`
`DOCKET NO: 0100157-00244
`Filed on behalf of EMC Corp. and VMWare, Inc.
`By: Peter Dichiara, Reg. No. 38,005 (Lead Counsel)
`
`David L. Cavanaugh, Reg. No. 36,476 (Back-up Counsel)
`
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`
`1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
`
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`Tel: (202) 663-6025
`
`Email: David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________________________________
`
`EMC Corporation and VMWare, Inc.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`Personal Web Technologies LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,415,280
`
`IPR Case No. IPR2013-00083
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS' LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR Case No. IPR2013-00083
`U.S. Patent 6,415,280
`Petitioners’ List of Proposed Motions
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`
`
`Further to the Decision of the Board to institute inter partes review on May
`
`17, 2013, Petitioners provide the following list of proposed motions.
`
`I.
`
`Proposed Motions
`1. Motion to Submit Supplemental Information under 37 C.F.R. §
`42.123
`
`2. Motion for admission pro hac vice for one additional counsel.
`
`3. Motion for Observation on Cross-Examination - Contingent
`upon any reply witness proffered by Patent Owner. Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768
`(August 14, 2012)
`
`4. Motion to Exclude Evidence under 37 C.F.R. § 46.64 –
`Contingent upon evidence presented by Patent Owner.
`
`Petitioners do not anticipate additional motions at this time. If the grounds
`
`of rejection are modified during this proceeding, Petitioners may request additional
`
`motions as appropriate. Petitioners expect that they will file Opposition(s) to
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion(s) as permitted under the Rules and authorized by the
`
`Board.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/David L. Cavanaugh/
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`
`Registration No. 36,476
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR Case No. IPR2013-00083
`U.S. Patent 6,415,280
`Petitioners’ List of Proposed Motions
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, on May 30, 2013, I caused a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing materials:
`
` PETITIONERS’ LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`to be served via email, previously agreed between the parties, on the following
`
`attorney of record:
`
`
`
`Joseph Rhoa
`
`Nixon Vanerhye, P.C.
`901 North Glebe Road, 11th Floor
`Arlington, Virginia 22203
`
`Joseph A. Rhoa <jar@nixonvan.com>
`
`
`
`/David L. Cavanaugh/
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`
`Registration No. 36,476
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR Case No. IPR2013-00083
`U.S. Patent 6,415,280
`Petitioners’ List of Proposed Motions
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ List of Exhibits for Inter Partes Review
`Case No. IPR2013-00083 (U. S. Patent 6,415,280)
`
`
`Exhibit
`1001.
`
`1002.
`
`1003.
`
`1004.
`
`1005.
`
`1006.
`
`1007.
`
`1008.
`
`1009.
`
`1010.
`
`1011.
`
`Description
`
` U.S. Patent No. 6,415,280
` S. Browne et al., “Location-Independent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Software Repositories,” University of Tennessee
`Technical Report CS-95-278 (Feb. 1995)
` Albert Langer, “Re: dl/describe (File descriptions),” post to the
`“alt.sources” newsgroup on August 7, 1991
` F. Kantor, “The Frederick W. Kantor Contents-Signature System
`Version 1.22,” FWKCS122.REF (August 10, 1993)
` Woodhill et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,649,196, entitled “System and
`Method For Distributed Storage Management on Networked
`Computer Systems Using Binary Object Identifiers,”
` S. Browne et al., “Location-Independent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Software Repositories,”
`http://www.netlib.org/utk/papers/lifn/main.html (Nov. 11, 1994)
` K. Moore et al., “An Architecture for Bulk File Distribution,”
`Network Working Group Internet Draft (July 27, 1994)
` Chart of Patent Family Members
` Declaration of Dr. Douglas W. Clark, PH.D
` Banisar et al., The Third CPSR Cryptography and Privacy
`Conference at 509 (1993)
` G. D. Knott, Hashing functions, The Computer Journal (1975),
`vol. 3, no. 3, p. 265.
`
`i
`
`
`
`IPR Case No. IPR2013-00083
`U.S. Patent 6,415,280
`Petitioners’ List of Proposed Motions
`Description
` R. Rivest, “The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm,” Internet RFC
`1321 (Apr. 1992)
` McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, (4th
`ed., 1989)
` B. Kaliski, “A Survey of Encryption Standards, “ IEEE Micro
`(Dec. 1993)
`
`
`
`Rabin, Fingerprinting by Random Polynomials, Center for
`Research in Computing Technology, Harvard University, Report
`TR-15-81
` U. Manber, “Finding Similar Files in a Large File System”,
`University of Arizona Technical Report (1994)
`
`
`
`D.R. McGregor and J.A. Mariani ‘Fingerprinting’ – A Technique
`for File Identification and Maintenance, 12 Software Practice &
`Experience 1165 (1982)
` T. Berners-Lee et al., “Uniform Resource Locators (URL),”
`Internet RFC 1738 (Dec. 1994)
` U. S. Patent 6,415,280 Prosecution History, Response (August
`22, 2001)
` EP Pub. No. EP0826181A1 Prosecution History, Annex to the
`communication dated May 8, 2009
`
`
`
`EP Pub. No. EP0826181A1 Prosecution History, Reply to
`communication from the Examining Division dated November
`18, 2009
` EP Pub. No. EP0826181A1 Prosecution History, Annex to the
`communication dated March 14, 2012
` EP Pub. No. EP0826181A1 Prosecution History, Closing of
`Application dated June 14, 2012
`
`Exhibit
`
`1012.
`
`1013.
`
`1014.
`
`1015.
`
`1016.
`
`1017.
`
`1018.
`
`1019.
`
`1020.
`
`1021.
`
`1022.
`
`1023.
`
`ii
`
`
`
`IPR Case No. IPR2013-00083
`U.S. Patent 6,415,280
`Petitioners’ List of Proposed Motions
`Description
` U.S. Patent No. 6,425,280 Preliminary Amendment (Jan. 11,
`2001)
`
` U.S. Patent No. 6,425,280 Office Action (June 5, 2001)
` Legent Software, Inc., “ESM: Product Information,” Legent
`Corporation (April 1994)
` R. Williams, “An algorithm for matching text”, posted to the
`“comp.compression” newsgroup (January 27, 1992)
` R. Williams, “An Introduction to Digest Algorithms,” Rocksoft
`(Nov. 1994)
`
`Satyanarayanan, “Scalable, Secure, and Highly Available
`Distributed File Access,” IEEE Computer, vol. 23, no. 5 (May
`1990)
`
`P. Alsberg and J. Day, “A Principle for Resilient Sharing of
`Distributed Resources”, Proc. of the 2d International Conference
`on Software Engineering (1976)
`
`J. Bartlett, “A ‘NonStop’ Operating System”, Proc. of the
`Eleventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
`(1978)
`
`Invalidity Claim Chart in view of Woodhill
`
`Invalidity Claim Chart in view of ESM
`
`Invalidity Claim Chart in view of LIFN (“Browne”)
`
`Invalidity Claim Chart in view of Langer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Invalidity Claim Chart in view of Satanarayanan
` U. S. Patent 7,945,539 Prosecution History, Response to Non-
`Final Office Action (Oct. 5, 2009)
`
`Exhibit
`
`1024.
`
`1025.
`
`1026.
`
`1027.
`
`1028.
`
`1029.
`
`1030.
`
`1031.
`
`1032.
`1033.
`
`1034.
`
`1035.
`
`1036.
`
`1037.
`
`iii
`
`
`
`IPR Case No. IPR2013-00083
`U.S. Patent 6,415,280
`Petitioners’ List of Proposed Motions
`Description
` March 26, 2013 Declaration of Cynthia Vreeland in Support of
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`Exhibit
`1038.
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 110580047v.2
`
`iv
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
