throbber
Trial@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 15
` Entered: 3 January 2013
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`MICROSTRATEGY, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Patent of ZILLOW, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR-2013-00034
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, JOSIAH C. COCKS, and MICHAEL W. KIM,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`ORDER – AUTHORIZING MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION – 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`On December 17, 2012, the Patent Owner (Zillow) filed a motion for pro
`
`
`
`hac vice admission of Mr. Ramsey M. Al-Salam, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10. Any
`
`opposition to that motion was due on December 24, 2012. As of January 3, 2013,
`
`Petitioner has filed no opposition.
`
`
`
`The motion is supported by the declaration of Mr. Ramsey M. Al-Salam.
`
`Mr. Al-Salam states that he has not been suspended or disbarred from practice
`
`10
`
`before any court or administrative body, that he has never had an application for
`
`

`
`Case IPR 2013-00034
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`admission to practice before any court or administrative body denied, and that no
`
`sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against him by any court or
`
`administrative body. (Declaration ¶¶ 2-4).
`
`
`
`Mr. Al-Salam further states that he has read and will comply with the Office
`
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42
`
`of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that he will be subject to the USPTO Code
`
`of Professional responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). (Declaration ¶¶ 5-6).
`
`
`
`Zillow represents that Mr. Al-Salam has advised Zillow on various patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`issues and has appeared as lead counsel for Zillow in at least five district court
`
`11
`
`patent suits. According to Zillow, Mr. Al-Salam is knowledgeable about the
`
`12
`
`technology to which this proceeding relates and is acting as lead counsel for a third
`
`13
`
`party in a separate district court litigation involving technology similar to that
`
`14
`
`described in the instant patent, Patent 7,970,674.
`
`15
`
`
`
`We have also reviewed a copy of Mr. Al-Salam’s biography submitted with
`
`16
`
`the motion as Exhibit A.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`
`
`
`
`On the basis of the foregoing, it is
`
`ORDERED that Zillow’s motion for pro hac vice admission of Mr. Ramsey
`
`19
`
`M. Al-Salam, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, is granted.
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR 2013-00034
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`For PETITIONER
`
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Thomas A. Rozylowicz
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`APSI@fr.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER
`
`Steven D. Lawrenz
`Ryan J. McBrayer
`PERKINS COIE, LLP
`slawrenz@perkinscoie.com
`RMcBrayer@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`
`-3-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket