`USPAP Q&A
`
`
`
`June 2007
`
`
`Vol. 9, No. 6
`
`This communication by the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) does not establish new standards
`or interpret existing standards. The ASB USPAP Q&A is issued to inform appraisers, regulators,
`and users of appraisal services of the ASB responses to questions raised by regulators and
`individuals; to illustrate the applicability of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
`Practice (USPAP) in specific situations; and to offer advice from the ASB for the resolution of
`appraisal issues and problems.
`
`
`Is an AVM an Appraisal?
`
`Question:
`Are the results from an Automated Valuation Model (AVM) an appraisal?
`
`Response:
`No. Advisory Opinion 18, Use of an Automated Valuation Model (AVM), states:
`
`
`An AVM’s output is not, by itself, an appraisal, and communication of an AVM’s
`output is not, in itself, an appraisal report.
`
`
`An AVM is a tool that delivers an estimation or calculation, whereas an appraiser arrives
`at a value opinion by applying his or her judgment and experience. An appraisal is
`defined as “an opinion of value,” which is distinctly different from an estimate or
`calculation of value. An AVM uses automated processes and cannot produce an opinion
`of value because only individuals can exercise judgment and form opinions. An AVM is
`just one tool among many that an appraiser might use to arrive at an opinion of value.
`
`Appraisers are cautioned that this response is based on the USPAP definition of
`“appraisal.” Jurisdictions that use a different definition of “appraisal” may reach a
`different conclusion.
`
`Appraiser’s USPAP Obligations When Using an AVM
`
`Question:
`What are an appraiser’s USPAP obligations when using an Automated Valuation Model
`(AVM)?
`
`Vol. 9, No. 6
`
`June 2007
`
`
`
` 1
`
`MICROSTRATEGY 1018
`Microstrategy, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc.
`IPR2013-00034
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`USPAP Q&A
`
`
`Response:
`Many appraisers use calculators, spreadsheets, analytic software, and similar tools to
`analyze market data and calculate assignment results. The nature of the appraiser’s
`service and how these tools are used are important factors in recognizing USPAP
`obligations. When appraisers use an AVM it can be as part of an appraisal assignment
`that provides value opinions to the client, or it may be for an assignment to run the AVM
`and provide the output to the client.
`
`Advisory Opinion 18, Use of an Automated Valuation Model (AVM), provides advice to
`help appraisers properly distinguish among the uses of an AVM.
`
`An appraiser who uses an AVM for any purpose is subject to the requirements of USPAP
`that apply to all appraisal practice: the DEFINITIONS, the PREAMBLE, the Conduct,
`Management, and Confidentiality sections of the ETHICS RULE, the COMPETENCY
`RULE, the JURISDICTIONAL EXCEPTION RULE and the SUPPLEMENTAL
`STANDARDS RULE.
`
`When the assignment includes providing an opinion of value for real property, the
`assignment is an appraisal and STANDARDS 1 and 2 also apply.
`
`
`
`
`Each year the ASB compiles the monthly USPAP Q&A into a publication entitled Frequently
`Asked Questions, or FAQ’s. In addition to compiling the new FAQ’s for the year, all of the
`FAQ’s in the publication are reviewed and updated, if necessary, to ensure they represent the
`most recent guidance from the Board. Frequently Asked Questions is published as an adjunct to
`each edition of USPAP, and has become a valuable reference for appraisers, users of appraisal
`services, and regulators. The Frequently Asked Questions publication can be purchased for
`$20.00 by visiting the “Foundation Store” page on The Appraisal Foundation website
`(https://commerce.appraisalfoundation.org ).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For further information regarding
`USPAP Q&A, please contact:
`
`John S. Brenan, Director of
`Research and Technical Issues
`
`The Appraisal Foundation
`1155 15th Street, NW, Suite 1111
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`(202) 624-3044
`(202) 347-7727 fax
`john@appraisalfoundation.org
`
`
`
`June 2007
`
`
`Vol. 9, No. 6
`
`2
`
`