Filed on behalf of Microsoft Corporation
`
`By: John D. Vandenberg (Reg. No. 31,312)
`
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`Stephen J. Joncus (Reg. No. 44,809)
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`
`____________
`
`FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AND LIST
`OF EXHIBITS TO PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF CLAIMS 1, 3, 10-12, 14 AND 22-24 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,757,717
`
`
`
`By: John D. Vandenberg (Reg. No. 31,312)
`
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`Stephen J. Joncus (Reg. No. 44,809)
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`
`____________
`
`FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AND LIST
`OF EXHIBITS TO PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF CLAIMS 1, 3, 10-12, 14 AND 22-24 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,757,717
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation files this List of Exhibits with the exhibit
`
`number and a brief description of each exhibit pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e).
`
`Exhibits 1001-1018 were filed on September 18, 2012 with Microsoft
`
`Corporation’s Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717, and
`
`Exhibits 1019-1020 will be filed on January 18, 2013, concurrently with this List
`
`of Exhibits and with Microsoft Corporation’s Notice of Supplemental Evidence in
`
`Response to Proxyconn’s Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-1018.
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Offered for
`
`Truth?
`
`1001 Appendix A, Chart mapping ’717 claims to prior art
`
`No.
`
`references Perlman, Yohe and Santos. (Part of Petition.)
`
`1002 Leonid Goldstein, U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717, “System
`
`Yes, but only
`
`and Method for Data Access,” issued Jun. 29, 2004, with
`
`for
`
`Certificate of Correction, issued Aug. 14, 2012.
`
`admissions of
`
`prior art and
`
`knowledge of
`
`PHOSITA.
`
`First Supplemental Appendix and List Of Exhibits To
`Petition For Inter Partes Review Of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Truth?
`
`1003 Radia J. Perlman et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,742,820,
`
`No.
`
`“Mechanism for Efficiently Synchronizing Information
`
`Over a Network,” issued Apr. 21, 1998.
`
`1004
`
`Jonathan Santos et al., “USENIX, Increasing Effective
`
`No.
`
`Link Bandwidth by Suppressing Replicated Date,”
`
`Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical
`
`Conference (NO 98) New Orleans, Louisiana, June 1998.
`
`1005 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,835,943,
`
`No.
`
`“Apparatus and Method for Increased Data Access in a
`
`Network File Oriented Caching System,” issued Nov. 10,
`
`1998.
`
`1006 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent Application No.
`
`No.
`
`08/888,311, filed July 3, 1997, issued as U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,835,943.
`
`1007 Expert declaration of Professor Darrell D. E. Long in
`
`Yes.
`
`Support of Microsoft’s Petition for Inter Partes Review.
`
`First Supplemental Appendix and List Of Exhibits To
`Petition For Inter Partes Review Of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Truth?
`
`1008 Microsoft Corporation, “[MS-RDC] – v20120705,
`
`No.
`
`Remote Differential Compression Algorithm
`
`Specification,” July 5, 2012.
`
`1009 Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Response to Plaintiff
`
`No.
`
`Proxyconn Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories with
`
`supporting Exhibits A-B and E, dated July 25, 2012.
`
`(Exhibits C-D omitted.)
`
`1010
`
`[Microsoft’s] Supplemental Ex. E to Defendants’
`
`No.
`
`Supplemental Interrogatory Response, dated Aug. 15,
`
`2012.
`
`1011 Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Objections and Responses to
`
`No.
`
`Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s First Set Of
`
`Interrogatories, dated Sept. 9, 2012.
`
`1012 Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Second Amended
`
`No.
`
`Consolidated Complaint for Patent Infringement and
`
`supporting Ex. B, dated July 16, 2012. (Exhibit A
`
`omitted.)
`
`First Supplemental Appendix and List Of Exhibits To
`Petition For Inter Partes Review Of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Truth?
`
`1013 Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary
`
`No.
`
`Judgment of Invalidity, dated July 3, 2012.
`
`1014 Declaration of Darrell D. E. Long in Support of
`
`No.
`
`Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and
`
`supporting Exhibits A-C, dated July 3, 2012.
`
`1015 Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,128,623, “High
`
`No.
`
`Performance Object Cache,” filed Apr. 15, 1998, issued
`
`Oct. 3, 2000.
`
`1016 Reasons for Allowance of U.S. Application No.
`
`No.
`
`09/398,007, dated Dec. 12, 2003.
`
`1017 Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,279,041,
`
`No.
`
`“Methods, Systems and Computer Program Products for
`
`Differencing Data Communications Using a Message
`
`Queue,” issued Aug. 21, 2001.
`
`1018 Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent Application No.
`
`No.
`
`09/192,128, filed Nov. 13, 1998, issued as U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,279,041.
`
`First Supplemental Appendix and List Of Exhibits To
`Petition For Inter Partes Review Of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Truth?
`
`1019 Verification of Microsoft’s Interrogatory Responses,
`
`Yes.
`
`signed by David M. Howard, dated August 13, 2012.
`
`1020 Declaration of Mung Tam as Supplemental Evidence in
`
`Yes.
`
`Response to Proxyconn’s Objections to Petitioner’s
`
`Exhibits 1001-1018.
`
`Dated: January 18, 2012
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/John D. Vandenberg/
`John D. Vandenberg
`Registration No. 31,312
`Stephen J. Joncus
`Registration No. 44,809
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`First Supplemental Appendix and List Of Exhibits To
`Petition For Inter Partes Review Of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Certificate of Service in Compliance With 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)
`
`The undersigned certifies that a complete copy of this First Supplemental
`
`Appendix and List of Exhibits to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,757,717 was served along with Microsoft’s Exhibit Nos. 1019 and 1020 on
`
`the official correspondence address for the U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717 shown in
`
`PAIR and the attorneys of record for Plaintiff in this proceeding and in the
`
`concurrent litigation matter:
`
`MATTHEW L. CUTLER
`BRYAN K. WHEELOCK
`DOUGLAS A. ROBINSON
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC
`7700 BONHOMME, SUITE 400
`ST. LOUIS, MO 63105
`
`GENE SCOTT
`PATENT LAW & VENTURE GROUP
`36 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE #110
`IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614
`
`MARC A. FENSTER
`ANDREW D. WEISS
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, 12TH FLOOR
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
`
`via EXPRESS MAIL, on January 18, 2013.
`
`
`
`By: /John D. Vandenberg/
`
`John D. Vandenberg, Reg. No. 31,312
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
