`Proceeding
`Patent 8,001,096
`
`Filing Date
`
`12/17/12
`
`Related Matters
`
`Related matters involving the patent in federal court
`
`1.
`
`Persona|Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Google, Inc. and
`
`YouTube, LLC; In the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:11—cv—656
`
`(LED).
`
`'
`
`’ PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.; In
`l
`2.
`the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:12-cv-662 (LED)
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Apple Inc.; In the
`3.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:12—cv—660 (LED).
`
`4.
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.; In the
`
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:12—cv-658 (LED)
`
`5.
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Microsoft Inc.; In
`
`the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:12—cv—663 (LED).
`
`Persona|Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. NEC Corporation of
`6.
`America, Inc.; In the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:11-cv-655
`(LED).
`7
`1
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. NetApp, Inc.; In the
`7.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:11—cv—657 (LED).
`
`8.)
`
`' PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.,
`
`Amazon Web Services LLC, and Dropbox, Inc.; In the United States District Court, Eastern
`
`District of Texas, Case No. 6:11—cv—658 (LED).
`
`Personalweb Technologies, LLC and Level 3.Communications, LLC v. Caringo, Inc.; In the
`.
`9.
`United States District Court, Eastern’ District of Texas, Case No. 6:11—cv—659 (LED).
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. EMC Corporation
`10.
`and VMWare, Inc.; In the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:11-
`cv-660(LED).
`»
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLCv. Autonomy, |nc.,
`11.
`Hewlett—Packard Company, and HP Enterprise Services, LLC; in the United States District Court,
`Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:11—cv—683 (LED).
`
`12.
`
`Persona|Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Nexsan,
`
`Technologies, Inc.; in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:12-
`
`cv-657 (LED).
`
`13.
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. International
`
`Business Machines Corporation; In the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas,
`Case No. 6:12—cv—66l (LED).
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. RackSpace US, Inc.
`14.
`and RackSpace Hosting, lnc.; In the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case
`No. 6:12-cv-659 (LED).
`
`Related Matters in the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Filing or 371(c) Date
`
`01-17-2012
`
`01-17-2012
`05-17-2011
`
`05—06~2011
`
`04-21-2011
`
`l
`
`{
`
`Pending Patent Applications
`
`U.S. Patent Application No.
`
`13/352,169
`
`13/351,433
`13/109,208
`
`13/102,337
`
`13/091,380
`
`.
`
`(
`
`'
`
`Petitions filed for Inter Partes Review
`
`Case
`
`Patent
`
`IPR 2013-00082
`
`_
`
`5,987,791
`
`IPR 2013-00083
`
`6,415,280
`
`IPR 2013-00086
`
`7,949,662
`
`IPR 2013-00085
`IPR 2013-00084
`
`7,945,539
`7,945,544
`
`
`
`
`
`lIE
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
