throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. ______
`Filed: June 21, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`IBG LLC;
`INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.; and
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.,
`
`Petitioners,
`v.
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`Patent Owner requests that the confidential version of its Patent Owner’s
`
`Demonstratives (Exhibit 2359) be sealed under 37 C.F.R. § 42.54.
`
`Good cause to seal this exhibit exists because a public version of the Patent
`
`Owner’s Demonstratives has also been filed, and because the unredacted Patent
`
`Owner’s Demonstratives contain information identified by Petitioners as sensitive,
`
`non-public information, that a business would not make public. Patent Owners
`
`contacted Petitioners regarding this Motion, and they do not oppose.
`
`II. Governing Rules and PTAB Guidance
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 326(a)(1), the default rule is that all papers filed in a
`
`post-grant review are open and available for access by the public, but a party may
`
`file a concurrent motion to seal and the information at issue is sealed pending the
`
`outcome of the motion.
`
`Similarly, 37 C.F.R. § 42.14 provides:
`
`
`The record of a proceeding, including documents and things, shall be
`
`made available to the public, except as otherwise ordered. A party
`
`intending a document or thing to be sealed shall file a motion to seal
`
`concurrent with the filing of the document or thing to be sealed. The
`
`document or thing shall be provisionally sealed on receipt of the
`
`1
`
`

`

`motion and remain so pending the outcome of the decision on the
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`motion.
`
`It is, however, only “confidential information” that is protected from
`
`disclosure. 35 U.S.C. § 326(a)(7)(“The Director shall prescribe regulations -- . . .
`
`providing for protective orders governing the exchange and submission of
`
`confidential information”). In that regard, the Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012) provides:
`
`The rules aim to strike a balance between the public’s interest in
`
`maintaining a complete and understandable file history and the
`
`parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive information.
`
`* * *
`
`Confidential Information: The rules identify confidential information
`
`in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret or
`
`other confidential research, development, or commercial information.
`
`§ 42.54.
`
`The standard for granting a motion to seal is “for good cause,” 37 C.F.R.§
`
`42.54, and the moving party has the burden of proof in showing entitlement to the
`
`requested relief, 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c).
`
`2
`
`

`

`A motion to seal is also required to include a proposed protective order and
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`a certification that the moving party has in good faith conferred or attempted to
`
`confer with the opposing party in an effort to come to an agreement as to the
`
`scope of the proposed protective order for this CBM review. 37 C.F.R. § 42.54.
`
`III.
`
`Identification of Confidential Information
`
`The confidential information consists of Petitioners’ confidential
`
`information appearing on page 26 of Patent Owner’s Demonstratives. Specifically,
`
`the confidential information contains information related to internal technical
`
`specifications. Patent Owner obtained the confidential information in a related
`
`U.S. District Court proceeding1 involving Patent Owner and Petitioners. Patent
`
`Owner has been previously authorized by Petitioners to present this information in
`
`the present Covered Business Method proceeding pursuant to the protective order
`
`in that District Court proceeding and the default protective order, attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit A. Patent Owner has been advised by counsel for Petitioners that this
`
`information has not been published or otherwise been made public.
`
`1 This proceeding is Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc., Case No. :10-
`
`cv-00715 (N.D. Ill.) (consolidated with Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. IBG LLC, Case
`
`No. 1:10-cv-00721 (N.D. Ill.) and Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. TradeStation Sec.,
`
`Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-00884 (N.D. Ill.)).
`
`3
`
`

`

`In total, the confidential material only appears on one page of the 32 page
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`presentation. To Patent Owner’s knowledge, this business information has not,
`
`and should not, be made public. Further, this Board previously granted a Motion
`
`to Seal in a related proceeding that contained the same confidential information at
`
`issue. TradeStation Group, Inc. v. Trading Technologies Int’l, Inc., CBM2015-
`
`00161, Paper 130, at 2-3.
`
`IV. Good Cause Exists for Sealing the Confidential Information
`Petitioners have asserted that the information on page 26 of Patent Owner’s
`
`Demonstratives is either confidential or highly confidential under the protective
`
`order in the corresponding district court litigation. Through these designations,
`
`Petitioners represented to Patent Owner that the information on page 26 of Patent
`
`Owner’s Demonstratives consists of sensitive information that a business would
`
`not make public. Thus, good cause exists for sealing the information in this
`
`proceeding. Accordingly, there is good cause to grant this motion to seal.
`
`V.
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`
`The parties have agreed to use the Default Protective Order located in
`
`Appendix B of the Trial Practice Guide and attached hereto as Exhibit A. In
`
`accordance with this Default Protective Order, both confidential and non-
`
`confidential versions of the Patent Owner’s Demonstratives have been filed.
`
`4
`
`

`

`VI. Conclusion
`Based on Patent Owner’s and Petitioners’ representations and the limited
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`scope of the protection sought, there is good cause to grant the motion to seal. 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.54. For all the reasons set forth above, Patent Owner respectfully
`
`requests that the Board grant this motion to seal.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 21, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT &
`BERGHOFF LLP
`
`/Leif R. Sigmond Jr./
`
`Leif R. Sigmond Jr.,
`Lead Counsel, Reg. No. 35,680
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`300 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`(312) 913-0001
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`CBM2016-00054
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`US. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.,
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`Patent No. 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board U.S.
`Patent and Trademark Office P.O.
`Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`This standing protective order governs the treatment and filing of
`
`confidential information, including documents and testimony.
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked
`
`“PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL.”
`
`2. Access to confidential information is limited to the following
`
`individuals who have executed the acknowledgment appended to this
`
`order:
`
`(A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the
`
`proceeding and other persons who are named parties to the
`
`proceeding.
`
`(B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in
`
`the proceeding.
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who
`
`further certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor
`
`to any party, or a consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor
`
`with respect to the subject matter of the proceeding.
`
`(D)
`
`In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`(E) Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`persons performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and
`
`in-house counsel’s support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement
`
`shall be extended access to confidential information only upon
`
`agreement of the parties or by order of the Board upon a motion
`
`brought by the party seeking to disclose confidential information to
`
`that person. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have
`
`the burden of proving that such person should be restricted from
`
`access to confidential information.
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who
`
`have a need for access to the confidential information shall have such
`
`access without the requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such
`
`employees and representatives shall include the Director, members of
`
`the Board and their clerical staff, other support personnel, court
`
`reporters, and other persons acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`(G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who
`
`are reasonably necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding
`
`shall not be required to sign an Acknowledgement, but shall be
`
`informed of the terms and requirements of the Protective Order by
`
`the person they are supporting who receives confidential
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`information.
`
`3. Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts
`
`to maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which
`
`persons not authorized to receive the information shall not have
`
`access;
`
`(B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality
`
`of the information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those
`
`the recipient uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not
`
`received from the disclosing party;
`
`(C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access
`
`to the confidential information understand and abide by the
`
`obligation to maintain the confidentiality of information received
`
`that is designated as confidential; and
`
`(D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable
`
`number of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and
`
`maintaining a record of the locations of such copies.
`
`4. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`(i) A party may file documents or information with the Board
`
`under seal, together with a non-confidential description of the
`
`nature of the confidential information that is under seal and
`
`the reasons why the information is confidential and should not
`
`be made available to the public. The submission shall be
`
`treated as confidential and remain under seal, unless, upon
`
`motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua
`
`sponte, the Board determines that the documents or
`
`information do not to qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of
`
`the information submitted to the Board, the submitting party
`
`shall file confidential and non-confidential versions of its
`
`submission, together with a Motion to Seal the confidential
`
`version setting forth the reasons why the information redacted
`
`from the non-confidential version is confidential and should
`
`not be made available to the public. The non-confidential
`
`version of the submission shall clearly indicate the locations of
`
`information that has been redacted. The confidential version of
`
`the submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted
`
`information shall remain under seal unless, upon motion of a
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board
`
`determines that some or all of the redacted information does not
`
`qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties.
`
`Information designated as confidential that is disclosed to
`
`another party during discovery or other proceedings before the Board
`
`shall be clearly marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL”
`
`and shall be produced in a manner that maintains its confidentiality.
`
`5.
`
`Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The following form
`
`may be used to acknowledge a protective order and gain access to
`
`information covered by the protective order:
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.,
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`Patent No. 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR ACCESS
`TO PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`I
`
`, affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that I will
`
`abide by its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in connection
`
`with this proceeding and for no other purpose; that I will only allow access to
`
`support staff who are reasonably necessary to assist me in this proceeding; that
`
`prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or will inform them of the
`
`requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally responsible for the
`
`requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to submit to the
`
`jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the Eastern
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`District of Virginia for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and
`
`providing remedies for its breach.
`
`Date:
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owner’s Motion to Seal was served on June 21, 2017, via email directed to
`
`counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Richard M. Bemben
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`John C. Phillips
`CBM41919-0013CP1@fr.com
`
`PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Date: June 21, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`/Leif R. Sigmond Jr./
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket