`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`IBG LLC; INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.; TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.;
`TRADESTATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;
`and IBFX, INC.
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2015-00182
`U.S. Patent 6,772,132
`_________________
`
`DECLARATION OF JENNIFER M. KURCZ
`
`
`Page 1 of 367
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2337
`IBG ET AL. v. TRADING TECH
`CBM2015-00182
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00182
`U.S. Patent 6,772,132
`
`I, Jennifer M. Kurcz, make the following Declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`
`
`
`§ 1746:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert &
`
`Berghoff LLP. I represent Patent Owner Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`(“TT”).
`
`2.
`
`I provide this Declaration in connection with the following CBM
`
`proceedings: CBM2015-00161, -00181, and -00182. Unless otherwise stated, the
`
`facts stated in this Declaration are based on my personal knowledge.
`
`3.
`
`As part of a litigation between TT and eSpeed, Inc. et al. (“eSpeed”)
`
`in the Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 04-cv-5312) (“the eSpeed case”), TT
`
`served document requests on eSpeed, which are attached to this Declaration as
`
`Appendices 1-9. In response to these requests, eSpeed served on TT in that
`
`litigation what are now marked as Exhibits 2240, 2241, 2242, 2243, 2244, 2245,
`
`2246, 2250, 2252, 2254, 2256, 2258, 2260, 2262, 2270, 2271, and 2272 in one or
`
`more of these CBM proceedings. Exhibits 2240, 2241, 2242, 2243, 2244, 2245,
`
`2246, 2250, 2252, 2254, 2258, 2260, 2262, 2270, 2271, and 2272 were admitted as
`
`trial exhibits in the litigation without their authenticity being challenged. Exhibit
`
`2256 was shown to the jury, but not admitted into evidence.
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 367
`
`
`
`4.
`
`As further part of the eSpeed case, what are now marked as Exhibits
`
`Case CBM2015-00182
`U.S. Patent 6,772,132
`
`
`
`2248 and 2249 in one or more of these CBM proceedings were admitted as trial
`
`exhibits in the eSpeed litigation without their authenticity being challenged.
`
`5.
`
`As further part of the eSpeed case, what are now marked as Exhibits
`
`2279, 2280, 2281, and 2282 in one or more of these CBM proceedings were shown
`
`to the jury during trial, but not admitted into evidence.
`
`6.
`
`As further part of the eSpeed case, TT and eSpeed served respective
`
`subpoenas and accompanying document requests on Patsystems, which are
`
`attached to this Declaration as Appendices 10-11. In response to these requests,
`
`Patsystems served on TT and eSpeed in that litigation what are now marked as
`
`Exhibits 2284 and 2285 in one or more of these CBM proceedings. Exhibit 2284
`
`was admitted as a trial exhibit in the litigation without its authenticity being
`
`challenged.
`
`7.
`
`As further part of the eSpeed case, eSpeed served a subpoena and
`
`accompanying document requests on Tokyo Stock Exchange (“TSE”), which is
`
`attached to this Declaration as Appendix 12. In response, TSE served on eSpeed
`
`and TT in that litigation what are now marked as Exhibits 2159 and 2175 in one or
`
`more of these CBM proceedings.
`
`8.
`
`As part of a litigation between TT and CQG, Inc et al. (“CQG”) in the
`
`Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 05-cv-4811), TT served document requests
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 367
`
`
`
`
`on CQG, which are attached to this Declaration as Appendices 13-16. In response
`
`Case CBM2015-00182
`U.S. Patent 6,772,132
`
`to these requests, CQG served on TT in that litigation what is now marked as
`
`Exhibit 2277 in one or more of these CBM proceedings. Exhibit 2277 was
`
`admitted as a trial exhibit in the litigation without its authenticity being challenged.
`
`9.
`
`As part of a litigation between TT and Interactive Brokers LLC et al.
`
`(“IB”) in the Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 10-cv-721) , TT served
`
`document requests on IB, which are attached to this Declaration as Appendix 17.
`
`In response to these requests, IB served on TT in that litigation what is now
`
`marked as Exhibit 2206 in one or more of these CBM proceedings.
`
`10. As part of a litigation between TT and TradeStation Securities, Inc. et
`
`al. (“TradeStation”) in the Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 10-cv-884), TT
`
`served document requests on TradeStation, which are attached to this Declaration
`
`as Appendices 18-19. In response to these requests, TradeStation served on TT in
`
`that litigation what is now marked as Exhibit 2207 in one or more of these CBM
`
`proceedings.
`
`11. Exhibit 2283 is a compilation of true and correct copies of consent
`
`judgements involving TT.
`
`12.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States
`
`of America that all statements made herein of my knowledge are true, and that all
`
`statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and that these
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 367
`
`
`
`
`statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements and the like
`
`Case CBM2015-00182
`U.S. Patent 6,772,132
`
`so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of
`
`Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Date: July 19, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jennifer M. Kurcz/
`By:
`
` Jennifer M. Kurcz
`
`____
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 367
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX 1
`
`APPENDIX 1APPENDIX 1
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 367
`Page 6 of 367
`
`Page 6 of 367
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`
`Civil Action No. 04 C 5312
`
`Judge: James B. Moran
`
`Magistrate: Sidney I. Schenkier
`
`) ) ) ) )
`
`) )
`
`) ) )
`
`)
`
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`eSpeed, Inc.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR THE
`PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS TO DEFENDANT §l_V_OS. 1-39!
`
`Plaintiff Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“Trading Technologies”) provides the
`
`following requests to Defendant eSpeed, Inc. (“eSpeed”), seeking production of the documents and
`
`things specified below for inspection and copying pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26
`
`and 34 and the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The
`
`documents shall be produced for inspection and copying within ten (10) days of service hereof at
`
`the offices of Trading Technologies’ counsel, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, 300
`
`South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, 60606.
`
`Page 7 of 367
`
`Page 7 of 367
`
`
`
`DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
`
`In the following requests for production of documents and things:
`
`1.
`
`The terms "Plaintiff" and “Trading Technologies" shall mean the Plaintiff in this
`
`lawsuit, Trading Technologies International, Inc.; any company name under which Trading
`
`Technologies is doing business; and its predecessors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, directors,
`
`officers, employees, agents, distributors, salespersons, sales representatives, and attorneys, and each
`
`person acting or purporting to act on its or their behalf or under its or their control.
`
`2.
`
`The terms "Defendant” and “eSpeed” shall mean eSpeed, Inc.; any company name
`
`under which eSpeed is doing business; and its predecessors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions,
`
`licensees, franchisees, assigns or other related business entities, as well as directors, officers,
`
`employees, agents, distributors, jobbers, salespersons, sales representatives, and each person acting
`
`or purporting to act on its or their behalf or under its or their control.
`
`3.
`
`The terms "person" and "persons" shall mean natural persons (including, without
`
`limitation, those employed by eSpeed), as well as all governmental entities, agencies, officers,
`
`departments, or affiliates of any other governmental entity, and any corporation, foundation,
`
`partnership, proprietorship, association, or other organization.
`
`4.
`
`The term "date" shall mean the exact day, month, and year (to the degree
`
`ascertainable) or, if not ascertainable,
`
`the best approximation (including relationship to other
`
`events).
`
`Page 8 of 367
`
`Page 8 of 367
`
`
`
`5.
`
`The term "document" shall mean writings, recordings and other communications,
`
`whether reduced to tangible or electronic form, including the originals and all non-identical copies,
`
`whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copies or otherwise
`
`(including without limitation, correspondence, memoranda, notes, executable and non-executable
`
`electronic files,
`
`including e-mail, software, screen shots, diaries, minutes, statistics,
`
`letters,
`
`telegrams, contracts,
`
`reports,
`
`studies, checks,
`
`statements,
`
`tags,
`
`labels,
`
`invoices, brochures,
`
`periodicals,
`
`receipts,
`
`returns, summaries, pamphlets, books, prospectuses, calendars, diaries,
`
`plarmers, interoffice and intra-office communications, offers, notations of any sort of conversations,
`
`working papers, applications, permits, surveys, indices, telephone calls, meetings, presentations, or
`
`printouts, teletypes, fax, invoices, work sheets, and all drafts, alterations, modifications, changes and
`
`amendments of the foregoing), graphic or oral representations of any kind (including without
`
`limitation, photographs, charts, microfiche, microfilm, videotape, recordings, motion pictures, plans,
`
`drawings, surveys), and electronic or electro-mechanical records or representations of any kind
`
`(including without limitation, computer memory, hard drives, discs, tapes, cassettes and recordings).
`
`6.
`
`The terms "relating to" and "referring to" shall be interpreted broadly so as to
`
`encompass the liberal scope of discovery set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b).
`
`7.
`
`The terms "identify" and "describe" shall mean providing, among other things:
`
`(a)
`
`with respect to a natural person, home and work addresses and telephone
`
`numbers, the name of the person’s present (or if unknown, the last known) place of employment,
`
`date of commencement and termination (if any) of employment, job title, and description of his or
`
`her duties and responsibilities;
`
`Page 9 of 367
`
`Page 9 of 367
`
`
`
`(b)
`
`with respect to a corporation or other non-natural person, the full name,
`
`address, main telephone number, state of incorporation, and identity of all persons who have acted
`
`on behalf of such entity with respect to the subject matter of the request;
`
`(c)
`
`with respect to a document, the type of document (e.g., letter, e-mail, fax,
`
`contract, calendar, invoice, report); the number of pages or size of electronic file; a description of
`
`the document's contents; an identification of the person(s) who prepared the document, for whom
`
`the document was prepared, who signed the document, to whom the document was delivered,
`
`mailed, or otherwise received, and to whom a copy of the document was sent or otherwise received;
`
`the date of writing, creation, or publication; identifying number(s), letter(s), or combination thereof,
`
`if any;
`
`the significance or meaning of such number(s),
`
`letter(s) or combination thereof; for
`
`electronic documents, the name of the software used to generate the document and the electronic
`
`file type; and the present location and identity of the custodian of that document. Documents to be
`
`identified shall include all documents in your possession, custody or control, documents you know
`
`or believe to have existed but are no longer existing, and other documents of which you have
`
`knowledge or information.
`
`8.
`
`The tenns "and," "or," and "and/or" shall be construed disjunctively or conjunctively
`
`as necessary to bring within the scope of the request all responses which otherwise might be
`
`construed to be outside its scope.
`
`9.
`
`The terms "describe" and "state" shall mean to set forth fully and unambiguously
`
`every fact relevant to the subj ect of the request, of which eSpeed (as defined herein) has knowledge
`
`or information.
`
`Page 10 of 367
`
`Page 10 of 367
`
`
`
`10.
`
`Any word written in the singular herein shall be construed as plural or vice versa to
`
`bring within the scope of the request all responses which otherwise might be construed to be outside
`
`its scope.
`
`11.
`
`The term "the ’304 patent" shall mean U.S. Patent No. 6,766,304. The term "the
`
`’132 patent" shall mean U.S. Patent No. 6,772,132. The term "patents-in-suit" shall mean the ’304
`
`patent and the ’132 patent either collectively or individually.
`
`12.
`
`"Prior Art" includes, by way of example and without limitation, any subject matter
`
`that eSpeed contends is encompassed by 35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 103.
`
`13.
`
`“Electronic Trading Tool” shall mean any software, hardware or combination
`
`thereof, for connecting to or interacting with any public or private trading system that provides for
`
`electronic trading, including but not limited to the Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”), the Chicago
`
`Mercantile Exchange (“CME”), the London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange
`
`(“LIFFE”), Eurex, the IntercontinentalExchange (“ICE”), ICAP BrokerTec, the eSpeed Exchange,
`
`the Cantor Exchange, or the eSpeed System.
`
`14.
`
`No request or subpart hereof shall be construed as a limitation on any other request
`
`or subpart hereof.
`
`Page 11 of 367
`
`Page 11 of 367
`
`
`
`15.
`
`In producing documents and things responsive to these requests, eSpeed shall
`
`furnish all documents and things within its possession, custody, or control, regardless of whether
`
`these documents are possessed directly by eSpeed, or by its present or past agents, employees,
`
`affiliates, related companies, subsidiaries, representatives, investigators, attorneys, or others.
`
`16.
`
`If eSpeed asserts the attomey-client privilege or work product doctrine as a basis for
`
`not producing any document or thing, or if any document or thing is not produced in full, produce
`
`the document or thing to the extent the request for production is not objected to, and, in so doing:
`
`(a)
`
`state the specific ground(s) for not producing the document or thing in full;
`
`(b)
`
`state the bases for such a claim of privilege or immunity; and
`
`(c)
`
`fully identify the information, document, or material for which such privilege or
`
`immunity is asserted, including the name and type of any document, the name,
`
`address and title of its author, each addressee, and each person to whom a copy of
`
`the document or thing has been sent, delivered, or provided.
`
`17.
`
`If eSpeed maintains that any document or thing requested by Trading Technologies
`
`has been destroyed, lost, or is otherwise unavailable, set forth the contents of the document or thing,
`
`the date of its destruction or loss, and the name of the person who authorized its destruction (if any).
`
`18.
`
`Where eSpeed asserts an objection to a request, state all grounds upon which the
`
`objection is based.
`
`19.
`
`For each document or thing produced in response to these requests, identify the
`
`request(s) to which the document or thing relates.
`
`Page 12 of 367
`
`Page 12 of 367
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT REQUESTS
`
`REQUEST NO.1
`
`All
`
`documents
`
`requested
`
`for
`
`identification
`
`by TRADING TECHNOLOGIES
`
`INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, served
`
`concurrently herewith.
`
`REQUEST NO. 2
`
`All documents relied upon,
`
`referred to, or consulted in responding to TRADING
`
`TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL,
`
`INC.’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO
`
`DEFENDANT, served concurrently herewith.
`
`REQ QUEST NO. 3
`
`Documents sufficient to identify each different Electronic Trading Tool for the trading of
`
`fl.ltU.I‘6S contracts developed, made, sold, distributed, marketed, licensed and/or used by, or with the
`
`assistance or at the direction of, eSpeed, including any versions that have not yet been commercially
`
`released, and further including one (1) sample of each such Electronic Trading Tool.
`
`REQUEST NO. 4
`
`Documents sufficient to identify each different Electronic Trading Tool for the trading of
`
`spreads developed, made, sold, distributed, marketed, licensed and/or used by, or with the assistance
`
`or at the direction of, eSpeed, including any versions that have not yet been commercially released
`
`Page 13 of 367
`
`Page 13 of 367
`
`
`
`and any version referred to internally or outside of eSpeed as an “autospreader” a “basis spreader”
`
`or any similar name, and further including one (1) sample of each such Electronic Trading Tool.
`
`REQUEST NO. 5
`
`Documents sufficient to identify each different Electronic Trading Tool developed, made,
`
`sold, distributed, marketed, licensed and/or used by, or with the assistance or at the direction of,
`
`eSpeed, where such Electronic Trading Tool is capable of presenting market information on a
`
`display in relation to a static price axis, including any versions that have not yet been commercially
`
`released, and further including one (1) sample of each such Electronic Trading Tool.
`
`REQUEST NO. 6
`
`All documents and things showing the operation, features, and/or display formats of
`
`eSpeed’s Electronic Trading Tools, including, but not limited to, demonstrations or presentations,
`
`instruction manuals, user’s guides, tutorials, animations, drawings, schematics, flow charts and
`
`tables.
`
`REg QUEST NO. 7
`
`All product
`
`literature associated with eSpeed’s Electronic Trading Tools,
`
`including
`
`demonstrations or presentations, product or
`
`instruction manuals, user’s guides or manuals,
`
`installation guides, technical manuals and other such materials.
`
`Page 14 of 367
`
`Page 14 of 367
`
`
`
`REQUEST NO. 8
`
`All documents and things identifying the names and titles of all persons having
`
`responsibility for the research, design, development, marketing or sales of eSpeed’s Electronic
`
`Trading Tools.
`
`RE! QUEST NO. 9
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to Mr. Steve Brucato, Catus Technology, or
`
`any other company related to Mr. Brucato.
`
`REQUEST NO. 10
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to eSpeed’s decisions to develop, launch,
`
`distribute, market, sell, delay, or pull from the market any Electronic Trading Tool i) having a static
`
`price axis; ii) for the trading of spreads; or iii) for the trading of futures contracts.
`
`REQUEST NO. 11
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to the design and development of eSpeed’s
`
`Electronic Trading Tools, including but not limited to any tools for trading futures contracts or
`
`spreads, or any tool capable of presenting market information on a display in relation to a static
`
`price axis.
`
`Page 15 of 367
`
`Page 15 of 367
`
`
`
`REQUEST NO. 12
`
`All documents and things constituting or relating to any agreement between eSpeed and any
`
`other person or entity for the design, development, or production of any Electronic Trading Tool for
`
`trading futures contracts or spreads, or any tool capable of presenting market information on a
`
`display in relation to a static price axis, including any component or subpart of any such Electronic
`
`Trading Tool.
`
`RE UEST NO. 13
`
`All documents and things constituting, referring to, or relating to advertising plans, business
`
`plans, marketing plans, promotional programs or strategies on the part of eSpeed or on its behalf,
`
`concerning eSpeed’s Electronic Trading Tools, including but not limited to documents and things
`
`relating to the training or instruction of eSpeed personnel in regard to the marketing or sales of
`
`Electronic Trading Tools for trading futures contracts, spreads, or any tool capable of presenting
`
`market information on a display in relation to a static price axis.
`
`RE UEST NO. 14
`
`All advertising and promotional materials for eSpeed’s Electronic Trading Tools, including
`
`any document or thing given to or developed for any customer or prospective customer describing
`
`eSpeed’s Electronic Trading Tools.
`
`-10-
`
`Page 16 of 367
`
`Page 16 of 367
`
`
`
`RES QUEST NO. 15
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to the patents in suit, any related patents, or
`
`any of Trading Technologies’ patent applications.
`
`REQUEST N0. 16
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to the validity, invalidity, enforceability,
`
`unenforceability, infringement or non-infringement of the patents-in-suit, including any opinions
`
`prepared by or on eSpeed’s behalf and/or received by or on eSpeed’s behalf.
`
`RESQUEST NO. 17
`
`All documents and things resulting from, or referring to, or relating to any literature and/or
`
`patent searches conducted by or at the request of eSpeed with respect to Electronic Trading Tools.
`
`REQ QUEST NO. 18
`
`All patents, printed publications, other items of prior art, or other documents or things, that
`
`eSpeed believes may have any bearing on the validity of the patents-in-suit.
`
`RE§ QUEST NO. 19
`
`All documents and things referring to or relating to the state of the art relevant to the subject
`
`matter claimed in the patents-in-suit as of the time of filing of the applications that issued as the
`
`patents-in-suit.
`
`-11-
`
`Page 17 of 367
`
`Page 17 of 367
`
`
`
`REQUEST NO. 20
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to any inspection, review, testing, analysis, or
`
`reverse engineering of any Electronic Trading Tool, including Trading Technologies’ MD Trader.
`
`REQUEST NO. 21
`
`All documents and things constituting, relating to, or referring to eSpeed’s pricing of
`
`Electronic Trading Tools, including unit pricing structure, pricing policies, any changes in eSpeed’s
`
`pricing, and/or any discounts or other incentives offered or given on Electronic Trading Tools.
`
`REQUEST NO. 22
`
`All documents and things describing, analyzing, evidencing, relating to, or referring to
`
`features or capabilities, or information on the marketing or sale, of products competitive with
`
`eSpeed’s Electronic Trading Tools, or comparing features offered by any eSpeed Electronic
`
`Trading Tool to Electronic Trading Tools offered by others, including but not limited to Trading
`
`Technologies.
`
`REQUEST NO. 23
`
`All documents and things from which eSpeed’s unit sales and/or distribution of each
`
`Electronic Trading Tool may be determined for each monthly and annual time period from 2000
`
`to present.
`
`-12-
`
`Page 18 of 367
`
`Page 18 of 367
`
`
`
`REQUEST NO. 24
`
`All documents and things from which eSpeed’s gross and/or net dollar sales of each
`
`Electronic Trading Tool may be determined for each monthly and annual time period from 2000
`
`to present.
`
`REQUEST NO. 25
`
`All documents and things constituting, relating to, or referring to sales summaries, sales
`
`invoices, incentive plans or discount summaries relating to eSpeed’s Electronic Trading Tools.
`
`REQUEST NO. 26
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to any proposal, agreement, contract, license
`
`or other business relationship between eSpeed and the Chicago Board of Trade relating to
`
`Electronic Trading Tools for trading futures contracts or spreads, or any tool capable of presenting
`
`market information on a display in relation to a static price axis.
`
`RE§ QUEST NO. 27
`
`All documents and things describing, referring to, or relating to eSpeed’s market share of
`
`the total market for Electronic Trading Tools in the United States since the year 2000, or any
`
`subpart thereof.
`
`-13-
`
`Page 19 of 367
`
`Page 19 of 367
`
`
`
`RE UEST NO.28
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to market share studies or reports for
`
`Electronic Trading Tools, including those prepared by or on behalf of eSpeed.
`
`RE UEST NO. 29
`
`All quarterly reports, annual reports and other shareholder reports for eSpeed from 2000 to
`
`present.
`
`REQUEST NO. 30
`
`All documents comprising any and all
`
`financial statements (audited and unaudited),
`
`financial projections or forecasts, and profit and loss statements prepared by eSpeed or on eSpeed’s
`
`behalf, including but not limited to income statements, balance sheets, and statements of cash flow
`
`for each monthly, quarterly, annual, or other period.
`
`REQUEST NO. 31
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to eSpeed’s information archival and/or
`
`retrieval system containing any information related to design, development, promotion, distribution,
`
`or sale of Electronic Trading Tools.
`
`-14-
`
`Page 20 of 367
`
`Page 20 of 367
`
`
`
`REg QUEST NO. 32
`
`Documents sufficient to identify all files or repositories in which any document responsive
`
`to the foregoing requests is maintained in the normal course of business and each index, key, code
`
`or other means of accessing and locating documents within such files or repositories.
`
`REQUEST NO. 33
`
`All documents and things referring or relating to eSpeed’s policies, practices and/or
`
`procedures now or previously in effect with respect to the retention or destruction of documents.
`
`REQ QUEST NO. 34
`
`All documents and things not otherwise described by the foregoing requests that refer or
`
`relate to the subject matter shown, described, or claimed in the patents—in-suit.
`
`REQUEST NO. 35
`
`All documents and things not otherwise described by the foregoing requests that refer or
`
`relate to eSpeed’s Electronic Trading Tools.
`
`REQUEST NO. 36
`
`All documents and things listing or otherwise identifying customers or potential customers
`
`to whom eSpeed has demonstrated an Electronic Trading Tool for trading futures contracts or
`
`spreads, or any tool capable of presenting market information on a display in relation to a static
`
`price axis.
`
`Page 21 of 367
`
`-15-
`
`Page 21 of 367
`
`
`
`REQUEST NO. 37
`
`All documents and things from the files of or accessible to Scott Arnold, James Steadman,
`
`Lon Steger or Stephanie Schutz referring or relating to i) meetings with customers or potential
`
`customers,
`
`including but not
`
`limited to any demonstrations or presentations,
`
`regarding any
`
`Electronic Trading Tool;
`
`ii) marketing, sales, promotion, demonstration or presentation of any
`
`Electronic Trading Tool for trading futures contracts or spreads, or any tool capable of presenting
`
`market information on a display in relation to a static price axis; or iii) feedback or comments from
`
`customers or potential customers regarding any feature or capability of any Electronic Trading Tool.
`
`RE§ QUEST NO. 38
`
`All documents that refer or relate to Trading Technologies, Trading Technologies’ products
`
`or product features, or any other Electronic Trading Tool that is capable of presenting information in
`
`relation to a static price axis, including comments or feedback thereon from customers or potential
`
`customers.
`
`REQUEST NO. 39
`
`All documents upon which eSpeed intends to rely for the Preliminary lnj unction Hearing.
`
`-16-
`
`Page 22 of 367
`
`Page 22 of 367
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`Leif R. Sigmond, Jr. (ID No. 6204980)
`Matthew J. Sampson (ID No. 6207606)
`George I. Lee (I.D. No. 6224430)
`Brian R. Harris (ID No. 6276539)
`Jennifer M. Swartz (ID No. 6279893)
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
`300 South Wacker Drive
`
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Te1.: (312) 913-0001
`Fax: (312) 913-0002
`
`Steven F. Borsand (ID No. 6206597)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`222 South Riverside
`
`Suite 1100
`
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: (312) 476-1000
`Fax: (312) 476-1 182
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff,
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES
`
`INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Page 23 of 367
`
`Page 23 of 367
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that TRADING TECHNOLOGIES’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR THE
`
`PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS TO DEFENDANT (NOS. 1-39) were served
`
`via facsimile and overnight delivery on September 10, 2004, to:
`
`Raymond C. Perkins
`Winston & Strawn LLP
`35 W. Wacker Drive
`
`Chicago, IL 60601
`
`
`
`-18-
`
`Page 24 of 367
`
`Page 24 of 367
`
`
`
`09/10/2004 16:12 FAX 312 913 0002
`
`MBHB
`
`001
`
`=l<=l<>l<>l<>l¢>l<?l¢>l<=lc=lc#l:=lc>l<=l¢>l<=l¢=!<>l<>l<>lHl<
`:i==i<:i-:
`TX REPORT
`:r<=i<>i<
`=i<>i<:i=>i<>i<>:<>ic:ic:i<:r==re:i:>i<:::=i=:z==l=>l:=i=a:>i=
`
`OK
`
`TRANSMI SS I ON OK
`
`TX/RX NO
`CONNECTION TEL
`CONNECTION ID
`ST. TIME
`USAGE T
`PGS. SENT
`RESULT
`
`13125585700
`
`09/10 16:05
`07'18
`29
`
`ei§ Mcllunnall Boehnan Hulhert & Berghoff LLP
`
`[
`
`Fax transmittal
`
`To
`
`Raymond Perkins
`
`Company
`
`Winston & Strawn LLP
`
`(312)558-5700
`
`(312)558-5500
`
`George Lombardi
`rew Johnstone
`~
`
`Fax
`
`Phone
`
`CnpyTo
`
`,
`P
`W?Ehe:OVE|'
`
`Re
`
`Date
`
`From
`
`Direct
`
`
`September 10. 2004
`
`Jennifer M. Swartz
`
`(312)913-3311
`
`5Wal'tZ@lTlbhb.C0lTI
`
`radlng Technologies International, lnc. v. Espeed, Inc.
`
`Please distribute to Raymond Perkins, George Lombardi, and Andrew Johnstone.
`
`NW '
`
`Pvxzc-eel 50% V‘€5?°“5€$
`“E liqilfl
`A®$€-\/Lvbl/I
`
`5+ gel bf-
`,
`1,4 TTS VW
`W b’QL€ykA&h/+
`eS 1”
`jlxifrroj 0\‘\"W“
`
`(M35. J40)
`
`Page25of367
`
`41 b€L€MiM—i
`
`(Nos.
`
`i~ 5°15
`
`Page 25 of 367
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX 2
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX 2APPENDIX 2
`
`
`
`Page 26 of 367
`Page 26 of 367
`
`Page 26 of 367
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.,
`
`%\&\J€\J%\./%%%%
`
`v.
`
`eSpeed, Inc.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No. 04 C 5312
`
`Judge: James B. Moran
`
`Magistrate: Sidney I. Schenkier
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S
`SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF
`DOCUMENTS AND THINGS TO ESPEED (NOS. 40-4:2}
`
`Plaintiff Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“Trading Technologies”) provides the
`
`following requests to Defendant eSpeed, Inc. (“eSpeed”), seeking production of the documents and
`
`things specified below for inspection and copying pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26
`
`and 34 and the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The
`
`documents shall be produced for inspection and copying within ten (10) days of service hereof at
`
`the offices of Trading Technologies’ counsel, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, 300
`
`South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, 60606.
`
`Page 27 of 367
`
`Page 27 of 367
`
`
`
`DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
`
`In the following requests for production of documents and things:
`
`1.
`
`The terms "Plaintiff" and “Trading Technologies" shall mean the Plaintiff in this
`
`lawsuit, Trading Technologies International, Inc.; any company name under which Trading
`
`Technologies is doing business; and its predecessors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, directors,
`
`officers, employees, agents, distributors, salespersons, sales representatives, and attorneys, and each
`
`person acting or purporting to act on its or their behalf or under its or their control.
`
`2.
`
`The terms "Defendant” and “eSpeed” shall mean eSpeed, Inc.; any company name
`
`under which eSpeed is doing business; and its predecessors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions,
`
`licensees, franchisees, assigns or other related business entities, as well as directors, officers,
`
`employees, agents, distributors, jobbers, salespersons, sales representatives, and each person acting
`
`or purporting to act on its or their behalf or under its or their control.
`
`3.
`
`The terms "person" and "persons" shall mean natural persons (including, without
`
`limitation, those employed by eSpeed), as well as all governmental entities, agencies, officers,
`
`departments, or afflliates of any other governmental entity, and any corporation, foundation,
`
`partnership, proprietorship, association, or other organization.
`
`4.
`
`The term "date" shall mean the exact day, month, and year (to the degree
`
`ascertainable) or, if not ascertainable,
`
`the best approximation (including relationship to other
`
`events).
`
`Page 28 of 367
`
`Page 28 of 367
`
`
`
`5.
`
`The term "document" shall mean writings, recordings and other communications,
`
`whether reduced to tangible or electronic form, including the originals and all non-identical copies,
`
`whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copies or otherwise
`
`(including without limitation, correspondence, memoranda, notes, executable and non-executable
`
`electronic files,
`
`including e-mail, software, screen shots, diaries, minutes, statistics,
`
`letters,
`
`telegrams, contracts,
`
`reports,
`
`studies, checks,
`
`statements,
`
`tags,
`
`labels,
`
`invoices, brochures,
`
`periodicals,
`
`receipts,
`
`returns, summaries, pamphlets, books, prospectuses, calendars, diaries,
`
`planners, interoffice and intra-office communications, offers, notations of any sort of conversations,
`
`working papers, applications, permits, surveys, indices, telephone calls, meetings, presentations, or
`
`printouts, teletypes, fax, invoices, work sheets, and all drafts, alterations, modifications, changes and
`
`amendments of the foregoing), graphic or oral representations of any kind (including without
`
`limitation, photographs, charts, microfiche, microfilm, videotape, recordings, motion pictures, plans,
`
`drawings, surveys), and electronic or electro-mechanical records or representations of any kind
`
`(including without limitation, computer memory, hard drives, discs, tapes, cassettes and recordings).
`
`6.
`
`The terms "relating to" and "referring to" shall be interpreted broadly so as to
`
`encompass the liberal scope of discovery set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b).
`
`7.
`
`The terms "identify" and "describe" shall mean providing, among ot