throbber
http://www.ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/NSSI-Net...
`
`2/1/2013
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. (NSSI.OB-OTB: BB)
`
`
`
`CEOCFO-
`Members
`Login
`January
`28, 2011
`Issue
`
`The Most Powerful Name In Corporate News and Information
`The Most Powerful Name In Corporate News and Information
`
`The Most Powerful Name In Corporate News and InformationThe Most Powerful Name In Corporate News and Information
`CURRENT ISSUE | COVER ARCHIVES | INDEX | CONTACT | FINANCIALS | SERVICES | HOME PAGE
`No Longer a Security Software Company, Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. is
`Helping Other Companies Monetize Their Intellectual Property – the First Being a
`Patent Covering Power Over Ethernet, Which is a New Solution to Bringing
`Operating Power to Network Devices
`Company Profile:
`Network-1 is an intellectual property licensing company. It
`focuses on the acquisition, development, licensing and
`protection of intellectual property assets. The Company
`presently owns six patents (the “Patent Portfolio”) covering various telecommunications and data
`networking technologies including, among others, patents covering the delivery of power over Ethernet
`cable for the purpose of remotely powering network devices, and the transmission of audio, video and
`data over computer and telephony networks. The Company’s strategy is to pursue licensing
`opportunities with companies in the industries that manufacture and sell products that make use of the
`technologies underlying its patents as well as with other users of the technology.
`
`
`Network-1 has recently been licensing its remote power patent (U.S. Patent No. 6,218,930) covering the
`control of power delivery of Ethernet cables (the “Remote Power Patent”). The Company had entered
`into 11 license agreements with respect to its Remote Power Patent that includes, among others,
`license agreements with Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco-Linksys, Extreme Networks, Inc., Netgear, Inc.
`and several other major data networking equipment manufacturers, Microsemi Corporation and D-Link
`Corporation.
`
`
`Network-1’s strategy includes continuing to pursue licensing opportunities for the Remote Power Patent
`from vendors of Power over Ethernet equipment in order to resolve possible infringement of the Remote
`Patent by such vendors.
`
`In addition, Network-1 continually reviews opportunities to acquire or license additional intellectual
`property for the purpose of pursuing licensing opportunities. It also reviews new opportunities to form
`strategic relationships with third parties to develop, commercialize, license or otherwise monetize their
`intellectual property.
`
`
`Technology
`Security
`Software &
`Services
`(NSSI.OB-
`OTB: BB)
`
`Network-1
`Security
`Solutions,
`Inc.
`
`445 Park
`Avenue, Suite
`1028
`New York, NY
`10022
`Phone: 212-
`829-5770
`
`
`Corey M. Horowitz J.D.
`Chairman, CEO and Secretary
`Mr. Horowitz is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Network-1 and has served as Chairman of
`the Board of Directors of the Company since January 1996. Mr. Horowitz is a private investor and
`President and sole shareholder of CMH Capital Management Corp., a New York investment advisory
`and merchant banking firm, which he founded in September 1991. Mr. Horowitz has a B.A in Economics
`from the University of Michigan and a J.D. from Northeastern University School of Law. He began his
`career practicing corporate law at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in New York City.
`
`
`
`Interview conducted by: Bud Wayne, Editorial Executive, CEOCFOinterviews.com, Published – January 28, 2011
`
`CEOCFO: Mr. Horowitz, how did you come to be a part of Network-1 Security Solutions, and what is your vision for the
`company?
`Mr. Horowitz: Network-1 Security Solutions was originally a security software company. It sold software that provided
`security for networks and I had been an early investor in the company. I made several investments as far back as 1995 to
`help the company grow as a security vendor in a time when networks were growing quickly and the need for security was
`increasing. We went public in 1998. The security software space became very competitive and we weren’t executing as
`well as I thought we could have so I became more involved to help make the company more successful. However, by
`2002-2003 it was clear to me that it was not going to succeed in that business so we began to look for new business
`
`http://www.ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/NSSI-Net...
`
`2/1/2013
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`AVAYA INC. AV­1014
`Avaya Inc. v. Network­1 Security Solutions, Inc.
`IPR2013­00071
`
`

`

`http://www.ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/NSSI-Net...
`
`2/1/2013
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`opportunities. One of the opportunities presented to us was to help a company named Merlot Communications that was
`affiliated with us that needed some funding support. We analyzed the company and agreed that we would provide some
`funding for that company and in return we acquired their intellectual property and agreed to license it for the benefit of
`both companies.
`
`
`Between 1995 and 2004 a lot of companies were innovating and creating a lot of great technologies and as a result a lot
`of new patents were issued. However, a lot of companies failed and couldn’t succeed in their businesses but still had a lot
`of very interesting intellectual property. They deserve to reap the benefits of those inventions and the intellectual property,
`so we decided that we would build a business based on licensing intellectual property. We acquired the intellectual
`property from Merlot, we gave it some cash to fund its business and we gave it an interest in the outcome of our licensing
`of the intellectual property. Therefore, our vision was and is to work with companies that have intellectual property that
`don’t have the financial where-with-all or the resources to monetize that intellectual property. Network-1 will undertake to
`do it for them and share in the benefits of such licensing.
`
`
`CEOCFO: What is your current technology or product focus?
`Mr. Horowitz: Between 2004 and 2010, we spent six years licensing intellectual property related to a technology
`standard called Power over Ethernet. That standard is a standard that allows companies to send operating power over
`their data and computer networks to certain devices connected to the network. Therefore, devices attached to the
`network, whether they are VOIP telephones, network security cameras or Wi-Fi wireless access points that require power
`to operate, now can receive that operating power over the data network. Instead of having to plug every one of those
`devices into the wall, they can just plug it into their computer network and the companies can then send operating power
`over the network to those devices. Companies want to have the central delivery of operating power to power those
`devices because its easier to control the power by having it centrally supplied and backed up so you can provide for
`power in the event of a power failure.
`
`In 2003, the IEEE, which is standard body for technology improvements, came up with a way of sending operating power
`over data networks, call Power over Ethernet, that happens to use the technologies described in our patent. So basically,
`our product focus related to Power over Ethernet is to license the vendors of Power over Ethernet products to the
`technologies described in our patent.
`
`
`CEOCFO: What is your revenue model?
`Mr. Horowitz: We focus on licensing revenues. In the case of our Power over Ethernet patent we have now licenses from
`a selection of companies that pay us royalties for the use of the technologies described in the patent. Some have paid us
`one-time payments and others pay royalties through the expiration of the patent, which is 2020. They pay us based on
`the sales of those products that are licensed; those products that are compliant with the industry standard for Power over
`Ethernet. It is very good model because those are very high margin royalties. We don’t have a big infrastructure, we don’t
`have a lot of cost of goods, but we do have very high margin licensing revenues.
`
`
`CEOCFO: How many players are in this particular area you are in?
`Mr. Horowitz: Virtually every large technology company licenses their intellectual property. There are also several so-
`called non-practicing entities or partnerships that accumulate intellectual property for the purpose of licensing the patents
`to third parties.
`
`
`CEOCFO: What about the Power over Ethernet?
`Mr. Horowitz: In the Power over Ethernet space, I believe there are one or two other companies trying to license patents
`related to the technology. They have different patents than ours and I think they are in litigation presently. We have been
`in litigation twice, and both times we went were successful in licensing the patent to the defendants in the case. In fact,
`we went to trial this summer and settled during the trial resulting in licenses with Cisco Systems, Adtran, Foundry
`Networks, Extreme Networks, and Enterasys Networks. We also have licenses with NetGear, D-Link Corporation and
`Microsemi. There are also probably over two hundred other companies practicing the same Power over Ethernet
`standard that we would like to license.
`
`
`CEOCFO: Would you tell us about your revenue and financial position for Network-1?
`Mr. Horowitz: We recently released our financials for the 3rd Quarter. We had approximately $31 million in royalties
`during the quarter, but that was because we had a large payment from the settlement of our recent litigation. In 2009, we
`had royalties of about $800,000. At the end of the 3rd quarter we had about $24 million in cash.
`
`
`CEOCFO: You are on the cutting edge of technology as far as I can see!
`Mr. Horowitz: I think a lot of companies now understand the benefits of intellectual property licensing as you can see by
`all the articles and patent litigation stories that always appear in the news. Many big companies are starting to sue
`companies for patent infringement and many companies are realizing that they have a valuable asset on their balance
`sheet. Therefore, they believe its proper to monetize the asset if possible. Again, it is very expensive, very time
`consuming, very difficult, and we would like to be able to partner with companies that don’t want to do it themselves, or
`don’t know how to do it themselves. We have an expertise in the field and the people know that we can help monetize an
`asset that they otherwise wouldn’t be able to monetize.
`
`http://www.ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/NSSI-Net...
`
`2/1/2013
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`http://www.ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/NSSI-Net...
`
`2/1/2013
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`CEOCFO: You are actually sending operating power to devices over an Ethernet cable? Are there any complications to
`watch out for?
`Mr. Horowitz: You will recall those days when your phone in your home would ring when somebody called you. You
`never plugged in your phone at home into a power source. What happened was the phone company sent you power over
`the phone line. Those were telephone lines, not Ethernet cables. This is almost the same thing, but now the technology
`allows you to send it over the lines that carry data in an Ethernet network. It is going to be mixed with data. The beauty of
`the regular phone system was that everything attached to the phone lines was a telephone. In an Ethernet environment,
`lots of things can be attached to those Ethernet cables, so you don’t want to send power without knowing what is at the
`other end because the thing at the other end may not be built to accept power. What the invention covers is making sure
`that before you send power, you can be sure that the thing at the other end is something that can accept the power.
`
`
`CEOCFO: To accomplish growth what do you need to do going forward, are you going to remain focused on this remote
`power patent or are you going to look for other technologies to add to the mix?
`Mr. Horowitz: We see the industry growing by virtue of companies recognizing that they have patents and that it would
`be wise to monetize these patents. They are sitting on company’s balance sheets and they either don’t know what to do
`with them or don’t want to spend the time building a licensing company. Their business is to build products and build
`technology. Therefore, they may choose to partner with Network-1 and let us do it for them. That is where the growth is
`going to come from, aside from the fact that our royalties are growing from Power over Ethernet, because that’s a growth
`industry. We are also going to get growth because we are going to be doing this for other partners with strong patents as
`well. We are presently in conversations with lots of companies who have patents who are saying why don’t you do this for
`us? They are more than happy to let us do the work. We will do the financing; we will take the stress, take the time,
`monitor the effort and make sure it is done the right way because they don’t really know how to do this.
`
`
`CEOCFO: So this is the first of many to come then?
`Mr. Horowitz: That is our plan and objective.
`
`
`CEOCFO: In closing, why should potential investors be interested in Network-1 Security Solutions?
`Mr. Horowitz: They should be interested because companies are starting to realize how valuable intellectual property is.
`It is a very difficult endeavor, so very few people have the expertise that we have. It is not as though you are going to
`have lots of competition because at the end of the day patents are monopolies, so nobody else can have the same patent
`you have. We manage the process well, we have low overhead, low expenses and high margin revenues and we have an
`expertise that few other people have. It makes for an interesting story because there are very few public opportunities to
`do this. We believe our stock is very attractive for these reasons and because it is trading at a discount to the value of the
`deals we already have in place.
`
`disclaimers
`
`Any reproduction or further distribution of this article without the express written consent of
`CEOCFOinterviews.com is prohibited.
`
`We are presently in conversations with lots of companies who have patents who are saying
`why don’t you do this for us? They are more than happy to let us do the work. We will do the
`financing; we will take the stress, take the time, monitor the effort and make sure it is done the
`right way because they don’t really know how to do this. - Corey M. Horowitz J.D.
`
`Therefore, our vision was and is to work with companies that have intellectual property that
`don’t have the financial where-with-all or the resources to monetize that intellectual property.
`Network-1 will undertake to do it for them and share in the benefits of such licensing. - Corey
`M. Horowitz J.D.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ceocfointerviews.com does not purchase or make
`recommendation on stocks based on the interviews published.
`
`http://www.ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/NSSI-Net...
`
`2/1/2013
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket