throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Page 1
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) CASE: IPR2013-00112
`) Patent 5,779,334
`)
`
`))
`
`))
`
`XILINX, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`VS.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I
`LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`*********************************************************
`ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
`A. BRUCE BUCKMAN
`AUGUST 7, 2013
`*********************************************************
`
`ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF A. BRUCE BUCKMAN,
`produced as a witness at the instance of the Patent
`Owner, and duly sworn, was taken in the above-styled and
`numbered cause on August 7, 2013, from 9:41 a.m. to 12:46
`p.m., before Lisa C. Hundt, CSR, RPR, CLR in and for the
`State of Texas, reported by machine shorthand, at the law
`offices of Haynes and Boone, located at 2505 North Plano
`Road, Suite 4000, Richardson, Texas, in accordance with
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the provisions
`stated on the record or attached hereto.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`IVI LLC Exhibit 2019
`XILINX V. IVI LLC
`IPR Case 2013-00029
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 2
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S
`FOR THE PETITIONER:
`Mr. David L. McCombs
`HAYNES AND BOONE
`2323 Victory Avenue
`Suite 700
`Dallas, Texas 75219
`214.651.5533
`972.692.9116 Fax)
`david.mccombs@haynesboone.com
`
`FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
`
`Mr. George E. Quillin
`FOLEY & LARDNER
`3000 K. Street, N.W.
`Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20007
`202.672.5413
`202.672.5399 (Fax)
`gquillin@foley.com
`
`ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Don Coulman, Intellectual Ventures
`Mr. Michael Barnes, Videographer
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`INDEX
`
`Page 3
`
`PAGE
`Appearances.......................................... 2
`Exhibits............................................. 3
`Stipulations......................................... 4
`A. BRUCE BUCKMAN
`4
`Examination by Mr. Quillin....................
`Examination by Mr. McCombs.................... 58
`Reporter's Certificate............................
`
`PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
`DESCRIPTION
`NO.
`1001 U.S. Patent Number 5,779,334
`1002 U.S. Patent Number 5,264,951
`1003 U.S. Patent Number 5,287,131
`1009 Excerpts from Guided Wave Photonics
`
`PAGE
`10
`16
`37
`47
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`P R O C E E D I N G S
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: On the record at 9:41.
`Today is Wednesday, August 7th, 2013. This is the
`videotaped deposition of Dr. Bruce Buckman. This is the
`beginning of Tape 1, Volume 1.
`Will counsel please state their
`appearances and any agreements for the record.
`MR. QUILLIN: I'm George Quillin with
`Foley & Lardner, LLP, representing patent owner,
`Intellectual Ventures. With me is Don Coulman, in-house
`counsel for the patent owner.
`MR. MCCOMBS: My name is David McCombs
`with Haynes and Boone, and I'm here for Xilinx, the
`petitioner.
`
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Any agreements?
`MR. QUILLIN: We'll handle it later.
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter
`please swear in the witness.
`BRUCE BUCKMAN, Ph.D.,
`having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
`EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. QUILLIN:
`Q.
`Good morning, Dr. Buckman.
`A.
`Good morning, Mr. Quillin.
`Q.
`Please state your name for the record.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`My name is Alvin Bruce Buckman. I go by my
`A.
`middle name, Bruce.
`Q.
`You've been deposed before, so you understand
`that you're under oath and that your testimony is being
`video-recorded?
`A.
`I do.
`Q.
`Are you taking any medications that would
`interfere with your testifying today?
`A.
`I'm not aware of any of their capabilities to
`interfere with my testifying. I take a list of
`medications.
`Q.
`And -- and your cell phone's turned off?
`A.
`My cell phone is turned off, yes.
`Q.
`What did you do to prepare for today's
`deposition?
`A.
`I reviewed the documents of the case, the
`patent in suit, the -- the prior art patent documents, my
`declarations that I previously made for this patent, and
`the transcript of my last deposition.
`Q.
`Any other documents?
`A.
`I believe that covers it.
`Q.
`How much time did you spend preparing for
`today's deposition?
`A.
`I spent the afternoon with -- with David and a
`team here, but not all of that was preparing for this
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 6
`deposition. We were working on some -- some other things
`as well. And in addition to that, I spent a couple of
`hours in the evening.
`Q.
`So --
`A.
`So a total --
`Q.
`Rough total?
`A.
`Total in preparing for the -- the deposition
`itself of maybe four hours altogether.
`Q.
`What's a pixel?
`A.
`A pixel is a piece of a larger image usually
`or -- let's be more general than image, let's instead say
`a pattern -- a piece of a pattern, which is discrete in
`nature.
`Is that sometimes a term used instead of the
`Q.
`term "picture element"?
`A.
`It has similarity to the term "picture
`element." Picture element doesn't connote to me the same
`idea of discreteness necessarily. An element of a
`picture could be a color in the picture or could be a
`number of other things. Picture element is a much more
`general idea than pixel.
`Q.
`Is there a physical thing that you think of
`when you think of a pixel?
`A.
`Any kind of physical thing? That's a very
`general question. Can you possibly be a little more
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`specific than that?
`Q.
`I'm -- I'm trying to understand, in the context
`of the technology that's involved here, what a person of
`skill in the art would understand a -- a pixel to mean?
`A.
`A personal of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand a pixel to be a part of a pattern; and within
`that pixel or part of a pattern, there's negligible or no
`variation of the physical parameter in question that
`makes up the pattern.
`Q.
`Does a pixel exist apart from a pattern?
`A.
`I suppose that, in general, you could look at a
`pixel had been extracted from some image or some pattern
`and say, for example, in some sort of pattern or array,
`this pixel has certain characteristics, such as maybe in
`this pixel the underlying device is on or off; that is, a
`pixel carries with it a characteristic such as on or off.
`That's an example.
`Q.
`How does a pixel work?
`A.
`A pixel doesn't really need to work. A pixel
`is part of a -- is part of a pattern. An assemblage of
`pixels can be perceived either -- if we're talking about
`visual pixels and a picture which is perhaps the best
`example, okay, a -- a visual pixel is part of the overall
`picture. It has characteristics associated with it.
`Simple black and white kind of an image, it's either dark
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`or it's light. It may in some cases have varying levels
`of darkness or lightness. But whatever the pixel is,
`there are some parameters that one can use like light or
`dark to describe the condition of that pixel.
`And the way that -- to get back to your
`original question, the way a pixel works when a pixel is
`part of a pattern is to make up or to constitute that
`particular spatial part of the pattern over the extent of
`the pixel.
`Q.
`How many pixels are there in a VGA resolution
`display?
`I'd have to look that up. I don't know off the
`A.
`top of my head.
`Q.
`Big number, small number?
`A.
`Pretty big number.
`Q.
`Can you approximate it?
`A.
`Well, a typical picture that's on your computer
`screen, for instance, a picture that you look at on your
`computer screen might -- might be 1024-by-1024 just as --
`just as an example. So the entire picture might be made
`up of roughly a million pixels.
`But the -- that -- that number is elastic.
`It depends on the resolution of what's -- what's doing
`the image. You can have something that's high definition
`or something in your computer that makes up a -- a large
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 9
`picture that contains a great many more pixels than that.
`Q.
`In such a display, like a VGA resolution
`display, are the pixels arranged know in an XY array to
`allow for forming of an image?
`A.
`They're -- they're typically arranged in an XY
`array that one would naturally describe using a Cartesian
`or rectangular coordinates system.
`Q.
`Multiple rows and multiple columns?
`A.
`Rows and columns or I like to think of it
`simply as spatial -- spatial coordinates with some
`granularity associated with them, describable in terms of
`a coordinate system, the most natural one being
`rectangular.
`Q.
`What about for liquid crystal displays in the
`mid-1990s, were the pixels arranged in an XY array to
`allow for forming of an image?
`A.
`In general with an electrically driven pixel --
`I'm sorry, an electrically driven display, the
`organization of electrical cells is in an array, which
`you can describe with a set of locations in XY Cartesian
`coordinates.
`Q.
`So was that a "yes" to my question? In a -- in
`a liquid crystal displays in the mid-1990s, were pixels
`displayed in an XY array to allow for forming an image?
`A.
`That answer's yes.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 10
`Okay. Let me hand you an exhibit. I've handed
`Q.
`you what's been previously marked as Xilinx's
`Exhibit 1001, which is U.S. Patent Number 5,779,334.
`You're familiar with this patent?
`A.
`Yes, I am.
`Q.
`Who is the inventor?
`A.
`The inventor is a Mr. Kikinis, if I'm
`pronouncing that correct.
`Q.
`And when was the patent application filed?
`A.
`The filing date listed is January 8, 1997.
`Q.
`Do you recognize this patent as a continuation
`in part of U.S. Patent 5,632,545?
`A.
`Yes. What I see here is a continuation in part
`of an application, which I'm assuming became '545.
`Q.
`Please turn to column 1 of the '334 patent.
`And near the top of that column, you'll see the heading
`"Field of the Invention." Under that heading, please
`read into the record the sentence about the field of the
`invention.
`A.
`In column 1, beginning at about line 7, the
`title of that paragraph is "Field of Invention," and the
`paragraph itself reads, "The present invention is in the
`area of video projection display and pertains more
`particularly to such displays using liquid crystal
`displays" [as read].
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`In the LCDs of the '334 patent, what role do
`Q.
`the pixels play?
`A.
`In the LCDs, the pixels play the role of the
`locations where the transmissivity or the transmission of
`the LCD display is set at the value that corresponds to
`the value for that color at that location, which one can
`measure with X and Y coordinates.
`So at a pixel, at that location and in the
`immediate neighborhood of that location, the
`transmissivity of a particular LCD is set to a value and
`that setting is done through external control -- control
`of the spatial light modulator of which the LC -- the LCD
`is a member of a class of devices called spatial light
`modulator.
`Q.
`Would a person of ordinary skill in the art in
`the mid-1990s understand the pixels of the '334 patent
`LCD to be arranged in an XY array to allow for forming of
`an image?
`Yes, a person of ordinary skill in the art
`A.
`would understand these pixels to be arranged in a
`rectangular array.
`Q.
`As of the filing date of the '334 patent, were
`pixels in a conventional LCD individually addressable?
`A.
`In order for the LCD to play this role we've
`talked about is a spatial light modulator, one has to be
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`able to, if one is going to display any image or any --
`any pattern one wants to display, one has to be able to
`individually address the pixels.
`Q.
`Are the pixels of the LCDs of the '334 patent
`individually addressable?
`A.
`It's a spatial light modulator, so by some
`scheme, the individual pixels have to be individually
`assignable, which means addressable. When you -- when
`you say "address," what you're saying, in effect, in
`terms of instructions is, I want this pixel located at
`some coordinate X and Y to be transmissive or
`nontransmissive or on or off if it's a -- if it's a light
`modulator that works in reflection or some other way,
`the -- the assignment that one makes is setting a
`transmissivity of a pixel to the desired value.
`So in one way or another, if one's going
`to display completely general patterns or images, any --
`any image one can conceive of, which is something that
`a -- that an imaging system basically needs to do, you
`have to be able to, in some way, individually address
`positions in the pixel. And by "individually address,"
`what I mean is to -- to assign and get in -- within
`operation then a value of transmission that one wants.
`Q.
`In the context of video projector systems, what
`is an LCD cell?
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`An LCD cell is -- I interpret that as being
`A.
`a -- another way to describe pixels. It's a -- it's a
`part of the spatial light modulator that corresponds to a
`particular position on a two-dimensional surface that
`corresponds to, in the case of a color projector, the
`transmissivity at a particular color.
`Q.
`So is it fair to say that your view is that the
`term "cell" in this context is a synonym for pixel?
`A.
`It's like a pixel; that is, there are -- there
`are full color LCD arrays where within one particular
`area of the picture, the red, green, and blue
`transmissivities are -- at that same physical location
`are set to three different assigned values. And in that
`case, if the color operations that are done separately in
`the '334 patent are done all at once in the same -- in
`the same cell, in a colored spatial light modulator, then
`one might consider that within this one pixel or cell,
`the way I'm -- I'm using the word, I have the capability
`to set the transmissivity for red and green and blue, all
`three.
`So does the question make any sense, how -- how
`Q.
`is a pixel related to an LCD cell? Does that question
`make any sense?
`A.
`As stated, I'm sorry to say no.
`Q.
`Okay. Is a matrix addressable display a
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`display in which electrical signals are applied to
`individual pixels to place or encode information on the
`display?
`Could I hear it again, that question again?
`A.
`Could she read it back, or could you restate it?
`Q.
`Is a matrix addressable display a display in
`which electrical signals are applied to individual pixels
`to place or encode information on the display?
`A.
`I think I would reverse the two parts of that
`definition you gave me. I think that a -- a display in
`which one can electrically address the different
`locations, that is a matrix display. Matrix display
`may -- may be broader.
`Q.
`In a color display, do you believe the cell
`includes the three pixels, red, green, and blue?
`A.
`A display might be different from a spatial
`light modulator. That is the overall purpose of the '334
`patent and a lot of the other prior art we've looked at
`in this case is to finally produce a color image where
`they're at a particular location in the -- in the
`pattern. There's a particular value for the red, the
`green, and the blue light.
`That might be -- somebody of ordinary
`skill in the art would understand that that might be
`accomplished with a color spatial light modulator, a
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`single one, where the cells or the pixels were organized
`in such a way that you got actions on the red, the green,
`and the blue parts of the light that's incident on the --
`on the spatial light modulator to begin with.
`But when you state it more generally in
`terms of the -- the cells or pixels or individual parts
`of an image, there are -- one of skill in the art would
`recognize there are multiple ways to accomplish that.
`Q.
`Do you agree that as of the filing date of the
`'334 patent, a person of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand the term "matrix" to mean a rectangular
`arrangement of elements into rows and columns?
`A.
`A person of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand that the rectangular arrangement of rows and
`columns is a matrix. Matrix, in the understanding of
`somebody of ordinary skill in the art, it's also a
`mathematical term which can be more general than a
`rectangular arrangement of rows and columns.
`We have a construction made by the board
`here, which makes -- equates matrix with this rectangular
`arrangement. But your question was, I believe, if I
`interpreted it correctly, how would somebody of ordinary
`skill in the art understand matrix.
`Q.
`You mentioned the board's definition. Do you
`think the board got it wrong in defining matrix?
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`No. I'm not saying that the board got it
`A.
`wrong, but you asked me what somebody of ordinary skill
`in the art would understand. And anybody who studied
`linear algebra as part of an engineering education
`understands that the word "matrix" goes further than
`that. This is a -- this is a definition of matrix
`that's -- that the board made that is tied to a -- an
`arrangement in two-dimensional space.
`Q.
`Let me hand you another exhibit. I just handed
`you what's been previously marked as Xilinx's
`Exhibit 1002 U.S. Patent Number 5,264,951. The inventor
`is Takanashi. You're familiar with this patent?
`A.
`Yes, I am.
`Q.
`Do you believe that Takanashi uses the phrase
`"LCD array spatial light modulator"?
`A.
`I would have to do a word search with a
`computer to answer your question accurately. I can't do
`it from memory.
`Q.
`No, I -- would you like to take a moment to
`look through it and see if can you find it?
`A.
`To be honest, I don't trust my capability to do
`a visual word search in any length of time which you
`might call reasonable. If you want me to do it, I will
`be -- I'll be happy to do it. It may take a while.
`Q.
`Well, I'll represent to you that our side has
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`looked through it and we can't find that phrase anywhere
`in Takanashi.
`A.
`All right. I take your representation.
`Q.
`Do you believe that Takanashi uses the term
`"array"?
`Same answer. I would have to do a word search
`A.
`to give you a definitive answer. And it would take a
`long time to do it visually.
`Q.
`You don't remember doing such a search before
`you wrote your declaration?
`A.
`I may have. I don't remember whether I did or
`did not.
`So as we sit here today, you don't have a
`Q.
`recollection that Takanashi does have the term "array" in
`it?
`
`That's correct, I don't have a recollection.
`A.
`Are all spatial light modulators addressed in
`Q.
`the same fashion?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`What are the differences?
`A.
`The differences -- not to get too detailed but
`to stick with classes of differences, I'll start with how
`they're driven, how -- how they're operated, what type of
`physical effect is made use of in order to cause it to do
`what all spatial light modulators do; that is, create a
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`particular pattern of transmissivity versus the
`coordinates X and Y.
`In -- in a broad classification scheme,
`it's possible to do that electrically with electrical
`signals, as we've already talked about a little bit this
`morning. It's also possible to do it optically with
`light that's not part of the image to be formed. But
`light, for example, of another wavelength, which is used
`to operate the spatial light modulator and to tell it
`what pattern of transmissivity versus X and Y to impose
`on the light that's going through it.
`Q.
`Other than electrically and optically
`addressable spatial light modulators, are there other
`categories?
`A.
`There are -- I'm aware of some acoustically
`driven spatial light modulators in the guided weight
`optics space, where an acoustic wave propagating across a
`material through which some light is coming causes a
`variation in the transmissivity. So electrical and
`optical are -- I characterize them as the main
`operational mechanisms, but they're not the only ones.
`Q.
`Is it correct that one difference between
`spatial light modulators that are optically addressed, as
`distinct from those that are electrically addressed, is
`that the optically addressed spatial light modulators do
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`not use a matrix?
`A.
`No, I don't believe that's true.
`Q.
`Why is that?
`A.
`Considering what a spatial light modulator is,
`a consideration of that to someone of ordinary skill in
`the art who wants to operate one and is perhaps trying to
`choose between optical addressing and electrical
`addressing for his or her particular application, to
`consider the types of modulators, that person also as to
`consider the driving mechanism of the modulator. The
`driving mechanism of a spatial light modulator, be it
`optical or be it electrical, is what produces the matrix
`nature of the transmissivity.
`Q.
`Is the spatial light modulator of Takanashi an
`electrically addressed one or an optically addressed one?
`A.
`Takanashi is optically addressed.
`Q.
`How does the write light -- W-R-I-T-E -- how
`does the write light of Takanashi function?
`A.
`The write light of Takanashi, insofar as
`Takanashi talks about it and he's very terse in talking
`about it, Takanashi -- the write light of Takanashi
`serves to change the local state of his spatial light
`modulator from transmissive to nontransmissive. It sets
`the value of the transmissivity at some location.
`Q.
`Is it your view that in Takanashi there are
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`individually addressable pixels?
`A.
`Effectively, yes.
`Q.
`So you believe in -- that in Takanashi a pixel
`at one XY coordinate could be addressed differently than
`a pixel at a different XY coordinate?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`Do you believe that the write light in
`Takanashi creates a pixilated image?
`A.
`Practically speaking, yes.
`Q.
`What do you mean by "practically speaking"?
`A.
`I mean inevitably; I mean in a real device.
`Q.
`Are you aware of real devices that embody
`Takanashi?
`A.
`No. But I understand somebody of ordinary
`skill in the art would understand how Takanashi's device
`works. And in understanding how -- how it works, one has
`inevitably a -- we use the term pixilated, discretized,
`granular, whatever terminology you might want to use,
`that the -- that the distribution of write light over the
`surface, that's what creates the spatial light modulator
`effect, how the write light is distributed over the
`surface of this liquid crystal. How that driving light
`is distributed over the surface, that's a matrix.
`Q.
`A rectangular array of rows and columns?
`A.
`Because the write light has that same
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`distribution with respect to the X and the Y coordinate,
`one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that
`that produces a matrix, a rectangular arrangement.
`Q.
`Does the charge-generating photo-conducting
`layer of Takanashi interact with a single pixel or with
`all the pixels?
`A.
`The charge-generating layer is excited by the
`write light in order to change the electric field that
`the liquid crystal sees, and hence change the
`transmissivity. The excitation of that is local. It's
`associated with a particular value of X and Y, and that
`excitation depends on how the write light is spatially
`distributed with respect to X and Y.
`Q.
`Are the pixels of the display in Takanashi
`individually addressable?
`A.
`With the correct distribution of write light,
`
`yes.
`
`I evidently didn't understand your answer to
`Q.
`the question about the charge-generating photo-conducting
`layer of Takanashi and whether it interacts with a single
`pixel or with all of the pixels simultaneously.
`What's -- what's your understanding of that?
`A.
`Okay. In your earlier question, you didn't use
`the word "simultaneous" -- or simul -- "simultaneously."
`Simultaneously refers to, in my understanding, an
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`ordering in time.
`Q.
`Okay.
`A.
`In principle, one can address two or more
`different pixels or different elements of this
`rectangular matrix, if you will, at the same time
`simultaneously. That's -- can be the case with -- with
`write light in Takanashi correctly presented. That is,
`forming the write light, the W-R-I-T-E light in the
`right, R-I-G-H-T, way one can address two different
`pixels simultaneously.
`Q.
`Where does Takanashi teach that?
`A.
`Takanashi simply talks about using the write
`light to create this pattern in the liquid crystal, which
`in his patent functions as a spatial light modulator. So
`it is a spatial light modulator that's -- that's driven
`optically rather than electrically.
`Takanashi simply talks about the write
`light during this process of energizing the photo
`conductive layer in the crystals so as to create this
`pattern of transmissivity. If the device is to be a
`spatial light modulator, it has to effect the
`transmissivity differently at different values for X
`and Y.
`
`So that says to me, says to one of
`ordinary skill in the art, that regardless of how it
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`might be distributed over time, simultaneously or not,
`setting that aside, that at different positions,
`different values of X and Y, that the write light is
`different.
`Q.
`If you'd turn to Figure 17 of Takanashi.
`A.
`Okay.
`Q.
`What element or elements in Figure 17 of
`Takanashi represent the matrix?
`A.
`The matrix is created, as I've explained or
`tried to, by the write light at different positions
`within these liquid crystals. And the write light in
`Figure 17 of Takanashi is inconveniently not shown. I
`believe he states that it's not shown. But it's -- I
`think he also states that it's there. I'd have to look
`for that, but I do recall that kind of a statement about
`the write light in Figure 17.
`But if you look at Figure 17, you don't
`find any WL designations, which refer to the write light.
`Q.
`So is it correct that, in your view, Figure 17
`of Takanashi does -- does not illustrate an element or
`elements that represent a matrix?
`A.
`No. I think -- if you're speaking literally of
`Figure 17 and only Figure 17, and you draw boundaries
`around Figure 17 and talk in terms of what is there in
`Figure 17 and what is not, since there's no write light
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`depicted in Figure 17 -- although he says in the text
`that it's there -- since there's no write light depicted
`in Figure 17, since it's the write light that creates the
`matrix in this type of -- of liquid crystal spatial light
`modulator, the precise answer to your question is that
`the matrix nature of the light modulators is not depicted
`explicitly in Figure 17.
`Q.
`You say that the write light creates the
`matrix. So in the absence of the write light, there is
`no matrix; is that correct?
`A.
`In the absence of write light, just no write
`light impinging at all, that's the equivalent, in more
`generic terms, of a spatial light modulator built some
`other way, say electrically, that's not driven at all.
`So in terms of the transmissivity, it's
`constant at some value over the whole surface. A -- a
`matrix isn't really -- in optical terms -- put it that
`way. In optical terms, a matrix of transmissivity is not
`created until the spatial light modulator, however it's
`addressed, is actually driven. But all spatial light
`modulators to operate must be -- must be driven whether
`it's electrical, whether it's optical, or whether it's
`something else.
`Q.
`So is it correct that to condense that -- that
`answer to say that in Takanashi, in the absence of a
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`write light, that Takanashi does not have a matrix?
`A.
`Although it's technically correct to -- to make
`that statement and stop there, it's also important and
`somebody of ordinary skill in the art would certainly
`make this operation, that without the write light in
`Takanashi, you don't have any spatial light modulation at
`all, so you don't have Takanashi's device being operable.
`That is that -- that posit you make about turning off the
`write light effectively turns off the image or pattern
`processing capability of Takanashi's invention, just as
`turning off the drive totally in -- in an electrically
`driven modulator would -- spatial light modulator would
`do the same thing, that is it would render the overall
`system that this spatial light modulator is in. In the
`invention in question, it would render it inoperable.
`Q.
`So as you take this device of Takanashi out of
`the box, before you turn on a light to do anything,
`before you do that, take the device of Takanashi out of
`the box, there's no matrix; is that correct?
`A.
`If you take the device out of the box, there
`isn't a matrix; but if there isn't a matrix, Takanashi's
`device is inoperable just as any other device employing a
`spatial light modulator would be inoperable for the
`purposes of spatial light modulation if it were not
`driven.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`It would be inoperable until you turned on the
`Q.
`light? Takanashi, you're saying, would be inoperable
`until you turned on the light?
`A.
`Until you turned on the write light, as well as
`the read light and otherwise powered up the system. And
`that situation would basically be the same in the case of
`an electrically driven light modulator. It would not be
`operable.
`It would not be operating, but I -- I want to
`Q.
`make sure I understand what you're saying. You go -- you
`know, you go to Radio Shack and you buy one of the
`Takanashi's devices, you bring it home, it's in a box.
`You take it out of the box and it's sitting on the table,
`you haven't plugged it in or turned on any lights, you're
`saying that in that condition, the device of Takanashi
`does not have a matrix?
`A.
`It doesn't have a matrix of transmissivity as a
`function of X and Y, which is -- the purpose of having a
`spatial light modulator of any kind is to create that
`distribution of transmissivity, that matrix of
`transmissivity versus X and Y. It can't create the
`matrix of transmissivity until you turn on the write
`light in the Takanashi device that you took out of the
`box.
`
`But if I took out of the box another
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`

`
`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`device, another -- another projector configured to do
`basically the same thing, it cannot create a matrix of
`transmissivity, transmissivity versus X and Y, that it
`needs in order to function unless I am turning on the
`driving mechanism for it.
`Q.
`So take, for example, the Kikinis '334 patent,
`it's Exhibit 1 -- Exhibit 1001.
`A.
`Right.
`Q.
`If you were to go to Radio Shack and get one of
`those devices, bring it home, take it out of its
`packaging box and put it on your table, before you did
`anything to it, would there be a matrix present in the
`device of Kikinis?
`A.
`There wouldn't be a spatial distribution of
`transmissivity that corresponds to what locations in the
`matrix of transmissivity get addressed and turned on or
`off until I turned on the drive to the spatial light
`modulators; and in this case, the electrical drive of the
`spatial light modulators.
`The key point here is let's not buy the
`whole device, let's take the spatial light modulating
`part of it out of the box and look at that. I'm never
`going to get a pattern, or a matrix of transmissivities,
`until I energize the device and apply some drive to it.
`There is no spatial in the spatial light modulator
`
`SOUND DE

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket