`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,240,376
`Petitioner Synopsys’ Presentation Showing Invalidity of Claims
`1-9, 11, 28, 29 over U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,109 to Gregory, et al.
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`2
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`3
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`‘376 Patent at 5:31-45.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp 28-29
`
`5
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp 45
`
`‘376 patent at 9:15-25
`
`6
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`Claims 5, 9
`
`Claim 9 shows that the applicant intended claim 5 to encompass the
`alternative embodiment
`
`7
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp 21-22
`
`8
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp 23
`
`9
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp 27-28
`
`See ‘376 patent at 2:47-50
`
`10
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`Page 9
`
`11
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`‘376 Patent at 9:10-14.
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp 45
`
`12
`
`
`
`Construction of ‘376 Patent Claims 5, 28
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp 62
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`13
`
`
`
`Construction of “instrumentation signal”
`
`14
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 1
`
`15
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 1
`
`16
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 1
`
`17
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 1
`
`18
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 1
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`19
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 1
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp. 42-43
`
`20
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 1
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp. 66-67
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`21
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 1
`
`Sarrafzadeh Dep. pp. 68
`
`22
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 2
`
`23
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 3
`
`24
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 3
`
`25
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 4
`
`26
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 5
`
`27
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 5
`
`28
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 5
`
`29
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 6
`
`30
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 6
`
`31
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 7
`
`32
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 8
`
`33
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 9
`
`34
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 11
`
`35
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 11
`
`36
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 11
`
`‘109 patent at 15:39-54
`
`37
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 28
`
`38
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 28
`
`39
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 28
`
`40
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 29
`
`41
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 28
`
`42
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 29
`
`43
`
`
`
`Mentor Failed to Show its Substitute
`Claims Are Patentable
`
`44
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 34
`
`45
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 34
`
`‘376 patent
`
`
`
`‘376 patent‘376 patent
`
`46
`
`
`
`Mentor Failed to Show Substitute Claim
`35 Is Patentable
`
`47
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 35
`
`48
`
`
`
`Mentor Failed to Show Substitute Claim
`36 Is Patentable
`
`49
`
`
`
`Gregory ‘109 Patent Anticipates Claim 36
`
`50
`
`
`
`Mentor Failed to Show its Substitute
`Claims Are Patentable
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`51
`
`
`
`Mentor’s Substitute Claims Are Not
`Substantially Identical to the Original Claims
`
`52
`
`