`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`INNOLUX CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PATENT OF SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY LABORATORY CO., LTD.
`Patent Owner
`
`CASE IPR2013—00064
`
`PATENT 7,923,311
`
`MANDATORY NOTICES BY PATENT OWNER UNDER 37 CFR § 42.8
`
`Pursuant
`
`to 37 CFR § 42.8(a)(3), Patent Owner Semiconductor Energy
`
`Laboratory Co., Ltd., updates the following mandatory notices. Specifically, additional
`
`backup counsel Stanley A. Schlitter and Douglas R. Peterson, who represent the Patent
`
`Owner in related civil matter Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v. Chimei
`
`Innolux Corp., have been appointed by the Patent Owner to provide representation in
`
`this inter partes review proceeding and to support the Patent Owner in the discovery
`
`and trial phases thereof.
`
`It respectfully is submitted that the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board has allowed multiple back-up counsel in at least one other inter partes reviewr
`
`proceeding,
`
`including related matters lPR2013-00028 and lPR2013-00038. See also
`
`Nissan v. Collins,
`
`lPR2012-00035, Order After Conference Call (Paper 13) dated
`
`November 9, 2012.
`
`
`
`— 2 —
`
`|PR2013—00064
`
`Attorney Docket No. 0756—9974
`
`(1) Real Party-in-Interest
`
`The real party—in—interest
`
`for
`
`the Patent Owner
`
`is Semiconductor Energy
`
`Laboratory Co., Ltd., a Japanese Corporation with its principal place of business located
`
`at 398, Hase, Atsugi—shi, Kanagawa—ken, 243—0036 Japan.
`
`(2) Related Matters
`
`US. Patent No. 7,923,311 was asserted against Petitioner Chi Mei lnnolux in a
`
`civil action styled Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v. Chimei lnnolux Corp.,
`
`et al., Case No. SACV 12—0021-JST (CD. Cal).
`
`Inter Partes Review No.
`
`lPR2013—00065 was filed by Petitioner with respect to
`
`the involved patent.
`
`(3) Lead and Back-up Counsel
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 8.5. , _.
`
`Enc J. Robinson
`Sean C. Flood
`
`Reg. No. 38,285
`
`
`
`
`
`
`erobinson@riplo.com
`sflood@riplo.com
`
`571 434—6789 (voice)
`571-434—6789 (voice)
`
`
`
`703—766-2394 (facsimile)
`703-766-2394 (facsimile)
`
`
`
`
`
`B
`on
` pic
`Stanley A. Schlitter
`Douglas R. Peterson
`
`
`
`
`Reg. No. 28,799
`Reg. No. 53,458
`
`
` Steptoe & Johnson LLP
`
`Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office, PC.
`3975 Fair Ridge Drive
`Suite 20 North
`
`Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office, PC.
`3975 Fair Ridge Drive
`Suite 20 North
`
`Reg. No. 64,378
`
`Fairfax, VA 22030 .
`
`Fairfax, VA 22030
`
`
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP
`
`
`
`— 3 —
`
`lPR2013-00064
`
`Attorney Docket No. 0756—9974
`
`
`
`115 South LaSalle Street
`Suite 3100
`
`Chicago, IL 60603
`
`2121 Avenue of the Stars
`Suite 2800
`
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`
`sschlitt@steptoe.com
`dpeterson@steptoe.com
`
`312—577—1 250 (voice)
`310—734-3269 (voice)
`
`(4) Service
`
`Please address all correspondence in this matter to lead and backup counsel at
`
`the address provided above.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Eric J. Robinson
`
`Reg. No. 38,285
`
`Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office, RC.
`3975 Fair Ridge Drive
`Suite 20 North
`
`Fairfax, Virginia 22033
`(571) 434-6789
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that the foregoing MANDATORY NOTICES OF PATENT OWNER
`
`UNDER 37 CFR § 42.8 was served on the Petitioner by Federal Express Standard
`
`Overnight at the following addresses on May 7, 2013.
`
`Scott A. McKeown
`
`Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.
`1940 Duke Street
`
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`GregoryS. Cordrey
`Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
`3 Park Plaza, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-2592
`
`24% I
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
