Paper No. ____
` Filed: February 2, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`IBG LLC; INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`CQG, INC.; and CQGT, LLC
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2016-00009
`U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Filed: February 2, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`IBG LLC; INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`CQG, INC.; and CQGT, LLC
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2016-00009
`U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00009
`U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Trading Technologies
`
`International, Inc. hereby submits a current listing of Trading Technologies
`
`Exhibits to counsel for Petitioners IBG, LLC, Interactive Brokers LLC, CQG, Inc.,
`
`and CQGT, LLC.
`
`Exhibit 2002
`
`Filed Exhibits Description
`Exhibit 2001
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated
`November 23, 2015
`Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. and SAP
`AG, Case No. 2014-1194 (CAFC), Docket No. 61, Brief for the
`Intervenor - Director of the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office (May 1, 2014)
`Exhibit 2003 Meyers, Brad A. “A Brief History of Human-Computer
`Interaction Technology.” Interactions 5.2 (1998): 44-54
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Technical Areas
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Human Computer Interaction Group
`University of Washington Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Degree Option
`Rochester Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Masters
`in Human Computer Interaction
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Web Page Print out, M.S. in
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Tufts University Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Certificate Program
`Georgia Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Human-
`Computer Interaction Master’s Program
`DePaul University Web Page Print out, Master of Science
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Carnegie Mellon University Web Page Print out, Masters of
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Reserved
`
`Exhibit 2004
`
`Exhibit 2005
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Exhibit 2007
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`Exhibit 2009
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`Exhibit 2012
`
`Exhibit 2013-
`2019
`Exhibit 2020
`
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading Techs.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00009
`U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`Int’l, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131, Ex. 2097, Declaration of
`Harold Abilock (March 6, 2015)
`Reserved
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,993,572 B2
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Volume 11-A Trial Transcript of Proceedings
`(Sept. 26, 2007)
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Verdict Form (Oct. 10, 2007)
`Reserved
`Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc. et al. , Case No. 04-cv-
`5312, Dkt. 1140, Notification of Docket Entry (Jan. 3, 2008)
`79 Fed. Reg. 74618- 633, USPTO 2014 Interim Guidance on
`Patent Subject Matter Eligibility (Dec. 16, 2014)
`July 2015 Update Appendix 1: Examples, USPTO Examination
`Guidelines (July 2015)
`Reserved
`
`Information Disclosure Statement 90/008,576 (Sept. 26, 2008)
`Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 04-cv-
`5312, Supplemental Invalidity Contentions of eSpeed, Inc.,
`eSpeed International, Ltd., Ecco LLC, and EccoWare Ltd. (May
`25, 2007)
`Reserved
`
`Information Disclosure Statement 90/008,576 (Feb. 28, 2008)
`Reserved
`
`Smith, Warren, Subpoena Honyaku English - Japanese
`Translation List, Google Group Discussion Web Page Print out
`(Aug. 24, 2007)
`Submission of Publications, etc., PCT 2004-504652 (Apr. 18,
`2005) (Japanese language original)
`Submission of Publications, etc., PCT 2004-504652 (Ap. 18,
`2005) (Translation)
`Reserved
`
`3
`
`Exhibit 2021-
`2027
`Exhibit 2028
`Exhibit 2029
`
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Exhibit 2031
`Exhibit 2032
`
`Exhibit 2033
`
`Exhibit 2034
`
`Exhibit 2035-
`2038
`Exhibit 2039
`Exhibit 2040
`
`Exhibit 2041-
`2043
`Exhibit 2044
`Exhibit 2045-
`2047
`Exhibit 2048
`
`Exhibit 2049
`
`Exhibit 2050
`
`Exhibit 2051
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00009
`U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`Japanese Patent 2004-504652
`Auroratm: The Most Technologically Advanced Trading System
`Available Today, Aurora Chicago Board of Trade
`Rosenthal Collins Group LLC Notice of Opposition to a
`European Patent, EP1319211 (Jan. 12, 2006)
`Deutsche Börse AG Notice of Opposition to a European Patent,
`EP1319211 (Jan. 12, 2006)
`Eccoware Limited Notice of Opposition to a European Patent,
`EP1319211 (Jan. 13, 2006)
`Reserved
`
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading Techs.
`Int’l, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131, TDA Ex. 1050,
`Deposition of Harold Abilock (Apr. 24, 2015)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading Techs.
`Int’l, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131, Petitioners’ Reply to
`Patent Owner’s Response, Paper 48 (May 29, 2015)
`Reserved
`Response to Communication Pursuant to Article 101(1) and Rule
`81(2) to (3) EPC dated 1 December 2010 (the "Article 101(1)
`Communication"), Opposition to EP1319211 (June 14, 2011)
`Reserved
`
`Lohr, Steve, “IBM’s Design-Centered Strategy to Set Free the
`Squares.” The New York Times (November 15, 2015)
`Class 345, Computer Graphics Processing and Selective Visual
`Display Systems, Classification Definitions (January 2011): 1-50
`Class 705, Data Processing: Financial, Business Practice,
`Management, or Cost/Price Determination, Classification
`Definitions (January 2012): 1-53
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC, Case No. 05-
`cv-4811 (N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 1073, Memorandum Opinion and Order
`(Feb. 24, 2015)
`The American Heritage College Dictionary Fourth Edition, 100
`(2002): Definition of “Axis”
`Response to Office Action Mailed October 6, 2008 11/585,907
`(April 6, 2009)
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 2052
`Exhibit 2053
`
`Exhibit 2054
`
`Exhibit 2055
`
`Exhibit 2056
`
`Exhibit 2057-
`2058
`Exhibit 2059
`
`Exhibit 2060
`
`Exhibit 2061
`Exhibit 2062
`
`Exhibit 2063-
`2066
`Exhibit 2067
`
`Exhibit 2068
`
`Exhibit 2069
`
`Exhibit 2070
`
`Exhibit 2071
`
`Exhibit 2072
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00009
`U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Rachel L. Emsley/
` Rachel L. Emsley, Back-up Counsel
`Reg. No. 63,558
`
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`
`
`5
`
`Dated: February 2, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00009
`U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`Owner’s Exhibit List and select Exhibits 2002 through 2072 were served on
`
`February 2, 2016, via email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the
`
`following:
`
`Robert Sokohl
`rsokohl-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Lori Gordon
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Richard Bemben
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Date: February 2, 2016
`
`/Valencia Daniel/
`Valencia Daniel
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
`& Dunner, LLP
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
