throbber

`
`Filed on behalf of Roy-G-Biv Corporation
`
`
`By: Richard T. Black
`Foster Pepper PLLC
`1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400
`Seattle, Washington 98101-3299
`Tel:
`(206) 447-6251
`Fax: (206) 749-2062
`Email:
`BlacR@foster.com
`Registration No.: 40514
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`ABB, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ROY-G-BIV CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`_____________________
`
`Trial No.: IPR2013-00062
`(pursuant to Joinder with IPR2013-00282)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,516,236B1
`___________________
`
`DECLARATION BY RICHARD T. BLACK
`IN SUPPORT OF PATENT OWNER’S
`MOTION TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1. My name is Richard T. Black. I have personal knowledge of the facts
`
`contained in this Declaration, am of legal age, and am otherwise competent to
`
`testify.
`
`2.
`
`I am lead counsel for Patent Owner in this proceeding, Roy-G-Biv
`
`Corporation. Both of my backup counsel also represent Plaintiff Roy-G-Biv.
`
`Corporation (RGB) in the co-pending District Court Litigation, Roy-G-Biv
`
`Corporation v. ABB, Inc., et al. Case No. 6:11-cv-00622, (E.D. Tex.) (the
`
`Litigation), in which RGB alleges infringement of the same RGB patents at issue
`
`in IPR2013-00062, 00063, and 00074, i.e., U.S. Patent Nos. 6,516,236; 6,513,058;
`
`and 8,073,557 (Patents-in-Suit).
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, ABB subpoenaed Parker-Hannifin
`
`Corporation (Parker) for documents from Compumotor on or about February 8,
`
`2013 (See ABB Subpoena to Parker-Hannifin, Exhibit 2020-1). Upon information
`
`and belief, Parker produced responsive documents to ABB and RGB on or about
`
`March 8, 2013. Upon information and belief, prior to this time, RGB produced
`
`numerous documents to ABB concerning RGB’s dealings with Compumotor in the
`
`1994 timeframe. Upon information and belief, some but not all the Parker
`
`produced documents were previously produced to ABB by RGB. Upon
`
`information and belief, on or about April 15, 2013, ABB filed under seal and
`
`served on RGB
`
`its First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`Counterclaims alleging, inter alia, that the Patents-in-Suit incorporate ideas
`
`conceived by Compumotor, including Marc McClung.
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, on or about September 18, 2013, ABB
`
`served Supplemental Initial Disclosures disclosing Stuart Goodnick and Marc
`
`McClung, both Compumotor employees during the relevant time period, as
`
`persons having knowledge of relevant facts concerning the conception of the
`
`subject matter disclosed in the Patents in Suit and knowledge concerning the
`
`design, development, manufacture, operation, marketing and/or sales of one or
`
`more prior art Parker systems, including Motion Toolbox and Motion Architect.
`
`(See ABB’s First Supplemental Initial Disclosures, See Exhibit 2020-2.) Id. at p. 5.
`
`5.
`
`On or about January 23, 2014 at the Trial in the proceedings IPR2013-
`
`00062 and IPR2013-00074, Mr. McLeod, lead counsel for ABB, asserted with
`
`regard to the July 24, 1994 Design Specification and Analysis Specification that
`
`RGB attached as Exhibit 2010-1 and 2, that there was, “no evidence that they were
`
`communicated to another person at a specific date and a specific form with specific
`
`information in them.” (See Oral Hearing Transcript in IPR2013-00062, Paper 76,
`
`page 16:25-17:2). He also stated with respect to the “need for independent third-
`
`party corroboration” that “[t]hey have none. They’ve admitted they have none. It’s
`
`simply not there.” Id. at page 68, 13-18. The above Design Specification exhibit
`
`was also introduced at Mr. McClung’s deposition as Exhibit 5 and was referred to
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`therein as the 2nd RGB Spec. (See Exhibit 2020-5). At the February 27, 2014 Trial
`
`in IPR2013-00063, it became apparent that the Board might view as necessary
`
`evidence of completely
`
`independent,
`
`third party corroboration of RGB’s
`
`conception evidence.
`
`6.
`
`ABB noticed Marc McClung’s Deposition on or about February 28,
`
`2014, the day after the IPR final hearing in IPR2013-00063. ABB took his
`
`deposition on or about March 14, 2014 (See Notice of Deposition, Exhibit 2020-3),
`
`after RGB had cancelled claims in proposed IPR2013-00122 and it had therefore
`
`been terminated by the Board.
`
`7.
`
`At his deposition, Mr. McClung testified that ABB and certain
`
`Compumotor employees had been working together regarding the co-pending
`
`litigation for some time. (Ex. 2021, McClung Transcript at 204:20-207:1)
`
`8.
`
`ABB counsel took both direct and redirect examination of this witness
`
`at his deposition on a variety of topics, including independent corroboration of
`
`RGB’s conception evidence. Upon information and belief, ABB has had access to
`
`the RGB-produced Compumotor documents and the Parker-produced Compumotor
`
`documents and elicited much of the corroborating testimony itself. After RGB’s
`
`counsel asked questions of Mr. McClung, ABB’s counsel asked questions on re-
`
`direct of McClung and had the opportunity during its re-direct to ask further
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`questions on proof of corroboration. (Exhibit 2021, McClung Transcript at 214:3—
`
`218:25.)
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, RGB attempted to expedite delivery, but
`
`the final deposition transcript of Mr. McClung’s deposition was not available until
`
`March 21, 2014. (See Mark McClung Transcript, Exhibit 2021). On that same day,
`
`RGB sought a conference call with the Board.
`
`10.
`
`I
`
`further declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true, and further that
`
`these statements were made with the
`
`knowledge that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine
`
`or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States
`
`Code, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the
`
`application or any patent issued thereon.
`
`Executed this 24th day of March, 2014 at Seattle, Washington.
`
`x'f—m“
`i
`if
`r
`/
`’u/
`,. fajwzywiy-ar.
`
`«"7"
`f
`
`“"77
`
`Richard T. Black
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket