`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 31
`Date: February 27, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, SCOTT R. BOALICK, and THOMAS L.
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Joint Motion For Protective Order
`37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`
`
`
`IPR2012-00026
`IPR2012-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties have submitted a proposed form of protective order (Exhibit
`
`2001) and jointly moved for its entry. Paper 25. The parties have also identified
`
`how the proposed form of order departs from the Board’s default order appearing
`
`in the Trial Practice Guide.
`
`
`
`
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is therefore:
`
`ORDERED that the joint motion for entry of a proposed protective order
`
`(Paper 25) is granted;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the proposed protective order submitted
`
`jointly by the parties (Exhibit 2001) is hereby entered;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that this protective order shall govern the conduct
`
`of the proceeding unless otherwise modified.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2012-00026
`IPR2012-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`For Patent Owner
`
`Matthew L. Cutler
`Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
`Email: mcutler@hdp.com
`
`Bryan K. Wheelock
`Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
`Email: bwheelock@hdp.com
`
`For Petitioner
`
`John D. Vandenberg
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`
`Stephen J. Joncus
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`
`3
`
`
`