`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. ______
`Filed: June 21, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`IBG LLC;
`INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.; and
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.,
`
`Petitioners,
`v.
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`Patent Owner requests that the confidential version of its Patent Owner’s
`
`Demonstratives (Exhibit 2359) be sealed under 37 C.F.R. § 42.54.
`
`Good cause to seal this exhibit exists because a public version of the Patent
`
`Owner’s Demonstratives has also been filed, and because the unredacted Patent
`
`Owner’s Demonstratives contain information identified by Petitioners as sensitive,
`
`non-public information, that a business would not make public. Patent Owners
`
`contacted Petitioners regarding this Motion, and they do not oppose.
`
`II. Governing Rules and PTAB Guidance
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 326(a)(1), the default rule is that all papers filed in a
`
`post-grant review are open and available for access by the public, but a party may
`
`file a concurrent motion to seal and the information at issue is sealed pending the
`
`outcome of the motion.
`
`Similarly, 37 C.F.R. § 42.14 provides:
`
`
`The record of a proceeding, including documents and things, shall be
`
`made available to the public, except as otherwise ordered. A party
`
`intending a document or thing to be sealed shall file a motion to seal
`
`concurrent with the filing of the document or thing to be sealed. The
`
`document or thing shall be provisionally sealed on receipt of the
`
`1
`
`
`
`motion and remain so pending the outcome of the decision on the
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`motion.
`
`It is, however, only “confidential information” that is protected from
`
`disclosure. 35 U.S.C. § 326(a)(7)(“The Director shall prescribe regulations -- . . .
`
`providing for protective orders governing the exchange and submission of
`
`confidential information”). In that regard, the Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012) provides:
`
`The rules aim to strike a balance between the public’s interest in
`
`maintaining a complete and understandable file history and the
`
`parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive information.
`
`* * *
`
`Confidential Information: The rules identify confidential information
`
`in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret or
`
`other confidential research, development, or commercial information.
`
`§ 42.54.
`
`The standard for granting a motion to seal is “for good cause,” 37 C.F.R.§
`
`42.54, and the moving party has the burden of proof in showing entitlement to the
`
`requested relief, 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c).
`
`2
`
`
`
`A motion to seal is also required to include a proposed protective order and
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`a certification that the moving party has in good faith conferred or attempted to
`
`confer with the opposing party in an effort to come to an agreement as to the
`
`scope of the proposed protective order for this CBM review. 37 C.F.R. § 42.54.
`
`III.
`
`Identification of Confidential Information
`
`The confidential information consists of Petitioners’ confidential
`
`information appearing on page 26 of Patent Owner’s Demonstratives. Specifically,
`
`the confidential information contains information related to internal technical
`
`specifications. Patent Owner obtained the confidential information in a related
`
`U.S. District Court proceeding1 involving Patent Owner and Petitioners. Patent
`
`Owner has been previously authorized by Petitioners to present this information in
`
`the present Covered Business Method proceeding pursuant to the protective order
`
`in that District Court proceeding and the default protective order, attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit A. Patent Owner has been advised by counsel for Petitioners that this
`
`information has not been published or otherwise been made public.
`
`1 This proceeding is Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc., Case No. :10-
`
`cv-00715 (N.D. Ill.) (consolidated with Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. IBG LLC, Case
`
`No. 1:10-cv-00721 (N.D. Ill.) and Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. TradeStation Sec.,
`
`Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-00884 (N.D. Ill.)).
`
`3
`
`
`
`In total, the confidential material only appears on one page of the 32 page
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`presentation. To Patent Owner’s knowledge, this business information has not,
`
`and should not, be made public. Further, this Board previously granted a Motion
`
`to Seal in a related proceeding that contained the same confidential information at
`
`issue. TradeStation Group, Inc. v. Trading Technologies Int’l, Inc., CBM2015-
`
`00161, Paper 130, at 2-3.
`
`IV. Good Cause Exists for Sealing the Confidential Information
`Petitioners have asserted that the information on page 26 of Patent Owner’s
`
`Demonstratives is either confidential or highly confidential under the protective
`
`order in the corresponding district court litigation. Through these designations,
`
`Petitioners represented to Patent Owner that the information on page 26 of Patent
`
`Owner’s Demonstratives consists of sensitive information that a business would
`
`not make public. Thus, good cause exists for sealing the information in this
`
`proceeding. Accordingly, there is good cause to grant this motion to seal.
`
`V.
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`
`The parties have agreed to use the Default Protective Order located in
`
`Appendix B of the Trial Practice Guide and attached hereto as Exhibit A. In
`
`accordance with this Default Protective Order, both confidential and non-
`
`confidential versions of the Patent Owner’s Demonstratives have been filed.
`
`4
`
`
`
`VI. Conclusion
`Based on Patent Owner’s and Petitioners’ representations and the limited
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`scope of the protection sought, there is good cause to grant the motion to seal. 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.54. For all the reasons set forth above, Patent Owner respectfully
`
`requests that the Board grant this motion to seal.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 21, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT &
`BERGHOFF LLP
`
`/Leif R. Sigmond Jr./
`
`Leif R. Sigmond Jr.,
`Lead Counsel, Reg. No. 35,680
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`300 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`(312) 913-0001
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`US. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.,
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`Patent No. 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board U.S.
`Patent and Trademark Office P.O.
`Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`This standing protective order governs the treatment and filing of
`
`confidential information, including documents and testimony.
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked
`
`“PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL.”
`
`2. Access to confidential information is limited to the following
`
`individuals who have executed the acknowledgment appended to this
`
`order:
`
`(A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the
`
`proceeding and other persons who are named parties to the
`
`proceeding.
`
`(B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in
`
`the proceeding.
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who
`
`further certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor
`
`to any party, or a consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor
`
`with respect to the subject matter of the proceeding.
`
`(D)
`
`In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`(E) Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`persons performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and
`
`in-house counsel’s support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement
`
`shall be extended access to confidential information only upon
`
`agreement of the parties or by order of the Board upon a motion
`
`brought by the party seeking to disclose confidential information to
`
`that person. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have
`
`the burden of proving that such person should be restricted from
`
`access to confidential information.
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who
`
`have a need for access to the confidential information shall have such
`
`access without the requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such
`
`employees and representatives shall include the Director, members of
`
`the Board and their clerical staff, other support personnel, court
`
`reporters, and other persons acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`(G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who
`
`are reasonably necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding
`
`shall not be required to sign an Acknowledgement, but shall be
`
`informed of the terms and requirements of the Protective Order by
`
`the person they are supporting who receives confidential
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`information.
`
`3. Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts
`
`to maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which
`
`persons not authorized to receive the information shall not have
`
`access;
`
`(B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality
`
`of the information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those
`
`the recipient uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not
`
`received from the disclosing party;
`
`(C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access
`
`to the confidential information understand and abide by the
`
`obligation to maintain the confidentiality of information received
`
`that is designated as confidential; and
`
`(D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable
`
`number of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and
`
`maintaining a record of the locations of such copies.
`
`4. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`(i) A party may file documents or information with the Board
`
`under seal, together with a non-confidential description of the
`
`nature of the confidential information that is under seal and
`
`the reasons why the information is confidential and should not
`
`be made available to the public. The submission shall be
`
`treated as confidential and remain under seal, unless, upon
`
`motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua
`
`sponte, the Board determines that the documents or
`
`information do not to qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of
`
`the information submitted to the Board, the submitting party
`
`shall file confidential and non-confidential versions of its
`
`submission, together with a Motion to Seal the confidential
`
`version setting forth the reasons why the information redacted
`
`from the non-confidential version is confidential and should
`
`not be made available to the public. The non-confidential
`
`version of the submission shall clearly indicate the locations of
`
`information that has been redacted. The confidential version of
`
`the submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted
`
`information shall remain under seal unless, upon motion of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board
`
`determines that some or all of the redacted information does not
`
`qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties.
`
`Information designated as confidential that is disclosed to
`
`another party during discovery or other proceedings before the Board
`
`shall be clearly marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL”
`
`and shall be produced in a manner that maintains its confidentiality.
`
`5.
`
`Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The following form
`
`may be used to acknowledge a protective order and gain access to
`
`information covered by the protective order:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.,
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`Patent No. 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR ACCESS
`TO PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`I
`
`, affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that I will
`
`abide by its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in connection
`
`with this proceeding and for no other purpose; that I will only allow access to
`
`support staff who are reasonably necessary to assist me in this proceeding; that
`
`prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or will inform them of the
`
`requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally responsible for the
`
`requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to submit to the
`
`jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the Eastern
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`District of Virginia for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and
`
`providing remedies for its breach.
`
`Date:
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00054
`U.S. Patent 7,693,768
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owner’s Motion to Seal was served on June 21, 2017, via email directed to
`
`counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Richard M. Bemben
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`John C. Phillips
`CBM41919-0013CP1@fr.com
`
`PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Date: June 21, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`/Leif R. Sigmond Jr./
`
`
`
`