`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. ____
`Filed: May 22, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________
`
`IBG LLC,
`INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC., and
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`
`Case CBM2016-00087
`U.S. Patent 7,412,416 B2
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Patent Owner objects to the following
`
`Case CBM2016-00087
`U.S. Patent 7,412,416 B2
`
`Petitioner Exhibits:
`
`1061 -
`
`Growth and Change in the Eighties, New York Stock Exchange
`
`Annual Report, 1983.
`
`1062 -
`
`Terrell, E., “History of the American and NASDAQ Stock
`
`Exchanges,” Business Reference Services, September 2006.
`
`1063 -
`
`Rustin, R., “Stock Exchange’s New Home May Feature Push-
`
`Button Trades Via Private Offices,” The Wall Street Journal,
`
`May 13, 1969.
`
`1066 - Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition,
`
`2008
`
`1067 - Webster’s New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition,
`
`2012.
`
`I.
`
`OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS 1061-1063, AND 1066-1067
`
`Patent Owner objects to Exhibits 1061-1063, and 1066-1067 to the extent
`
`that Petitioners rely on their contents for the truth of the matters asserted therein.
`
`Exhibits 1061-1063, and 1066-1067 are inadmissible hearsay under FRE 801 and
`
`802, and no exception applies.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00087
`U.S. Patent 7,412,416 B2
`
`Further, Petitioners have submitted no evidence that sufficiently
`
`authenticates Exhibits 1061-1063, and 1066-1067 rendering these Exhibits
`
`inadmissible under FRE 901.
`
`Patent Owner also objects to Exhibits 1061-1063, and 1066-1067 as lacking
`
`any tendency to make any fact at issue in this proceeding more or less probable.
`
`These Exhibits are therefore inadmissible under FRE 401 and 402, or in the
`
`alternative, under FRE 403 as prejudicial and a waste of time.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 22, 2017
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Cole B. Richter/
`Cole B. Richter,
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Reg. No. 65,398
`
`
`
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert &
`Berghoff LLP
`300 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`(312) 913-0001 Telephone
`(312) 913-0002 Facsimile
`
`2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case CBM2016-00087
`U.S. Patent 7,412,416 B2
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owner’s Objections to Evidence was served on May 22, 2017, via email directed
`
`to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Richard M. Bemben
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`John C. Phillips
`PTABINBOUND@fr.com
`
`PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`
`Date: May 22, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Cole B. Richter/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`