiles. The laminate in Wade includes
`
`a first thermoplastic layer, a patterned metal layer on the first thermoplastic layer,
`
`an adhesive layer on the metal layer opposite the first thermoplastic layer, and a
`
`second thermoplastic layer on the adhesive layer opposite the patterned metal
`
`layer. Wade reduces weathering and corrosion problems of the laminate by
`
`forming the laminate such that the patterned metal layer is not exposed at the edge
`
`of the laminate. Wade’s two thermoplastic layers may be formed from
`
`thermoplastics such as a polyester and polyurethane. The patterned metal layer
`
`may be formed from a variety of metals, for example aluminum. The metal layer
`
`is formed on one of the thermoplastic layers by a deposition technique, such as
`
`evaporation, sputtering, ion beam deposition and chemical vapor deposition.
`
`Wades states that the adhesive layer may be formed from a polyester, an acrylic, a
`
`polyamide, an epoxy or a urethane adhesive. This adhesive is used to attach the
`
`first thermoplastic layer and the patterned metal layer to the second thermoplastic
`
`layer. Wade states that the thermoplastic layers and the adhesive may be colored.
`
`Wade also states that the laminate may be molded.
`
`Va_386108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`Wavelock
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 21
`
`!
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`#
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,407,871 (Eisfeller)
`
`44.
`
`Eisfeller was patented on October 4, 1983 and is Exhibit 1012.
`
`Eisfeller was applied against the claims as a secondary reference to disclose a
`
`discontinuous metal layer during the prosecution of the ’ 138 patent. Eisfeller
`
`relates to a decorative laminate, including a metallized thermoplastic layer, used as
`
`a trim for automobiles. Eisfeller discloses a first thermoplastic lay