throbber
IVI LLC EXHIBIT 2011
`XILINX V. IVI LLC
`IPR Case 2013-00029
`
`

`

`5,170,271
`Page 2
`
`Mackniok et 31.. “High Resolution Displays Using
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`NCAP Liquid Crystals“, SPIE. vol. 1080, Liquid Crys-
`G. P. Montgomery: "Polymer—dispersed liquid crystal
`ta] Chemistry. Physics and Applications (1989), pp.
`films for light control applications", SPIE, vol. 1030,
`169473.
`1989, pp. 242—249.
`Takizawa et al.. “Transmission Mode Spatial Light
`Afonin et al., “Optionally Controllable Transparencies
`Based on Structures Consisting of a Photoconductor Modulator Using 3 31151020 Crystal and Polymer-Dis-
`andaPolymcr—Encapsulated Nematic Liquid Crystal",
`parsed Liquid—Crystal Layers”. Appl. Phys. Lett.
`Sov. Tech. Leit. 14(1), Jan. 1933. pp. 56, 58.
`56(11}, 12 Mar. 1990, pp. 999—1001.
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 8, 1992
`
`Sheet 1 of 5
`
`5,170,271
`
`'70TRANSMISSION
`
` 0
`
`20
`
`so
`
`40
`Harm
`Fig 1.
`
`no
`
`IOO
`
`TOV
`
`s
`
`100
`
`SST
`
`a
`
`m,
`
`Fig. 20.
`
`0
`
`so
`
`IOU
`
`Iso
`
`TlMEImSEC)—*
`
`m
`
`100
`
`IBV
`
`:00
`
`on
`
`IBV
`
`an
`
`ov
`
`o
`
`o
`
`o
`
`50
`
`IOU
`
`I50
`
`TIME (mSEH—I-
`
`F i g. 2b.
`
`a
`
`so
`
`"30150
`
`.
`
`Flg.2c.
`
`mm sun—+-
`
`m
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 3, 1992
`
`Sheet 2 of 5
`
`5,170,271
`
` 0
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`ID
`
`20
`
`Fig.3.
`
` 0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`5
`
`I0
`
`TIRE (mSEC) —~—
`
`Fig.4.l
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 3, 1992
`
`Sheet 3 of 5
`
`5,170,271
`
` 0
`
`IO
`
`[5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`5
`
`Fig.5.
`
` 0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`5
`
`IO
`
`TIME (mSEC) --*-
`
`Fig.6.
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 8, 1992
`
`Sheet 4 of 5
`
`5,170,271
`
`'00
`
`h
`
`--- VOLTAGE PULSE
`
`—-———-0PT!CAL RESPONSE
`
`%LTP - 37.4%
`
`f__...-—-
`
`0
`
`I,
`
`/
`
`‘00
`
`50
`
`V
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`| I I I :
`
`°/oT
`
`50
`
`25
`
` 75
`
`0
`
`D
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`50
`
`55
`
`TIHE (RISES) "-4“-
`
`Fig.9.
`
`

`

`nu
`
`_—
`
`US. Patent
`
`a:223.5;g
`
`
`
`$52,.2:.33:55.:
`
`0
`
`5Va.aMW.mTLSyawn—
`
`ED-5?
`
`uu
`
`E—C0_
`
`_m
`
`f
`
`5,170,271
`
`0s...
`
`“yawn.U5T1,...5
`
`138—
`
`TlHE
`
`{mSEM-Hr Fig—7.
`
`-- VOLTAGE PULSE
`
`LS_”E2Pan_9_mEm.
`..an...»NnoTil
`.LT\l.cnvnrnom“101....
`ananmm.mum..fiEmmcEEEEEEEEE
`R0saafii
`n”E:
`
`
`
` %HWm.w«an+”MPumWm.H...5
`
`Fig.8.
`
`
`
`E:223.555#
`
`
`
`3.2.8...2.:—33:52:32.
`
`U5
`
`IIIullI
`Ill-Ill.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`5,170,271
`
`SHAPED VOLTAGE PULSE METHOD FOR
`OPERATING A POLYMER DISPERSED LIQUID
`CRYSTAL CELL, AND LIGHT VALVE
`EMPLOYING THE SAME
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`This invention relates to methods for operating a
`dynamic response polymer dispersed liquid crystal
`(PDLC) cell to increase its transmissivity and reSpon-
`sivity. and to PDLC light valve systems employing
`such methods.
`2. Description of the Related Art
`Photoactivated and charge-coupled device {CCD}
`addressed liquid crystal light valves (LCLVs) are well
`known, and are described for example in Margerum et
`al., “Reversible Ultraviolet Imaging With Liquid Crys'
`tals“, Appl. Phys. Letters. Vol. 17. No. 2. 15 July 3970,
`pages 51—53. Efron et al.. “The Silicon Liquid-Crystal
`Light Valve"..1oumnl ofApplied Physics, Vol. 57, No. 4,
`15 February 1935, pages 1356—68. Efron et al.. "A Sub-
`rnicron Metal Grid Mirror Liquid Crystal Light Valve
`for Optical Processing Applications”, SPIE. Vol. 1151.
`1989. pages 591—606. and Sterling et al., “Video~Rate
`LCLV Using an Amorphous Silicon Photoconductor“.
`SID 90 Digest. Vol. 21, paper 17A.2, 16 May 1990. They
`use various types of nematic liquid crystal
`layers to
`modulate a readout light beam, which may be used in a
`transmissive or reflective mode of operation, depending
`upon the design of the LCLV and the input signal.
`Photoactivated LCLVs are often addressed with an
`input image to be amplified, such as that presented by
`the phosphor screen of a cathode ray tube or a scanning
`laser beam. particularly for dynamic modulation of a
`readout beam.
`Nematic LCLVs operate by modulating the spatial
`orientation ofthe liquid crystals in a cell, in accordance
`with the input signal pattern. This often requires the use
`of polarizers to obtain a corresponding modulation of
`the readout beam. The polarizers, however, reduce the
`total
`light
`throughput. Also. alignment
`layers are
`needed on each side of the cell for surface alignment of
`the liquid crystals, thus adding to the expense of the
`device. The response time of the nematic liquid crystal
`to changes in the voltage across the cell may also be
`somewhat limited.
`More recently, polymer dispersed liquid crystal
`(PDLC) films have been reported, including the use of
`such films in photoactive LCLVs and in active matrix
`LCLV projectiou displays. Unlike most nematic liquid
`crystal cells which modulate the optical polarization in
`response to an applied voltage, PDLCs scatter light and
`become transparent with an applied voltage. They have
`several advantages over nematic liquid crystal devices.
`including the elimination of surface alignment layers
`and polarizers. and a faster reSponse time. However,
`while PDLCs exhibit a rapid response to a shift in ap-
`plied voltage between fully OFF and fully 0N voltage
`levels, their response to gray scale levels (levels not
`fully on or fully off) is quite slow.
`LCLVs are generally Operated with an alternating
`current applied voltage, since the liquid crystals tend to
`deteriorate under a DC voltage. There have been sev-
`eral reports of the response of PDLC-type films to
`Square wave type voltage pulses. including the use of
`such films in photoactivated LCLVs and in active ma-
`trix LCLV projection displays. In Afonin et a1., “Opti-
`
`[0
`
`i5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`2
`cally Controllable Transparencies Based on Structures
`Consisting of a Photoconductor and a Polymer-Encap-
`sulated Nematic Liquid Crystal". Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett.
`Vol. 14, No. 56. January 1938. pages 56-58, a PDLC-
`type film was photoactivated with a ZnSe photocon-
`ductor. The photoactivated rise and decay times (with a
`constant bias voltage in typical LCLV operation) were
`5—10 ms on-time and 1.5—3 seconds off-time; thus, the
`frame time (on-time plus off-time) is very slow com»
`pared to a dynamic television image frame time of less
`than 33 ms. The response of the PDLC-type film layer
`to a square voltage pulse was much faster. with rise and
`decay times of less than 1 ms and 15 ms. respectively.
`but such a pulse shape and response time is not attain-
`able with this photoconductor.
`In Macknick et al., "High Resolution Displays Using
`NCAP Liquid Crystals“, Liquid Crystal Chemistry.
`Physics. and Applications. SHE. Vol. 1080, January
`1989. pages 169—173, fast response PDLC-type films
`were reported with a square pulse input signal of 5.3 ms.
`About 50% transmissiou was reached during the 5.3 ms
`pulse. and the decay time at the end of the pulse was
`about 2 ms; full voltage activation of the film was not
`shown.
`In Takizawa et al.. “Transmission Mode Spatial Light
`Modulator Using a custom Crystal and Polymer-Dis-
`persed Liquid Crystal Layers". Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol.
`56. No. 11, March 1990. pages 999—1001. fast photoacti~
`vated PDLC film response of 10 ms ON and 36 ms OFF
`was reported for a 60 ms square pulse of bright white
`activating light with a 30 volt bias across a photocon-
`ductor/PDLC cell. A hysteresis loop was reported
`when the cell was scanned with increasing and decreas-
`ing writing light intensities. but the loops were said to
`disappear when pulsed write light was incident on the
`device. Response times were reported and discussed
`only for square wave intensity writing light pulses.
`In Kunigita et al., “A Full-Color Projection TV
`Using LC/Polymer Composite Light Valves", SID
`International Symposium Digest. May 3990. pages
`221—230, a low voltage PDLC-type film was used in an
`active matrix display with a poly-Si thin film transistor
`and a storage capacitor for each pixel. Three active
`matrix cells were used for red. blue and green channels
`of full color projection TV. The response time of the
`PDLC-type film to a square wave voltage pulse was
`given for a full on-tirne ol'35 ms and a decay } time onS
`ms. The use of a storage capacitor at each pixel was
`necessary to obtain square wave voltage pulses used in
`this display.
`In Lauer et al., "A Frame-Sequential Color-TV Pro-
`jection Display", SID International Symposium Digest.
`May 1990. pages 534-537, a PDLC active matrix dis-
`play was made with CdSe thin film transistors. The time
`response characteristics were fast enough for sequential
`three-color filtering effects at 50 Hz (6.67 ms for each
`color). PDLC response times were reported only for 50
`volt square wave pulses of 5 ms, with the PDLC reach—
`ing a transient 60% transmission level in 5 ms of on-
`time. and decaying in about 2 ms. giving a relatively
`low light throughput in the frame time. Full projection
`light illumination was reported as having a large effect
`on the thin film transistor off-state current.
`In each of the above papers, the PDLC response is
`described with respect
`to an idealized step-voltage
`change, or to a quare wave pulse.
`
`

`

`3
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`5,170,271
`
`In view of the limitations ofthe approaches described
`above. the present invention seeks to provide a method
`of operating a PDLC cell to provide a higher optical
`throughput and better gray scale response than has
`previously been obtained at comparable current levels.
`while retaining or even improving upon the fast re-
`sponse of PDLC to a voltage change. The invention
`also describes a photoactivated LCLV system that uti-
`lizes this method.
`
`In accordance with the invention. shaped voltage
`pulses are applied to a PDLC cell such that the cell
`achieves a higher optical throughput. good gray scale
`operation. and a rapid response time. The shape refers
`to the instantaneous rms (rms per cycle) envelope of the
`applied AC voltage pulse or the instantaneous DC volt»
`age of the applied DC pulse. The applied voltage is
`referenced to a time frame during which a readout from
`the PDLC is desired. The voltage level is initially raised
`to a level substantially in excess of the PDLC‘s thresh-
`old voltage; this initial voltage level is applied for a
`substantially shorter period than the duration of the
`time frame. It is then gradually reduced within the time
`frame to a level less than the threshold voltage. The
`initial voltage is applied for a substantially shorter per-
`iod of time than the time over which the voltage is
`being reduced; the applied voltage waveform is prefera-
`bly shaped so that this reduction occurs exponentially.
`Shaped pulse signals of this type can be obtained, for
`example, from raster scan inputs from a CRT activating
`a photosubstrate in which the photoactivation of each
`spot decays fully within the frame time ofthe full raster
`scan. or from an active matrix in which the charge on
`each PDLC picture element (pixel) decays below the
`threshold voltage within the frame time. in about 3 to 5
`RC time constants of the PDLC film.
`The voltage waveform takes advantage of a hystere-
`sis effect
`in the PDLC transmission versus voltage
`curves that has previously been considered a nuisance
`because of the difference in transmission values on volt-
`age rise and fall curves, and because of the long times
`taken to reach steady state transmission levels at inter-
`mediate voltages from either the voltage rise or fall
`curves. The voltage waveform of this invention always
`starts below the threshold voltage necessary to change
`the transmission of the PDLC. This shaped waveform
`begins with a steep initial increase to a voltage that is
`substantially higher than the minimum steady state volt-
`age needed to obtain the desired PDLC transmission
`level, maintains this initial voltage for only a short per-
`iod that is less than the time required for the PDLC to
`reach a steady state transmission. and then decreases
`more gradually back down to below the threshold volt-
`age before the end of the frame time. The PDLC re-
`aponds quickly to the large initial voltage increase
`which driVes it toward a higher transmission hysteresis
`state. The transmission changes slowly during the grad-
`ual decrease of the voltage waveform, permitting a
`relatively high integrated transmission. The PDLC
`transmission drops quickly as the voltage decreases to
`below the threshold level so that by the end of the frame
`time the PDLC returns to its initial state and is ready to
`respond to a new pulse (of the same or different voltage
`level} without any memory effect from the prior pulse.
`This provides a rapid response to both gray scale and
`fully 0N levels. with a time-integrated voltage that
`need be no greater than a square wave that produces a
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3D
`
`35
`
`45
`
`SD
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`lower throughput and a much slower gray scale re-
`sponse.
`To minimize electrochemical deterioration of the
`PDLC, the voltage is preferably applied so that there is
`no overall net DC current through the PDLC film. For
`example. in a photoactivated amorphous silicon (a-Si:I-I)
`LCLV the applied voltage can be an AC signal. with a
`periodicity much shorter than that of the frame time.
`whose pulse envelope establishes the voltage wave-
`form. In an' active matrix display the applied voltage
`can be a series of shaped DC pulses of alternating polar-
`ity. each of which establishes the voltage waveform.
`More complex. unsymmetrical. voltage formats can also
`be applied, such as are used in MOS-silicon LCLVs.
`CCD-LCLVs. Schottky—LCLVs. p~i-n photodiode-
`LCLVs, etc.. as long as the desired shaped pulse voltage
`waveform envelope is obtained. The invention also
`encompasses an LCLV system which includes an opti-
`cal input means that. together with the photoconductor,
`is selected to collectively produce the desired voltage
`waveform across the PDLC within the light valve.
`These and other features and advantages of the inven-
`tion will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the
`following detailed description. taken together with the
`accompanying drawings, in which:
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a graph of hysteresis curves for two PDLC
`films;
`FIGS. 2a, 26 and 2c are graphs showing the resporISe
`of a PDLC film to step voltage shifts between fully ON
`and fully OFF levels, fully OFF and nominal half-on
`levels, and fully ON and nominal half-off levels, respec~
`tively;
`FIGS. 3-6 are graphs of applied AC voltage wave-
`forms and PDLC responses in accordance with the
`invention;
`FIGS. '7 and 8 are graphs of a PDLC response respec-
`tively to an AC square wave and to an AC voltage
`waveform that is shaped in accordance with the inven-
`tion. both voltage signals having approximately the
`same integrated area;
`FIG. 9 is a graph of a PDLC response to alternating
`positive and negative DC voltage waveforms in accor-
`dance with the invention; and
`FIG. 10 is an illustrative sectional view of an
`LCLV/CRT system that can be used to implement the
`invention.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`The present invention takes advantage of a hysteresis
`effect in PDLC films that previously was considered to
`be a disadvantage in obtaining gray scale and fast re-
`sponse for displays. Two sets of hysteresis curves show-
`ing percent transmission through the PDLC, plotted as
`a function of RMS voltage across the PDLC, are given
`in FIG. 1. The right hand set of curves 2 were obtained
`with BDH-EQ/NOA65 PDLC. while the left hand set 4
`were obtained with HRbPDSD/NOAtSS. The rise
`curves 2a and 40 were obtained by ramping a 100 Hz
`voltage signal up from zero to a fully ON level of 100
`volts over a period of 75 seconds. while the fall curves
`2b and 4b were obtained by ramping the voltage back
`down to zero over another 75 second interval.
`As shown in FIG. 1 each type of PDLC exhibits a
`threshold voltage bEIOw which it
`is nomtransmissive.
`This threshold voltage is about 25 volts for curves 2,
`
`

`

`5
`and about 6 volts for curves 4. Above these thresholds
`levels, the hysteresis fall curves 2b,4b are shifted to the
`left from the rise curves 20,40. Thus, for any particular
`voltage above the threshold level and below the fully
`ON level,
`there is a higher degree of transmission
`through the PDLC on the fall curve than on the rise
`curve. The invention makes beneficial use of this phe-
`nomenon by driving the PDLC cell with a shaped volt-
`age waveform that forces the majority of the transmis-
`sion period toward the fall curve, and thus produces a
`substantial
`increase in the total optical
`transmission
`through the PDLC.
`FIGS. 20—2-6 illustrate the problem of achieving good
`gray scale response with PDLC films, using square
`wave pulse envelopes of 100 Hz AC signals for 100 ms.
`The fully ON and fully OFF PDLC response times can
`be quite fast, as shown in FIG. 2a. The PDLC in this
`case was switched between zero volts and a fully ON
`level of 70 volts (rms) with a 100 msec square wave
`pulse. The turn-off time along curve segment 6 was
`about 7 msec, while the turn-on time along curve 8 was
`about 1 msec.
`
`However, the dynamic response of the PDLC film
`was found to be strongly influenced by the hysteresis
`effect when voltages were switched to intermediate
`gray scale levels, below the fully 0N voltage. FIG. 2b
`shows the results of switching the voltage from zero
`volts to a gray scale 18 volt level, while FIG. 2: shows
`switching from a fully ON 70 volt level to a gray scale
`13 volt level. As a reference (not shown), a long-term
`activation of several minutes at 13 volts resulted in 50%
`transmission. However, as illustrated in FIG. 2b,
`the
`transmission level increased to Only about 30% with an
`18 volt square wave pulse that commenced at time zero
`and lasted for 100 msec. The result when the voltage
`was reduced from 1'0 volts to )8 volts with a 100 msec
`square pulse is shown in FIG. 2c—the final transmission
`level was about 60%. All PDLC-type films that were
`tested showed this type of hysteresis effect, which on
`the surface would appear to be a serious deterrent to
`obtaining rapid response displays with reproducible
`gray scale.
`The invention overcomes this problem in a manner
`that not only achieves good gray scale operation, but
`also substantially increases the optical throughput. As
`mentioned above, a shaped waveform that causes an
`appreciable part of the PDLC transmission to take place
`along a hysteresis fall curve at a higher transmission
`level is used, rather than a square wave. In addition,
`during the initial portion of the applied waveform the
`PDLC is overdriven by using an initial voltage level
`that is substantially higher than the voltage level that
`would produce the desired transmission level in steady»
`state operation. However,
`this initial voltage level is
`rapidly reduced from its initial high level so that the
`PDLC peaks at about the desired level of transmission.
`The voltage is reduced, preferably at an exponential
`decay rate, causing the PDLC to exhibit a relatively
`high level of optical transmission along a hysteresis fall
`curve for as long as the applied voltage is above the
`PDLC‘s transmission threshold.
`
`It is important that the applied voltage be brought
`down to a level below the PDLC‘s transmission thresh-
`old voltage before the end of each time frame so that the
`PDLC transmission returns to the initial bias level dur-
`ing the frame time. In an LCLV, the time frame is estab-
`lished by the scanning periodicity of the input signal On
`each pixel, such as from a CRT scan of a photoactivated
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`SS
`
`65
`
`5,1?0,271
`
`6
`LCLV or an activating voltage in an active matrix
`LCLV. Starting each time frame from a voltage level
`below the threshold ensures that the liquid crystal Oper-
`ates reproducibly for a given signal during each frame.
`Several experiments have demonstrated the advan-
`tages realized with the specially shaped waveform. In
`these demonstrations a PDLC sample was prepared by
`photopolymerization of a
`1:1 mixture of Norland
`NAObS monomer/initiator and BDH-ET liquid crystal
`in a transmission mode test cell formed with indium tin
`oxide (ITO) coated glass separated by a 0.5 mil spacing.
`An ultraviolet cure was performed with a 300 Watt
`mercury lamp {8 mW/cm2 at 365 rim} for three minutes.
`resulting in liquid crystal droplet sizes estimated at be-
`tween } and 2 microns. The cells were read out with a
`
`green HeNe laser beam in examples 1—4 and 6. and a red
`HeNe laser beam in examples 5 and 7.
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`A voltage waveform representing the product of a
`shaped pulse signal and a bias sine wave signal was
`applied to the PDLC cell, and repeated every 25 msec.
`The bias voltage level was established slightly below
`the PDLC's transmission threshold. The peak voltage
`level of the shaped pulse was 25 volts while the bias
`level was 1.5 volts. representing a 16:] amplitude ratio
`that was higher than presently available LCLV switch-
`ing ratios. Bias voltage frequencies of l. 3 and 5 KHz
`were tested. and showed no significant change in light
`throughput or response times.
`The PDLC optical response with a 5 KHz bias signal
`is shown in FIG. 3. The shaped voltage waveform can
`he considered as the instantaneous rms values from the
`envelope 10 of the alternating polarity 5 RH: cycles.
`The applied voltage rose rapidly to its peak level 12,
`and then decayed approximately exponentially to the
`bias level 14. A maximum transmission level 16 of about
`70% was achieved for about
`1 msec, and slowly de-
`creased along a generally exponential curve until the
`voltage neared the bias level, at which point the trans-
`missivity leveled off in region 18 at about a 4% level;
`this was retained until the end of the frame.
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`The PDLC sample was tested with a shaped pulse
`and a 5 KB: bias signal combination, refreshed at a 60
`Hz frame rate. The results are shown in FIG. 4. In one
`
`case a very fast-rising 0.1 msec pulse signal 20 with a
`peak level of 25 volts and a bias level of 4.3 volts was
`used. while in a second case the pulsed signal 22 had the
`same 25 volt peak voltage, a bias voltage of 2.6 volts,
`and a slower 1.5 msec rise time. The PDLC optical
`response to the voltage waveforms within envelopes 20
`and 22 is indicated by curves 24 and 26, respectively.
`The higher bias voltage of signal 20 did not appear to
`effect the PDLC’s off-state transmission or the resulting
`contrast.
`Transmission curve 24 had a faster rise time than
`curve 26, corresponding to the faster rise time of its
`voltage signal 2|], but a lower peak transmission level
`corresponding to the more rapid termination of its peak
`voltage. Both transmission curves 24 and 26 exhibited a
`fairly high PDLC transmission level until the voltage
`dropped to the bias value, resulting in a higher optical
`throughput than a fast response twisted nematic cell.
`
`

`

`7
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`5,170,271
`
`The same PDLC cell was tested with a shaped pulse
`and a 5 KHz bias signal combination, refreshed at a 60
`Hz frame rate. An initial 90 volt peak signal was expo»
`nentially decayed down to zero over about half the
`frame period. This resulted in an initial peak transmis-
`sion of 91%, which gradually fell to a minimum trans-
`mission of 8% by the end of the frame. The voltage
`envelope 28 and transmission curve 30 are shown in
`FIG. 5.
`
`EXAMPLE 4
`
`The same conditions were employed as in Example 3,
`but the initial peak voltage was lowered from 90 volts to
`60 volts. as indicated by voltage envelope 32 in FIG. 6.
`The resulting optical transmission curve 34 exhibited a
`maximum transmission of 82% and a minimum of 6%.
`In addition to the change in the maximum and minimum
`transmission levels. the shape of the transmission decay
`curve was also changed, with the transmission decaying
`more rapidly for the lower initial voltage of Example 4.
`This demonstrated that higher initial voltages (corre-
`sponding for example to higher input light levels in a
`photoconductive LCLV) would result in higher bright-
`ness from the PDLC cell, making it possible to achieve
`quality gray scale operation.
`EXAMPLE 5
`
`A similar PDLC cell made with 0.14 mil spacing was
`subjected to one square voltage pulse and one shaped
`voltage pulse for comparison. using 10 KHZ AC. Both
`rms signals had the same integrated area (amplitude x
`pulse width) switching ratio of 1.5. and bias voltage
`level of 12.11 volts.
`
`The Optical response 36 to a 7 msec IOng. 4L] volt
`amplitude square wave pulse 38 is shoWn in FIG. 7.
`This signal partially activated the PDLC film. reaching
`a 31% maximum transmission level at the end of the 7
`msec pulse. and rapidly decayed to a transmission level
`of less than 5%. The resulting total light throughput
`(LTP) was 8.1% for the 30 Hz frame time.
`The optical response 40 of the same PDLC film to a
`shaped pulse 42 with a 60.0 volt peak and a 7 msec
`decay is shown in FIG. 8. The voltage area of shaped
`pulse 42 was equal to that of square wave pulse 33. A
`much faster rise time of 0.83 msec was experienced with
`the shaped pulse. in contrast to the square wave pulse
`whose rise time occupied the entire 7 msec. The maxi-
`mum light transmission for the shaped pulse was 69%,
`and its total light throughput for the 30 Hz frame time
`was 19.5%. This example demonstrated the improve-
`ments in rise time and light throughput from a shaped
`pulse signal with a rapid rise and a gradual decay.
`EXAMPLE 6
`
`To compare the shaped pulse mode operation of the
`PDLC film with twisted nematic liquid crystals,
`the
`same liquid crystal as in Examples 1—5 was tested in a
`90° twisted nematic cell of 4.8 micron thickness. This
`liquid crystal thickness corresponded to the 10 micron
`thick PDLC film of Examples 1—5. which contained
`about 50% liquid crystal by volume. The cell was fabri-
`cated with 90“ twisted surface parallel alignment be-
`tween medium angle deposition/shallow angle deposi~
`tion 510; coated conductive electrodes. Transmission
`measurements were performed with the same Optical
`setup used for the PDLC samples. a green HeNe laser.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`8
`and two parallel polarizers inserted into the system.
`Shaped pulses of S KHz AC voltages with 25 msec
`repetition rates, as in Example I. were used. The maxi-
`mum rms pulse amplitudes were considerably less than
`in Example 1, since a substantial portion of the applied
`voltage in a PDLC cell is dropped across the polymer,
`rather than the liquid crystals themselves. Steady-state
`levels of only about 2 volts are usually required to turn
`this type of liquid crystal cell fully on.
`The results of this test are summarized in the table
`below. The PDLC test cells in FIG. 3 exhibited higher
`contrast ratios and optical efficiency as compared to the
`twisted nematic cell. which can be attributed to the
`PDLC film‘s fast rise time and the effect of hysteresis in
`slowing down the optical decay. The test results indi-
`cated that the twisted nematic mode response time was
`too slow for a 25 Hz frame rate with an exponential
`decay pulse mode operation, and that the transmissiOn
`decay within each time frame was too slow to obtain
`contrasts above 5:1 even with a signal ratio of 400:1.
`The high residual transmission at the end of each frame
`would also interfere with gray scale changes in a dy—
`namic display. With the same shaped driving pulse. the
`PDLC film of Example 1 was operated between 70%
`maximum transmission and 4% minimum transmission.
`for a transmission ratio of 17.5 and a switching ratio of
`about 17:1.
`
`
`Bias
`Applied
`Swilching
`Tampa"
`
`Voltage
`Voltage
`Ratio
`9? Tm.”
`9‘2 Tm}.
`Tm"
`0.3
`4.7
`15.7
`34.7
`60.0
`1.4
`0.2
`4.5
`32.5
`46.0
`26.0
`1.8
`0.6
`10.0
`16.1
`97.0
`42.6
`2.3
`1.35
`12.0
`3.9
`94.0
`56.8
`1.6
`0.03
`12.0
`‘00
`94.0
`22.0
`4.3
`
`
`EXAMPLE 7
`
`A voltage waveform of a pulse shape signal of alter-
`nating positive and negative DC pulses. each with a 16.7
`ms frame time was applied to the PDLC cell of Exam-
`ple 5. This waveform corresponds to that obtained by
`placing an instantaneous (submillisecond) charge on the
`PDLC and having it leak off within a frame time by
`conduction through the PDLC due to its resistivity
`value of 7.5 x 109 ohm-cm (corresponding to 8 RC time
`constant of 3.3 ms), and then in the next frame placing
`the opposite polarity charge on the PDLC and having it
`leak off. The results are shown in FIG. 9. In each frame
`time. the optical response of the PDLC quickly reached
`a high transmission level within a millisecond, decayed
`relatively slowly until the DC pulse had decayed by
`more than an RC time constant. and then dropped back
`to its off-state transmission before the end of the 16.7 ms
`
`frame time. The positive and negative DC shaped pulses
`gave the same optical response. This resulted in an
`integrated light throughput which was 37.4% of the
`total incident light.
`This invention may be implemented in a relatively
`simple active matrix raster-scan display system in which
`the pixel circuitry requires neither a storage capacitor
`nor a reset voltage to obtain the type of shaped pulse
`signal waveform described in Example 7 and shown in
`FIG. 9. A relatively low resistivity PDLC film, such as
`the 7.5X109 ohm-cm film in Example 7, provides the
`shaped pulse waveform needed for good optical
`throughput from the fast response on-time and inte-
`
`

`

`5,1?0,2?1
`
`9
`grated transmission effect from the exponential decay of
`the signal in each frame time at the 60 Hz frame rate.
`Similarly, a PDLC film with a resistivity of 1.5x1010
`ohm-cm provides fast
`response and good optical
`throughput when activated at a 30 Hz frame rate. Ac-
`tive matrix displays using nematic LCs (not in PDLCs)
`require much higher resistivity values (greater than
`1011 ohm-cm) to obtain good light throughput without
`storage capacitors in the pixel circuitry when operated
`at 30 Hz and 60 Hz frame rates.
`The invention may be implemented in an LCLV
`system such as that shown in FIG. 10. An LCLV #4 is
`addressed by a cathode ray tube 4-6. The LCLV in-
`cludes a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition
`deposited a-Si:H photoconductor 48 with a transparent
`ITO electrode 50 and a fiberoptic face plate 52 on one
`side. and a CdTe light-blocking layer 54 on the other
`side. After the light-blocking layer comes a dielectric
`mirror 56. a PDLC film 58 surrounded by a spacer ring
`60. an ITO counterselectrode 62, and a quartz readout
`window 64. An audio frequency power supply 66 is
`COnnected across the two electrodes 50 and 62.
`The CRT 46 directs an electron beam 68 across a
`phosphor screen 70. which is positioned to illuminate
`the liberoptic face plate 52 with radiation emitted from
`the locations on the screen that are struck by the elec~
`tron beam. Controlled scanning of the beam across the
`phosphor screen thus forms an input image to the light
`valve.
`The input image is transmitted through the fiberoptic
`face plate 52 and transparent electrode 50 to the photo-
`conductor layer 48. The impedance of the photocon-
`doctor layer is lowered in proportion to the intensity of
`the incident light. resulting in a spatially varying impe-
`dance pattern. This causes a corresponding increase in
`the voltage dropped across the liquid crystal layer 58 in
`a spatially varying pattern that matches the input image.
`This pattern modulates a readout beam 72 that is di-
`rected through the liquid crystal. reflects off of dielec-
`tric mirror 56 and exits back through the liquid crystal.
`The input and output beams are thus optically isolated,
`giving the light valve a capability of accepting a low»
`intensity light
`image and converting it
`into a much
`higher output image. The light blocking layer 54 pre-
`vents the readout beam from interfering with the photo-
`conductor layer 48. For a higher contrast reflective
`mode PDLC-LCLV display. a wedge-shape front glass
`surface 64 is used so that the front surface reflection of
`the readout beam 72 (whether at normal incidence or at
`a small off-normal angle of incidence as indicated in
`FIG. 10) is reflected out of the optical system used to
`collect the main readout beam 72 that is reflected by the
`dichroic mirrors.
`The shape of the voltage waveform across the liquid
`crystal will be a combined function of the phosphors
`used in the CRT. and the type of photoconductor in the
`light valve. These should be selected through empirical
`determinations to obtain the desired waveform. For
`
`example, a suitable combination of phosphor and photo-
`c0nductor for the voltage waveforms in Example 2 is
`obtained by using the fast response a-Si:I-I photosub-
`strate (with greater than 60 Hz frame rate) character-
`ized by Sterling et al.. (cited above) activated with a
`medium persistence red CRT phosphor such as PZZR
`(about 2 ms decay to 10%). Another example is to use
`relatively thin (5 pm thick) boron-doped a-Si:H films
`such as those described by Ashley and Davis, “Amor-
`phous Silicon Photoconductor in a Liquid Crystal Spa-
`
`10
`tial Light Modulator". Applied Optics, Vol. 26. No. 2. 15
`January 1987, pages 241-246,
`in conjunction with a
`medium-short persistence green CRT phosphor such as
`P3] (about 33 its to 10%} to obtain voltage waveforms
`such as those in Example I. This voltage waveform on
`the PDLC will provide frame rates of about 40 Hz,
`which is considerably greater than the 10 Hz frame rate
`Ashley and Davis observed using step pulse reSponse
`from optically chopped white light with the nematic
`liquid crystal EDI-I44. Altema

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket