throbber
US006998973B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`Lefaure
`
`(10) Patent N0.:
`
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 6,998,973 B2
`Feb. 14, 2006
`
`(54) DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD FOR A
`TIRE-PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM OF
`A VEHICLE
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor: Philippe Lefaure, Montbrun Lauragais
`(FR)
`
`(73) Assignee: Siemens VDO Automotive, Toulouse
`Cedex (FR)
`
`11/1998 Robinson
`5,838,229 A
`6,331,822 B1 * 12/2001 Sato et al.
`............... .. 340/3.22
`6,505,507 B1 *
`1/2003 Imao et al.
`73/146.5
`
`6,700,480 B1 *
`3/2004 Moore . . . . . . . . . . .
`. . . . .. 340/445
`6,885,293 B1 *
`4/2005 Okumura .................. .. 340/448
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 149 days.
`
`W0
`
`W0 96 15919
`
`5/1996
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 10/771,374
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Feb. 5, 2004
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2004/0155762 A1
`
`Aug. 12, 2004
`
`(30)
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Feb. 6, 2003
`
`(FR)
`
`................................. .. 03 01386
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`B60C 23/00
`
`(2006.01)
`
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`
`.................... .. 340/442; 340/438; 73/146.2
`
`(58) Field of Classification Search .............. .. 340/442,
`340/438, 443, 445, 446, 447, 448; 73/146.2,
`73/146.3, 146.8
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`Primary Examiner—Daryl C Pope
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Young & Thompson
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A data transmission method for a tire-pressure monitoring
`system (10) of a Vehicle. The data is transmitted by Wheel
`units (12) to a central computer (13) located in the Vehicle.
`The method comprises:
`a data transmission phase in parking mode, over a first
`period; and
`a data transmission phase in running mode, over a second
`period shorter than the first period. The method is
`characterized in that a natural time lag between Various
`internal clocks with which each Wheel unit (12) is
`equipped is used to prevent collisions between trans-
`missions from the Various Wheel units of one and the
`same Vehicle.
`
`12 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`
`
`—.QTSn'i':'7l
`
`1 0
`
`SCHRADER
`
`EXH. 1001
`
`Page 1001-l
`
`Page 1001-1
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 14, 2006
`
`US 6,998,973 B2
`
`
`
`--- ..
`
`——>: k-
`._—.§:
`:
`V‘.
`I
`i
`
`3
`
`:<—
`—>:
`'
`:
`E §60ms +Aams
`:
`:
` frame 1
`
`--+:
`:
`5
`:
`
`:e—
`...
`.-
`...
`:< - ._..-.......
`:80ms+A0‘ms
`:
`
`12
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`sample
`amount
`
`per class
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D“’—K3*~""1A45?-:3rs-L-:.‘.‘.'11.:-Iv...x..~“$9.
`
`
`Page 1001-2
`
`Page 1001-2
`
`

`
`US 6,998,973 B2
`
`1
`DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD FOR A
`TIRE-PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM OF
`A VEHICLE
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`invention relates to a data transmission
`The present
`method for a tire-pressure monitoring system of a vehicle.
`More particularly,
`it relates to a method for preventing
`collisions between the data transmitted by the wheel units of
`one and the same vehicle.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is known to equip motor vehicles with tire-pressure
`monitoring systems. These systems generally comprise a
`device fixed to the inside of the tire and called a wheel unit.
`
`This wheel unit measures the pressure inside the tire (and
`also a certain number of other parameters such as, for
`example, the temperature) and transmits the measurements
`made to a central computer located in the vehicle. This
`central computer is responsible for warning the driver of any
`pressure defect in one of the tires. Of course, each wheel unit
`is provided with an identifier so that the data received by the
`central computer not only contains the measurements made
`but also an indication of position of tire (right or left front
`tire, right or left rear tire) in which these measurements have
`been made.
`
`It is also known to transmit the data, measured by the
`suitable sensors located in the wheel units, at different time
`intervals depending on the movement of the vehicle. If the
`vehicle is in parking mode, that is to say at rest or moving
`at very slow speed (for example less than 25 km/h), the
`measurements made by the wheel units are generally trans-
`mitted at relatively long time intervals (of around one hour).
`On the other hand, when the vehicle is in running mode, that
`is to say moving at more than 25 km/h, the same information
`is transmitted to the central processing unit at time intervals
`of around one minute.
`
`As soon as the vehicle is in running mode, each wheel unit
`regularly transmits the measurements made. However, many
`transmission are thus made simultaneously by several wheel
`units of one and the same vehicle. This results in scrambling
`of the messages received by the central processing unit that
`collects the transmissions coming,
`sometimes simulta-
`neously, from the four wheels (or even more in the case of
`heavy goods vehicles). In this case, the data measured can no
`longer be used and the system becomes inoperable.
`To overcome these drawbacks, it is known to time-shift
`the transmission of each wheel unit. These time-shifting
`methods are complex as they require all the wheel units of
`one and the same vehicle to be synchronized. Furthermore,
`this requires complex computations that
`limit
`the time
`intervals available for transmission.
`
`To overcome this problem of collision between data
`transmitted by each wheel unit, it is also possible to ensure
`that the central computer interrogates each of the wheel units
`one by one. However, here again,
`this operating mode
`extends the time required to receive all the data and slows
`down the performance of the tire-pressure monitoring sys-
`tem.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The object of the present invention is to implement a
`method of transmitting data between a wheel unit and a
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`central computer that avoids collisions between the trans-
`mitted data, while remaining simple, inexpensive and fast.
`For this purpose, the present invention relates to a data
`transmission method for a tire-pressure monitoring system
`of a vehicle, said data being transmitted by wheel units to a
`central computer located in the vehicle, said method com-
`prising:
`a data transmission phase in parking mode, over a first
`period; and
`a data transmission phase in running mode, over a second
`period shorter than the first period; said method being
`characterized in that:
`
`a natural time lag between various internal clocks with
`which each wheel unit is equipped is used to prevent
`collisions between transmissions from the various
`wheel units of one and the same vehicle.
`
`By virtue of this natural time lag, it is possible to prevent
`collisions between transmitted data without employing
`means that are complex, time-consuming and expensive.
`More precisely, the relatively poor precision of the cir-
`cuits producing the internal clock of the wheel unit is put to
`good use in order to automatically time-shift (randomly) the
`transmissions from the wheel units.
`
`Again advantageously, the internal clocks of the wheel
`unit are produced by RC-type oscillating circuits. The pre-
`cision of such oscillators is preferably about 115%.
`Thus, unlike what is usually produced in the wheel unit,
`in which it is general practice to seek to have extremely
`precise internal clocks so as to be able to operate a defined
`time shift between the transmission of the data and thus
`
`prevent collisions, the present invention uses, on the con-
`trary, internal clocks of poor precision, and therefore there
`are less expensive and less difficult to implement in order to
`obtain a similar result.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Other objects, features and advantages of the present
`invention will also become apparent from the description
`that follows, given by way of non-limiting example and with
`reference to the appended drawings in which:
`FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a vehicle fitted with a device
`
`according to the invention;
`FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing an example of frame
`transmission in running mode; and
`FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the range in inter-frame time
`owing to the natural internal time lag of the device used.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`the
`According to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1,
`tire-pressure monitoring system 10 according to the inven-
`tion comprises two main elements, namely:
`a plurality of wheel units 12 mounted in each of the
`wheels 11 of the vehicle; and
`a central computer 13 that receives the data transmitted by
`the wheel units. This central computer is placed in the
`vehicle.
`
`Indicated below is a very brief reminder of how a tire-
`pressure monitoring system operates.
`The wheel units 12, placed in each of the wheels, are
`positioned on the rim inside the wheel. These wheel units are
`provided with suitable sensors, especially with a pressure
`sensor, but also with sensors for measuring temperature,
`acceleration, speed, etc. Each wheel unit has an identifier
`that is specific to it. It regularly transmits data (including the
`
`Page 1001-3
`
`Page 1001-3
`
`

`
`3
`
`4
`
`US 6,998,973 B2
`
`values of the measurements made, but also its identifier) to
`the central computer that receives and processes the data.
`Sometimes, this data has already been preprocessed in the
`wheel unit itself. After processing,
`the central computer
`determines whether it is necessary to inform the driver of a
`defect and, in order to do so, uses the display devices 14
`located on the instrument panel of the vehicle.
`It should be noted (see. FIG. 2) that the messages trans-
`mitted by the wheel units preferably consist of three frames
`having identical data. These frames are each transmitted for
`10 ms. The time interval separating the first and second
`frames is 160 ms+Ao ms. The time interval separating the
`second and third frames is 180 ms+Ao ms. A0 is a value due
`
`to the imprecision of each clock. The value of 0 is 0.25 ms
`(as will be explained later with regard to FIG. 3). The entire
`message (with these three frames) is transmitted every
`minute when the vehicle is moving (for example with a
`speed greater than 25 km/h). It should also be noted that the
`entire message is transmitted during one revolution of the
`vehicle’s wheel, so as to avoid transmission symmetry
`problems.
`Each wheel unit consists in particular of a microcontroller
`whose internal clock consists, according to the present
`invention, of an RC oscillator (a conventional device com-
`prising resistors and capacitors) and of an RF transmitter.
`According to the present invention, it is preferred to use
`RC oscillators whose precision is about 115%.
`Thus, when the microcontroller of the wheel units detects
`that the vehicle is in running mode, it starts to transmit data,
`especially pressure data, every minute. Now, the microcon-
`troller call-up and the transmission sequence are managed
`by means of the internal clock with a precision of about
`115%. This has the consequence of randomly time-shifting
`the transmissions of the first frames of a message, but also
`of the following two frames.
`As FIG. 3 shows, the tolerance of the oscillator follows a
`Gaussian-type distribution law with a standard deviation of
`around 25 ms.
`
`Thus, the transmission sequence of the various messages
`coming from the various wheels makes it possible to avoid
`(or minimize) the risk of a collision between the transmitted
`data, by randomly time-shifting each frame transmission
`from a wheel unit relative to the other wheel units.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`The use of the substantial tolerance possessed by each
`internal microcontroller clock mounted in each wheel unit
`
`45
`
`thus makes it possible to minimize the risk of simulta-
`neously transmitting several information items, without the
`use of complex and/or expensive devices.
`It should be noted that the natural time lag A0 also applies
`to the time interval of one minute (in running mode) and of
`one hour (in parking mode) between each data transmission.
`Of course,
`the present invention is not limited to the
`method of implementation indicated above, rather it encom-
`passes any variant lying within the competence of a person
`skilled in the art. Thus,
`the degree of precision may be
`different from 115%, provided that this automatically intro-
`duces a time lag in the transmissions, thus avoiding any risk
`of a collision. Likewise, the operating mode of the vehicle
`
`50
`
`55
`
`(parking or running) may be determined by a speed of
`movement other than 25 km/h. In particular, the running
`mode may be detected as soon as the ignition has been
`turned on or the engine started, or even as soon as a request
`for gaining access to the inside of the vehicle is indicated.
`What is claimed is:
`
`1. A data transmission method for a tire-pressure moni-
`toring system (10) of a vehicle, said data being transmitted
`by wheel units (12) to a central computer (13) located in the
`vehicle, said method comprising:
`a data transmission phase in parking mode, over a first
`period; and
`a data transmission phase in running mode, over a second
`period shorter than the first period; said method being
`characterized in that:
`
`a natural time lag between various internal clocks with
`which each wheel unit (12) is equipped is used to
`prevent collisions between transmissions from the vari-
`ous wheel units of one and the same vehicle.
`2. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that
`the internal time lag between the various clocks of each
`wheel unit is preferably determined by the precision of an
`RC-type oscillator mounted in each wheel unit.
`3. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that
`RC oscillators having a precision of about 115% are pref-
`erably used.
`4. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that
`each wheel unit transmits several frames for each data item
`to be transmitted.
`5. The method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that
`three frames are transmitted for each data item to be trans-
`mitted.
`6. The method as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that
`the time interval separating the first and second frames is
`around 60 ms+Ao ms and the time interval separating the
`second and third frames is around 80 ms+Ao ms.
`7. The method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that
`the frames transmitting the same data item are transmitted
`during a single wheel revolution.
`8. A tire-pressure monitoring system (10) of a vehicle,
`employing the method as claimed in claim 1, said system
`being characterized in that it includes, for each wheel unit
`(12), an internal clock produced by an RC type circuit whose
`precision is about 115%.
`9. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that
`each wheel unit transmits several frames for each data item
`to be transmitted.
`10. The method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in
`that each wheel unit transmits several frames for each data
`item to be transmitted.
`11. The method as claimed in claim 5, characterized in
`that the frames transmitting the same data item are trans-
`mitted during a single wheel revolution.
`12. The method as claimed in claim 6, characterized in
`that the frames transmitting the same data item are trans-
`mitted during a single wheel revolution.
`
`Page 1001-4
`
`Page 1001-4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket