`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`VISA INC., and VISA U.S.A. INC.,1
`Petitioners,
`v.
`UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`Case CBM2018-00025
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER APPLE INC.’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Visa Inc. and Visa U.S.A. Inc., which filed a petition in CBM2019-00026, have
`
`been joined as a party to this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2018-00025
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`Petitioner Apple Inc.’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s November 20, 2018 Scheduling Order (Paper No. 9)
`
`and January 31, 2019 email granting the joint stipulation modifying certain
`
`deadlines, Petitioner Apple Inc. (“Apple”) respectfully requests oral argument
`
`currently scheduled on August 27, 2019. Petitioner requests the ability to use a
`
`computer, projector, and screen to display demonstrative exhibits. Petitioner
`
`requests 30 minutes per side for each of IPR2018-00812, CBM2018-00024, and
`
`CBM2018-00025, all of which are scheduled concurrently on August 27, 2019, for
`
`a total of 90 minutes per side for all three proceedings. Petitioner respectfully
`
`submits that the differences in claim scope between the two patents at issue in
`
`addition to the varied grounds and different prior art references relied upon among
`
`the IPR2018-00812, the CBM2018-00024, and the CBM2018-00025 proceedings
`
`warrant additional time over the 60 minutes per side allotted for oral hearing in
`
`IPR2018-00809, IPR2018-00810, and IPR2018-00813, arguments for which were
`
`heard on July 16, 2019 between the same parties as this proceeding.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Apple specifies the following issues to be
`
`argued:
`
`
`
`I. Whether the ’813 patent qualifies as a CBM patent under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.302.
`
`1
`
`
`
`CBM2018-00025
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`Petitioner Apple Inc.’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`II. Whether challenged claims 1, 2, 4-11, 13, 16-20, and 24 are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the ’585
`
`reference (Ex. 1115) and Maritzen (Ex. 1116).
`
`III. Whether challenged claims 14, 15, 22, 23, 25, and 26 are unpatentable
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the ’585 reference (Ex.
`
`1115), Maritzen (Ex. 1116), and Labrou (Ex. 1117).
`
`IV. Respond to any arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`
`Response (Paper No. 7), Patent Owner’s Response (Paper No. 20) and
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply (Paper No. 33).
`
`V. Respond to Patent Owner’s Motion to Strike (Paper No. 30) and any
`
`arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply to Petitioner’s
`
`Opposition to the Motion to Strike (if filed).
`
`VI. Respond to Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude, if one is submitted.
`
`VII. Respond to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument.
`
`VIII. Respond to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`IX. Any arguments raised by the Parties in their respective papers,
`
`motions, oppositions, responses, replies, and sur-replies.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`CBM2018-00025
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`Petitioner Apple Inc.’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`Issues related to the Board’s Decision on Institution and the grounds
`
`X.
`
`instituted in the Decision.
`
`XI. Any issues raised in the briefing pursuant to the schedule.
`
`XII. Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`/Monica Grewal/
`
`Monica Grewal
`Registration No. 40,056
`
`
`
`3
`
`Date: July 19, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2018-00025
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`Petitioner Apple Inc.’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that on July 19, 2019, I caused a true and correct copy of
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc.’s Request for Oral Argument to be served via electronic mail
`
`on the following correspondents of record as listed in Patent Owners’ Mandatory
`
`Notices and in Paper 29 (Decision to Institute CBM2019-00026 Granting Motion
`
`for Joinder):
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`James M. Glass (jimglass@quinnemanuel.com)
`Tigran Guledjian (tigranguledjian@quinnemanuel.com)
`Christopher A. Mathews (chrismathews@quinnemanuel.com)
`Nima Hefazi (nimahefazi@quinnemanuel.com)
`Richard Lowry (richardlowry@quinnemanuel.com)
`Razmig Messerian (razmesserian@quinnemanuel.com)
`Jordan B. Kaericher (jordankaericher@quinnemanuel.com)
`Harold A. Barza (halbarza@quinnemanuel.com)
`Quinn Emanuel USR IPR (qe-usr-ipr@quinnemanuel.com)
`QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`(CBM2019-00026):
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 19, 2019
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`/Monica Grewal/
`Monica Grewal
`Registration No. 40,056
`
`4
`
`