`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`rsokohl-ptab@skgf.com; "lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com"; rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com; Sigmond Jr, Leif R.; Gannon,
`Michael D.; steve.borsand@tradingtechnologies.com; Kurcz, Jennifer M.; jay.knobloch@tradingtechnologies.com
`Trials
`CBM2016-00054; Paper 39, Motion to Seal
`Tuesday, November 07, 2017 12:12:31 PM
`
`Counsel,
`
`Petitioner filed a Motion to Seal Exhibits 1063 and 1064. Paper 39. The Motion indicates that Patent
`Owner “requested that the entirety of the deposition transcripts of Mr. Thomas be designated as
`Confidential pursuant to the Protect Order.” Id. at 1. Per the Scheduling Order, “[i]t is the responsibility
`of the party whose confidential information is at issue . . . to file the motion to seal.” Paper 11, 3. Based
`on the record before us, good cause has not been shown to grant the request to seal Exhibits 1063 and
`1064 and we will deny the Motion to Seal.
`
`Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Seal will unseal Exhibits 1063 and 1064 and make Patent Owner’s
`allegedly confidential information available to the public. We, thus, authorize the parties to jointly file a
`revised motion to seal Exhibits 1063 and 1064. If the parties jointly file a revised motion to seal, the
`motion shall be accompanied with non-confidential, redacted versions of Exhibits 1063 and 1064 (with
`the same exhibit numbers as the currently filed confidential exhibits). To the extent the parties have
`reconsidered the need to maintain confidentiality, the parties are instructed to notify the Board via email
`of any currently confidential documents that parties wish to de-designate as confidential.
`
`The parties are authorized to file the joint revised motion to seal, along with redacted Exhibits 1063 and
`1064, no later than November 16, 2017.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`
`