`
`By: Robert G. Mukai, Esq.
`BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
`
`1737 King Street, Suite 500
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314—2727
`Telephone (703) 836—6620
`Facsimile (703) 836—2021
`robert.mukai@,bipo.com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`AVAYA INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent 6,218,930
`Administrative Patent Judges Jameson Lee, Joni Y. Chang and Justin T. Arbes
`
`Case IPR2013-00071
`
`NETWORK-1’s EXHIBIT LIST
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,218,930
`(as of March 12, 2013)
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2013—00071
`
`US. Patent No. 6,218,930
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63 (e), Patent Owner hereby submits the
`
`following current Exhibit List identifying the exhibit number and a brief
`
`description of each exhibit that has been filed by Patent Owner in connection with
`
`the above—captioned case, IPR2013—00071.
`
`Exhibit
`
`EX #
`._—__l__
`N1—2001
`Declaration of Mr. Greg Dovel in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission
`
`
`N1—2002
`
`US. Patent No. 6,762,675, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Remote
`Powering of Device Connected to Network” (“the ’675 patent”),
`CAFIERO et al.
`
`
`Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Rule 3—3,
`Network—I v. Cisco et al., Case No. 6:08-cv-00030-LED
`
`
`—l
`
`EX-99. 1, (Network—1 Press Release), Prospectus Supplement No. 2,
`Securities and Exchange Filing Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of July 20,
`2010
`
`
`
`
`
`N1—2003
`
`l—
`
`N1 —2004
`
`l_
`
`l...—
`
`N1—2005
`
`_I—
`US. Patent No. 6,301,358, entitled “Dual—Slope Current Battery-Feed
`Circuit” (“the ’358 patent”), CHEN et a1.
`_|_
`
`N1—2006
`
`Memorandum Opinion and Order (Markman Ruling), Network-1 v.
`LCz’sco et al., Case No. 6:08-cv—00030-LED
`
`N1—2007
`
`US Published Patent Application No. 2009/0019296, entitled
`“Network System Port Thereof for Transmitting Various Signals and
`Power”, HUANG
`
`
`L_
`
`N1—2008
`
`Transcript of Jury Trial, Afternoon Session, July 14, 2010, Network—I v.
`Cisco er al., Case No. 6:08—cv—00030-LED
`_l
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2013—00071
`
`US. Patent No. 6,218,930
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & RODNEY PC
`
`Date: March 12 2013
`
`1737 King Street, Suite 500
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`Telephone (703) 836-6620
`
`By- /2M/4 2131;!
`
`Robert G. Mukai, Esq.
`Registration No. 28,531
`Counselfor NETWORK-I SECURITY
`SOLUTIONS, INC.
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2013-00071
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,218,930
`
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing NETWORK—
`
`l’S EXHIBIT INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,218,930
`
`(as of March 12, 2013) and Exhibits N1-2002 through N1-2008 are being served
`
`upon the following this 12th day of March 2013, via EXPRESS MAIL:
`
`Jeffrey D. Sanok
`Jonathan Lindsay
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`
`Intellectual Property Group
`1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.
`Washington, DC 20004—2595
`
`and Via e—mail to: AVl—PRPS@Crowell.com
`
`Date: March 12 2013
`
`
`
`W4 W
`
`Robert G. Mukai, Esq.
`Registration No. 28,531
`Counselfor NETWORK—1 SECURITY
`SOLUTIONS, INC.
`
`