`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SYNOPSYS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Patent of MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00042 (SCM)
`Patent 6,240,376 B1
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board, PTAB
`United State Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`DECLARATION OF TRAVIS JENSEN IN
`SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S OPPOSITION TO
`PATENT OWNER’S SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO AMEND
`
`OHSUSA:754427552.1
`
`1
`
`SYNOPSYS 1020 Synopsys v. Mentor, IPR2012-00042
`
`
`
`I, Travis M. Jensen, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`
`LLP, representing the Petitioner Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) in the above-
`
`captioned inter partes review.
`
`I am licensed to practice law in the State of
`
`California and the District of Columbia, and have been admitted to practice before
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office. I am familiar with the facts set forth
`
`herein, and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to those
`
`facts.
`
`2.
`
`Synopsys Exhibit 1012 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,363,520 to Boubezari et al.
`
`3.
`
`Synopsys Exhibit 1014 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from
`
`“Field-Programmable Gate Array Technology,” Stephen M. Trimberger, 1994.
`
`4.
`
`Synopsys Exhibit 1015 is a true and correct copy of “Taking
`
`Advantage of Reconfigurable Logic,” Bradly K. Fawcett, Seventh Annual IEEE
`
`International Proceedings, ASIC Conference, 1994, pgs. 227-230.
`
`5.
`
`Synopsys Exhibit 1016 is a true and correct copy of “Effects of FPGA
`
`Architecture on FPGA Routing,” Stephen Trimberger, 32nd ACM/IEEE Design
`
`Automation Conference, 1995.
`
`OHSUSA:754427552.1
`
`2
`
`2
`
`SYNOPSYS 1020 Synopsys v. Mentor, IPR2012-00042
`
`
`
`6.
`
`Synopsys Exhibit 1017 is a true and correct copy of “A
`
`Reprogrammable Gate Array and Applications,” Stephen Trimberger, Proceedings
`
`of the IEEE, Vol. 81, No. 7, July 1993.
`
`7.
`
`Synopsys Exhibit 1018 is a true and correct copy of “Proper Use of
`
`Hierarchy in HDL-Based High Density FGPA Design,” Carol A. Fields, published
`
`in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1995 at pgs. 168-177.
`
`8.
`
`Synopsys Exhibit 1019 is a true and correct copy of the deposition
`
`transcript of Dr. Majid Sarrafzadeh, dated August, 22, 2013.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States
`
`that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`Dated: September 6, 2013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Travis M. Jensen/
`
`Travis M. Jensen
`Registration No. 60,087
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Tel: (650) 614-7400
`Fax: (650) 614-7401
`
`OHSUSA:754427552.1
`
`3
`
`3
`
`SYNOPSYS 1020 Synopsys v. Mentor, IPR2012-00042
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
