throbber
DECLARATION OF SCOTT L. JOHNSTON
`
`I, Scott L. Johnston, declare that:
`
`1'.
`I am personally familiar with the facts set forth herein, and, if called as a witness,
`I could and would testify thereto of my own personal knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`I reside in Oak Park, illinois.
`
`From April of 2000 until May of 2004, I was Managing Director and Chief
`2.
`Information Officer ("CIO") ofthe Chicago Mercantile Exchange ("CME"). In this role,
`I was responsible for building and managing the Technology Division (which was
`responsible for the CME's teclmology, including GLOBEX, the CME's electronic trading
`platform). I was responsible for 410 employees in this role at the time I left. I was also
`the primary external representative and spokesperson for the CME in technology matters.
`In that role, I participated in customer and vendor calls.
`
`From the summer of2000 through 2002, the electronic trading volumes on
`3.
`GLOBEX exploded. Based on my experience, I believe that Trading Technologies'
`('TI") MD Trader product (which was launched in the faU of2000) was a significant
`factor contributing to the electronic volume growth at the CME.
`
`After the fall of2000, I noticed that the volume being traded electronically by
`4.
`Kingstree Trading L.L.C., a proprietary trading firm, had exploded. In around May of
`2001, I along with several other CME employees went on a field trip to Kingstree's
`offices in Evanston. This was the first time I had actua11y seen TT's MD Trader. Upon
`this visit, I was struck by the fact that Kingstree's traders were all frenetically trading on
`a front-end that looked different from what I had seen before. This front-end was TT's
`MD Trader. What I noticed was that the traders were entering many orders by rapidly
`clicking at various price levels on the MD Trader tool. Prior to seeing this, I had
`knowledge and had witnessed people trading using GL front-end software to trade
`electronically on the GLOBEX In my experience, traders using this GL front-end did
`not enter at the same rate as I saw the traders entering orders using MD Trader at
`Kingstree.
`
`5.
`From the fall of2000 until early 2002, I recall that TT's MD Trader product
`spreading until the point that it was the order entry of choice for most high-end active
`professional futures traders. In late 2001 or early 2002, I recall the CME requesting GL
`'i f-z.w I a" I
`
`Sl.. \'!i
`
`1
`
`TTosaoo
`Confidential
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`TT0061397
`TTX00061397
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2227
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054
`
`

`
`to put a tool similar to MD Trader into its front-end because the CME viewed the MD
`Trader type front-end as causing traders to trade more volume.
`
`I declare under penalty ofpexjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
`s~remb~~2004.
`
`~ ~ J
`
`~----------------------
`Scott L. Johnston
`
`2
`
`TT05801
`
`Confidential
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`TT0061398
`TTX00061398
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2227
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket