`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 12
`
`Entered: April 26, 2013
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`CHI MEI INNOLUX CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY
`LABORATORY CO., LTD.
`Patent OWNER
`_______________
`
`Cases IPR2013-00060 (Patent 7,697,102 B2)
`IPR2013-00064 (Patent 7,923,311 B2)
`IPR2013-00065 (Patent 7,923,311 B2)
`IPR2013-00066 (Patent 7,876,413 B2)
`IPR2013-00068 (Patent 8,068,204 B2)1
`_______________
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KARL D. EASTHOM, and KEVIN F.
`TURNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This order addresses an issue that is identical in all five cases. Therefore, we
`exercise discretion to issue one order to be filed in each of the five cases. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent
`papers since doing so may cause confusion.
`
`
`
`CASES IPR2013-00060, 00064, 00065, 00066, 00068
`Patent 7,697,102 B2, 7,923,311 B2, 7,876,413 B2, 8,068,204B2
`
`
`
`On April 24, 2013, the initial conference call for related cases IPR2013-
`
`00028 and IPR2013-00038 was held. During the call, counsel for CMI
`
`indicated that CMI has undergone a name change. Despite CMI counsel’s
`
`representation made during the call that the company is the same and that the
`
`real party-in-interest has not changed (that only the name of the real party-in-
`
`interest has changed), the company name change should be identified to make
`
`clear who is the petitioner in this proceeding. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3).
`
`Accordingly, CMI was ordered to provide an update for related cases
`
`IPR2013-00028 and IPR2013-00038. The same update would appear to be
`
`appropriate in these five related cases as well.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that CMI shall provide an update of its company name
`
`change in compliance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3) 2 by April 30, 2013 in the
`
`above captioned cases.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 In the event that the name change occurred more than twenty-one (21) days
`ago, the 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3) twenty-one (21) day requirement is waived for
`the sole purpose of allowing CMI to update its notice information. 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.5(b).
`
`
`
`CASES IPR2013-00060, 00064, 00065, 00066, 00068
`Patent 7,697,102 B2, 7,923,311 B2, 7,876,413 B2, 8,068,204B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Scott McKeown
`cpdocketMcKeown@oblon.com
`
`Gregory S. Cordrey
`gcordrey@jmbm.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Eric Robinson
`erobinson@riplo.com
`
`Sean Flood
`sflood@riplo.com
`
`Stanley Schlitter
`sschlitt@steptoe.com
`
`Douglas Peterson
`dpeterson@steptoe.com
`
`Mark Murphy
`Mark.murphy@huschblackwell.com
`
`Edward Manzo
`Edward.manzo@huschblackwell.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`