`
`Filed on behalf of Microsoft Corporation
`
`By: John D. Vandenberg (Reg. No. 31,312)
`
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`Stephen J. Joncus (Reg. No. 44,809)
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`Salumeh R. Loesch (pro hac vice)
`salumeh.loesch@klarquist.com
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`____________
`
`CORRECTED FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AND LIST
`OF EXHIBITS TO PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) files and serves this List of
`
`Exhibits with the exhibit number, a brief description of each exhibit, and a notation
`
`of which exhibits were served and which were filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.63(e).
`
`IPR2012-00026
`
`Exhibits 1001-1018: Filed September 18, 2012 with Microsoft’s Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717;
`
`Exhibits 1019-1020: Served January 18, 2013, concurrently with the First
`
`Supplemental List of Exhibits and with Microsoft’s Notice of Supplemental
`
`Evidence in Response to Proxyconn’s Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-
`
`1018;
`
`Exhibit 1021: Filed March 21, 2013, concurrently with Microsoft’s Motion for
`
`Pro Hac Vice Admission Under4 7 C.F.R. § 42.10;
`
`Exhibit 1022: Served May 29, 2013, concurrently with Microsoft’s Objections To
`
`Patent Holder Proxyconn, Inc.’s Exhibits 2002, 2004;
`
`Exhibits 1023-1026: Filed August 21, 2013, concurrently with the Fourth
`
`Supplemental List of Exhibits, Microsoft’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Corrected
`
`Response to Petition, and with Microsoft’s Response to Patent Owner’s Corrected
`
`Motion to Amend.
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Exhibit 1027: Filed October 14, 2013, concurrently with the Fifth Supplemental
`
`List of Exhibits and Microsoft’s Motion to Exclude Evidence.
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Offered for
`Truth?
`
`Exhibits
`Not Filed
`
`1001 Appendix A, Chart mapping ’717 claims to
`
`No.
`
`
`
`prior art references Perlman, Yohe and Santos.
`
`(Part of Petition.)
`
`1002 Leonid Goldstein, U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717,
`
`Yes, but only
`
`
`
`“System and Method for Data Access,” issued
`
`for
`
`Jun. 29, 2004, with Certificate of Correction,
`
`admissions of
`
`issued Aug. 14, 2012. (Long Dep. Ex. 1021;
`
`prior art and
`
`Konchitsky Dep. Exhibit.)
`
`knowledge of
`
`PHOSITA.
`
`1003 Radia J. Perlman et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`5,742,820, “Mechanism for Efficiently
`
`Synchronizing Information Over a Network,”
`
`issued Apr. 21, 1998. (Long Dep. Ex. 1024;
`
`Konchitsky Dep. Exhibit.)
`
`1004 Jonathan Santos et al., “USENIX, Increasing
`
`No.
`
`Effective Link Bandwidth by Suppressing
`
`Replicated Date,” Proceedings of the USENIX
`
`Annual Technical Conference (NO 98) New
`
`Orleans, Louisiana, June 1998. (Long Dep.
`
`
`
`
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Ex. 1026.)
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`Truth?
`
`Exhibits
`Not Filed
`
`1005 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`5,835,943, “Apparatus and Method for
`
`Increased Data Access in a Network File
`
`Oriented Caching System,” issued Nov. 10,
`
`1998. (Long Dep. Ex. 1022; Konchitsky Dep.
`
`Exhibit.)
`
`1006 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent
`
`No.
`
`Application No. 08/888,311, filed July 3,
`
`1997, issued as U.S. Patent No. 5,835,943.
`
`1007 Expert declaration of Professor Darrell D. E.
`
`Yes.
`
`Long in Support of Microsoft’s Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review. (Long Dep. Ex. 1020.)
`
`1008 Microsoft Corporation, “[MS-RDC] –
`
`No.
`
`v20120705, Remote Differential Compression
`
`Algorithm Specification,” July 5, 2012.
`
`1009 Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Response
`
`No.
`
`to Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s First Set of
`
`Interrogatories with supporting Exhibits A-B
`
`and E, dated July 25, 2012. (Exhibits C-D
`
`omitted.)
`
`1010 [Microsoft’s] Supplemental Ex. E to
`
`No.
`
`Defendants’ Supplemental Interrogatory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Response, dated Aug. 15, 2012.
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`Truth?
`
`Exhibits
`Not Filed
`
`1011 Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Objections and
`
`No.
`
`Responses to Defendant Microsoft
`
`Corporation’s First Set Of Interrogatories,
`
`dated Sept. 9, 2012.
`
`1012 Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Second Amended
`
`No.
`
`Consolidated Complaint for Patent
`
`Infringement and supporting Ex. B, dated July
`
`16, 2012. (Exhibit A omitted.)
`
`1013 Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for
`
`No.
`
`Summary Judgment of Invalidity, dated July 3,
`
`2012.
`
`1014 Declaration of Darrell D. E. Long in Support
`
`No.
`
`of Defendants’ Motion for Summary
`
`Judgment and supporting Exhibits A-C, dated
`
`July 3, 2012.
`
`1015 Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,128,623,
`
`No.
`
`“High Performance Object Cache,” filed Apr.
`
`15, 1998, issued Oct. 3, 2000.
`
`1016 Reasons for Allowance of U.S. Application
`
`No.
`
`No. 09/398,007, dated Dec. 12, 2003.
`
`1017 Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`6,279,041, “Methods, Systems and Computer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`Truth?
`
`Exhibits
`Not Filed
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Program Products for Differencing Data
`
`Communications Using a Message Queue,”
`
`issued Aug. 21, 2001.
`
`1018 Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent
`
`No.
`
`
`
`Application No. 09/192,128, filed Nov. 13,
`
`1998, issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,279,041.
`
`1019 Verification of Microsoft’s Interrogatory
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`Responses, signed by David M. Howard, dated
`
`August 13, 2012.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`1020 Declaration of Mung Tam as Supplemental
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`Evidence in Response to Proxyconn’s
`
`Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-1018.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`1021 Declaration Of Salumeh R. Loesch in Support
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`of Microsoft Corporation’s Motion for Pro
`
`Hac Vice Admission Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10.
`
`1022 Dr. Alon Konchitsky’s Publicly-Available CV
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`(6 pages). (Konchitsky Dep. Exhibit.)
`
`1023 Declaration of Mung Conway in Support of
`
`Yes.
`
`Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response
`
`to Petition.
`
`1024 Deposition Transcript of Alon Konchitsky,
`
`Yes.
`
`recorded July 2, 2013.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`
`
`
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`Truth?
`
`Exhibits
`Not Filed
`
`1025 Third Expert Declaration of Professor Darrell
`
`
`
`D. E. Long in Support of Petitioner’s Reply to
`
`Patent Owner’s Response to Petition.
`
`1026 Deposition Transcript of Darrell D. E. Long,
`
`
`
`Ph.D., recorded May 6, 2013.
`
`1027 Microsoft Corporation’s Objections to
`
`No.
`
`Patent Holder Proxyconn, Inc.’s Exhibits
`
`2002, 2004, served May 29, 2013.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`IPR2013-00109
`
`Exhibits 1001-1014: Filed January 11, 2013 with Microsoft’s 2nd Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717, which was consolidated with
`
`IPR2012-00026.
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Offered for
`Truth?
`
`
`
`1001 Appendix A, Chart mapping ’717 claims to
`
`No.
`
`
`
`prior art references HTTP DRP, Mattis and
`
`Yohe. (Part of Petition.)
`
`1002 Leonid Goldstein, U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717,
`
`Yes, but only
`
`
`
`“System and Method for Data Access,” issued
`
`for
`
`Jun. 29, 2004, with Certificate of Correction,
`
`admissions of
`
`issued Aug. 14, 2012.
`
`prior art and
`
`knowledge of
`
`PHOSITA.
`
`1003 Arthur van Hoff, John Giannandrea, Mark
`
`No, except
`
`
`
`Hapner, Steve Carter, and Milo Medin, “The
`
`for its date of
`
`HTTP Distribution and Replication Protocol,”
`
`submission to
`
`W3C Note, http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-
`
`the W3C.
`
`drp-19970825.html, August 1997. (Long Dep.
`
`Ex. 1025; Konchitsky Dep. Exhibit.)
`
`1004 Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,292,880,
`
`No.
`
`
`
`“Alias-Free Content-Indexed Object Cache,”
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 7
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`Truth?
`
`
`
`issued Sept. 18, 2001 on application filed Apr.
`
`15, 1998. (Long Dep. Ex. 1023.)
`
`1005 Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent Application
`
`No.
`
`Ser. No. 09/060,886 , filed April 15, 1998.
`
`1006 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`5,835,943, “Apparatus and Method for
`
`Increased Data Access in a Network File
`
`Oriented Caching System,” issued Nov. 10,
`
`1998.
`
`1007 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent
`
`Yes.
`
`Application Ser. No. 08/888,311, filed July 3,
`
`1997 (Yohe Patent Application)
`
`1008 Tim Berners-Lee, “W3C Staff Note on HTTP
`
`No.
`
`Distribution and Replication Protocol
`
`Submission,”
`
`http://www.w3.org/Submission/1997/10/Com
`
`ment.html, Aug. 28, 1997
`
`1009 Tim Berners-Lee, “Acknowledged
`
`No.
`
`Submissions to W3C,”
`
`http://web.archive.org/web/19980213220701/h
`
`ttp:/www13.w3.org/Submission/, Feb. 12,
`
`1998.
`
`1010 Michael A. Goulde, “Network Caching Guide No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 8
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`Truth?
`
`
`
`Optimizing Web Content Delivery”, Patricia
`
`Seybold Group for Inktomi Corp., Mar. 1999.
`
`1011 Simon Spero, “HTTP-NG Architectural
`
`No.
`
`Overview,”
`
`http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP-NG/http-
`
`ng-arch.html, 1995.
`
`1012 Joint Stipulation Requesting Stay of Case
`
`No.
`
`Pending Inter Partes Review, dated Nov. 2,
`
`2012.
`
`1013 Expert declaration of Professor Darrell D. E.
`
`Yes.
`
`Long in Support of Microsoft’s Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review. (Long Dep. Ex. 1027.)
`
`1014 Supporting declaration of Sean-Michael Riley
`
`Yes.
`
`in Support of Microsoft’s Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review.
`
`Dated: October 14, 2013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/John D. Vandenberg/
`John D. Vandenberg, Reg. No. 31,312
`Stephen J. Joncus, Reg. No. 44,809
`Salumeh R. Loesch, pro hac vice
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`Corrected Fifth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 9
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Certificate of Service in Compliance With 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)
`
`The undersigned certifies that a complete copy of this Corrected Fifth
`
`Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits to Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717 was served along with Microsoft’s Exhibit No. 1027 on
`
`the attorneys of record for Patent Owner in this proceeding:
`
`
`
`MATTHEW L. CUTLER
`BRYAN K. WHEELOCK
`DOUGLAS A. ROBINSON
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC
`7700 BONHOMME, SUITE 400
`ST. LOUIS, MO 63105
`
`
`via EMAIL on October 14, 2013, and EXPRESS MAIL on October 15, 2013.
`
`
`
`
`By: /John D. Vandenberg/
`
`John D. Vandenberg, Reg. No. 31,312
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`