throbber
greater ability to design how your trading front-end
`With
`system looks and the leveling of functionality across vendors
`the battle over trading front-ends may be fought over what is
`behind the screens By Daniel
`Collins
`
`PLAINTIFFS
`TRIAL EXHIBIT
`
`WHAT IS BEHIND1
`YOUR FRONT-END
`
`COUPLE WEEKS AbE an e-mail was received
`from an individual who was researching
`futures markets He wanted
`to know
`electronic
`on when
`if Futures had or knew of any projections
`markets would overtake
`and eventually
`electronic
`the
`eliminate open outcry markets Coincidentally
`answer was provided almost
`year ago by an officer of
`electronic trading firm who suggested
`the
`Chicago Board of Trade CBOT floors would be closed
`by the end of 2000 see Going Electronic
`Futures
`2000 Now we know of course that
`November
`and
`as the floors still
`are active
`answer was premature
`some electronic
`
`trading start-ups are shutting
`
`their doors
`
`large
`
`and slashing
`
`staff
`
`services
`
`they
`
`it is ironic
`
`trading
`
`systems
`
`that several of the front-end
`Beyond
`trading systems
`who were
`on the death of open outcry are
`banking
`now figuring out ways
`to take advantage of the value-
`added
`can provide clients by also porting
`clerks ECs
`their system to outcry pits via electronic
`While open outcry may not
`last forever
`that
`the competition among front-end
`spurred on by the belief
`that Chicagos
`open outcry
`pits would bow to the electronic
`revolution may now
`be won by whoever
`can offer
`the most efficient
`access
`to those pits in the meantime
`Tom Theys
`chairman
`of Patsystems an order
`trading system is one who
`routing and front-end
`readily admits his firm was banking
`on the death of
`now sees
`open outcry However Theys
`significant
`in providing European customers
`business
`potential
`to U.S grain markets
`linked
`through
`routed to ECs in the Chicago
`Patsystems software and
`Board of Trades
`floor
`agricultural
`The
`onset of ECs and its effects
`on front-end
`fluid nature of the
`
`access
`
`business models demonstrates
`
`the
`
`business
`
`customer
`
`and the need for agility and flexibility to meet
`needs One difficulty
`the
`in understanding
`is grasping exactly what
`business
`of trading front-ends
`those firms do There is always
`reference
`to
`vague
`Some folks arent
`providing solutions
`
`sure if they
`
`are
`
`independent
`
`software vendors
`
`direct
`
`risk
`
`ISVs routing systems
`or all of the
`brokers trading front-ends
`access
`above The vendors combine
`software back office
`even clearing
`
`management
`brokerage
`and have
`entered the fray from each of these different
`
`capabilities
`
`and
`
`perspectives Perhaps their claim of offering
`is because
`the problems keep
`It is not
`evolving
`talking to the top 15 widget
`of
`simple question
`and finding out who makes
`the best
`widgets at the cheapest price
`
`manufacturers
`
`solutions
`
`BEHIND
`
`ThE SCREEN ISVs not
`
`offer
`
`traders front-end
`
`to
`
`number of
`
`clients
`
`to think
`
`of us
`
`as Intel
`
`inside
`
`says
`
`compares
`
`it
`
`flexibility
`
`clients
`
`the competition
`
`quality control
`themselves
`
`Theys
`
`points
`
`involved
`
`it
`
`is important
`
`for
`
`provider
`
`of
`
`directly
`
`to their application
`
`processing
`
`their front-end
`
`screen
`
`bypassing
`
`We want
`
`distribute
`
`Trading Technologies
`
`front-end
`
`screens themselves
`
`are
`
`to be the technology
`they
`vice president of
`says Steve Monieson
`In the same light we feel
`that our
`very powerful tool
`
`behind what
`
`(cid:224)nly
`trading systems but also order routing
`For many providers that
`different
`electronic
`exchanges
`they are selling
`
`connectivity
`
`is the heart of what
`
`We want
`Scott Shellady COO of Patsystems Shellady
`to the gold rush of 1849 We arent mining the gold we
`are selling the shovels
`While most
`front-end providers claim tremendous
`with most allowing
`in their built-in functions
`to greatly customize their screens
`systems is turning into one
`among ISVs and -routing
`on market
`based
`risk management
`access pre-trade
`and the viability
`of the companies
`out that with the commitment
`futures commission
`merchant FCM to know that their technology
`is going to be around for
`long time
`The front-end
`is important but even more
`important
`is the backbone
`and the possibility to
`the architecture
`systems to our clients says Jeff Patrick
`deliver open
`of GL Trade
`marketing manager
`to write
`they allow people
`Several
`ISVs note that
`interface API
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2230
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054
`
`

`
`they prefer
`
`as well
`
`Xpresstrade
`
`has as an online
`
`trading
`
`service
`
`for self-
`
`traders
`directed
`retail
`than we do
`Nobody knows our customers
`Principal Dan ONeil So whos in
`says Xpresstrade
`to design and build the system that we
`to our clients
`
`better position
`make available
`
`better
`
`An example of this is how data service provider CQG
`and has arrangements
`has developed its own front-end
`ISVs that connect CQG screens
`to the
`with numerous
`ISVs routing software This allows FCMs and their
`and
`the data provider
`customers to select
`routing system
`desktop real estate
`as conserving
`the amount of bells and whistles
`
`an
`
`At some point
`is going to level off Everyone is going to
`ISV can offer
`level of service
`from front-
`be able to offer
`the same
`trading perspective What
`is going to differentiate
`end
`them is support and the number of exchanges
`that
`they
`on board says Fimatrade Managing Director
`have
`Christian Akmayer Those
`ISVs that
`can provide the
`up with competition
`to keep
`and products
`are going to
`
`best support
`
`continue
`
`and add
`
`Interactive
`
`Brokers
`
`places
`
`itself
`
`that developed
`
`institutional
`
`traders
`
`their systems
`and electronic
`
`between
`those ISVs
`to FCMs and
`
`to market
`
`firms It
`brokerage
`clients and now
`
`developed its systems for institutional
`
`is marketing
`
`that
`
`upgrades
`
`itto retail customers
`that many large FCMs started out
`Theys says
`their own systems and found out there was
`developing
`He
`lot more involved than they originally thought
`the process is lengthy and expensive and the
`notes
`expenses dont stop once
`the system is in place
`There
`are two to three
`year Multiply
`says To support
`it
`real big business Our
`else who
`
`Theys
`
`it is
`
`that by 10 exchanges
`maintain it and distribute
`to do that
`approach
`for everybody
`to write their own front-ends
`wants
`our API risk systems
`back office interfaces
`
`and
`
`exchange
`
`gateways
`
`they can use
`and all our
`
`SPECIALIZATION With so many markets
`faced by many is whether
`trade
`certain niche where
`whole market or find
`there wont
`thrive One aspect where
`in markets served Every
`routing system provider
`as many markets
`to access
`emphasizes the necessity
`they are marketing to FCMs
`possible whether
`traders The only exceptions
`institutional
`traders or retail
`are those that
`to electronic markets
`question faced by electronic
`markets -both
`
`question
`
`limit themselves
`
`and ways
`to serve the
`
`to
`
`they can
`be specialization
`
`is
`
`as
`
`as many exchanges
`be the most successful
`While much commonality
`has grown among
`there will be
`end systems
`some providers believe
`second
`generation of front-end technology
`from
`can choose
`users
`The market at
`the beginning of the year was
`and stabilize
`vendors
`the primary
`to refine
`among
`in order execution and
`components
`management Monieson says
`Trading Technologies
`function
`that allows traders
`
`front-
`
`that end-
`
`race
`
`involved
`
`is developing
`
`an Auto
`nine
`
`to create
`
`Spreader
`spread For example this will allow traders
`legged
`the Nasdaq SP Dow and FTSE
`spread between
`Vice President of Operations
`best
`notes that her firm offers
`
`to
`
`Interactive
`
`Brokers
`Laura Schueneman
`
`execution feature
`
`that offers
`
`to its customers Best execution
`the best price on
`picks the exchange
`commonly traded contract While that has mainly been
`for equity option traders Schueneman
`notes
`tool
`and multiple-listed
`that with the onset of BrokerTec
`futures contracts that will become more important
`Brokers
`is not alone in that capability
`Interactive
`common
`theme among ISVs is
`the ability to
`connect
`to every market out
`there and provide
`tools to spread across
`customers
`and different markets
`
`different
`
`exchanges
`
`is
`
`routing
`
`is
`
`expense
`and
`
`ISV VS BROKER/FCM
`For some order
`business
`and for others it
`business
`Patsystems GL Trade
`Trading
`Technologies
`others market their
`front-ends
`and connectivity
`to
`FCMs and institutional
`traders On the other hand
`and to
`certain
`extent
`Fimatrade Xpresstrade
`Brokers
`are primarily in the brokerage
`Interactive
`There are advantages
`and disadvantages
`each business model
`firms and FCMs offering their own
`Brokerage
`networks
`note that
`complete trading solution
`Our core business
`be clearing
`is and will always
`and execution
`says Fimatrades
`Aitmayer
`services
`The success
`of Firnatrades platform as an ISV is not
`
`business
`
`to
`
`it is
`
`direction
`
`to sell screens
`upon our ability
`dependent
`solely
`Because Fimat owns
`the system we control
`and speed of development We are not at
`mercy of
`third party that may not want
`to go
`many of the smaller markets
`
`the
`
`the
`
`to
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2230
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054
`
`

`
`new and old is who will provide liquidity Who
`trader who scalps
`will take the function
`tight bid/ask with reasonable
`turned to market makers to
`have
`
`of
`
`the local
`
`market providing
`markets
`
`Electronic
`
`the
`
`size
`
`Chuck Dolce managing director
`software
`recalculates
`
`of RTS says his
`anytime
`quotes
`RTS also has
`prices change
`developed
`of stocks
`that could allow
`baskets
`to trade
`
`theoretical
`
`functions
`
`fill
`
`that role and several
`
`ISVs have developed software
`
`for
`
`greater
`
`opportunity
`
`for cash arbitrage
`
`in equity
`
`to serve those
`
`traders as well
`ISV that specializes
`in automated
`Actant
`is one
`market making on electronic
`The company
`platforms
`writes software for market makers
`and other liquidity
`General Manager
`
`to Actant
`
`according
`providers
`Joshua Hodge
`Market making is particularly
`options where
`in one
`you are not providing
`on puts calls
`market
`but across several
`strike prices
`and other orders RTS is an order
`routing front-end
`
`difficult while trading
`
`bid/ask
`
`system that specializes
`
`in options pricing
`
`indexes Dolce says
`With the advent
`
`importance
`end-users access
`
`of
`
`of individual equity futures
`front-end
`provider being able
`not only to those markets but also
`
`the
`
`to give
`
`to
`
`cash markets
`intensified
`the underlying
`is greatly
`After all equity futures and narrow-based equity
`the potential
`index futures
`have
`to create
`huge basis
`trade market
`
`exchanges
`
`We want
`
`futures
`
`is linked to all
`
`the
`
`stock
`
`futures
`
`Theys says Patsystems
`market
`because of equity
`to be able
`to execute into single stock
`but we also want
`to make sure we
`the underlying market as well Theys says
`have
`From our screen you will be able to trade
`the future
`and the cash outright
`
`-4
`
`WHO WILL SURVIVE Along with the death of open
`the other assumption many people within the
`outcry
`there would be
`held
`is that
`
`though
`
`it
`
`industry
`year ago
`great deal of consolidation among ISVs and front-end
`settled on the best
`in the field Well
`systems as users
`that hasnt
`yet either
`happened
`undoubtedly will The full
`of what
`ISVs
`these
`scope
`do is not entirely defined yet and the rules are
`changing
`continually
`hint of what the future may look like for ISVs may
`of Refco
`been provided
`by the recent
`and EasyScreen
`see Treridlines-
`2001 The agreement
`institutional and massive retail customer
`
`have
`
`partnership
`
`Futures September
`the door to Refcos
`
`opens
`
`base according
`Stephen Pains Parnis notes
`to EasyScreen Vice President
`into an agreement with fl-Speed
`that
`also
`entered
`cash bond traders
`network
`
`they
`
`enabled
`
`E-Speeds
`
`futures
`
`outlet
`
`through
`
`EasyScreens
`
`Pains
`
`believes
`
`those
`
`partnerships
`
`strengthen
`
`their position among ISVs
`he sees happening is
`the consolidation
`says that
`Theys
`by FCMs choosing their technology providers He notes
`firms with
`to have
`those
`perspective will prefer
`
`global
`
`one solution
`
`While winners
`
`and losers will be determined
`
`to
`
`certain extent
`
`by those with the best
`
`technology
`
`an old-
`
`VU
`
`fashioned
`
`service will also play
`the most
`
`that
`
`can
`
`offer
`
`role
`
`provider
`
`idea like customer
`The front-end
`and
`products
`
`best
`
`will be the dominant
`
`functionality
`cant support their multitude
`them
`as well not offer
`
`if
`
`provider
`
`player
`of products
`they might
`says Traders
`single access
`point
`reliable and supported
`major markets
`is quick
`individuals who can qthcldy
`the problem...
`identify
`you are not flexible you will not succeed
`agrees The casualties will be
`GL Trades Patrick
`those who arent constantly adapting
`themselves
`changing market
`conditions staying
`technologies and keeping close
`ensure they understand
`each
`
`Altrnayer
`
`want
`
`to all
`
`that
`
`by
`
`If
`
`to
`
`abreast
`
`of newer
`
`to their customers
`individual customers
`
`to
`
`business
`
`requirements
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2230
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket