throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper No: 33
`
` Entered: March 13, 2013
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, SCOTT R. BOALICK, and THOMAS L.
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`
`An initial telephone conference call in this proceeding resulting
`
`from the joinder of IPR2012-00026 and IPR2013-00109 was held on
`
`March 12, 2013. The participants were John D. Vandenberg, Esq., for the
`
`Petitioner, Bryan K. Wheelock, Esq., for the Patent Owner, and
`
`Administrative Patent Judges Sally C. Medley, Scott R. Boalick, and
`
`Thomas L. Giannetti.
`
`The following matters were discussed:
`
`
`
`1. Status
`
`The parties confirmed that there are no pending motions or other
`
`matters currently under submission.
`
`
`
`2. Schedule
`
`The parties currently have no issues with the Scheduling Order
`
`(Paper 29) entered on February 25, 2013.
`
`
`
`3. Protective Order
`
`The parties were advised that the Protective Order (Paper 25) entered
`
`in IPR2012-00026 is applicable to the joined proceeding.
`
`
`
`4. Motions
`
`Patent Owner is contemplating filing a motion to amend the claims at
`
`the time of filing the patent owner response. Patent Owner is reminded of
`
`the provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 42.121, particularly the provision requiring
`
`that any amendment propose a reasonable number of claims. As stated in
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`the rule, the presumption is that only one claim would be needed to replace
`
`each challenged claim. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a)(3).
`
`Petitioner was authorized to file a motion for pro hac vice admission
`
`of attorney Loesch. Patent Owner does not oppose filing of the motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`4. Settlement
`
`The parties have nothing further to report.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Case IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`For Patent Owner
`
`Matthew L. Cutler
`Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
`mcutler@hdp.com
`
`Bryan K. Wheelock
`Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
`bwheelock@hdp.com
`
`For Petitioner
`
`John D. Vandenberg
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`
`Stephen J. Joncus
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket