`IBG ET AL. v. TRADING TECH
`CBM2015-00182
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`Feb 1'7 2004-18:24PM Trading Technologies
`
`"24'761159
`
`33.6
`
`02/17/2004 11:11 mt 911745.09
`
`Jackson nurse LLP
`
`@000
`
`Applicatlonlcontrol Number: 09I894.637
`
`Ari Unit: 3324
`
`Pace 2
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`_
`
`The following is an examiners statement of reasons for allowance. The following
`1.
`is an examiners statement of reasons tor allowance: This statement of reasons for
`allowance includes the major differences in the claims not found in the prior art of record
`and reasons why that ditfenenoes are considered to define patentebly over the prior art
`The statement is not intended to necessarily state all the reasons for allowance or all
`the details why claims are allowed and should not be relied upon for this purpose.
`Rather, this statement reflects what the examiner considers important andtherefore the
`
`primary reasons for the allowance of the claims.
`
`The primary reason for allowance is the imitation directed to the “dynamic
`
`display’ of a plurality of the quantity of bids and asks aligned with a ‘static display‘ of
`
`corresponding prices. Here, unlike the prior art. the "static" display of prices is just that.
`static, and does not move In response to a change in the inside market. With this
`
`display of market depth, claimed in each ol the independent claims. a trader places a
`
`trade order with the pointer in the area of the order entry region of the dynamic market
`depth region. through a single computer implemented action, see Figures 3 and 4. For
`example, in figure 3. a click on Bid C! 18 will send an order to the market to sell 17 lots
`
`of the commodity at a price of B9.
`
`The closest prior art including us Patent 6.408.282, PCT W0 01I16852 and
`
`commonly owned non~patent literature ‘X Trader” (see. applicant‘: response to
`
`USPTO's request for information) all lack this feature. The PTO also inquired as to the
`
`sublect matter at alleged inlrlngement referenced in applicant's petition to make special
`
`9‘d
`Pag.e2of4
`
`28II9l.trEIl-2
`i
`
`ELLIS 00949
`
`11
`
`uaewe bone 3
`
`a
`I q 3
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`-
`-
`‘
`F b
`Tradxng Technologies
`1'7 2004 6.241331,
`2
`oz/11/zoo: mu mx II12'Iu._a9
`JACKSON MIXER up
`
`Appncauonrconuoi Number. 091894.637
`
`Art Unlt: 3624
`
`;
`.
`"‘ -~24~'78i~1G9— -
`
`'p_7 -
`
`@007
`
`Pace 3
`
`in related case SN 091590.692. The USPTO found no evidence of public use or any
`printed publication of the system known as J Tradet. the eubiect matter of potential
`infringement and the applicant's basis for his petition to make special, earlier than
`November 6, 2000. Therefore. the USPTO has concluded that the system known as J
`traderis not priorart to the instant application. which has a tiling date of June 06. 2000.
`
`Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later
`2.
`than the payment ofthe issue fee and. to avoid pmoessing delays. should preferably
`accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled ‘Comments on
`
`Statement of Reasons fcrAllowance."
`
`Respectfully
`
`
`
`By.
`
`Richard Weisberger
`
`Page30f4
`cud
`
`BBIISM-are
`
`L1
`
`lnldtvtv-8 t-002 BI Q9.-l
`.
`
`ELLIS 00950
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`Trading Technologies
`Feb 172094 6:2-APM
`02/17/>200! 17:14 FAX 072715.400
`JACKSON WALKER LLP
`
`Applicationlcontrol Number. as/394.637
`
`Ari Unit: 3524
`
`"24761189
`
`p.V8
`
`008
`
`"°9° “
`
`pageqpm-4
`
`2eITI9z.taIe
`
`.|.J.
`
`Haw-=5 t-003 BI qas
`
`ELLIS 00951
`
`Page 4 of 4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
