`
`By: John D. Vandenberg (Reg. No. 31,312)
`
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`Stephen J. Joncus (Reg. No. 44,809)
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`____________
`
`SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AND LIST
`OF EXHIBITS TO PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation serves this List of Exhibits with the exhibit
`
`number, a brief description of each exhibit, and a notation of which exhibits were
`
`served and which were filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e). Exhibits 1001-1018
`
`were filed on September 18, 2012 with Microsoft Corporation’s Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717, and Exhibits 1019-1020 were served
`
`on January 18, 2013, concurrently with the First Supplemental List of Exhibits and
`
`with Microsoft Corporation’s Notice of Supplemental Evidence in Response to
`
`Proxyconn’s Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-1018.
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1001 Appendix A, Chart mapping ’717 claims to
`
`No.
`
`prior art references Perlman, Yohe and Santos.
`
`(Part of Petition.)
`
`1002
`
`Leonid Goldstein, U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717,
`
`Yes, but
`
`“System and Method for Data Access,” issued
`
`only for
`
`Jun. 29, 2004, with Certificate of Correction,
`
`admissions
`
`issued Aug. 14, 2012.
`
`of prior art
`
`and
`
`
`
`
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`knowledge
`
`of
`
`PHOSITA.
`
`1003 Radia J. Perlman et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`5,742,820, “Mechanism for Efficiently
`
`Synchronizing Information Over a Network,”
`
`issued Apr. 21, 1998.
`
`1004
`
`Jonathan Santos et al., “USENIX, Increasing
`
`No.
`
`Effective Link Bandwidth by Suppressing
`
`Replicated Date,” Proceedings of the USENIX
`
`Annual Technical Conference (NO 98) New
`
`Orleans, Louisiana, June 1998.
`
`1005 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5,835,943, “Apparatus and Method for
`
`Increased Data Access in a Network File
`
`Oriented Caching System,” issued Nov. 10,
`
`1998.
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1006
`
`Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent
`
`No.
`
`Application No. 08/888,311, filed July 3, 1997,
`
`issued as U.S. Patent No. 5,835,943.
`
`1007 Expert declaration of Professor Darrell D. E.
`
`Yes.
`
`Long in Support of Microsoft’s Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review.
`
`1008 Microsoft Corporation, “[MS-RDC] –
`
`No.
`
`v20120705, Remote Differential Compression
`
`Algorithm Specification,” July 5, 2012.
`
`1009 Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Response
`
`No.
`
`to Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s First Set of
`
`Interrogatories with supporting Exhibits A-B
`
`and E, dated July 25, 2012. (Exhibits C-D
`
`omitted.)
`
`1010
`
`[Microsoft’s] Supplemental Ex. E to
`
`No.
`
`Defendants’ Supplemental Interrogatory
`
`Response, dated Aug. 15, 2012.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1011
`
`Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Objections and
`
`No.
`
`Responses to Defendant Microsoft
`
`Corporation’s First Set Of Interrogatories,
`
`dated Sept. 9, 2012.
`
`1012
`
`Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Second Amended
`
`No.
`
`Consolidated Complaint for Patent
`
`Infringement and supporting Ex. B, dated July
`
`16, 2012. (Exhibit A omitted.)
`
`1013 Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for
`
`No.
`
`Summary Judgment of Invalidity, dated July 3,
`
`2012.
`
`1014 Declaration of Darrell D. E. Long in Support of
`
`No.
`
`Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`and supporting Exhibits A-C, dated July 3,
`
`2012.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1015
`
`Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,128,623,
`
`No.
`
`“High Performance Object Cache,” filed Apr.
`
`15, 1998, issued Oct. 3, 2000.
`
`1016 Reasons for Allowance of U.S. Application No.
`
`No.
`
`09/398,007, dated Dec. 12, 2003.
`
`1017
`
`Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`6,279,041, “Methods, Systems and Computer
`
`Program Products for Differencing Data
`
`Communications Using a Message Queue,”
`
`issued Aug. 21, 2001.
`
`1018 Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent
`
`No.
`
`Application No. 09/192,128, filed Nov. 13,
`
`1998, issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,279,041.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1019 Verification of Microsoft’s Interrogatory
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`Responses, signed by David M. Howard, dated
`
`August 13, 2012.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1020 Declaration of Mung Tam as Supplemental
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`Evidence in Response to Proxyconn’s
`
`Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-1018.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`1021 Declaration Of Salumeh R. Loesch in Support
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`of Microsoft Corporation’s Motion for Pro Hac
`
`Vice Admission Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10.
`
`Dated: March 21, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/John D. Vandenberg/
`John D. Vandenberg
`Registration No. 31,312
`Stephen J. Joncus
`Registration No. 44,809
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`Second Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Certificate of Service in Compliance With 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)
`
`The undersigned certifies that a complete copy of this Second Supplemental
`
`Appendix and List of Exhibits to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,757,717 was served along with Microsoft’s Exhibit No. 1021 on the official
`
`correspondence address for the U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717 shown in PAIR and the
`
`attorneys of record for Plaintiff in this proceeding and in the concurrent litigation
`
`matter:
`
`MATTHEW L. CUTLER
`BRYAN K. WHEELOCK
`DOUGLAS A. ROBINSON
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC
`7700 BONHOMME, SUITE 400
`ST. LOUIS, MO 63105
`
`GENE SCOTT
`PATENT LAW & VENTURE GROUP
`36 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE #110
`IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614
`
`MARC A. FENSTER
`ANDREW D. WEISS
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, 12TH FLOOR
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
`
`via EXPRESS MAIL, on March 21, 2013.
`
`
`
`By: /John D. Vandenberg/
`
`John D. Vandenberg, Reg. No. 31,312
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`