throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PATENT OF SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY LABORATORY CO., LTD.
`I
`Patent Owner
`
`CASE |PR2013—00038
`
`PATENT 7,956,978
`
`PATENT OWNER’S LISTING OF ANTICIPATED MOTIONS FOR
`
`DISCUSSION IN INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL
`
`

`

`An initial conference call is scheduled in this matter for April 23, 2013 at 2
`
`PM EST. Pursuant to the Oflz‘ce Patent Trial Practice Guide (OPTPG), 77 Fed.
`
`Reg, 48765 (Aug. 14, 2012), Patent Owner submits this initial listing of motions it
`
`may bring during this trial. Patent Owner reserves its right to seek authorization to
`
`bring additional motions, or to decide not to bring motions as indicated, as
`
`circumstances may warrant.
`
`1. Motion to Amend the Claims
`
`On April 4, 2013, Patent Owner filed a Request for Rehearing on the Board’s
`
`Decision to institute inter partes review, which is currently pending. Depending on
`
`Patent Owner’s continuing evaluation of the Board’s Decision, and upon the
`
`Board’s decision on Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing, Patent Owner may
`
`move to amend or propose substitute claims pursuant to 37 CPR. § 42.121 for one
`
`or more of the claims of US. Patent 7,956,978 for which a trial has been granted.
`
`2. Motion to Take Discovery Relating to the Identification of
`Real Parties—In—Interest Under 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2)
`
`Depending on the Board’s decision on Patent Owner’s Request
`
`for
`
`Rehearing, Patent Owner may move to take additional discovery1 regarding the
`
`identification of real parties-in—interest with respect to the current Petition. The
`
`1 This includes, potentially, a reasonable number of requests for production,
`interrogatories, requests for admission, and depositions of persons knowledgeable of
`the relevant facts.
`
`2
`
`

`

`identification of the real parties-in—interest in the Petition is required under 35
`
`U.S.C.
`
`§ 312(a)(2). More specifically,
`
`the additional discovery may seek
`
`information concerning the involvement of Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei
`
`Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Acer America Corporation, VieWSonic Corporation,
`
`VIZIO, Inc., and Westinghouse Digital, LLC, in the preparation and filing of the
`
`current Petition.
`
`Dated: April 18, 2013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Eric J. Robinson
`
`Sean C. Flood
`
`ROBINSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`
`LAW OFFICE, PC.
`
`3975 Fair Ridge Drive,
`Suite 20 North
`
`Fairfax, Virginia 22033
`(571) 434—6789
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that the foregoing LISTING OF ANTICIPATED MOTIONS was
`
`served on the Petitioner by Federal Express Standard Overnight at the following
`
`addresses on April 18, 2013.
`
`Scott A. McKeown
`
`Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.
`1940 Duke Street
`
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`Gregory S. Cordrey
`Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
`3 Park Plaza, Suite 1100
`
`Irvine, CA 92614-2592
`
`Stanley Gibson
`Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
`3 Park Plaza, Suite 1100
`
`Irvine, CA 92614—2592
`
`1;?»
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket