throbber
Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend
`U.S. Patent 6,575,717
`
`IRP2012-00026
`IPR2013-00109
`
`Hearing Date: November 18, 2013
`
`Confidential
`
`1
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Motion to Amend
`
`Patent Owner proposes the following substitute claims, if the
`corresponding claim of the ‘717 patent is determined to be
`invalid.
`
`Original Claim
`1
`3
`6
`10
`11
`22
`23
`
`Proposed Substitute
`35
`36
`37
`38
`39
`40
`41
`
`Confidential
`
`2
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Motion to Amend
`
`Microsoft does not contest that Substitute Claims 35-
`41 are patentable over Perlman, the Combination of
`Perlman and Yohe, Santos, and the Combination of DRP
`and Mattis.
`
`Only 2 Grounds of Review are at issue for the Motion to
`Amend
`– Anticipation by Yohe of Claims 1, 3, 6, 7, 10, 22-23
`– Anticipation by DRP of Claims 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14
`
`Confidential
`
`3
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`4
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Motion to Amend
`
`Microsoft is improperly attempting to introduce
`New Grounds of Rejection.
`– Claims 1, 3, 10, and 22-23 are not subject to any
`Ground of Review involving DRP.
`– Microsoft has waived challenge to this subject matter
`in view of DRP.
`– Substitute Claims 35, 36, 38, and 40-41 are amended
`versions of Claims 1, 3, 10, and 22-23, respectively.
`
`DRP is irrelevant to Substitute Claims 35, 36, 38, and 40-41
`
`Confidential
`
`5
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`6
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 35
`
`Confidential
`
`7
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 35 – No New Matter
`
`EX1002 at 7:65-67
`
`Confidential
`
`EX1002 at 2:5-8
`
`8
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 35 - Patentable
`Yohe merely discloses a remote client 12 that initiates a READ
`operation, by sending a signature of the data to the Cache
`Verifying Computer 14.
`
`Confidential
`
`9
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 35 - Patentable
`
`Yohe does not disclose the data being a range of octets in a file.
`
`EX. 1006 at 6:28-30
`
`EX. 1006 at 7:24-26
`
`Confidential
`
`10
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`11
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 36
`
`Confidential
`
`12
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 36 – No New Matter
`
`Original Claim 1
`
`EX1002 at 3:37-39
`
`EX1002 at 2:5-8
`
`Confidential
`
`13
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 36 – Not Enlarged
`
`The Amendment merely structurally recites
`“communicating” as “configured to communicate.”
`
`Confidential
`
`14
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 36 - Patentable
`Yohe does not disclose a receiver/computer storing signatures in
`permanent storage memory.
`
`No storage of
`signatures from
`Cache Verifying
`Computer14
`
`No storage of
`signatures from
`Remote Client 12
`
`And, as indicated above, Yohe does not disclose creating a digital
`digest on at least a range of octets in a file.
`
`Confidential
`
`15
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`16
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 37
`
`Confidential
`
`17
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 37 – No New Matter
`
`EX1002 at 9:25-31
`
`EX1002 at 2:5-8
`
`Confidential
`
`18
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 37 - Patentable
`Yohe does not disclose creating a digital digest on data,
`during a DIRECTORY operation.
`
`Yohe and DRP do not disclose calculating a digital digest on
`a plurality of octet ranges in a file or files.
`• Yohe merely references generically to data.
`
`EX. 1006 at 6:28-30
`• DRP only suggests to digital digest on entire files.
`
`Confidential
`
`EX. 1003 at 3:28
`
`19
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`20
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 38
`
`Confidential
`
`21
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 38 – No New Matter
`
`EX1002 at 7:52-67
`
`EX1002 at 2:5-8
`
`Confidential
`
`22
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 38 – Not Enlarged
`
`As amended, searching for a particular Digital Digest
`inherently includes at least one comparison of the
`particular digest to one of multiple digests in the
`Receiver/Computer.
`– If the Digital Digest does not match, the
`Receiver/Computer compares the Digital Digest to
`additional Digital Digests, until a match is found.
`
`Confidential
`
`23
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 38 - Definite
`At least one of “said” Digital Digests draws antecedent
`basis from “said” Sender/Computer further including
`means for creating digital digests on data.
`
`Confidential
`
`24
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 38 - Patentable
`
`In Yohe, the remote client 12 is not configured
`to search, but instead is configured to compare
`the only ONE directory signature.
`
`Confidential
`
`25
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`26
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 39
`
`Confidential
`
`27
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 39 – No New Matter
`
`v
`
`EX1002 at 7:65-67
`
`v
`
`Confidential
`
`EX1002 at 3:36-39
`
`28
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 39 – Patentable
`
`DRP does not disclose the step of receiving a
`request for data.
`– The client evaluates what files it needs, based on
`the Index, and then downloads those files. The
`client downloads the content that is needed, not a
`content identifier, or other file.
`
`Confidential
`
`29
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`30
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Claim 40 – No New Matter
`
`v
`
`EX1002 at 7:65-67
`
`v
`
`v
`
`EX1002 at 7:51-67
`
`Confidential
`
`EX1002 at 7:44-51
`
`31
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 40 – Not Enlarged
`
`As amended, Claim 40 requires searching for
`each received digital digest.
`– In the context of the ‘717 patent, this is a more narrow
`recitation of the “searching” step recited in claim 22.
`
`Confidential
`
`32
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 40 - Patentable
`With regard to Yohe:
`– In the READ operation, the remote client 12 does
`not send a request, but instead sends the
`identifier.
`– In the DIRECTORY operation, the remote client
`sends a request for a signature for the directory,
`not the directory itself.
`– Further, there is no searching for a directory
`signature in the remote client, because only one
`directory signature is present.
`
`Confidential
`
`33
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`34
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 41
`
`Confidential
`
`35
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Substitute Claim 41
`
`• Claim 41 is merely amended to make it consistent with the
`Amendment to claim 40, from which it depends.
`– The claim is responsive and supported by the original
`specification
`– Further, in combination with claim 40, it is certainly more
`narrow than original claim 22. Thus, there has been no enlarged
`claim scope.
`– Claim 41 is patentable of Yohe for the reason explained above
`with reference to Claim 40
`
`Confidential
`
`36
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Opposition
`
`Confidential
`
`37
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

`

`Motion to Amend
`
`• The substitute claims are patentable, and
`properly submitted.
`• To the extent any claim of the ‘717 patent is
`determined to be invalid, its corresponding
`substitute claim should be included in the
`‘717 patent.
`
`Confidential
`
`38
`
`PROXYCONN
`DEM. EX. 2008
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket