`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`
`IBG LLC,
`INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, TRADESTATION GROUP, INC., and
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00051
`Patent No. 7,904,374
`
`___________
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00051
`Attorney Docket No. 41919-0013CP1
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Scheduling Order (Paper 12),
`
`Petitioners submit this Request for Oral Argument on all of the instituted grounds of
`
`unpatentability of U.S. Patent No. 7,904,374. Petitioners request that argument in
`
`CBM2016-00051 be consolidated with argument in CBM2016-00031, and request
`
`that each party receives one hour to present its arguments, with the time to be
`
`allocated amongst the two cases as each party sees fit.
`
`With regard to this particular proceeding, Petitioners request (without waiving
`
`consideration of any issue not listed below) to address the following issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 1-36 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101;
`
`2. Reply and rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters,
`
`including any motions Patent Owner may bring; and
`
`3. Any issues on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`The Board has already scheduled Oral Argument for May 3, 2017. See
`
`Scheduling Order of August 17, 2016, Paper No. 12.
`
`Petitioners also request that visual projector equipment, such as an ELMO-
`
`type projector, be made available for use during the Oral Argument, and
`
`Petitioners will separately contact trials@uspto.gov to request the equipment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Dated: March 29, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00051
`Attorney Docket No. 41919-0013CP1
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/John C. Phillips/
`John C. Phillips, Reg. No. 35,322
`Fish & Richardson, P.C.
`
`Attorney for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00051
`Attorney Docket No. 41919-0013CP1
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.6(e)(4)(iii), the undersigned certifies
`
`that on March 29, 2017, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioners’ Request for
`
`Oral Hearing was provided via email to the Patent Owner, by serving the
`
`correspondence address of record as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Leif R. Sigmond, Jr., Cole B. Richter,
`Michael D. Gannon and Jennifer M. Kurcz
`McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
`
`Erika H. Arner, Joshua L. Goldberg, Kevin Rodkey,
`Rachel L. Emsley and Cory C. Bell
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`
`Steven F. Borsand, Jay Q. Knobloch
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`Email: sigmond@mbhb.com
`
` richter@mbhb.com
` gannon@mbhb.com
` kurcz@mbhb.com
` erika.arner@finnegan.com
` joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
` kevin.rodkey@finnegan.com
` rachel.emsley@finnegan.com
` cory.bell@finnegan.com
` tt-patent-cbm@tradingtechnologies.com
` Trading-Tech-CBM@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Christine Rogers/
`Christine Rogers
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(650) 839-5092
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
