`571-272-7822 Date Entered: December 20, 2013
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`MUNCHKIN, INC. AND TOYS “R” US, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
` LUV N’ CARE, LTD.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2013-00072
`Patent D617,465
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, BENJAMIN D. M. WOOD, and
`MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BISK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00072
`Patent D617,465
`
`
`The Scheduling Order in this proceeding set the date for oral hearing for
`
`January 22, 2014, if a hearing was requested by either party and granted by the
`
`Board. Paper 9.
`
`Petitioner requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Paper 21.
`
`The request for oral hearing is granted. Each party will have one hour to present
`
`arguments.
`
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s sole claim
`
`at issue in this review is unpatentable. Patent Owner bears the burden of proof
`
`with respect to its motion to amend (Paper 13). Petitioner will open the hearing by
`
`presenting its case regarding the challenged claim for which the Board instituted
`
`trial. Patent Owner will then respond to Petitioner’s argument and also argue in
`
`support of its motion to amend claims. Each party may reserve time to respond to
`
`arguments presented by the other party with some limitations. More specifically,
`
`to the extent that Petitioner reserves time, it may respond to Patent Owner’s
`
`presentation on all matters. To the extent that Patent Owner reserves time, it may
`
`respond to Petitioner’s arguments opposing the motion to amend claims.
`
`The hearing will commence at 1:00 PM, on January 22, 2014, on the ninth
`
`floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. The
`
`Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s transcript will
`
`constitute the official record of the hearing. There are no motions to seal in the
`
`present proceeding. Accordingly, the Board exercises its discretion to make the
`
`final hearing publically available via in-person attendance. The hearing will be
`
`open to the public for in-person attendance that will be accommodated on a first-
`
`come, first-served basis.
`
`The parties are reminded that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(f)(7), a proponent of
`
`deposition testimony must file such testimony as an exhibit. The Board will not
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00072
`Patent D617,465
`
`consider any deposition testimony that has not been so filed. Furthermore, under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at least five business
`
`days before the hearing. The Board requests that such exhibits be filed at the
`
`Board at least five business days before the hearing. The parties must initiate a
`
`conference call with the Board at least two business days before the hearing to
`
`present any objection regarding the propriety of any demonstrative exhibit. Any
`
`objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`
`waived.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person at the
`
`oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s argument. If
`
`either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be attending the oral argument,
`
`the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference with the Board no later than
`
`two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to the
`
`hearings clerk at 571-272-9797.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00072
`Patent D617,465
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`A. Poplin
`Lathrop & Gage LLP
`JPoplin@LathropGage.com
`
`Dane Baltich
`Alston & Bird, LLP
`Dane.baltich@alston.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Morris Cohen
`Goldberg Cohen, LLP
`mcohen@goldbergcohen.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`