throbber
SEL EXHIBIT NO. 2014
`INNOLUX CORP. v. PATENT OF SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY
`LABORATORY CO., LTD.
`
`IPR2013-00064
`
`

`

`Anisotropic Si deep beam etching with profile control using SF6/O2 Plasma
`H. Zou
`
`Microsystem Technologies 10 (2004) 603–607 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004
`DOI 10.1007/s00542-003-0338-3
`
`603
`
`In our investigation, SF6 and O2 are chosen for RIE
`etching of silicon. In a plasma containing SF6 and O2, each
`gas has its own specific function, so by altering the flow
`rate of one of the gases, changes to the etch profile can be
`achieved. The SF6 and O2 generate F and O free-radicals
`under the influence of strong electric fields generated in
`the reactive ion etcher. The F radicals initiate a chemical
`reaction with silicon, producing the highly volatile by-
`product SiF4. The O radicals act to passivate the silicon
`surface by forming SiOxFy (siliconoxyfluoride). In addi-
`tion to generating F radicals, SF6 is also the source of SFþ
`x
`ions, which act to remove the oxyfluoride layer. Alternate
`formation and removal of the oxyfluoride layer is the en-
`abling mechanism behind anisotropic etching of silicon
`[9–12].
`Substrate damage and mask erosion can be minimised
`through appropriate lowering of ion energy. Etch profile is
`also more controllable at lower ion energies. Ion energy is
`governed by the dark space voltage, Dv, which is the po-
`tential developed between the plasma and the powered
`electrode. The O2 creates high voltages, whereas SF6 results
`in lower voltages. The Dv voltage also increases with
`increasing input power, RRF and decreasing system pres-
`sure, p. The relationship can be expressed qualitatively as
`[13]:
`PRF F½O2Š
`p F½SF6Š
`where F[gas] refers to the gas flow rate. The dark space
`voltage is not easily measured. In practice DC bias is
`measured instead, as this is known to increase with
`increasing dark space voltage [9]. In the etching of silicon
`using the SF6=O2 mixture, there is a continual competition
`between etching and passivating reactions caused by F
`and O free-radicals, respectively. When RF power, system
`pressure and gas flow rates are at the right levels, etch
`features with vertical side walls result.
`
`Dv a
`
`ð1Þ
`
`Abstract This paper presents the results of dry plasma
`etching of single crystal silicon using SF6 and O2 as process
`gases in a traditional Reactive Ion Etcher. The highly
`anisotropic profiles are achieved for a deep beam feature
`with depths in excess of 100 lm. The effect of O2 con-
`centration on both etch rate and etch profile is investigated
`across a range of chamber pressures. Etch profile anisot-
`ropy can be controlled through appropriate variations in
`O2 and SF6 flow rate and SEM images are provided to show
`this effect over a range of chamber pressures and RF
`powers. Our results indicate O2 concentration to be the
`primary factor influencing etch profile, while system
`pressure is shown to have a strong influence over etch rate.
`Shadowing effect also has been discussed for the possible
`application of releasing the freestanding beams. These
`results aided in the formulation of a suitable process for
`fabricating long-travel electrothermally actuated beam
`structures with the depth and width of 100 lm and 20 lm.
`The ratio of beam depth to the mask-undercut is 10:1. This
`etching technique is resulting in the successful fabrication
`of thermoelectrically-driven long-travel beam structures.
`
`1I
`
`ntroduction
`An important factor in any silicon etch process is the
`ability to control the profile of the etch cavity. In the
`fabrication of MEMS sensors and actuators, vertical walls
`are especially desirable [1–4]. Reactive ion etching (RIE) is
`a popular choice for etching silicon; here, fluoride-based
`plasmas are used because of their ability to spontaneously
`react with silicon at room temperature to create isotropic
`etch features. Anisotropic etching and high etch rates have
`been demonstrated in RIE plasmas containing SF6 and O2
`[5–8].
`
`2E
`
`xperimental
`Etching trials were conducted using an Oxford Instru-
`ments PlasmaLab 80+ reactive ion etcher. Figure 1 shows
`the key components featured in the etcher.
`The PlasmaLab 80+ consists of a pair of parallel plate
`electrodes connected to a 13.56 MHz RF generator, capa-
`ble of automatic matching. The base-plate electrode is
`20 cm in diameter and is water-cooled, allowing an
`adjustable temperature range of 5–20 °C. Base-plate
`temperature was maintained at 20 °C for all experiments.
`
`Received: 17 April 2003 / Accepted: 9 September 2003
`
`H. Zou
`Optical and Semiconductor Devices Group,
`Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
`Imperial College London, Exhibition Road,
`London SW7 2BT, UK
`e-mail: h.zou@imperial.ac.uk
`
`The author would like to thank Professor R. R. A. Syms and
`Mr Michael Larsson for encouraging and useful discussions
`during this work. This project is supported by the EPSRC under
`grant GR/R07844/01.
`
`

`

`photoresist, which is itself patterned using standard pho-
`tolithography processes. Sample sizes were approximately
`3.5 cm2 in area, and a dummy 4-inch wafer was employed
`to maintain loading consistency between trials.
`
`3R
`
`esults and discussions
`
`Oxygen concentration
`The effect of oxygen concentration on etch rate and profile
`has been investigated. Keeping the SF6 flow rate and
`substrate electrode temperature constant, the system
`pressure is set at 30 and 200 mTorr, respectively. The ef-
`fect of increments in oxygen concentration on etch rate
`and etch profile is demonstrated in Figs. 2 and 3, respec-
`tively.
`Figure 2 indicates an increase in silicon etch rate up to
`a maximum, followed by a decrease, with increasing
`oxygen flow rate. The maximum etch rate with system
`pressure set to 200 mTorr is approximately twice that of
`the minimum value. In addition, the etch rate is greater
`when system pressure is at 200 mTorr rather than
`30 mTorr.
`At low oxygen concentrations, further increments of
`oxygen have the effect of facilitating the conversion of
`SF6 to F radicals, as the oxygen reacts with fluorosul-
`phur radicals, thereby hindering their reaction with F
`radicals and the subsequent re-formation of sulphur
`hexafluoride (SF6). The result is a net increase in the
`concentration of fluoride radicals, leading to an increase
`in the silicon etch rate. At high oxygen concentrations,
`however, there is competition between the F and O
`radicals for reaction with silicon; the former resulting in
`etching, the latter resulting in surface passivation. At
`very high oxygen concentrations, the silicon etch rate is
`retarded due to polymerisation on the side walls and
`bases of etch trenches. The polymers protect the silicon
`from reaction with F radicals, thereby, causing a de-
`crease in silicon etch rate with further increases in oxy-
`gen concentration [9, 12].
`The effect of oxygen concentration on silicon etch
`profile is shown in Fig. 3. The SF6 flow rate and system
`pressure are kept constant at 12 sccm and 200 mTorr,
`respectively. At an oxygen flow rate of 4 sccm (Fig. 3a), the
`silicon etch profile is largely isotropic (i.e. non-direc-
`tional). At a flow rate of 6 sccm (Fig. 3b), the degree of
`
`604
`
`Fig. 1. RIE PlasmaLab 80+ component layout
`
`Fig. 2. Si etch rate dependency on O2 flow rate: 12 sccm SF6 at
`160 W RF power, with DC bias varying from 360 to 387 V at
`30 mTorr and from 117 to 175 V at 200 mTorr
`
`Gas-flows are controlled by a standard mass-flow regulator
`and mixed prior to entering the chamber via the gas inlet.
`Etch profile is investigated by sectioning samples and
`viewing in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Mea-
`surements of etch depth and lateral etch of the vertical face
`beneath the mask layer are made using the SEM.
`All samples used originate from 4-inch <100> oriented,
`phosphorous-doped single crystal silicon wafers, with
`resistivity within the range 1–10 Xcm. The etch mask used
`is 2000 ˚A thick chromium, applied via sputtering.
`Patterning of the chromium layer is achieved using a
`1.3 lm layer of Shipley S1813 positive-working
`
`Fig. 3. SEM cross section micrographs of 30 lm wide trenches etched at different O2 flow rates of a 4 sccm, b 6 sccm, c 9 sccm,
`d 12 sccm respectively. Other conditions: SF6: 12 sccm; system pressure: 200 mTorr, RF power: 160 W
`
`

`

`isotropy is reduced, and the side-wall profile can best be
`described as following a negative taper. At an oxygen flow
`rate of 9 sccm (Fig. 3c), side-walls exhibit a dual positive-
`negative taper, with the overall result close to 90° with
`respect to the horizontal. Finally, at an oxygen flow rate of
`12 sccm, the side-walls exhibit a positive taper and the
`base of the etch trench becomes rounded (Fig. 3d).
`
`increasing system pressure until a pressure of 180 mTorr,
`after which the silicon etch rate continues to increase, but
`at a lower rate. A maximum etch rate of approximately
`880 nm/min is reached at a system pressure of 200 mTorr.
`The increase in etch rate with system pressure is directly
`attributable to the increase in plasma ion density resulting
`from increasing system pressure.
`
`System pressure
`Silicon etch rate is found to be strongly dependent upon
`system pressure; this is shown in Fig. 4. The SF6 and O2
`flow rates are kept constant at 12 sccm and 7 sccm,
`respectively and RF power maintained at 200 W. System
`pressure is varied between 150 mTorr and 200 mTorr. A
`monotonic increase in silicon etch rate is observed with
`
`Fig. 4. Si etch rate as a function of system pressure: 2 sccm SF6,
`7 sccm O2 at 200 W RF input power, with DC bias varying from
`223 to 167 V
`
`Fig. 5. Layout of electrothermally driven, long-travel beam res-
`onator
`
`605
`
`Anisotropic etching of the long-travel beam resonator
`The layout of an electrothermally-driven, long-travel beam
`resonator [3] is shown in Fig. 5. The intention is to fab-
`ricate the device using deep anisotropic reactive ion
`etching. The design in question has dimensions
`L ¼ 14 mm, W ¼ 25 lm and H ¼ 100 lm.
`The device is fabricated from a <100> oriented single
`crystal silicon wafer. A 2000 ˚A thick chromium etch-mask
`was applied via sputtering. Release of the long-travel
`beams is to be achieved via a final isotropic etch step.
`Figure 6 shows SEM images of beam-tips to illustrate
`the variation in anisotropy achieved at various oxygen
`flow rates, and the details of the processing parameters are
`summarized in Table 1. Figure 6a, b and c indicate the
`influence of an increase in oxygen flow rate on the etched
`profiles with the fixed SF6 flow rate, RF power and system
`pressure. An anisotropic profile can be obtained at an
`oxygen flow rate of 8 sccm (Fig. 6b). However oxygen flow
`rates of 5 sccm and 10 sccm, either side of this critical
`point, lead to worsening of beam profile; with either neg-
`ative taper (Fig. 6a) or positive taper (Fig. 6c), respec-
`tively.
`Comparison of Fig. 6d and 6e show the effect of a de-
`crease in system pressure from 200 mTorr to 160 mTorr
`on etch profile. It can be seen that the decrease in system
`pressure (all other process parameters remaining con-
`stant) results in a decrease in lateral etch in the region of
`side-wall directly beneath the etch mask; the reduction is
`from 11 lm to 8 lm. A reason for this observed decrease
`stems from the fact that at lower system pressures, fewer
`reactive ions exist within the chamber at any one time,
`resulting in fewer collisions and fewer chances for poorly
`directed ions to cause lateral etching.
`Figure 7 shows an isometric view of a long-travel beam
`resonator, formed via anisotropic reactive ion etching;
`etching parameters being 12 sccm SF6, 7 sccm O2, 200 W RF
`power and 160 mTorr’s of system pressure. The depth and
`
`Fig. 6. Variations in etch profile with various O2 flow rates a
`5 sccm, b 8 sccm, c 10 sccm; other parameters, SF6 12 sccm, RF
`power 200 W, system pressure 160 mTorr. SEM images showing
`
`anisotropic etching with different system pressure, d 200 mTorr,
`e 160 mTorr. Other parameters; SF6 12 sccm, RF power 200 W,
`O2 7 sccm
`
`

`

`Table 1. Processing para-
`meters for anisotropic etching
`of long, narrow and deep beam
`
`Samples
`
`SF6 flow
`(sccm)
`
`O2 flow
`(sccm)
`
`RF Power
`(W)
`
`Pressure
`(mTorr)
`
`Beam depth
`(lm)
`
`Mask-undercut
`(lm)
`
`(a)
`(b)
`(c)
`(d)
`(e)
`
`12
`12
`12
`12
`12
`
`5
`8
`10
`7
`7
`
`200
`200
`200
`200
`200
`
`160
`160
`160
`200
`160
`
`100
`95
`115
`110
`105
`
`10
`8
`9
`11
`8
`
`606
`
`Free-standing features, such as single lines or walls,
`which are subject to ion bombardment at angles-of-inci-
`dence deviating from the vertical, will eventually assume a
`negative taper. Such an effect can be used to under etch
`free-standing beams with negatively sloping side walls that
`eventually meet on the underside (Fig. 8).
`
`4C
`
`onclusions
`The anisotropic etching of single crystal silicon using SF6
`and O2 process gas mixtures has been demonstrated using
`a PlasmaLab 80+ RIE system. Our results suggest O2
`concentration to be the principal factor influencing etch
`profile, while etch rate is strongly affected by system
`pressure. Based on these findings, process recipes were
`developed to achieve anisotropic profiles for fabricating
`deep beams with the depth and width of 100 lm and
`20 lm. The ratio of beam depth to the mask-undercut is
`10:1. This etching technique allowed the successful fabri-
`cation of thermoelectrically-driven long-travel beam
`structures.
`
`References
`1. Syms RRA; Moore DF (2002) Optical MEMS for telecommu-
`nications. Materials Today July/August Issue: 26–35
`2. Syms RRA; Lohmann A (2002) A Tuning mechanism for
`a MEMS external cavity laser. Proceedings of IEEE/LEOS
`International Conference on Optical MEMS and their
`Applications, Lugano, Switzerland, 20–23 August:
`paper ThD4
`3. Syms RRA (2002) Long-travel electrothermally-driven reso-
`nant cantilever microactuators. J Micromech Microeng 12:
`211–218
`4. Jansen HV; de Boer MJ (1996) High aspect ratio trench
`etching for MEMS applications. Proceedings of IEEE The
`Ninth Annual International workshop Micro Electrical
`Mechanical System, San Diego, USA, pp. 250–257
`
`Fig. 7. Isometric view of long-beam resonator structure after
`isotropic etching, showing beam profiles a, c and d and electro-
`thermal actuator b. Etch conditions: SF6 12 sccm, O2 7 sccm, RF
`power 200 W, system pressure 160 mTorr
`
`Fig. 8. Free-standing beam with negatively sloped sidewalls
`etched by ions at angles-of-incidence deviating from the vertical
`direction
`
`width of the beam are 105 lm and 20 lm, respectively. The
`ratio of beam depth to the mask-undercut is 10:1. The
`cantilever beams were released using SCREAM processing
`[14]. After anisotropic etching the freestanding beams were
`released by isotropic etching of the SF6 plasma.
`
`Shadowing effect
`Ions with an angle-of-incidence substantially different to
`the vertical are prevented from proceeding along their
`intended path by the sidewalls of narrow trenches and / or
`nearby free-standing features; the effect is known as
`‘shadowing’. Shadowing of ions by beam or trench side-
`walls is one reason for the decrease in etch-rate that is
`observed with increasing feature aspect ratio, known as
`RIE-lag [15–17], if the etch rate is substantially governed
`by ion assistance.
`
`

`

`5. D’Emie CPD; Chan KK; Blum J (1992) Deep trench plasma
`etching of single crystal silicon using SF6/O2 gas mixtures.
`J Vac Scl Technol B 10(3): 1105–1110
`6. Pomot C; Mahi B; Petit B; Arnal Y; Pelletier J (1986)
`Anisotropic etching of silicon using an SF6/Ar microwave
`multipolar plasma. J Vac Scl Technol B 4(1): 1–5
`7. Francou M; Danel JS; Peccoud L (1995) Deep and fast plasma
`etching for silicon micromachining. Sens Actuators Phys A
`46–47: 17–21
`8. Darbyshire DA; Pitt CW; Stride AA (1987) Fabrication of
`large scale optical components in silicon by reactive ion
`etching. J Vac Sci Technol B 5(2): 575–578
`9. Manos DM; Flamm DL (1989) Plasma Etching: An Intro-
`duction. Academic Press, Boston, London
`10. Bosch Gmbh RB (1994) U.S. Pat. 4855017, U. S. Pat. 4784720,
`and Germany Pat. 4241045C
`11. Syau T; Baliga BJ; Hamaker RW (1991) RIE of Si trenches
`using SF6/O2 gas mixtures. J Electrochem Soc 138(10): 3076–
`3081
`12. Legtenberg R; Jansen H; Deboer M; Elwenspoek M (1995)
`Anisotropic RIE of Si using SF6/O2/CHF3 gas mixtures.
`J Electrochem Soc 142(6): 2020–2028
`
`13. Jansen HV; Deboer MJ; Legtenberg R; Elwenspoek MC (1995)
`The black silicon method: A universal method for determin-
`ing the parameter setting of a fluorine based reactive ion
`etcher in deep silicon trench etching with profile control.
`J Micromech Microeng 5: 115–120
`14. Shaw KA; Zhang ZL; MacDonald NC (1994) Scream I: a single
`mask, single-crystal silicon, reactive ion etching process for
`microelectromechanical structures. Sensors and Actuators A
`40: 63–70
`15. Volland BE; Heerlein H; Kostic I; Rangelow IW (2001) The
`application of secondary effects in high aspect ratio dry
`etching for the fabrication of MEMS. Microele Eng 57–58:
`641–650
`16. Cardinaud C; Peignon MC; Tessier PY (2000) Plasma etching:
`principles, mechanisms, application to micro- and nano-
`technologies. Appl Surf Sci 164: 72–83
`17. Arnold JC; Gray DC; Sawin HH (1993) Influence of reactant
`transport of fluorine reactive of ion etching of deep trenches
`in silicon. J Vac Sci Technol B 11(6): 2071–2080
`
`607
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket