`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 15
` Entered: 3 January 2013
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`MICROSTRATEGY, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Patent of ZILLOW, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR-2013-00034
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, JOSIAH C. COCKS, and MICHAEL W. KIM,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`ORDER – AUTHORIZING MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION – 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`On December 17, 2012, the Patent Owner (Zillow) filed a motion for pro
`
`
`
`hac vice admission of Mr. Ramsey M. Al-Salam, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10. Any
`
`opposition to that motion was due on December 24, 2012. As of January 3, 2013,
`
`Petitioner has filed no opposition.
`
`
`
`The motion is supported by the declaration of Mr. Ramsey M. Al-Salam.
`
`Mr. Al-Salam states that he has not been suspended or disbarred from practice
`
`10
`
`before any court or administrative body, that he has never had an application for
`
`
`
`Case IPR 2013-00034
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`admission to practice before any court or administrative body denied, and that no
`
`sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against him by any court or
`
`administrative body. (Declaration ¶¶ 2-4).
`
`
`
`Mr. Al-Salam further states that he has read and will comply with the Office
`
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42
`
`of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that he will be subject to the USPTO Code
`
`of Professional responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). (Declaration ¶¶ 5-6).
`
`
`
`Zillow represents that Mr. Al-Salam has advised Zillow on various patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`issues and has appeared as lead counsel for Zillow in at least five district court
`
`11
`
`patent suits. According to Zillow, Mr. Al-Salam is knowledgeable about the
`
`12
`
`technology to which this proceeding relates and is acting as lead counsel for a third
`
`13
`
`party in a separate district court litigation involving technology similar to that
`
`14
`
`described in the instant patent, Patent 7,970,674.
`
`15
`
`
`
`We have also reviewed a copy of Mr. Al-Salam’s biography submitted with
`
`16
`
`the motion as Exhibit A.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`
`
`
`
`On the basis of the foregoing, it is
`
`ORDERED that Zillow’s motion for pro hac vice admission of Mr. Ramsey
`
`19
`
`M. Al-Salam, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, is granted.
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR 2013-00034
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`For PETITIONER
`
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Thomas A. Rozylowicz
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`APSI@fr.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER
`
`Steven D. Lawrenz
`Ryan J. McBrayer
`PERKINS COIE, LLP
`slawrenz@perkinscoie.com
`RMcBrayer@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`
`-3-