`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________
`
`
`IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.,
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC., TRADESTATION
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC and IBFX, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Patent No. 6,772,132
`Case No. CBM2015-00182
`_____________________
`
`PETITIONERS’
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “Patent Board”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2015-00182
`U.S. Patent No. 6,772,132
`
`The Board has scheduled oral hearing for this proceeding for October 19,
`
`
`
`2016. (Paper 20.) Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner requests oral hearing
`
`on the issues raised in the Petition for Covered Business Method Review of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,772,132, Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Patent Owner’s
`
`Response, Patent Owner Response, Petitioner’s Reply and any Motion to Exclude
`
`and corresponding Oppositions and Replies (if filed).
`
`The issues to be argued are whether:
`
`• claims 1–56 of U.S. Patent No. 6,772,132 are patent ineligible under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 101;
`
`• claims 1–3, 7–10, 14–16, 20–28, 30–38 40–48, and 50–56 of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,772,132 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`TSE and Belden;
`
`• claims 4, 11, and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,772,132 are unpatentable
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over TSE, Belden, and May; and
`
`• claims 5, 6, 12, 13, 18, 19, 29, 39, and 49 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,772,132 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over TSE, Belden,
`
`and Gutterman.
`
`
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector
`
`and screen.
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 23, 2016
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2015-00182
`U.S. Patent No. 6,772,132
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
`/Robert E. Sokohl/
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`Registration No. 36,031
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2015-00182
`U.S. Patent No. 6,772,132
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PETITIONERS’
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served electronically via e-mail on
`September 23, 2016 in its entirety on the following:
`
`Erika H. Arner, Joshua L. Goldberg, Kevin D. Rodkey,
`Rachel L. Emsley, Cory C. Bell
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Erika.arner@finnegan.com
`Joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`Kevin.rodkey@finnegan.com
`Rachel.emsley@finnegan.com
`Cory.bell@finnegan.com
`Trading-Tech-CBM@finnegan.com
`
`Steven F. Borsand
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`tt-patent-cbm@tradingtechnologies.com
`
`Michael D. Gannon, Leif R. Sigmond, Jr., and Jennifer M. Kurcz
`MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP
`gannon@mbhb.com
`sigmond@mbhb.com
`kurcz@mbhb.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
`
`
` /Robert E. Sokohl/
`
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`Registration No. 36,031
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`Date: September 23, 2016
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
