throbber
-United States Patent
`Gutterman et al.
`
`[191
`
`|||l||||l|||||Ill|||||IllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllll
`US00529703 IA
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,297,031
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Mar. 22, 1994
`
`"StarLAN chosen to link Hutton branches", PC Week,
`May 12, 1987, c241, (abstract of article).
`to securities
`“Unisys: Unisys broadens commitment
`industry with snapnet back office administrative sys-
`tern", Nov. 7, 1989, article from Diaglog File 610—Busi-
`nesswire.
`Lyons, D. J. "Brokers tuning in to intelligent worksta-
`tions”, PC Week, vol. 4, Oct. 6, 1987, 187.
`“Stratus to use Apollo’s network computing system to
`link workstations, OLTP computers”, Apr. 26, 1988,
`article from Diaglog File 610-Businesswire.
`“SAEF 2. Product Overview,” (date unknown).
`1. Schmerken, “How Computer Assisted Trading is
`Making the Toronto Stock Exchange Purr," Wall Street
`Computer Review, (Dec. 1987) pp. 71-78, 97.
`Anon., “SOFFEX Management Summary,” Swiss Op-
`tions and Financial Futures Exchange Ltd. (1987).
`Primary Examiner—Roy Envall
`Assistant Examiner—-Frantzy Poinvil
`Attorney. Agent, or F1'rm—-Kirkland & Ellis
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`
`'
`
`There is provided a broker workstation for managing
`orders in a market for trading commodities, securities,
`securities options, futures contracts and futures options
`and other items including: a device for selectively dis-
`playing order information; a computer for receiving the
`orders and for controlling the displaying device; and a
`device for entering the orders into the computer;
`wherein the displaying device comprises a device for
`displaying selected order information about each in-
`coming order, a device for displaying a representation
`of an order deck and a device for displaying a total of
`market orders. In another aspect of the invention, there
`is provided in a workstation having a computer, a de-
`vice for entering order information into the computer
`and a device for displaying the order information en-
`tered, a method for managing orders in a market for
`trading commodities, securities, securities options, fu-
`tures contracts and futures options and the like compris-
`ing the steps of: selectively displaying order information
`incoming to the workstation; accepting or rejecting
`orders corresponding to the incoming order informa-
`tion displayed; displaying accepted order information in
`’ a representation of a broker deck; and selectively dis-
`playing a total of orders at the market price.
`
`13 Claims, 8 Drawing Sheets
`
`[54] METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ORDER
`MANAGEMENT BY MARKET BROKERS
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Burton J. Gutterman, Glencoe; John
`J. Brogan, Palatine; Thomas Palenik,
`Oak Forest; Dolores Panek, St.
`.
`Charles; Shirley Wu, Roselle. all of
`I11.
`
`[73] Assignee: Chicago Board of Trade, Chicago, Ill.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 489,196
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Mar. 6, 1990
`
`Int. Cl.’ .............................................. G06F 15/20
`[51]
`
`[52] U.S. Cl. ................
`364/408; 364/406
`[58] Field of Search ........................ 364/408. 412, 406
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`_U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,677,552 6/1987 Sibley, Jr. ........................... 364/408
`4,760,527 7/ 1988 Sidley .......
`.. 364/412
`4,903,201
`2/1990 Wagner ........
`.. 364/408
`4,942,616 7/1990 Linstroth et al.
`.. 364/408
`4,980,826 12/1990 Wagner
`.. 364/408
`5,038,284 8/1991 Kramer
`.. 364/408
`5,101,353 3/1992 Lupien et al. ....................... 364/4-08
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`
`
`"Unisys introduces PC—based quotation system for
`stockbrokers at Securities Industry trade show in New
`York", Feb. 10, 1988, article from Dialog File 649-
`Newswire ASAP ®.
`“GTE Telenet and Reveal Software Inc. have cooper-
`ated in developing a complete broker’s workstation
`software package", Jan. 22, 1985, article from Diaglog
`File 649—Newswire ASAP ®.
`Bucken, M. “Stock traders ponder Make or Buy
`choice", Software Magazine, vol. 9, No. 15, Dec. 1989,
`75-77. (abstract of article).
`Mazzelia, D. P. “Workstations for financial services
`professionals”, Wall Street Computer Review, vol. 3, No.
`8, May 1986, 51-58 (abstract of article).
`Nathans, L. “Can computers help Merrill take posses-
`sion of the field?", Wall Street Computer Review, vol. 3,
`No. 5, Feb.‘ 1986. 35-39 (abstract of article).
`-
`“Software alliance unveils system to help banks trad
`securities", American Banker. Nov. 17, 1987, 14 (ab-
`stract of article).
`
`
`
`TS 1004
`
`1
`
`TS 1004
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 22, 1994
`
`Sheet 1 of s
`
`A
`
`5,297,031
`
`FIG.
`
`Io
`
`MX TERMINAL
`
`IO
`
`Z
`
`USER I/ F
`
`TRANSACTION
`
`PROCESSOR
`
`RECEIVER
`
`2
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`. Mar. 22, 1994
`
`Sheet 2 of s
`
`.
`
`5,297,031
`
`3
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 22, 1994
`
`Sheet 3 of 8
`
`5,297,031
`
`on.*2«Qaan.
`
`.:mmSm
`
`
`
`:2..\m2..EmEm5..._\m:2
`
`::._Nm:3..mm...n:m~m:onON2.Nnn_~m:on0..
`
`
`
`:8._~m:mmon
`
`::\~mammmm
`
`8.m~mm«No.
`
`at
`
`4
`
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 22, 1994_
`
`Sheet 4 of 8
`
`5,297,031
`
`m..oEou£Eoo..._
`
`
`.5.._..§w_..._h.6Fto
`
`®@Eon2GNm:m~®
`
`9
`
`«.23Nm:SE
`
`EDD
`
`mzz.mxmxx:
`
`moan.
`
`rlll'\0.:
`
`5
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 22, 1994
`
`Sheet 5 of8
`
`I
`
`&
`
`5,297,031
`
`5®o@o@
`@@@@@@
`
`@@©@ ®&
`
`Qfifilem
`aeeeeag
`9®9@@E
`
`®@@@®
`@@@@®
`
`
`as-s@
`
`131-:E
`
`
`
`
`
`FileEditSetupMenuWindowsAlertHelpHeartbeat
`
`6
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 22, 1994
`
`Sheet 6 of 8
`
`5,297,031
`
`on2.m~m:mN®
`
`«mm._Nu:SE
`
`Na.4N8RE
`
`.52.can
`
`9;E3%:E.E83
`
`7
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 22, 1994
`
`Sheet 7 of s
`
`.
`
`5,297,031
`
`4|O
`
`400
`
`CONHGURATOR
`
` 450
`
`INPUT
`SCREEN
`
`F1(3.
`
`I5
`
`8
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`H Mar. 22, 1994
`
`Sheet 8 of s
`
`‘
`
`5,297,031
`
`FIG. 30
`
`START
`
`INCOMTNG
`
`ORDER PANE
`
`MARKET
`TOTAL
`WINDOWS
`
`452
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BUTTONS om
`SCREEN
`
`
`
`PANE
`
`
`
`
`TOTAL
`
`FTLLED
`WINDOW
`
`
`458
`
`9
`
`

`
`5,297,031
`
`1
`
`METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ORDER
`-MANAGEMENT BY MARKET BROKERS
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`invention relates to computer-based
`The present
`techniques for managing orders placed in a physical
`market for trading instruments such as stocks, bonds,
`7 stock options, futures options and futures contracts on
`commodities including agricultural products, financial
`instruments, stock market indices and the like.
`A futures contract is an agreement providing for the
`future delivery of a fixed quantity of a commodity
`under conditions specified by a federally designated
`exchange. In general, that contract is a firm legal agree-
`ment between a buyer and seller to make or take deliv-
`ery of the underlying commodity and is cleared by a
`separate clearinghouse.
`The futures exchanges house centralized auction mar-
`kets (called designated contract markets) where" stan-
`dardized contracts for future delivery of specified quan-
`tities of commodities are bought and sold by open out-
`cry. The open outcry method of auction trading is
`widely believed to be the best method of buying and .
`selling goods because of the fast access to the market it
`provides to all prospective traders. It is important to
`note that the exchanges themselves do not tradefutures
`contracts, nor do they set prices at which contracts are
`traded. They merely furnish a place where market par-
`ticipants and their brokerage representatives can meet
`to trade futures contracts.
`
`Trading generally takes place in a pit or around the
`outside of a ring. All orders received by exchange mem-
`ber firms are transmitted to the exchange floor for exe-
`cution and are filled according to bids and offers in the
`respective pits by open outcry to all members present at
`the time. Only one instrument or commodity is traded in
`a pit or around a ring unless the volume is too small to
`justify so much space. Customarily, those trading the
`same contract delivery month gather in the same area of
`the ring or on the same step of the pit so that a broker
`with an order can locate the particular market as
`quickly as possible.
`Transactions on the trading floor must be reported to
`the membership and the general public. This is accom-
`plished through a variety of communications systems
`by the "various exchanges. Transaction information is
`typically entered by exchange-employed market report-
`ers in each trading pit and is accessible through com-
`puter terminals and electronic wallboards on each trad-
`ing floor. At present the open outcry auction in the pit
`produces a large quantity of information which must be
`recorded accurately and quickly by hand.
`At the end of each day the clearing house, which may
`be a subsidiary of the exchange or an independent en-
`tity, assumes one side of all open contracts: the clearing
`house becomes the buyer to each seller of a futures
`contract, and a seller to each buyer. The clearing house
`guarantees its members the performance of both sides of
`all open contracts.
`Other aspects of the commodity markets are treated
`in the literature, which includes Kaufman. “Handbook
`of Futures Markets,” John Wiley & Sons, New York
`(1984); Rothstein, “The Handbook of Financial Fu-
`tures,” McGraw Hill Book. Company, New York
`(i984); Gould, “The Dow Jones-Irwin Guide to Com-
`modities Trading," Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood
`(1981); Gas & Yarney, "The Economics of Futures
`
`2
`Trading," John Wiley & Sons (l976); Johnson & I-lazen,
`“Commodities Regulation,” Little, Brown and Com-
`pany, Boston (1989); R. Teweles et al., “The Commod-
`ity Futures Game,” McGraw-Hill, New York (1974); T.
`Hieronymus, “Economics of Futures Trading," Com-
`modity Research Bureau,
`Inc., New York (1971);
`“Commodity Trading Manual,” Chicago Board of
`Trade, Chicago (1989); and J. Schwager, “A Complete
`Guide to the Futures Markets," John Wiley & Sons,
`New York (1984).
`Floor traders are generally classified in two ways: (1)
`speculators, or “locals”, buy and sell for their own
`accounts; and (2) floor brokers fill orders for commis-
`sion houses, producers and processors seeking to lock in
`a price for their products. Unless a trader is a member of
`an exchange, it is necessary for the trader to deal on the
`exchange through a member brokerage firm. Normally,
`firms that handle public business (the “commission
`houses”) must be registered as “Futures Commission
`Merchants”, or "FCMs." A “local” can take long-term
`positions (i.e., weeks or months) or “scalp” over very
`short periods (liquidating positions within seconds or
`minutes of entering the transactions). He may trade in
`one or more pits. I-‘le benefits from the speed with which
`he can take or liquidate positions, but this is in itself no
`assurance of a profit. Some floor traders specialize in
`spreads by taking opposite positions between future or
`options when the price difference appears abnormal.
`Floor traders have the advantage of lower transaction
`costs available to all members of exchanges.
`The floor traders who execute orders for others but
`seldom or never trade for themselves are the brokers
`who may specialize in orders from customers such as
`commercial processors, exporters, financial institution
`commodity trading funds and the like. They may re-
`ceive only a small percentage of the commissions paid
`by the customer to his commission house, but the com-
`mission revenues may be substantial depending on the
`volume of business. The orders held by a floor broker at
`any given time are referred to as his “deck.” He is al-
`lowed to trade for his own account if he chooses, but he
`can not use the public orders to benefit his own trading.
`When a registered representative‘ of the commission
`house receives an order from a customer, the represen-
`tative sends the order to the commission house's order
`desk on the trading floor, where it is usually handed to
`a messenger and taken directly to anqappropriate broker
`in the trading pit or ring. Once the broker in the trading
`pit has the order, he typically uses voice and hand sig-
`nals to announce his bid or offer price, the delivery
`month, and the quantity to be bought or sold. Once the
`order has been executed, it is carried by messenger back
`to the commission house’s order desk on the trading
`floor, and the confirmation of the order is dispatched
`back to the office where it was initiated. The represen-
`tative then usually telephones the confirmation to the
`customer or hands him a confirmation slip if he is pres-
`ent in the office.
`_
`The communication of orders from the registered
`representative to the order desks on the trading floor '
`takes place with great speed. All orders are time-
`stamped at various stages along the order route as a
`check that the order is being expedited in the best possi-
`ble fashion. Increasingly, this process is performed by
`computerized communications systems which start
`with a terminal used by the registered representative
`and end with a printer near the broker. Often the com-
`
`5
`
`l0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`
`5,297,031
`
`3
`puter simultaneously records the terms of the order for
`later use in preparing statements for the registered rep-
`resentative and his customer.
`'
`The floor brokers’ stock in trade is their skill in exe-
`
`cuting the orders they receive and accept. They must
`decide, instantly, the tactics that will be most effective
`in filling a given order: whether to wait for bids or
`offers, or whether to hold with the current price, or to
`bid up or offer down promptly. To be effective, they
`must know the pit: who will do how much at what
`price. They must read the intentions of scalpers, locals
`and other brokers while concealing their own inten-
`tions.
`
`One of the skills of a broker is in knowing his deck.
`As described above, the deck is a stack of orders that
`are to be executed by the broker. The orders are typi-
`cally written on pieces of paper about five by seven
`inches which are then arranged by the broker in a se-
`quence for execution as the market price moves up or
`down. The broker usually folds them for concealment
`and puts them in his pocket so that his hands will be free
`to signal and to handle his trading card and pencil.
`Occasionally, the decks are as much as an inch thick and
`require great memory skill and anticipatory planning.
`Perhaps the most common type of order is the “mar-
`ket order” in which the customer states how many
`contracts of a given delivery month he wishes to buy or
`sell. He does not specify the price at which he wants to
`initiate the transaction but simply wants it placed as
`soon as possible at the best possible price.
`“Contingency orders” are those that impose certain
`limitations beyond the quantity and delivery month,
`such as limits in price or time, or both. A “price limit
`order” contains a price limitation that is specified by the
`customer; it can be executed only at the price specified
`or at a better price level. A “fill or kill” order contains
`a specified price at which the order must be executed or
`it is to be immediately cancelled.
`“Stop orders” are sometimes confused with “limit
`orders", but they are actually quite different. A “buy
`stop order" instructs a broker to execute the order when
`the price of a commodity rises to a specified level above
`the current market price. The “buy limit order” is usu-
`ally placed below the current market price and must be
`executed at the limit price or better. The difference
`between a buy limit order and a buy stop order is exem-
`plified as follows. A customer may be inclined to buy
`December sugar, which could be selling at a price of
`5.43 cents per pound. The customer could tell his bro-
`ker to buy a contract at a price not to exceed 5.35 cents;
`this is a “buy limit order”. Another customer under the
`same circumstances could tell his broker to buy a con-
`tract of December sugar but not until the price rises to
`at least 5.55 cents, at which point the order will be
`executed at the market; this is a “buy stop order". The
`buy stop order is placed above the current market and
`may be executed at the price specified on the stop,_
`above it, or below it because it is executed at the market
`price after the stop price is touched; at that point, the
`stop is said to be “elected”.
`A “sell stop order” instructs a broker to execute an
`order when the price falls to a given level, at which
`point it is to be executed at the market price. Unlike a
`typical “sell limit order”, the sell stop order is below the
`current market price and may be executed at a price at,
`above, or below the specified stop price when it is
`elected.
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`4
`Some customers will raise their stop prices as the
`market price advances in an effort to gain as much as
`possible from a major move, while making certain that
`they can probably lose back only a little of the gain.
`Such an order is frequently called a “trailing stop".
`A somewhat more complex order is the “stop limit
`order”. The customer might instruct his broker not to
`buy sugar until it rises to 5.53 cents per pound and not
`to pay more than 5.55 cents. This is unlike the unlimited
`stop, which becomes a market order when the stop
`price has been touched. The limit price may be the same
`or different from the specified stop.
`A “market-if-touched (M.l.T.) order" is like a limit
`order, but the M.I.T. order is executed at the market
`when the market has traded at the price specified on the
`order, and so it may be filled either at that specified
`price, above it, or below it. M.I.T. orders are sometimes
`called “board orders". The order may be entered for
`one day, a specified period, or open (i.e., good until
`cancelled).
`Sometimes a customer may wish to take a position
`within a short time but would like the broker on the
`floor of the exchange to use some of his personal judg-
`ment in the timing of the fill. The broker could do this
`if the order indicates that he is to fill it at the market but
`is to take his time and will not be responsible if by wait-
`ing too long or not waiting long enough the price is
`unsatisfactory to the customer. Such orders may be
`marked “not held". Customers may also specify the
`time at which they wish their orders filled, e.g., “on
`opening," “on close,” or at a particular specified time.
`“Altemative orders” provide for one of two possible
`executions: a customer may order 5,000 bushels of corn
`at $1.45 a bushel and 5,000 bushels of wheat at $2.56 a
`bushel, but not want both. A far more common example
`of the alternative order is the placing of an objective
`and a stop, with instructions to cancel one if the other is
`filled; for example, having bought one contract of soy-
`bean oil at 14.50 cents a pound, a customer may order
`his broker to sell the oil either at 14.95 or 14.25 cents
`stop, whichever occurs first, and then immediately can-
`cel the remainder of the order to avoid inadvertently
`reversing his position.
`“Scale orders” are used to establish or liquidate posi-
`tions as the market moves up or down. The sugar trader
`may instruct his broker to buy a contract of sugar at
`5.45 cents and another contract each time the price
`drops five points from that level until he has accumu-
`lated six contracts. When he sells out his position, he
`may order the broker to sell one contract at 5.70 cents
`and another contract each time the price rises five
`points until his six contracts have been sold.
`“Contingent orders" are filled by the broker after the
`price of another contract or even another commodity
`reaches a specified level.
`“Spreads” may be established at a fixed difference
`rather than at specified prices because the spreader is
`concerned only with the difference rather than the
`level. He may therefore order his broker to “buy one
`July pork bellies and sell one February bellies at 80
`points difference or more, premium February.” Such an
`order could be used to establish a new spread position,
`which the trader believes will narrow, or to take the
`profit in a position at a narrower difference and be
`satisfied with the profit at 80 points difference.
`Although the foregoing description has concentrated
`on the commodity futures markets, it will be understood
`that the order management system of the present inven-
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`
`5
`tion is applicable to all markets, including those for
`securities trading. Securities markets are usually based
`on actions by specialists, each of whom is the market
`maker for one or more specific securities. In the New
`York Stock Exchange, for example, the ultimate deter-
`mination of price for any given transaction frequently is
`determined by a specialist who deals in a particular
`stock and who maintains a running list or "boo ” of
`offers to sell and orders to purchase that stock. The
`specialist may complete a transaction in the stock when-
`ever one or more purchase and sell orders can be
`matched with respect to price; on occasion, the same
`specialist purchases the particular stock in which he
`specializes or sells the same stock in order to maintain a
`market for the stock and prevent violent fluctuations in
`its price. Similar functions, particularly with respect to
`the matching of orders to purchase and to sell, must be
`carried out in all auction markets for the marketing of
`fungible goods, including such commodities as wheat,
`corn, and the like as well as stocks and bonds.
`A computation system for establishing prices in auc-
`tion trading’ for the securities market is described in U.S.
`Pat. No. 3,581,072 to Nymeyer. That computation sys-
`tem comprises a main data store for recording encoded
`data items representative of orders to buy and to sell the
`goods, such orders including orders at specific prices
`and other orders "at the market.” The system includes a
`buy order sequencing device for arranging and record-
`ing purchase offers frrsttin descending order by price
`and secondly by time of entry so that at each price level
`the oldest orders are uppermost. A sell order sequenc-
`ing device is provided for arranging and recording all
`offers to sell first in ascending order by price and se-
`condly in descending order by time so that once again
`the oldest orders‘ are the highest at each price level. A
`closing price store is provided to record the last actual
`selling price for the goods. The closing price store and
`the main data store are coupled, by suitable control
`means, to the sequencing devices in order to transfer the
`recorded data items from the data store to the sequenc-
`ing devices with “at market” prices being transferred at
`the aforementioned last selling price. The two sequenc-
`ing devices are coupled to a comparator that compares
`the sell orders and the buy orders, when they have been
`arranged in sequence,
`to determine the lowest buy
`order price that is equal to or greater than a recorded
`sell order and thus establish a new selling price for the
`goods.
`' More than such a system for merely matching buy
`and sell orders, the present invention provides a system
`that allows brokers to manage their decks and to im-
`prove the accuracy of communications between the
`trading floor and the customers. The present invention
`can also reduce the back office costs to trading firms by
`reducing the volume of paperwork and consequent
`errors.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In accordance with the present invention, there is
`provided a broker workstation for managing orders in a
`market for trading commodities, securities, securities
`options, futures contracts and futures options and other
`items. comprising: means for selectively displaying
`order information; a computer for receiving the orders
`and for controlling the displaying means; and means for
`entering the orders into the computer; wherein the
`displaying means comprises means for displaying se-
`lected order information about each incoming order,
`
`'
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`65
`
`5,297,031
`
`6
`means for displaying a representation of an order deck
`and means for displaying a total of market orders.
`In another aspect of the invention, there is provided
`in a workstation having a computer, means for entering
`order information into the computer and means for
`displaying the order information entered, a method for
`managing orders in a market for trading commodities,
`securities, securities options, futures contracts and fu-
`tures options and the like comprising the steps of: selec-
`tively displaying order information incoming to the
`workstation; accepting or rejecting orders correspond-
`ing to the incoming order information displayed; dis-
`playing accepted order information in a representation
`of a broker deck; and selectively displaying a total of
`orders at the market price.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THEIDRAWINGS
`
`The features and advantages of the present invention
`will be better understood after a reading of the follow-
`ing detailed description in conjunction with the draw-
`ings in which:
`FIG. 1a shows a block diagram of a portion of an
`apparatus in accordance with the present invention;
`FIG. 1b shows an embodiment of other portions of an
`apparatus in accordance with the present invention;
`FIGS. 2a, 2b, 2c and 2:! show display partitions in
`accordance with present invention; and
`FIGS. 3 and 3a show functional block diagrams of
`the broker workstation instructions.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`The broker workstation in accordance with the pres-
`ent invention is an electronic replication of the broker’s
`management of the orders in his deck. The broker has
`the ability to manage his deck just as he has today in the
`pits, but more effectively. The present invention facili-
`tates the rapid organization, presentation and exchange
`of large amounts of order information to a broker with-
`out requiring a physical order deck.
`As described further below, orders can be entered
`into the workstation in two ways. The order may be
`entered directly to the workstation via an electronic,
`order entry system, or it may be entered manually when
`brought to the pit by a messenger or other signalling.
`For best utilization of an electronic market trading sys-
`tem such as that described in co-pending U.S. patent
`application Ser. Nos. 07/322,985 and 07/329,866, the
`orders are preferably entered by way of the electronic
`order entry system.
`The broker workstation in ‘accordance with the pres-
`ent invention allows the broker to manage the FCMS’
`orders more efficiently and to handle order accep-
`tances, fill reports and cancel confirmations more effec-
`tively. When used with an electronic order entry sys-
`tem, the broker workstation enables the broker to com-
`municate information as to the status of the orders he is
`working. Therefore, the FCM can track the orders
`from the time they are entered into the electronic order
`entry system until the time the orders are returned. The
`broker workstation can also feed information directly to
`the customer and clearing house via the electronic
`order entry system of the exchange. The audit trail is
`thus enhanced for. the FCMS, the broker and the ex-
`change. From the improved procedures provided by
`the present invention, savings in the form of reduced
`staff and reduced errors due to manual handling of
`paper orders.can also be expected.
`
`12
`
`12
`
`

`
`5,297,013 1
`
`7
`The broker workstation in accordance with the pres-
`ent invention is a deck management system that contin-
`ues to permit the broker to use his expertise to execute
`the order depending on the market situation. The bro-
`ker has indicated on his workstation the different types
`of orders residing in his deck, including the total quan-
`tity at a price of limit orders, stops, stop limits, M.I.T.s,
`and orders with special instructions. There is also an
`area indicating the total market orders to buy and sell.
`Just as in the present markets, the broker must judge
`how to get the best order execution, whether that is in
`the physical pits or on an electronic trading system. The
`system of the present invention thus enables the broker
`to better serve the needs of the market.
`Referring now to the Figures in which like reference
`numerals indicate like parts throughout, FIG. 1a shows
`a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance with the
`present invention comprising a broker workstation 10.
`As described in more detail below, the broker worksta-
`tion 10 may advantageously be a MICROEXPLORER
`processor, made by Texas Instruments Inc., that in-
`cludes a MACINTOSI-l II computer, manufactured by
`Apple Computer, Inc., having a high-resolution (e.g.,
`350 dots per inch), color, touch-sensitive display screen.
`Suitable touch-sensitive screens are made by Apple
`Computer, Inc, and it will be appreciated that many
`other suitable devices are commercially available. One
`embodiment of a broker workstation 10 is illustrated in
`FIG. 1b which shows a high-resolution display screen
`12, a keyboard 14 and an auxiliary control device 16,
`such as a trackball or mouse. It will be understood by
`those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present
`invention pertains that the various keys and touch-sensi-
`tive screen functions can also be implemented by a
`conventional keyboard, mouse and other standard input
`devices.
`
`The workstation 10 carries out a plurality of instruc-
`tion modules that can be written in any suitable com-
`puter language, such as LISP, PASCAL and C, al-
`though LISP is preferable because of the flexibility it
`provides. In addition, the broker workstation 10 shown
`in the block diagram of FIG. 1a is representative of a
`plurality of broker workstations that may be operational
`simultaneously.
`A workstation receiver module 18 receives suitable
`communications from an electronic order entry system
`and price reporting system that are provided by the
`exchange and are electronically connected to the work-
`station 10 by a suitable link 20. The receiver module 18
`is thus a port into the workstation 10, which may be
`activated initially by an attempt at connection by the
`order entry system. It will be understood that connec-
`tion of the workstation 10 to an electronic price report-
`ing system would be made in a manner substantially
`similar to the connection to the electronic order entry
`system and that the communication link 20 may com-
`prise any of the well known hard-wired, radio-fre-
`quency or optical technologies.
`In operation,
`the workstation receiver module 18
`receives orders and other information directed to the
`workstation and electronically attaches or associates
`that information with a time of receipt indication. Such
`time stamping is important for audit and integrity func-
`tions of the system, as well as for carrying out order-
`matching features of some types of trading system. The
`received order and time-stamp are then stored tempo-
`rarily in a workstation—in queue 22 in the workstation
`receiver module 18, and the module 18 causes the work-
`
`station 10 to send an acknowledgment of receipt to the
`transmitting order entry system. In some situations, the
`workstation receiver module 18 would cause the work-
`station 10 to send a not-acknowledged message to the
`order entry system so that the information could be
`retransmitted. Such situations would typically occur
`when the workstation-in queue 22 is temporarily full or
`when an error in the format of the information occurs,
`such as might arise from a noisy communication link.
`The workstation receiver module 18 receives the
`information from the order entry system and places it in
`the workstation-in queue 22 in a predetermined time
`sequence. The receiver module 18 thus could advanta-
`geously arrange for processing of information from an
`electronic order entry system before processing of in-
`formation entered by band despite the earlier receipt of
`the hand-input information. For example, orders from a
`trader in Japan could be presented to a Chicago-located
`broker workstation before orders flashed by hand from
`a Chicago trader to the broker are processed. In this
`way, communications link delays could be compensated
`by the system so that the system access time is equal for
`all traders, but such access time equalization is not es-
`sential to the present invention. It will be appreciated
`that such delay compensation would not be expected in
`applications in which the workstation 10 received or-
`ders through a plurality of different electronic order
`entry systems used by different FCMS. In addition, the
`receiver module 18 can implement the features of the
`present invention for organizing information in price
`and time sequences as in stock-exchange and other
`types of trading system.
`After time-stamping the received information, the
`workstation receiver module 18 places the infomiation
`in the workstation-in queue 22, such as a FIFO buffer,
`and transmits an acknowledgement message to the
`order entry system. If the workstation-in queue 22 is full
`or if an error in the information is detected by the work-
`station receiver module 18, the module 18 transmits a
`not-acknowledged message to the order entry system.
`The workstation receiver module 18 also handles an
`“alive” or “heartbeat” message from the workstation 10
`to the order entry system in the event of little market
`activity.
`Information in the workstation-in queue 22 is re-
`moved by a workstation transaction processor 24 which
`time-stamps the information and updates the worksta-
`tion’s display screen and database, which may be stored
`on a hard disk memory, in accordance wit

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket