`
`. :-— 1.
`
`I .— I
`
`E".
`
`Published by Chapman & Hall, 2-6 Boundary Row, London SE1 SHN, UK
`
`Chapman & Hall, 2-6 Boundary Row, London SE1 8HN, UK
`Chapman & Hall GmbH, Pappelallee 3, 69469 Weinheim, Germany
`Chapman & Hall USA, 115 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003, USA
`
`3 ’C I
`W4
`’,
`
`1) J 075
`‘/7, J /
`_
`
`'
`
`/ 9 (f
`
`:-
`
`/
`
`Chapman & Hall Japan, ITP-Japan, Kyowa Building, 3F, 2-2-1 Hirakawacho,
`Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102, Japan
`Chapman & Hall Australia, 102 Dodds Street, South Melbourne, Victoria 3205,
`Australia
`Chapman & Hall India, R. Seshadri, 32 Second Main Road, CIT East, Madras
`600 035, India
`
`First edition 1997
`
`© 1997 Nick Burd
`
`Printed in Great Britain by Cambridge University Press
`ISBN 0 412 49730 1
`
`Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or
`criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright Designs and Patents
`Act, 1988, this publication may not be reproduced, stored, or transmitted, in any
`form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publishers,
`or in the case of reprographic reproduction only in accordance with the terms of
`the licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in
`accordance with the terms of licences issued by the appropriate Reproduction
`Rights Organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside
`the terms stated here should be sent to the publishers at the London address
`printed on this page.
`The publisher makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the
`accuracy of the information contained in this book and cannot accept any legal
`responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made.
`
`A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
`
`$
`@Printed on permanent acid-free text paper; inanufactured in accordance with
`ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 and ANSI/NISO Z39.48—l984 (Permanence of
`Paper).
`
`,
`
`_ _
`
`__ 1;
`
`
`
`
`
`U interface standards
`
`123
`
`terms ofthe opelraation and performance ofthe ISDN U transmission systems used
`-
`rica and uroP°-
`.
`in fimzmerica,
`the NT1 is defined as customer premises equipment which is
`purchased and maintained by the user. The U interface may therefore be a user-
`network interface, and as such required standardization at an early stage inthe
`deployment of ISDN to ensure equipment compatibility. The result is that ANSI
`has led the way in the standardization of the U interface through the ANSI T1.601
`Standard [6] which defines the use of a 2BlQ transmission system.
`In Europe, the NT1 belongs to the network operator, and is installed at the time
`of subscription and subsequently maintained by the network operator. The user
`therefore never has direct access to the U interface, and instead connects to the
`ISDN through the S/T user—network interface.
`European ISDNs use both the 2BlQ or 4B3T line code. Through ETSI, a
`technical recommendation ETR 080 [7] has been defined which covers the
`licensed use of both of
`these. The ETSI document exists only as
`a
`recommendation which may be adopted by European network operators, and is
`not an enforced standard in order to respect specific requirements that may exist
`in the European national networks which fall outside this recommendation. For
`example, the test loops and conditions which are defined for conformance testing
`of the U transceiver in different countries may be different in order to use
`reference loops which more closely represent the population of subscriber loops
`that exist within a network than do the test loops and conditions defined in the
`ETSI recommendation. (A further ETSI standard, prETS 300 297 [8], has also
`been generated for the digital section which is equivalent to G.960.)
`Three main differences between the ETSI and ANSI U transmission systems
`are their performance testing specifications, power supply configurations, and test
`and maintenance functions.
`
`4-51 Performance testing
`
`The U transmission ‘standards and recommendations include test arrangements
`and procedures which are intended to be used to qualify the performance of LT
`and NT1 equipment for use in ISDN BRA subscriber loops. According to the
`requirements of
`the networks
`represented by the relevant
`standard or
`r§C0mmendation, a number of test subscriber loop cables are defined together with
`Sllnulated noise sources whose signals are injected onto the cable to which the
`equipment under test is connected. After activation, a pseudo-random binary
`Sequence (PRBS) test signal is used to simulate user information in the 2B+D
`Channels and the bit error rate (BER) is measured by comparing the transmitted
`and received data streams.
`loops which are
`The ANSI T1.601 standard specifies 12 mandatory test
`representative of the subscriber loops found in North America. A further three
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`124 The U interface
`
`ases which are not so frequently found.
`optional test loops cover more demanding c
`ths of different types of cable with a
`The test loops are made up of different leng
`The test loops may also include up to
`total length of up to 18000 feet (5.5 km).
`f the ANSI loops is shown in Fig.
`three bridge taps. As an example, loop 14 0
`4.1221.
`
`500’
`
`LT
`
`22 AWG
`
`
`24 AWG
`
`
`24 AWG
`
`AWG=American Wire Gauge
`
`(8)
`
`
`
`BER tester
`
`
`
`PRBS
`receive
`
`noise source
`
`
`
`gainl
`attenuation
`
`
`
`‘ransmn
`
`transceiver
`
`‘
`
`receiver
`
`l
`
`
`
`test loop cable
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 4.12 The U transmission performance test system. (a) An example test 1
`(ANSI loop 14); (b). a typical test system.