`
`By: Robert G. Mukai, Esq.
`Charles F. Wieland III, Esq.
`BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
`
`1737 King Street, Suite 500
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314-2727
`Telephone (703) 836—6620
`Facsimile (703) 836—2021
`robert.mukai@bipc.com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`AVAYA INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent 6,218,930
`Administrative Patent Judges Jameson Lee, Joni Y. Chang and Justin T. Arbes
`
`Case IPR2013—00071
`
`NETWORK-1’s EXHIBIT LIST
`
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF US. PATENT N0. 6,218,930
`
`(as of July 1, 2013)
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2013—00071
`
`US. Patent No. 6,218,930
`Network—1’s Exhibit List (July 1, 2013)
`
`Pursuant to 37 CPR. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner hereby submits the
`
`following current Exhibit List identifying the exhibit number and a brief
`
`description of each exhibit that has been filed by Patent Owner in connection with
`
`the above—captioned case, IPR2013 -0007 l.
`
`
`EX #
`
`Exhibit
`
`N1-2001 Declaration of Mr. Greg Dovel in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission
`
`N1—2002 US. Patent No. 6,762,675, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Remote
`Powering of Device Connected to Networ ” (“the ’675 patent”),
`CAFIERO et al.
`
`
`
`N1-2003 Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Rule 3—3,
`Network—1 v. Cisco er al., Case No. 6:08—cv-00030—LED
`
`
`N1-2004
`
`EX—99.1, (Network-1 Press Release), Prospectus Supplement No. 2,
`Securities and Exchange Filing Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of July 20,
`2010
`
`N1-2005 US. Patent No. 6,301,358, entitled “Dual—Slope Current Battery-Feed
`Circuit” (“the ’358 patent”), CHEN et al.
`
`N1-2006 Memorandum Opinion and Order (Markman Ruling), Network-1 v.
`Cisco et al., Case No. 6:08-cv-00030—LED
`
`N1—2007 U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2009/0019296, entitled
`“Network System Port Thereof fOr Transmitting Various Signals and
`Power”, HUANG
`
`N1-2008 Transcript of Jury Trial, Afternoon Session, July 14, 2010, Network—1 v.
`Cisco et al., Case No. 6:08—cv-00030-LED
`
`N1-2009 Proof of Service on Dell Inc in Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. v.
`Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., et al., Case No. 6:11 cv 492 (ED. Tex. filed
`Sept. 15, 2011)
`
`
`
`Case No. lPR2013—00071
`
`US. Patent No. 6,218,930
`Network-1’s Exhibit List (July 1, 2013)
`
`
`
`
`N1-2010 Defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review filed in
`Network—l Security Solutions, Inc. V. Alcatel—Lucent USA Inc, et a1.,
`Case No. 6:11 cv492 (E.D. Tex. filed Sept. 15, 2011)
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
`
`95/0, 22 ;.
`
`,
`By:
`Robert G. Mukai, Esq.
`Registration No. 28,531
`Counselfor NETWORK-I SECURITY
`SOLUTIONS, INC.
`
`Date: July 1, 2013
`
`1737 King Street, Suite 500
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`Telephone (703) 836-6620
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2013-0007l
`
`US. Patent No. 6,218,930
`
`Network—1’s Exhibit List (July 1, 2013)
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing NETWORK-
`
`l’S EXHIBIT INTER PARTES REVIEW OF US. PATENT NO. 6,218,930
`
`(as of July 1, 2013) and Exhibits N1—2009 through N1—2010 are being served
`
`upon the following this lst day of July 2013
`
`Jeffrey D. Sanok
`Jonathan Lindsay
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`
`Counsel for Petitioner in this IPR2013-00071
`
`Via e-mail to: AVl-PRPSgQCrowellcom
`and is being served upon the following this 1St day of July, 2013, Via electronic
`mail to
`
`Michael J. Scheer
`
`mscheer@winston.com
`and
`
`Thomas M. Dunham
`
`tdunham@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Dell Inc. in IPR2013-003 85
`
`Date: July 1, 2013
`
`r M I
`
`Robert G. Mukai, Esq.
`Registration No. 28,531
`Counselfor NETWORK-1 SECURITY
`SOLUTIONS, INC.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
