`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 06
`
`
`Entered: October 23, 2012
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`LKQ CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Patent of CLEARLAMP, LLC
`Patent OWNER
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2013-00020
`Patent 7,297,364
`_______________
`
`
`SALLY C. MEDLEY Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER – AUTHORIZING MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION – 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00020
`Patent 7,297,364
`
`LKQ Corporation (LKQ) requests authorization to file a motion for pro hac
`
`vice admission of Heather Boice. (Petition at 2:11-12.)
`Section 42.10(c) provides that:
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead
`counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the
`Board may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that
`counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`The Board authorizes both parties to file motions for pro hac vice admission
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the
`“ORDER – AUTHORIZING MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION” in
`Case IPR2013-00010 (MPT), a copy of which is attached to this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`/Sally C. Medley/
`Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`
`Alan L. Barry
`K&L GATES LLP
`70 W. Madison Street
`Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60602
`Tel: 312.807.4438
`Fax: 312.827.8196
`E-mail: alan.barry@klgates.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00020
`Patent 7,297,364
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`
`Matthew L. Cutler
`Douglas A. Robinson
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC
`7700 Bonhomme Avenue
`Suite 400
`Clayton, MO 63105
`Tel: 314.726.7500
`Fax: 314.726.7501
`E-Mail: stldocket@hdp.com
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
