throbber
Existence of a p-Glycoprotein Drug Efflux Pump in
`Cultured Rabbit Conjunctival Epithelial Cells
`
`Pratt/e Sci/m,"3 Johnny]. Yang,‘ and VincentH. L. Leel’2
`
`PURPOSE. To determine whether a p-glyeoprotein (P-gp) drug efflux pump exists in cultured rabbit
`conjunctival epithelial cells (RCEs) to restrict the absorption of cyclosporin A (CSA) and other
`lipophilic drugs such as verapamil and dexamethasone.
`
`Msmons. The anti—ng monoclonal antibody (mAb) C219 was used in western blot analysis to
`reveal the presence of P—gp in freshly isolated and cultured RCEs. Bidirectional transport of tritiated
`CSA, verapamil, and dexamethasone (0.5 or 5.0 ptM) across cultured RCEs was evaluated in the
`absence and presence of P-gp inhibitors and an external mAb to P-gp (4133).
`
`RESULTS. Western blot analysis of lysates of freshly isolated and cultured RCEs with C219 mAb
`revealed a 170-kDa membrane protein band. At 0.5 nM CSA, the basal-to-apical (ba) apparent
`permeability coefficient (Paw; that is, efflux) was 9.5 times higher than that in the apical-to-basal
`direction (that is, influx). At 5 jiM, this ratio was halved: Net CSA secretion was blocked completely
`at 4°C. Verapamil (100 MM), progesterone (100 MM), and 4E3 mAb (5 jig/ml) increased CSA influx
`three times, while reducing efflux by 50% to 70%. Verapamil and progesterone inhibited CSA efflux
`in a concentration-dependent manner. In all cases, net secretory CSA flux was markedly reduced.
`
`The Pam, for verapamil (0.5 MM) and dexamethasone (0.5 nM) in the ba direction was 3.4 and LG
`times, respectively, which was higher than that in the opposite direction. The 4E3 mAb reduced net
`verapamil secretion by 65%.
`
`CONCLUSIONS. There may exist a P-gp—mediated drug efflux pump on the apical aspect of the
`rabbit conjunctiva to restrict the absorption of cyclosporinA and other lipophilic drugs. (Invest
`Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:1221-1226)
`
`he p-glycoprotein (P-gp) drug efflux pump is a 170-kDa
`membrane protein (gp170) encoded by the MDR1 gene.
`First identified in nmltidrugresistant tumor cells,l it was
`subsequently found to exist in diverse mammalian epithelia,
`including the retina and iris,2 small intestine,“4 liver,“ kid-
`n ey,
`“ and blood— brain endotheliumf"5 In these locations,
`gp170 possibly serves a protective role against the entry of
`foreign chemicals, including cyclosporin A (CSA)("7 and pacli—
`taxel.“ In Caco-Z cell nionolayers,("9"” cultured bovine brain
`capillary endothelial cells,7"' human adenocarcinoma cell
`lines (I'lC'I'—8 and T84),'2 and Chinese hamster ovaty cells,”
`P-gp has been shown to reduce the transepithelial permeation
`of CSA,“7 vinblastine,’I2 vincristine,ll and the lipophilic pep-
`tides, AcI’he(NMeI’he)2NH2,l0 and N—acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-nor-
`leucinal.” In all instances, the apical-tobasolateral (ab) trans-
`port (influx) of each drug is lower than its basolateral-to-apical
`(ba) transport (efflux). Moreover, influx and efflux are subject
`
`
`
`From the Departments of 'Pharmaceutical Sciences and 2Ophthal-
`mology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
`Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant EYIO/iZI,
`the United States l’harmacopeia Fellowship, and the Gavin S. Herbert
`Professorship.
`Submitted for publication November I9, 1997; revised February
`'10, I998; accepted February 24, I998.
`Proprietary interest category: N.
`3Present address: Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth,
`NJ 07033.
`Reprint. requests: Vincent H. L. Lee, University of Southern Cali-
`fornia, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
`I985 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033.
`
`Investigative Ophthalmology S: Visual Science, june 1998, Vol. 39, No. 7
`Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
`
`to modulation by other lipophilic substrates. For instance,
`Augustijns et al.“ reported that chlorpromazine (100 MM) and
`progesterone (100 MM) increased CSA (0.5 MM) influx across
`Caco-Z cell monolayers three times, while they reduced efflux
`by 75%. In addition, Tsuji et al.7 observed that P-gp inhibitors
`and MRK16 (an external monoclonal antibody [mAb] to P-gp)
`increased CSA uptake into primary cultured bovine brain cap-
`illary endothelial cells by 150% to 300%.
`The conjunctiva is the conduit for topically applied drugs
`to the posterior segment of the eye.'4 This tissue has been
`shown to be permeable to drugs of diverse physicochemical
`characteristics, including peptides.'5"H The main objective of
`the present study was to determine whether a P—gp drug efflux
`pump exists in rabbit conjunctiva that may restrict
`the
`conjunctival absorption of CSA,
`an undecapeptide P—gp
`substrate 6'7 that is being tested clinically for the treatment of
`uveitis '9 and tested experimentally for the treatment of aller-
`gic conjunctivitis.20 Two other drugs of comparable lipophi-
`Iicity also were studied: verapamil, a competitive substrate Ol:
`P-gpz'; and dexamethasone, a physiologic substrate of P-gp.22
`Cultured rabbit conjunctival epithelial cells (RCEs) on a per-
`meable support 2324 were used instead of the intact tissue to
`avoid complications caused by any P-gp that may also exist in
`the vascular endothelia in the intact tissue. Bidirectional trans-
`
`port of CSA was studied at 0.5 and 5.0 MM to bracket the
`threshold drug concentration (1 nM) previously identified in
`Caco-2 cells for CSA.6 Verapamil,9 progesterone,“ and a murine
`mAb that recognizes an external epitope of P-gp, namely,
`4E3,25 were used as P-gp inhibitors. A different mAb, C219,
`which binds to a cytoplasmic epitope near the adenosine
`
`1221
`
`ALCON 2259
`Apotex Inc. v. Alcon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
`Case |PR2013-00012
`
`

`

`1222
`
`Saha et a1.
`
`IOVS, June 1998, Vol. 39, No. 7
`
`triphosphate binding sites of gp170,26 was used in western
`blot analysis to further demonstrate the existence of P-gp in the
`conjunctiva. This antibody has been used extensively for that
`purpose in other tissues.27
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`3H—CSA (specific activity, 7.5 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Am-
`ersham Co. (Downers Grove, IL). D-[3H]mannitol (specific ac-
`tivity, 26.4 Ci/mmol), 3‘H-Verapamil (specific activity, 66.3 Ci/
`mmol), and 5H-dexamethasone (specific activity, 43.9 Ci/
`mmol) were obtained from Dupont NEN (Boston, MA). 36Cl
`was obtained from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). Unla-
`beled CSA was supplied by Sandoz Pharmaceuticals (Basel,
`Switzerland). Unlabeled verapamil, progesterone, dexametha-
`some, and D-mannitol were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St.
`Louis, MO). C219 and 4133 murine mAbs were obtained from
`Signet Laboratories (Dedham, MA). Cell culture media and
`supplies were obtained from Gibco (Grand Island, NY). PC-l
`medium (a serum-free, low-protein, defined medium) was pur-
`chased from Hycor Biomedical
`(Portland, ME). Collagen-
`treated Transwells (Transwell—COL inserts with 0.45pm pore
`size, 12-mm diameter, 1.13 cm2) and cluster plates (tissue
`culture-treated multiwell plates for holding the inserts) were
`obtained from Costar (Cambridge, MA). Male Dutch-belted
`pigmented rabbits, weighing 3.0 to 3.5 kg, were purchased
`from American Rabbitry (Los Angeles, CA). The studies using
`rabbits described in this report conformed to the Guiding
`Principles in the Care and Use of Animals (Department of
`Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institutes of Health;
`Publication 80 —23), and all animals were treated in accordance
`with the the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Oph-
`thalmic and Vision Research.
`
`Primary Culture of Rabbit Conjunctival Epithelial
`Cell Layers
`
`The procedure for the routine generation of tight RCE layers
`was reported elsewhere.” Briefly, epithelial cells were isolated
`by treating the excised conjunctiva with 0.2% protease for 90
`minutes. Isolated cells were declumped with DNase I and
`centrifuged. The cell pellet was washed, filtered through a
`40-pin cell strainer, and centrifuged. The final cell pellet was
`resuspended in defined PC-l growth medium supplemented
`with 1% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM uglutamine, 100 U/ml
`penicillin-streptomycin, 0.5% gentamicin, and 0.4% fungizone.
`The cells were plated at a density of 1.5 X 106 cells/cm2
`on Costar 12-mm Transwell-COL inserts. After 48 hours, adher-
`ent cells were washed with a defined PC-l medium containing
`0.1% fetal bovine serum, and they were fed daily with serum-
`free medium from day 3 onward. The transepithelial electrical
`resistance (in kilo-ohms per square centimeter) and potential
`difference (apical negative; in millivolts) of the cultures were
`monitored with an epithelial voltohmeter (EVOM; World Pre-
`cision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) and were corrected for back-
`ground transepithelial electrical resistance and potential differ-
`ence contributed by the blank filter and culture medium.
`Confluent cultured RCEs (days 6—8) with transepithelial elec-
`trical resistance 2 1.0 kQ/cm2 were used for transport studies.
`
`Western Blot Analysis
`
`Western blot analysis was performed with the C219 murine
`mAb using the procedure modified from that of Muller et a1.23
`Freshly isolated and confluent (day 8) cultured RCEs grown on
`Transwells underwent lysis for 45 minutes in ice-cold phos-
`phate-buffered saline containing 3% sodium dodecyl sulfate
`and protease inhibitors (83 MM antipain, 73 MM pepstatin A,
`and 0.1 mM leupeptin). The cell lysate then was centrifuged at
`12,000g for 15 minutes, and the supernatant was used for
`protein assay. Total cell protein was measured by a protein
`assay (DC; Bio—Rad, Hercules, CA), using bovine serum albu-
`min as a standard. Cell proteins (10 Mg) underwent electro-
`phoresis on 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate—polyacrylamide gel and
`subsequently were electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose mem-
`brane (Amersham). An immunoblot procedure based on the
`enhanced chemiluminescence method was performed by ex-
`posing the protein side of the nitrocellulose membrane to the
`enhanced chemiluminescence method detection reagent (Am-
`ersham) for 1 minute, followed by immediate exposure to x-ray
`film.
`
`Bidirectional Transport of P-Glycoprotein
`Substrates
`
`Before each experiment, cultured cells grown on Transwell
`inserts were washed with modified Ringer's solution (pH 7.4)
`and were allowed to equilibrate at 37°C. This solution (300
`mOsm) comprised 116 mM NaCl, 5.6 mM KCl, 0.8 mM
`NaHZPOm 25 mM NaHCOS, 1.8 mM CaCl2.2H20, 0.8 mM
`MgSO4, 5.5 mM D-glucose, and 15 mM HEPES. Hypotonic
`modified Ringer’s solution (200 mOsm) was made by reducing
`the NaCl concentration to 66 mM.29 After incubation at 37°C,
`the transepithelial electrical resistance was measured to gauge
`the integrity of the cell layers. The same protocol was used for
`the 4°C incubations.
`
`Transport of 3H-CSA in the Apical-to-Basolateral Di-
`rection. CSA transport was performed based on the proce-
`dures of Augustijns et al.6 and Hosoya et al.,30 which were
`designed to minimize the adsorption of CSA to Transwells,
`thereby maximizing its recovery (approximately 90%). Sili-
`conized pipet tips were used in all experiments.
`Transport was initiated by adding a solution containing
`3H—CSA (0.3 uCi) and unlabeled CSA to the apical compartment
`(0.4 ml) of Transwell
`inserts bathed with 1.5 ml modified
`Ringer’s solution in the basolateral compartment, followed by
`incubation at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The final concen-
`tration of CSA in the apical compartment was either 0.5 MM or
`5 [.LM. At predetermined times during a 3-hour period, the
`inserts were transferred to new wells containing 1.5 ml fresh
`modified Ringer‘s solution. Twenty microliters of 1 mM unla-
`beled CSA then was added to the receiver fluid to minimize
`
`3’H—CSA adsorption to the well. After 1 hour of incubation at
`37°C, the receiver solution was removed and placed (along
`with the tip) in a scintillation vial (first sampling). To maximize
`the recovery of the approximately 20% 3H-CSA remaining that
`was adsorbed into the receiver well, 2 ml of modified Ringer’s
`solution containing 10 uM cold CSA in 10% dimethylsulfoxide
`was added to the receiver wells for incubation overnight be-
`fore collection (along with the tip) in another scintillation vial
`(second sampling). The amount of 3H-CSA transported (sum of
`both samplings) was measured in a liquid scintillation spec-
`trometer (Beckman, Fullerton, CA).
`
`

`

`IOVS, June 1998, Vol. 59, No. 7
`
`Conjunctival Drug Efflux Pump
`
`1223
`
`Transport of all-GSA in the Baselateralto-Apical Di-
`rection. aH—CSA (0.3 [LCD and unlabeled CSA were added
`separately to the basolateral compartment of Transwells to
`attain a final drug concentration of 0.5 ,LLM or 5 MM in 1.5 ml,
`and they were mixed with gentle agitation. Inserts containing
`0.4 ml modified Ringer‘s solution in the apical Compartment
`then were transferred to the basolateral donor compartment
`containing radiolabeled CSA to initiate transport, as described
`above. In time-course studies, 0.4 ml modified Ringer’s solution
`on the apical side containing transported (ISA was removed
`and replaced with fresh modified Ringer’s solution. The apical
`samples (along with the tip) were placed in scintillation vials
`for counting in a liquid scintillation spectrometer.
`Transport in the Presence of Inhibitors and 4133
`Monoclonal Antibody. CSA (0.5 uM) transport in the pres—
`ence of li-gp inhibitors, verapamil, and progesterone (S, 10, 50,
`and 100 ,ulvl) was carried out essentially as described earlier
`with minor modifications. verapamil and progesterone stock
`solutions were prepared in modified Ringer‘s solution contain—
`ing 1% dimethylsulfoxidefa The same concentration of P—gp
`inhibitor was present in the apical and basolateral compart—
`ments atall times during transport. In the case of 4B} mAb (5
`pig/ml), it was present only in the apical compartment.
`Transport of Verapamil, Dexamethasone and o-Man-
`nitol. The same protocol described for CSA was used to cval~
`uate the transport: of verapamil (0.5 ,uM), dexamethasone (0.5
`nM; a transcellular transport marker“), and omannitol (1 mM;
`:1 paracellular marker”). Verapamil transport also was evaluw
`ated in the presence of the 4E3 math to further confirm its
`interaction with the P—gp efflux pump.
`
`Data Analysis
`
`The steady-State flux was estimated from the slope of the linear
`portion of a plot of a cumulative amount (moles) of the drug or
`36C! appearing in the receiver fluid versus time. The apparent
`permeability coefficient (flaw; centimeters per second) was
`calculated from the observed flux (rigid: in moles per second)
`normalized against the nominal surface area of the filter mem—
`brane (A; 1.13 cm2) and the initial drug concentration (Co in
`moles per milliliter) in the donor fluid, according to the equa—
`tion: l3app : (dQ/dt)/(A*C0). Statistical significance was tested
`by two-tailed Student’s I—test or one-way analysis of variance
`(Fisher PLSD) using a statistical software package (Starview II;
`Ahacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). Statistical significance was set
`at P < 0.35.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Western Blot Analysis
`
`As shown in Figure 1, a distinct major immunoreactive band at
`approximately 170 kDa was evident in cultured (lanes 2 and 3)
`and freshly isolated RCEs (lane 4). There exist numerous other
`minor bands, which Suggests that the C219 mAb might recog-
`nize more than one epitope or might signify the presence of
`truncated P-gp fractions in the RCE. The absence of any posi-
`tive band in lane 1 (cultured RCEs) and lane 5 (freshly isolated
`RCES)
`in the presence of a mouse Ingn isotype—matchcd
`negative control antibody served as a negative control.
`
`MW. (ltDa)
`
`1
`
`9
`
`3
`
`5
`
`‘
`
`203 —D-
`
`1 18
`
`I
`
`-- W
`“filmW
`“rm-ma w
`.....mat
`
`‘_ P-g p
`,
`-
`( “' l70de)
`
`s
`
`.....
`
`51—p-
`
`34—r
`
`.3”;
`
`FIGURE 1. Western blot analysis of pnglycoprotein (P-gp) ex-
`pression in cultured conjunctiva] epithelial cells. The numbers
`to the left of the blot indicate the positions of molecular mass
`markers that underwent electrophoresis in parallel (expressed
`in kilodaltons). The proteins used as molecular mass standards
`were myosin (205 kDa), B—galactosidase (11,8 kDa), ovalbumin
`(51 kDa), and carhmiic anhydrase ('54 kDa) (presrainetl sodium
`dodecyl sulfate—polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis standards,
`broad range). Lane 1, mouse lngfl isotype—matched negative
`control in cultured conjunctiva] epithelial cells (RCES); lanes 2
`and 3, mouse C219 monoclonal antibody to P—gp in cultured
`RCES; {ans 4, mouse (3219 monoclonal antibody to P-gp in
`freshly isolated R035; and tone 5, mouse lgGZ,
`isowpe—
`matched negative control in freshly isolated REES.
`
`Directionality and Temperature Dependency of
`Conjunctival Cyclosporin A Transport
`
`The time course of 0.5 nM CSA transport in either direction
`across cultured RCE cell layers, in the presence and absence of
`100 ,uM verapamil, is shown in Figure 2. CSA (0.5 ,uM) flux
`exhibited marked directional asymmetry. The bit Pam, was 9.5
`times higher than in the ab direction (P < 0.01; see Table 1).
`By contrast,
`the bidirectional transport of Elli-mannitol was
`symmetric. Its ba Papp was 1 X 10—7 cm/sec, and its ab Papp
`was 0.9 X 10—7 cm/sec. When the CSA concentration was
`
`raised to 5 pm, the ratio of ha and ab PM, was reduced to 4.6
`(Table 1). This was attributed principally to a 70% increase in
`
`the (ISA ab Pam When the temperature was lowered to 4°C,
`the ab Papp was increased three times, while the ba Pm, was
`reduced three times (Table 1), which resulted in no net secre-
`tion.
`
`Effect of P—Glycoprotein on Conjunctival
`Cyclosporin A Transport
`
`Verapamil (10, 50, and 100 old) and progesterone (50 nM and
`100 uM) inhibited the conjunctival efflux of 0.3 MM GSA in a
`dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05 by one~way analysis of
`variance; see Fig. 3). No significant inhibition of CSA secretory
`flux was observed with 5 pM verapamil and 5 uM to 10 MM
`progesterone (Fig. 3). Although 100 uM verapamil and proges—
`terone were as effective as 5 rig/ml 4E3 mill) in enhancing CSA
`influx (Table 1), both were less effective than 4E3 mAb in
`reducing (ISA efflux (Table 1). Indeed, 4E3 mAb was the only
`modulator that abolished net GSA secretion.
`
`

`

`1224
`
`Saha et a1.
`
`IOVS, June 1998, Vol. 39, No. 7
`
`cm/s)
`
`CsAbaPapp(E-07
`
`aa
`
`Vg
`
`Verapamil
`
`Progesterone
`
`FIGURE 3. Basolateral-to-apical (ba) transport of cyclosporin A
`(CSA; 0.5 MM) in the absence (I) or the presence of 5 MM (11),
`terone. Error bars represent SEM for n = 4 to 8. Data were
`statistically significant (P < 0.05) by one-way analysis of vari-
`ance (Fisher PLSD) between groups I and III, I and IV, I and V,
`II and III, II and IV, I] and V, 111 and IV, and III and V for
`verapamil, and between groups I and IV, I and V, II and IV, II
`and V, and III and V, and IV and V for progesterone.
`
`ab Papp 1.7 times (Table 2). The net result was a 65% smaller
`pp
`net secretory P“
`and a 2.3 times smaller ratio of efflux to
`influx.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The study provides evidence for the existence of a P~gp drug
`efflux pump in cultured RCEs that may restrict the conjunctival
`absorption of CSA and other lipophilic drugs such as verapamil
`and dexamethasone. Western blot analysis using C219 mAb
`
`CsATransported
`
`(pmol)
`
`Time (h)
`
`FIGURE 2. Time course of 0.5 MM cyclosporin A (CSA) bidi-
`rectional transport across cultured conjunctiva] epithelial cell
`layers in the absence (-) or presence (+) of 100 MM verapamil.
`I, apical-to-basal transport (ab; —); El, basal-to-apical transport
`(ba; —); O, ab (+ 100 uM verapamil): 0, ba (+100 p.M vera-
`pamil). Error bars represent SEM for n = 4 to 5. In cases in
`which it is not seen, the error bar is smaller than the size of the
`symbol.
`
`Conjunctival Verapamil and Dexamethasone
`Transport
`
`As in the case of CSA, verapamil and dexamethasone transport
`across the conjunctiva also showed asymmetry in favor of
`efflux (Table 2). Compared with CSA, verapamil and dexameth—
`asone afforded a 30 to 50 times higher Pam, in the ab direction
`and a 10 times higher Papp in the ba direction (Table 2).
`Consequently,
`the ratio of efflux to influx was smaller for
`verapamil and dexamethasone, The presence of 5 ug/ml 4E5
`mAb reduced verapamil ba Papp by 25%, Whereas it increased
`
`TABLE 1. Cyclosporin Transport Across Cultured Rabbit Conjunctival Epithelial Cell Layers Under
`Various Conditions
`
`CsA
`
`(MM)
`
`0.5
`5.0
`
`0.5
`0.5
`
`0.5
`
`0.5
`
`Pa“, (10—7 cm/sec) *
`
`Condition
`
`Control
`10-fold
`Excess
`4°C
`+100 “M
`Verapamil
`+100 p.M
`Progesterone
`+5 ug/ml
`4E3 mAb
`
`'ab
`
`0.9 i 0.04
`1.5 i 03*
`
`2.7 : 0.4%
`2.7 i 0.6:
`
`2.8 : 0.6a
`
`2.5 i 0.2:
`
`[m
`
`8.3 i 0.9
`6.9 : 0.2§
`
`2.7 i 0.1:
`4.1: 0.31:
`
`3.2 i 0.41:
`
`2.6 i 0.71:
`
`Net
`
`' 7.4
`5.4
`
`0
`1.4
`
`0.4
`
`0.1
`
`Ratio1'
`
`9.3
`4.6
`
`1,0
`1.5
`
`1.1
`
`1.0
`
`ba, basal-to—apical transport; ab, apical-to-basal transport; Paw, apparent permeability coefficient; CSA, cyclosporin A; mAb, monoclonal
`antibody.
`‘ Apparent permeability coefficient; mean : SEM for n = 4 to 6.
`’r ba/ab Pupp
`tip < 0.05 from control.
`§p > 0.05 from control.
`
`

`

`IOVS, June 1998, Vol. 39, No. 7
`
`Conjunctival Drug Efflux Pump
`
`1225
`
`TABLE 2. Apparent Permeability Coefficient Values for the Transport of p—Glycoprotein Substrates Across Cultured
`Rabbit Conjunctival Cell Layers
`
`—6
`
`Pa”, (10
`
`cm/sec)1'
`
`Solute
`
`log PC‘
`
`ab
`
`CsA
`Verapamil
`Verapamil + 4135 mb
`Dexamethasone‘
`
`5.0
`3.8
`
`2.9
`
`0.09 i 0.0
`2.8 i 0.1
`4.8 i‘ 0.1
`4.1 i 0.1
`
`lm
`
`0.83 : 0.09§
`9.3 : 0.6§
`7.1 i 0.3“
`6.6 i- O.5§
`
`Net
`
`7.4
`6.5
`2.3
`2.5
`
`Ratio:
`
`9.3
`3.4
`1.5
`1.6
`
`ba, basal-to-apical transport; ab, apical-to-basal transport; P
`antibody.
`‘ Logarithm of the n-octanol/pH 7.4 buffer partition coefficient.
`TMean : SEMforn = 4t08.
`fl: ba/ab Pup”.
`§ P < 0.05 from ab flux.
`‘P > 0.05 from ab flux.
`
`app!
`
`apparent permeability coefficient; CSA, cyclosporin A; mAb, monoclonal
`
`against P—gp revealed a 170-kDa protein in the lysates of freshly
`isolated and cultured RCEs (Fig. 1), as was the case in Caco~2
`cells.30 Despite equal amounts of protein, the density of the
`170-kDa band in freshly isolated RCEs was less than that af-
`forded by the cultured cells. A possible explanation may be the
`dilution of epithelial cell protein, hence P-gp, by nonepithelial
`cell protein in the case of the tissue. Another possible expla-
`nation may be the overexpression of P-gp in cultured cells that
`was induced by hormones alone or in conjunction with xenO»
`biotics in the medium. This has been shown to be the case for
`
`rat hepatocyte primary culturesgz’fi’i and for Caco-2 cells.35 In
`any event, the location of the P—gp pump in the cell is probably
`apical, which is characteristic of other cell types. Nevertheless,
`the basolateral location of this or a related P-gp drug efflux
`pump cannot be ruled out. Indeed, the multidrug resistance—
`related protein, another drug efflux pump, has been found
`recently in the basolateral membrane of the pig kidney cell line
`LLc-PKi.36
`‘
`Probably because of the P-gp drug efflux pump, the trans-
`port of CSA, verapamil, and dexamethasone across the con-
`junctiva was asymmetric (9.5, 3.4, and 1.6 times higher, re-
`spectively; see Table 2) for efflux than influx. Further evidence
`for the involvement of P-gp in restricting the conjunctiva]
`absorption of CSA includes: saturation of P—gp with increasing
`CSA concentration, as indicated by a 67% increase in CSA
`influx when increasing the CSA concentration from 0.5 to 5
`MM (Table 1); a threefold increase in the influx of CSA in the
`presence of 100 uM verapamil, 100 uM progesterone, and 5
`jig/ml 4E3 mAb (Table 1); and the abolition of net CSA secre-
`tion at 4°C (Table 1). Partly because of the P-gp drug efflux
`pump, the ab Pam, of CSA, verapamil, and dexanlethasone was
`1 to 2 orders of magnitude smaller than that of betaxolol of
`comparable lipophilicity (log PC = 5.4).“ The 4°C and the 4155
`mAb results suggest that approximately 30% of CSA transport
`in either direction is P-gp independent. Given that the PH“, of
`CSA under these conditions (2.5—2.7 X 10—7 cm/sec) is ap—
`proximately three times higher than that of mannitol (1 X 10~7
`cm/sec), such a P—gp-independent pathway is probably trans
`cellular.
`
`Like CSA, the transport of verapamil across cultured RCEs
`also showed directional asymmetry (Table 2). The net secre—
`tory verapamil PuPp was reduced by 65% in the presence of S
`jig/ml 4E3 mAb, which suggests that verapamil itself was a
`
`substrate for P-gp. Such a possibility is consistent with the
`finding of Saitoh and Aungst.2| It is impossible to estimate the
`relative affinity of CSA and verapamil for P-gp on the basis of
`the ratio of Palms in the ba and ab directions at a single
`concentration (0.5 jiM). In inhibition studies, verapamil inhib-
`ited CSA ba Pm, at concentrations of 10 11M to 100 MM, which
`were 20 to 200 times higher than that of CSA (0.5 MM).
`Therefore, verapamil may block CSA efflux by acting as a
`competitive P—gp substrate. Relative to CSA and verapamil of
`comparable lipophilicity,
`the ratio of efflux and influx for
`dexamethasone was smaller (1.6; see Table 2). It is possible
`that dexamethasone efflux was already saturated at 0.5 MM,
`which was 20 times higher than the 25 nM used by Ueda22 to
`establish dexamethasone as a physiological substrate of P—gp.
`The unexpectedly lower Papp for CSA in comparison with
`that for verapamil and dexamethasone of comparable lipophi-
`licity needs to be explained. For a lipophilic peptide similar to
`CSA, the principal determinant of passive transport across the
`cell membrane seems to be desolvation of the solute, rather
`than lipophilicity, for it to enter the hydrophobic, non-hydro-
`gen— bonding interior of the membrane.”38 Therefore, as the
`number of potential solute—solvent hydrogen bonds increase,
`peptide permeability will decrease. The presence of potential
`hydrogen-bonding functional groups similar to amide (—NH-
`CO—) and alcohol (-OH) in the CSA structure suggests a pro-
`nounced impeding influence of the associated hydrogen-bond-
`ing potential on the entry of CSA into the membrane interior of
`the conjunctival cells. This factor together with the P-gp drug
`Ipp
`efflux pump probably contribute to the unusally small CSA PK
`observed in the ab direction in the conjunctiva.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Western blot analysis and the transport behavior of model P-gp
`substrates under typical conditions for detecting the existence
`of a P-gp drug efflux pump support such a possibility in RCEs.
`The present study underscores a possible role for P—gp in
`restricting conjunctival CSA absorption en route to the poste-
`rior segment after topical application. Further work is required
`to determine whether the conjunctival absorption of other
`lipophilic ophthalmic drugs would be affected similarly as for
`CSA and to determine whether P—gp also exists in corneal
`epithelial cells.
`
`

`

`1226
`
`Saha et al.
`
`IOVS, June 1998, V01. 39, N0. 7
`
`Acknowledgments
`The authors thank John Xu for technical assistance with the western
`blot analysis.
`
`References
`l.
`
`Ling V. P-glycoprotein and resistance to anticancer drugs. Cancer.
`1992;69:2603-2609.
`Holash JA, Stewart PA. The relationship of astrocyte-like cells to
`the vessels that contribute to the bloodocular barriers. Brain Res.
`1993;629:218-224.
`'l‘hiebaut F, Tsuruo T, Hamada H, Gottesman MM, Pastan I, Will-
`ingham MC. lmmunohistochemical localization in normal tissues
`of different epitopes in the multidrug transport protein P170:
`evidence for localization in brain capillaries and crossreactivity of
`one antibody with a muscle protein. JHistocbem Cytochem. 1989;
`37:1 59 —164.
`. Thiebaut F, Tsuruo T, Hamada H, Gottesman MM, Pastan I, Will-
`ingham MC. Cellular localization of the multidrug-resistance gene
`product p-glycoprotein in normal human tissues. Proc Natl Acad
`Sci USA. 1989;813:7735—7738.
`. Cordon-Cardo C, O‘Brien JP, Casalas D, Rittman-Grauer L, Biedler
`JL, Melamed M. Multidrug—resistance gene (p—glycoprotein) is ex-
`pressed by endothelial cells at blood-brain barrier sites. Proc Natl
`Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:695-698.
`Augustijns PF, Bradshaw TP, Gan LL, Hendren RW, ’l'hakker DR.
`Evidence for a polarized efflttx system in Caco~2 cells capable of
`modulating cyclosporin A transport. Biochem Biophys Res Co-
`mtm. 1993;197:360 —365.
`. Tstlji A, Tamai I, Sakata A, Tenda Y, Terasaki T. Restricted transport
`of cyclosporin A across the blood-brain barrier by a multidrug
`transporter, p-glycoprotein. Biocbem Pbm‘macol. 1993;46:1096—
`1099.
`. Sparreboom A, Van AsperenJ, Mayer U, et al. Limited oral bioavail-
`ability and active epithelial excretion of paclitaxel (Taxol) caused
`by p-glycoprotein in the intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;
`94:2031-2035.
`. Hunter J, Hirst BH, Simmons NL. Drug absorption limited by
`p—glycoprotein—mediated secretory drug transport in human intes-
`tinal epithelial Caco-2 cell layers. Pharmacol Res. 1993;10:743-
`749.
`Burton PS, Conradi RA, Hilgers AR, Ho NFH. Evidence for a polar-
`ized efflux system for peptides in the apical membrane of CacoZ
`cells. Biochem Biophys Res Cormm. 1993;190:760 -766.
`Tsuji A, Terasaki T, Takabatake Y, et al. P—glycoprotein as the drug
`efflux pump in primary cultured bovine brain capillary endothelial
`cells. Life Sci. 1992;51:1427—1437.
`HunterJ, Hirst BH, Simmons N1. Epithelial secretion of vinblastine
`by human intestinal adenocarcinoma cell (HCT-8 and T84) layers
`expressing p-glycoprotein. Br] Cancer. 1991;64:437—444.
`Sharma RC, lnoue S, RoitelmanJ, Schimke RT, Simoni R1). Peptide
`transport by the multidrug resistance pump] Biol Chem. 1992;
`267:5731-5734.
`Ahmed l, Patton TF. Disposition of timolol and inulin in the rabbit
`eye following corneal versus non-corneal absorption. Int] Pbarm.
`1987;38:9-21.
`Hayakawa E, Chien DS, lnagaki K, Yamamoto A, Wang W, Lee VHL.
`Conjunctival penetration of insulin and peptide drugs in the albino
`rabbit. Pbarmacol Res. 1992;92769—775.
`Horibe Y, Hosoya K, Kim K, Ogiso T, Lee VHL. Polar solute
`transport across the pigmented rabitt conjunctiva: size depen-
`dence and the influence of 8-bromo cyclic adenosine monophos-
`phate. Pharmacol Res. 1997;14:1246—1251.
`Sun L, Basu SK, Kim K, Lee VHL. Arginjne vasopressin transport
`and metabolism in the pigmented rabbit conjunctiva. EurJPbafin
`Sci. l998;6:47~52.
`Hosoya K, Kompella UB, Kim K, Lee VHL. Contribution of Na"—
`glucose cotransport to the shortcircuit current in the pigmented
`rabbit conjunctiva. Curr Eye Res. 1996;16:1050—1055.
`
`2.
`
`.
`
`VI
`
`6.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`‘13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`Oh JO, Minasi P, Grabner G, Ohashi Y. Suppression of secondary
`herpes simplex uveitis by cyclosporine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
`Sci. 1985;26:494 -500.
`Whitcup SM, Chan CC, Luyo DA, Bo P, Li Q. Topical cyclosporine
`inhibits mast cell-mediated conjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
`Sci. 1996;357:2686-2695.
`Saitoh H, Aungst BJ. Possible involvement of multiple p-glycopro—
`tein-mediated efflux systems in the transport of verapamil and
`other organic cations across rat intestine. Pbarmacol Res. 1995;
`12:1304-1310.
`Ueda K. Human p—glycoprotein transports cortisol, aldosterone,
`and dexamethasone, but not progesterone.J Biol Chem. 1992;267:
`24248—24252.
`Saha P, Kim K, Lee VHL. A primary culture model of rabbit
`conjunctival epithelial cells exhibiting tight barrier properties.
`Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:1163—1169.
`Saha P, Uchiyama T, Kim K, Lee VHL. Permeability characteristics
`of primary cultured rabbit conjunctival epithelial cells to low
`molecular weight drugs. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:1170—1174.
`Arceci RJ, Steiglitz K, Croop JM, Bras J, Schinkel A, Baas F. A
`monoclonal antibody to an external epitope of the p-glycoprotein.
`Cancer Res. 1992;53:310 -317.
`Georges E, Zhang JT, Ling V. Modulation of ATP and drug binding
`by monoclonal antibodies against p-glycoprotein. ] Cell Physiol.
`1991;148:479—484.
`Toth K, Vaughan MM, Slocum HK, et al. Comparison of an immu-
`noperoxidase “sandwich” staining method and western blot de-
`tection of p-glycoprotein in human cell lines and sarcomas. Am]
`Pathol. 1992;140:1009-1016.
`Muller C, Bailly JD, Goubin F, et al. Verapamll decreases p~glyco-
`protein expression in multidrug-resistant human leukemic cell
`lines. Int] Cancer. 1994;56:749 —754.
`Ambasch K, Cabantchik I, Slotki
`IN. Effects of hypotonic and
`hypoionic media on drug pumping by p-glycoprotein expressed in
`epithelial and nonepithelial cell lines. ] Cell Physiol. 1995;164:
`1 17- 122.
`
`Hosoya K, Kim K, Lee VHL. Age-dependent expression of p-glyco—
`protein gp17O in Caco-Z cell monolayers. Pbarmacol Res. 1996;
`13:885- 890.
`'
`Artursson P, KarlssonJ. Correlation between oral drug absorption
`in humans and apparent permeability coefficients in human intes-
`tinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comun. 1991;
`175:880—885.
`Adson A, Raub TJ, Burton PS, et al. Quantitative approaches to
`delineate paracellular diffusion in cultured epithelial cell monolay-
`ers] Pharm Sci. 19943315294536.
`Bailly JD, Pourquier P, Jaffrezou JP, et al. Effect of 5736—c0ndi-
`tioned medium and recombinant cytokines on P—glycoprotein ex-
`pression in a human GM-CSF—dependent leukemic my

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket