throbber
Engineering Circuit Analysis
`
`Second Edition
`
`William H. Hayt, Jr.
`Professor of Electrical Engineering
`Purdue University
`
`Jack E. Kemmerly
`Professor of Engineering
`California State College, Fullerton
`
`McGraw-Hili Book Company
`
`New York
`St. Louis
`San Francisco
`Dusseldorf
`Johannesburg
`Kuala Lumpur
`London
`Mexico
`Montreal
`New Delhi
`Panama
`Rio de Janeiro
`Singapore
`Sydney
`Toronto
`
`

`
`Engineering Circuit Analysis
`
`Copyright © 1962, 1971 by McGraw-Hill, Inc. All rights reserved.
`'Printed in the United States of America. No part of this
`publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
`or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
`mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without
`the prior written permission of the publisher.
`
`Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 70-141920
`
`07-027382-0
`
`234567890 HDBP 7987654321
`
`This book was set in Laurel by York Graphic Services, Inc., printed on
`permanent paper by Halliday Lithograph Corporation, and bound by
`The Book Press, Inc. The designer was Merrill Haber; the drawings
`were done by John Cordes, J. & R. Technical Services, Inc. The
`editors were Michael Elia and Madelaine Eichberg. Robert R.
`Lamer ~upervised production.
`
`

`
`1 2 2 The Transient Circuit
`
`currents. However, circuit analysiS is not concerned with this internal
`displacement current, and since it is fortunately equal to the conduction
`current, we may consider Maxwell's hypotheSiS as relating the conduction
`current to the changing voltage across the capacitor. The relationship is
`linear, and the constant of proportionality is obViously the capacitance C;
`. C av
`.
`Idisp = I = dt
`
`A capacitor constructed of two parallel conducting plates of area A,
`separated a distance d, has a capacitance C = fA/d, where f is the permit­
`tivity, a constant of the insulating material between the plates, and where
`the linear dimensions of the conducting plates are all very much greater
`than d. For air or vacuum, f = fO = 8.854 pf/m == (1/3671") nF/m.
`The concepts of the electric field, displacement current, and the gener­
`alized form of Kirchhoff's current law are more appropriate subjects for
`courses in physics and electromagnetic field theory, as is the determination
`of a suitable mathematical model to represent a specific physical capacitor.
`Several important characteristics of our new mathematical model can
`be discovered from the defining equation (8). A constant voltage across
`a capacitor requires zero current passing through it; a capacitor is thus
`an "open circuit to dc." This fact is certainly represented by the capacitor
`symbol. It is also apparent that a sudden jump in the voltage requires an
`infinite current. lust as we outlawed abrupt changes in inductor currents
`and the associated infinite voltages on physical grounds, we shall not permit
`« abrupt changes in capacitor voltage; the infinite current (and infinite power)
`which results is nonphysical. We shall remove this restriction at the time
`we assume the existence of the current impulse.
`The capacitor voltage may be expressed in terms of the current by
`integrating (8). We first obtain
`
`dv = lidt
`C
`
`and then integrate between the times to and t and between the corre­
`sponding voltages v(to) and v(t),
`v(t) = cf i dt + v(to)
`
`to
`
`Equation (9) may also be written as an indefinite integral plus a constant
`of integration,
`'
`
`v(t) =C1 J'tdt + k
`
`(10)
`
`1
`
`!
`
`(9)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket