throbber
Filed on behalf of Microsoft Corporation
`
`By: John D. Vandenberg (Reg. No. 31,312)
`
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`Stephen J. Joncus (Reg. No. 44,809)
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`____________
`
`SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AND LIST
`OF EXHIBITS TO PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`

`

`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation serves this List of Exhibits with the exhibit
`
`number, a brief description of each exhibit, and a notation of which exhibits were
`
`served and which were filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e). Exhibits 1001-1018
`
`were filed on September 18, 2012 with Microsoft Corporation’s Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717, and Exhibits 1019-1020 were served
`
`on January 18, 2013, concurrently with the First Supplemental List of Exhibits and
`
`with Microsoft Corporation’s Notice of Supplemental Evidence in Response to
`
`Proxyconn’s Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-1018.
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1001 Appendix A, Chart mapping ’717 claims to
`
`No.
`
`prior art references Perlman, Yohe and Santos.
`
`(Part of Petition.)
`
`1002
`
`Leonid Goldstein, U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717,
`
`Yes, but
`
`“System and Method for Data Access,” issued
`
`only for
`
`Jun. 29, 2004, with Certificate of Correction,
`
`admissions
`
`issued Aug. 14, 2012.
`
`of prior art
`
`and
`
`
`
`
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`knowledge
`
`of
`
`PHOSITA.
`
`1003 Radia J. Perlman et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`5,742,820, “Mechanism for Efficiently
`
`Synchronizing Information Over a Network,”
`
`issued Apr. 21, 1998.
`
`1004
`
`Jonathan Santos et al., “USENIX, Increasing
`
`No.
`
`Effective Link Bandwidth by Suppressing
`
`Replicated Date,” Proceedings of the USENIX
`
`Annual Technical Conference (NO 98) New
`
`Orleans, Louisiana, June 1998.
`
`1005 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5,835,943, “Apparatus and Method for
`
`Increased Data Access in a Network File
`
`Oriented Caching System,” issued Nov. 10,
`
`1998.
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1006
`
`Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent
`
`No.
`
`Application No. 08/888,311, filed July 3, 1997,
`
`issued as U.S. Patent No. 5,835,943.
`
`1007 Expert declaration of Professor Darrell D. E.
`
`Yes.
`
`Long in Support of Microsoft’s Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review.
`
`1008 Microsoft Corporation, “[MS-RDC] –
`
`No.
`
`v20120705, Remote Differential Compression
`
`Algorithm Specification,” July 5, 2012.
`
`1009 Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Response
`
`No.
`
`to Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s First Set of
`
`Interrogatories with supporting Exhibits A-B
`
`and E, dated July 25, 2012. (Exhibits C-D
`
`omitted.)
`
`1010
`
`[Microsoft’s] Supplemental Ex. E to
`
`No.
`
`Defendants’ Supplemental Interrogatory
`
`Response, dated Aug. 15, 2012.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1011
`
`Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Objections and
`
`No.
`
`Responses to Defendant Microsoft
`
`Corporation’s First Set Of Interrogatories,
`
`dated Sept. 9, 2012.
`
`1012
`
`Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Second Amended
`
`No.
`
`Consolidated Complaint for Patent
`
`Infringement and supporting Ex. B, dated July
`
`16, 2012. (Exhibit A omitted.)
`
`1013 Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for
`
`No.
`
`Summary Judgment of Invalidity, dated July 3,
`
`2012.
`
`1014 Declaration of Darrell D. E. Long in Support of
`
`No.
`
`Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`and supporting Exhibits A-C, dated July 3,
`
`2012.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1015
`
`Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,128,623,
`
`No.
`
`“High Performance Object Cache,” filed Apr.
`
`15, 1998, issued Oct. 3, 2000.
`
`1016 Reasons for Allowance of U.S. Application No.
`
`No.
`
`09/398,007, dated Dec. 12, 2003.
`
`1017
`
`Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`6,279,041, “Methods, Systems and Computer
`
`Program Products for Differencing Data
`
`Communications Using a Message Queue,”
`
`issued Aug. 21, 2001.
`
`1018 Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent
`
`No.
`
`Application No. 09/192,128, filed Nov. 13,
`
`1998, issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,279,041.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1019 Verification of Microsoft’s Interrogatory
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`Responses, signed by David M. Howard, dated
`
`August 13, 2012.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1020 Declaration of Mung Tam as Supplemental
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`Evidence in Response to Proxyconn’s
`
`Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-1018.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`1021 Declaration Of Salumeh R. Loesch in Support
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`of Microsoft Corporation’s Motion for Pro Hac
`
`Vice Admission Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10.
`
`Dated: March 21, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/John D. Vandenberg/
`John D. Vandenberg
`Registration No. 31,312
`Stephen J. Joncus
`Registration No. 44,809
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Certificate of Service in Compliance With 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)
`
`The undersigned certifies that a complete copy of this Second Supplemental
`
`Appendix and List of Exhibits to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,757,717 was served along with Microsoft’s Exhibit No. 1021 on the official
`
`correspondence address for the U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717 shown in PAIR and the
`
`attorneys of record for Plaintiff in this proceeding and in the concurrent litigation
`
`matter:
`
`MATTHEW L. CUTLER
`BRYAN K. WHEELOCK
`DOUGLAS A. ROBINSON
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC
`7700 BONHOMME, SUITE 400
`ST. LOUIS, MO 63105
`
`GENE SCOTT
`PATENT LAW & VENTURE GROUP
`36 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE #110
`IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614
`
`MARC A. FENSTER
`ANDREW D. WEISS
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, 12TH FLOOR
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
`
`via EXPRESS MAIL, on March 21, 2013.
`
`
`
`By: /John D. Vandenberg/
`
`John D. Vandenberg, Reg. No. 31,312
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket