`
`By: Richard D. MC Leod (Reg. No. 46,921)
`rick.mcleod@klarquist.com
`Michael D. Jones (Reg. No. 41,879)
`michael.jones@l<larquist.com
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 SW. Salmon Street
`
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595—5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595—5301
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`ABB INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V .
`
`ROY—G—BIV CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR20l3-00062
`
`Patent 6,516,236
`
`_.._—_—___-______-___
`
`DECLARATION OF JAMES S. ALEX
`
`ABB v ROY-G-BIV
`
`ABB - EXHIBIT 1146
`
`TRIAL IPR2013-00062
`
`TRIAL IPR2013-00282
`
`
`
`1, JAMES S. ALEX, hereby declare and state as follows:
`
`Case IPR2013AOOO62
`
`Patent 6,516,236
`
`1.
`
`I am counsel for petitioner ABB Inc. in the related district court
`
`proceeding, ROY-G—BIV Corporation v. ABB Ina, MEADWESTVA CO TEXAS, LP
`
`AND MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION, Case No. 6:1 Lev-00622 (ED. Tex,
`
`filed November 15, 2011).
`
`2.
`
`I make this declaration in support of petitioner ABB Inc’s opposition
`
`to patent owner ROY—G-BIV (“RGB”)’s motion to submit supplemental evidence.
`
`I am familiar with the facts set forth in this declaration.
`
`3.
`
`I searched for Marc McClung using an internet browser.
`
`It was a
`
`simple matter and it took me approximately 10 minutes to locate him. To find
`
`Marc McClung’s contact information, I searched for him using Google Search,
`
`and was able to locate him on his current employer’s website.
`
`4.
`
`Marc McClung was no longer an employee of Parker Hannifm when I
`
`searched for him.
`
`5.
`
`
`The website for his employer is wwdragnetsolutions.com, and the
`
`company’s contact information is included in the website.
`
`6.
`
`On February 11, 2014 I called the phone number listed on Dragnet
`
`Solutions Inc’s website, and was able to reach Marc McClung.
`
`Declaration of James S. Alex
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 1PR2013—00062
`
`Patent 6,516,236
`
`7.
`
`After an introduction, Marc McClung briefly spoke with me regarding
`
`the circa 1994 collaboration effort between RGB and Compumotor regarding a
`
`specification for a WOSA motion control APl/SPI specification (the
`
`“Collaboration”), and he was able recall the Collaboration with reasonable
`
`accuracy.
`
`8.
`
`On February 17, 2014, 1 called Marc McClung again to ask whether
`
`he would have an informal telephone conversation regarding the Collaboration,
`
`and he agreed.
`
`9.
`
`During a later phone call also on February 17, 2014, Marc McClung
`
`elaborated on his involvement in the Collaboration, and agreed to have a more
`
`detailed informal discussion with counsel for ABB lnc. regarding the
`
`Collaboration.
`
`10.
`
`On February 25, 2014, I spoke with Marc McClung again on the
`
`telephone, and he agreed to have an informal discussion with counsel for ABB
`
`Inc. on Tuesday March 11, 2014 regarding the Collaboration.
`
`1 1.
`
`Also during the February 25 discussion, Marc McClung agreed to
`
`receive a subpoena for a deposition and document production. The deposition
`
`was noticed for March 14, 2014, and was not drawn to the informal discussion to
`
`take place on March 11, 2014.
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00062
`
`Patent 6,516,236
`
`12. Also during the February 25 discussion, Marc McClung indicated to
`
`me that he did not have any documents relevant to the Collaboration, and that any
`
`of his work emails from that time frame would be in Parker’s possession.
`
`13.
`
`On March 11, 2014, ABB Inc’s counsel, including myself, Jeremy
`
`Dutra, and Rob Nupp, called Marc McClung for an informal discussion regarding
`
`the Collaboration. This phone call lasted approximately three hours.
`
`14. ABB Inc. did not at any time retain Mr. McClung as a consultant and
`
`did not compensate Mr. McClung for his time spent engaged in informal
`
`conversations.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and
`
`further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and that such willful
`
`false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent issued
`
`thereon.
`
`Date: March 26, 2014
`
`/:}.1
`3
`iI
`j
`
`
`/;’MUM;
`
`Page 3
`
`