throbber

`USPAP Q&A
`
`
`
`June 2007
`
`
`Vol. 9, No. 6
`
`This communication by the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) does not establish new standards
`or interpret existing standards. The ASB USPAP Q&A is issued to inform appraisers, regulators,
`and users of appraisal services of the ASB responses to questions raised by regulators and
`individuals; to illustrate the applicability of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
`Practice (USPAP) in specific situations; and to offer advice from the ASB for the resolution of
`appraisal issues and problems.
`
`
`Is an AVM an Appraisal?
`
`Question:
`Are the results from an Automated Valuation Model (AVM) an appraisal?
`
`Response:
`No. Advisory Opinion 18, Use of an Automated Valuation Model (AVM), states:
`
`
`An AVM’s output is not, by itself, an appraisal, and communication of an AVM’s
`output is not, in itself, an appraisal report.
`
`
`An AVM is a tool that delivers an estimation or calculation, whereas an appraiser arrives
`at a value opinion by applying his or her judgment and experience. An appraisal is
`defined as “an opinion of value,” which is distinctly different from an estimate or
`calculation of value. An AVM uses automated processes and cannot produce an opinion
`of value because only individuals can exercise judgment and form opinions. An AVM is
`just one tool among many that an appraiser might use to arrive at an opinion of value.
`
`Appraisers are cautioned that this response is based on the USPAP definition of
`“appraisal.” Jurisdictions that use a different definition of “appraisal” may reach a
`different conclusion.
`
`Appraiser’s USPAP Obligations When Using an AVM
`
`Question:
`What are an appraiser’s USPAP obligations when using an Automated Valuation Model
`(AVM)?
`
`Vol. 9, No. 6
`
`June 2007
`
`
`
` 1
`
`MICROSTRATEGY 1018
`Microstrategy, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc.
`IPR2013-00034
`
`

`

`
`
`Page 2
`
`USPAP Q&A
`
`
`Response:
`Many appraisers use calculators, spreadsheets, analytic software, and similar tools to
`analyze market data and calculate assignment results. The nature of the appraiser’s
`service and how these tools are used are important factors in recognizing USPAP
`obligations. When appraisers use an AVM it can be as part of an appraisal assignment
`that provides value opinions to the client, or it may be for an assignment to run the AVM
`and provide the output to the client.
`
`Advisory Opinion 18, Use of an Automated Valuation Model (AVM), provides advice to
`help appraisers properly distinguish among the uses of an AVM.
`
`An appraiser who uses an AVM for any purpose is subject to the requirements of USPAP
`that apply to all appraisal practice: the DEFINITIONS, the PREAMBLE, the Conduct,
`Management, and Confidentiality sections of the ETHICS RULE, the COMPETENCY
`RULE, the JURISDICTIONAL EXCEPTION RULE and the SUPPLEMENTAL
`STANDARDS RULE.
`
`When the assignment includes providing an opinion of value for real property, the
`assignment is an appraisal and STANDARDS 1 and 2 also apply.
`
`
`
`
`Each year the ASB compiles the monthly USPAP Q&A into a publication entitled Frequently
`Asked Questions, or FAQ’s. In addition to compiling the new FAQ’s for the year, all of the
`FAQ’s in the publication are reviewed and updated, if necessary, to ensure they represent the
`most recent guidance from the Board. Frequently Asked Questions is published as an adjunct to
`each edition of USPAP, and has become a valuable reference for appraisers, users of appraisal
`services, and regulators. The Frequently Asked Questions publication can be purchased for
`$20.00 by visiting the “Foundation Store” page on The Appraisal Foundation website
`(https://commerce.appraisalfoundation.org ).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For further information regarding
`USPAP Q&A, please contact:
`
`John S. Brenan, Director of
`Research and Technical Issues
`
`The Appraisal Foundation
`1155 15th Street, NW, Suite 1111
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`(202) 624-3044
`(202) 347-7727 fax
`john@appraisalfoundation.org
`
`
`
`June 2007
`
`
`Vol. 9, No. 6
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket