throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 68
`Entered: November 14, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AVAYA INC., DELL INC., SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
`and HEWLETT-PACKARD CO.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2013-000711
`Patent 6,218,930
`
`
`
`Before JONI Y. CHANG, JUSTIN T. ARBES, and GLENN J. PERRY,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ARBES, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`A conference call in the above proceeding was held on
`
`November 13, 2013 among counsel for Petitioners Avaya Inc. (“Avaya”),
`
`
`1 Cases IPR2013-00385 and IPR2013-00495 have been joined with this
`proceeding.
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00071
`Patent 6,218,930
`
`Sony Corporation of America, and Hewlett-Packard Co.; counsel for Patent
`
`Owner; and Judges Chang, Arbes, and Perry. The call was requested by
`
`Patent Owner to seek an extension of DUE DATES 4-6 in the Revised
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper 51).
`
`Patent Owner stated that it anticipates filing, with its reply to Avaya’s
`
`opposition to Patent Owner’s motion to amend due on November 14, 2013, a
`
`new declaration from Dr. James Knox. According to Patent Owner,
`
`however, Dr. Knox is unavailable for deposition until December 3, 2013.
`
`Therefore, Patent Owner requested that DUE DATES 4-6 be postponed so
`
`that Avaya may depose Dr. Knox and prepare any motion for observation it
`
`desires to file by DUE DATE 4. Avaya opposed Patent Owner’s request,
`
`arguing that Patent Owner should not be permitted to rely on a reply witness
`
`unless it makes the witness available for deposition during the required time
`
`period. Avaya further requested that, if DUE DATE 4 is extended to permit
`
`a later deposition of Dr. Knox, Avaya should be permitted the same number
`
`of days between DUE DATES 4 and 5 as are present in the existing
`
`schedule.
`
`Patent Owner also requested that DUE DATE 7 (oral argument) be
`
`postponed from January 17, 2014 to at least January 27, 2014 because one of
`
`its back-up counsel in the instant proceeding, Greg Dovel, has a district
`
`court trial scheduled to begin on January 13, 2014. Patent Owner did not
`
`represent that its other designated counsel—lead counsel Robert G. Mukai
`
`and back-up counsel Charles F. Wieland III—are similarly unavailable on
`
`January 17, 2014. See Paper 8. Avaya opposed Patent Owner’s request, but
`
`stated that it needed to check its counsel schedules regarding other potential
`
`dates on which it may be available for oral argument.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00071
`Patent 6,218,930
`
`
`As discussed during the call, the Board is persuaded that minor
`
`extensions of DUE DATES 4-6 are appropriate to accommodate the
`
`deposition of Dr. Knox and related briefing, and would not be unduly
`
`prejudicial to Petitioners. A Revised Scheduling Order will be entered
`
`setting the following dates:
`
`DUE DATE 4
`
`December 11, 2013
`
`DUE DATE 5
`
`December 23, 2013
`
`DUE DATE 6
`
`December 30, 2013
`
`However, given the need for the Board to complete this proceeding in an
`
`efficient and expeditious manner and the fact that Patent Owner has other
`
`counsel available for oral argument on January 17, 2014, DUE DATE 7 will
`
`not be postponed. Patent Owner indicated during the call that Mr. Dovel is
`
`available the week of January 6, 2014. Petitioners and Patent Owner shall
`
`confer and provide to the Board multiple alternative dates during the week
`
`of January 6, 2014 on which counsel for all parties are available for oral
`
`argument. Patent Owner’s request to move DUE DATE 7 will be subject to
`
`Board availability.
`
`
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that Petitioners and Patent Owner shall confer and
`
`provide, by email to Trials@uspto.gov by November 14, 2013, multiple
`
`dates during the week of January 6, 2014 on which counsel for all parties are
`
`available for oral argument.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2013-00071
`Patent 6,218,930
`
`PETITIONERS:
`
`Jeffrey D. Sanok
`Jonathan Lindsay
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`JSanok@Crowell.com
`JLindsay@Crowell.com
`
`Michael J. Scheer
`Thomas M. Dunham
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`mscheer@winston.com
`tdunham@winston.com
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue
`Erika Arner
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`erika.arner@finnegan.com
`
`
`Robert J. Walters
`Charles J. Hawkins
`McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`rwalters@mwe.com
`chawkins@mwe.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert G. Mukai
`Charles F. Wieland III
`BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY P.C.
`Robert.Mukai@BIPC.com
`Charles.Wieland@BIPC.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket